<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2011:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681-</id>
  <updated>2011-08-16T17:26:18Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Google Gets Mini-Sitelinks</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.35-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14681" title="Google Gets Mini-Sitelinks" />
    <published>2009-04-16T21:50:52Z</published>
    <updated>2009-04-17T15:16:09Z</updated>
    <title>Google Gets Mini-Sitelinks</title>
    <summary>Google announced a new, smaller version of their sitelinks search feature on their official Webmaster Blog today. The new mini-sitelinks will appear on more than just the top search result, and will occupy a maximum of one line and four links per result. Sitelinks were originally added by Google to help people jump to more...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Phil Glockner</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Google" />
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/imgGoogleLogo200902.jpg" /><a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/04/one-line-sitelinks.html">announced</a> a new, smaller version of their <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=47334">sitelinks</a> search feature on their official <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com">Webmaster Blog</a> today. The new mini-sitelinks will appear on more than just the top search result, and will occupy a maximum of one line and four links per result. Sitelinks were originally added by Google to help people jump to more specific portions of large web domains like Amazon or About.com. Additionally, the original version of sitelinks ws only generated for the top-most result of a search query; the new one-liners can appear on other results on the first page.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p><center><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/google-sitelinks-apr09.png" /></center></p>

<p>Sitelinks can be seen as a slow encroachment of Google into a function that is traditionally part of the experience of visiting a site. Depending on how a site is structured, a business might not appreciate customers being pushed directly to a page below the front page. It could be seen as taking away from the customer's average time on site (a commonly measured site statistic) as well as potentially confusing if a company's offerings are complex and require some explanation. </p>

<p>To this end, Google has made available settings in its suite of <a href="http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/">Google Webmaster Tools</a> that allow domain holders, once registered, to block specific sitelinks from being listed in Google search results. It does appear that the block is only temporary (90 days) and for specific pages - which means webmasters are going to have a headache dealing with it if they have a lot of potential sitelink pages to block. In any case, Google has written about how to block sitelinks <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/10/webmasters-can-now-provide-feedback-on.html">here</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681-comment:164916</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php#c164916" />
    <title>Comment from Maozakor on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Maozakor</name>
        <uri>http://trash.maozakor.co.il</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://trash.maozakor.co.il">
        <![CDATA[<p>this is very helpfull for the 2nd and 3rd places to "steal" a little traffic.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T09:27:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681-comment:147939</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php#c147939" />
    <title>Comment from mini-google on 2009-07-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>mini-google</name>
        <uri>http://www.mini-google.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mini-google.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>site link can be  helpful for visitors.</p>

<p>and that save us lots of time~</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-19T14:09:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681-comment:145116</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php#c145116" />
    <title>Comment from Digital camera Reviews on 2009-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Digital camera Reviews</name>
        <uri>http://www.kevinkatovic.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kevinkatovic.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I am pretty sure you have to either work their or spend vast amounts of money to get sitelinks with google.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-02T20:36:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681-comment:141750</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php#c141750" />
    <title>Comment from mario oyunları on 2009-06-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>mario oyunları</name>
        <uri>http://www.bedavamario.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.bedavamario.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Well it would be very useful that we can suggest some links on which Google should pay attention while he choosing Sitelinks for our websites.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-10T12:31:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681-comment:134917</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php#c134917" />
    <title>Comment from Arber Technologies on 2009-04-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Arber Technologies</name>
        <uri>http://www.arbertechnologies.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.arbertechnologies.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hello Every One </p>

<p><br />
can you tell me how to get mini sitelinks for any website . Is that any process by which google will start listing mini sitelinks for my Website. Your all suggestion and feedback are welcome.</p>

<p>seo@arbertechnologies.com</p>

<p>www.arbertechnologies.com</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-23T07:50:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681-comment:134045</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php#c134045" />
    <title>Comment from John Sack on 2009-04-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>John Sack</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Speculation continues that this 'bypass' of a site home page is bad for business and interfere with some metrics.  Google on the other hand says that having these links may direct more traffic to a site.</p>

<p>Since the old version of this feature (limited to the first result) has been out for some time, is there any evidence one way or another about whether it reduces traffic to the home page but increases it to other pages, as Google "suggests"?</p>

<p>John</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-17T13:28:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681-comment:134042</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php#c134042" />
    <title>Comment from 布里斯班 on 2009-04-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>布里斯班</name>
        <uri>http://brisbane.at9t.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brisbane.at9t.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Google always surprises me :-)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-17T12:06:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681-comment:134035</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php#c134035" />
    <title>Comment from mobiler on 2009-04-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>mobiler</name>
        <uri>http://www.inside-handy.de</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.inside-handy.de">
        <![CDATA[<p>Nice feature. So nearly every site will get sitelinks. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-17T10:49:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681-comment:134031</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php#c134031" />
    <title>Comment from Giáng Châu on 2009-04-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>Giáng Châu</name>
        <uri>http://www.manysoft.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.manysoft.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Google, that newest tool will the guy as us, some webmasters could watch out what are hiding in his owner site!</p>

<p> </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-17T10:26:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681-comment:134015</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php#c134015" />
    <title>Comment from raivo pommer on 2009-04-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>raivo pommer</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p></p>

<p>GOOGLE</p>

<p>Der erfolgsverwöhnte Internet-Konzern Google hat der Wirtschaftskrise zum Jahresauftakt weiter getrotzt und seinen Gewinn kräftig gesteigert. Der Überschuss kletterte im ersten Quartal um neun Prozent auf 1,42 Milliarden Dollar (1,08 Mrd Euro).</p>

<p>Der Umsatz wuchs zum Vorjahr um sechs Prozent auf 5,51 Milliarden Dollar, wie Google am Donnerstag nach US-Börsenschluss im kalifornischen Mountain View mitteilte.</p>

<p>«Google hatte ein gutes Quartal angesichts der Schwere der Rezession», sagte Konzernchef Eric Schmidt. Mit den Zahlen übertraf der Suchmaschinen-Riese die Erwartungen der Analysten. Die Aktie legte in einer ersten Reaktion nachbörslich deutlich zu. Wesentliche Einnahmequelle Googles sind bezahlte Werbeanzeigen rund um die Internet-Suche. Der Konzern ist hier mit weitem Abstand Marktführer vor Yahoo! und Microsoft.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-17T09:18:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681-comment:133990</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14681" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners.php#c133990" />
    <title>Comment from crvenk on 2009-04-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>crvenk</name>
        <uri>http://www.dotcominfoway.com/internet-marketing/search-engine-optimization</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.dotcominfoway.com/internet-marketing/search-engine-optimization">
        <![CDATA[<p>This maybe Google's way of optimizing/refining its results, but it prunes a webmaster's options. As you say Phil, webmasters are going to juggle with links. Now,being a webmaster, have to go and read on "how to block sitelinks"</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-17T06:59:38Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
