<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kevin_rose_new_digg_search_destroys_the_old_stuff.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14590-</id>
  <updated>2009-11-23T17:10:55Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Kevin Rose: New Digg Search Destroys the Old Stuff</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14590</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kevin_rose_new_digg_search_destroys_the_old_stuff.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14590" title="Kevin Rose: New Digg Search Destroys the Old Stuff" />
    <published>2009-04-10T00:32:01Z</published>
    <updated>2009-04-10T00:55:17Z</updated>
    <title>Kevin Rose: New Digg Search Destroys the Old Stuff</title>
    <summary>For discovering new content and participating in an active community, Digg is awesome. But, everyone who has used the service for a while knows that Digg search has been mediocre at best, returning different results from one day to the next. All that has changed today with the just-announced Digg Search overhaul. Designed by (in...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Phil Glockner</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <category term="Search Services" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/digg_apr_09.jpg">For discovering new content and participating in an active community, <a title="Digg" href="http://digg.com" target="_blank">Digg</a> is awesome. But, everyone who has used the service for a while knows that Digg search has been mediocre at best, returning different results from one day to the next. All that has changed today with the <a href="http://blog.digg.com/?p=653" target="_blank">just-announced</a> Digg Search overhaul. Designed by (in Kevin's words) <em>pretty bad ass engineers,</em> the new search takes in to account a lot of under-the-hood Digg mechanics when selecting what results to show you, while simultaneously improving the user interface and usability.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>There are numerous improvements in all areas of Digg Search. The biggest improvement, hinted at by Digg's own post title, is that it no longer <em>sucks. </em>Search results will be more reliable. General terms will give you more relevant content, and more targeted searches (using quotes around an exact match and a minus sign in front of a word you want to exlude) are now supported. Search results can be further refined by choosing to weight by Digg count, age, categorical topic and more. New shortcuts are supported, for example +u will only return stories marked 'upcoming.' Additionally, searches on particular domains (we suggest <a href="http://digg.com/search?s=digg&source=readwriteweb.com&sort=digg">this search</a>, illustrated below) gives most priority to stories from that domain.</p>

<p align="center"><img alt="digg-search-apr09.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/digg-search-apr09.jpg"></p>

<p>With these changes, the strength of using the available search result-generated RSS feeds has also improved. Now, you have greater flexibility to get just the items you are interested in from in a search result, and consequently, in your feed reader.<img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/digg-search-tips-apr09.png" align="right"> If you are an information junkie like we are, you know that leveraging some time getting the perfect search result locked in to an RSS feed is huge, and it can make the difference between continuously sifting through noise and every story being one that is important to you.</p>

<p>Frankly, we think Digg's work on search is simply tremendous. Although it does not rely on search to remain immensely popular, its now leverages that popularity to return results that are relevant and useful sliced any number of different ways. A great job on a core part of Digg's infrastructure that has been overlooked for too long.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14590-comment:132793</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14590" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kevin_rose_new_digg_search_destroys_the_old_stuff.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kevin_rose_new_digg_search_destroys_the_old_stuff.php#c132793" />
    <title>Comment from ArabCrunch on 2009-04-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>ArabCrunch</name>
        <uri>http://arabcrunch.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://arabcrunch.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Great Job Digg, the old search was really not helpful, now i can filler most dugg stories on lets Say RRW TC mashable, CNN :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-10T01:41:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14590-comment:132794</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14590" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kevin_rose_new_digg_search_destroys_the_old_stuff.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kevin_rose_new_digg_search_destroys_the_old_stuff.php#c132794" />
    <title>Comment from ArabCrunch on 2009-04-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>ArabCrunch</name>
        <uri>http://arabcrunch.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://arabcrunch.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>opps i keep missing this, it is RWW not RRW :P</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-10T01:44:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14590-comment:132796</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14590" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kevin_rose_new_digg_search_destroys_the_old_stuff.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kevin_rose_new_digg_search_destroys_the_old_stuff.php#c132796" />
    <title>Comment from Anrkist on 2009-04-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anrkist</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Digg is cool, it's nice they upgraded the search function. I've not used it in over a year... to me, they police it just a tad too much. Don't ban a user because he gamed your system, improve upon it so it doesn't happen again. They really have no incentive to try any harder to fix the algorithms, because they can just ban anyone they want too. It's a social network, not IRC.</p>

<p>IRC has made no strides in the last... oh, 10 years. It's exactly the same as it has been. I love it, but it's a dinosaur... don't be the dinosaur, be the bird.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-10T02:00:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14590-comment:132801</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14590" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kevin_rose_new_digg_search_destroys_the_old_stuff.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kevin_rose_new_digg_search_destroys_the_old_stuff.php#c132801" />
    <title>Comment from Michael Fidler on 2009-04-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Michael Fidler</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I can think of another site that is in desperate need of search, but I'll hold my breath!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-10T03:48:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14590-comment:132802</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14590" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kevin_rose_new_digg_search_destroys_the_old_stuff.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kevin_rose_new_digg_search_destroys_the_old_stuff.php#c132802" />
    <title>Comment from 面经 on 2009-04-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>面经</name>
        <uri>http://www.jobsphere.cn</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.jobsphere.cn">
        <![CDATA[<p>stop using the digg bar, plz</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-10T03:57:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14590-comment:132808</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14590" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kevin_rose_new_digg_search_destroys_the_old_stuff.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kevin_rose_new_digg_search_destroys_the_old_stuff.php#c132808" />
    <title>Comment from Phil Glockner on 2009-04-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Phil Glockner</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Michael, If you are trying to imply that this site has less than spectacular search capabilities, well that is the limit, mister!  :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-10T07:00:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14590-comment:132819</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14590" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kevin_rose_new_digg_search_destroys_the_old_stuff.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kevin_rose_new_digg_search_destroys_the_old_stuff.php#c132819" />
    <title>Comment from GrahamK on 2009-04-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>GrahamK</name>
        <uri>http://www.keeno.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.keeno.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>The new Digg search engine will help no doubt about it. But it still delivers too much choice. We have just launched <a href="http://www.Keeno.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.Keeno.net</a> as a network of social bookmark sites to cater for highly targeted interest groups.</p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-10T08:48:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14590-comment:136047</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14590" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kevin_rose_new_digg_search_destroys_the_old_stuff.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kevin_rose_new_digg_search_destroys_the_old_stuff.php#c136047" />
    <title>Comment from homepage on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>homepage</name>
        <uri>http://sthrt.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://sthrt.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Very cool... Digg is great.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T16:44:02Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>