<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485-</id>
  <updated>2009-11-23T00:41:12Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for New Yahoo Image Search Better Than Google&apos;s</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14485" title="New Yahoo Image Search Better Than Google's" />
    <published>2009-04-03T20:25:05Z</published>
    <updated>2009-04-04T00:18:16Z</updated>
    <title>New Yahoo Image Search Better Than Google&apos;s</title>
    <summary>Yahoo unveiled major changes to its image search service this morning and the user experience is now better than Google Image Search. Google may have all kinds of special collections (like the new Life Magazine archives) but Yahoo&apos;s image search is just more pleasing to use. The new Yahoo! interface includes more recommended search queries...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Marshall Kirkpatrick</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Products" />
    
    <category term="Search Services" />
    
    <category term="Yahoo" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/yahoo_logo_sep08.png" />Yahoo unveiled <a href="http://ysearchblog.com/2009/04/03/image-search-preview-page-overhaul/">major changes</a> to <a href="http://images.search.yahoo.com/">its image search service</a> this morning and the user experience is now better than Google Image Search.  Google may have all kinds of special collections (like the new Life Magazine archives) but Yahoo's image search is just more pleasing to use.</p>

<p>The new Yahoo! interface includes more recommended search queries for related images than Google, a next-image picking slideshow on each image's page, and an easy direct link to the image itself.  Unfortunately, there is not a filter by copyright conditions, which is a major shortcoming.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/yahoo_images1.jpg" /></p>

<p>Google's interface does not make it as easy to scan through multiple images as quickly, but both could use meaningful support for limiting searches to Creative Commons or public domain images.  The new Yahoo! Image Search option of limiting to within or outside of Flickr isn't really useful at all.  </p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/yahoo_images2.jpg" /></p>

<p>None the less, we're impressed with this small change from the search giant and we expect that for casual image searching, Yahoo may now be the engine of choice for more people.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485-comment:132006</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php#c132006" />
    <title>Comment from Michael on 2009-04-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Michael</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Did anyone here tried Live Search Image Search !!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-03T20:44:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485-comment:132022</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php#c132022" />
    <title>Comment from Brandon J. Mendelson on 2009-04-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Brandon J. Mendelson</name>
        <uri>http://www.youtube.com/brandonjmendelson</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.youtube.com/brandonjmendelson">
        <![CDATA[<p>Very neat stuff. I'm hoping changes to the rest of their search offerings are forthcoming.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-03T21:41:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485-comment:132026</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php#c132026" />
    <title>Comment from Vic on 2009-04-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Vic</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is so funny. The author of RRW is always very subjective. Can't you let ppl judge by themselves????</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-03T22:40:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485-comment:132033</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php#c132033" />
    <title>Comment from Anrkist on 2009-04-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anrkist</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>They both work with Cooliris, if you're not using that to surf the results then you probably need to look into it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-04T03:04:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485-comment:132035</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php#c132035" />
    <title>Comment from Nikhil on 2009-04-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nikhil</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yeah I use Live Search Image. Its really very cool infact better tan bith Google and Yahoo.!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-04T04:47:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485-comment:132037</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php#c132037" />
    <title>Comment from Avatar on 2009-04-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Avatar</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>in terms of most search vertical Live Search is always better than Google. but in image search even ASK image search is as good as Google's. no news in that.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-04T05:18:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485-comment:132045</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php#c132045" />
    <title>Comment from mickerlodeon on 2009-04-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>mickerlodeon</name>
        <uri>http://mickerlodeon.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mickerlodeon.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@vic what is wrong with being subjective? There is no such thing as a completely objective story, they all lean one way or another. Also remember that this is a post talking about Marshall Kirkpatrick's first impressions regarding Yahoo's new image search, that is what the post is about. Would you rather have read:</p>

<p>"Yahoo has a new image search, go look at it."</p>

<p>Maybe with a pretty image above and a link below. I don't know about you but I'd rather read what other people think about it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-04T07:54:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485-comment:132050</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php#c132050" />
    <title>Comment from Payment system on 2009-04-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Payment system</name>
        <uri>http://www.perfectmoney.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.perfectmoney.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I dont think RWW is subjective mhe just said what he think is good and after try I think that is fair opinion I agree it is better then the Google image ,it is more Fresh look,that is my last conclusion</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-04T09:11:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485-comment:132054</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php#c132054" />
    <title>Comment from Imran on 2009-04-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Imran</name>
        <uri>http://www.ithinkdiff.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ithinkdiff.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Live Search for images is actually way more better than Yahoo or Google's</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-04T09:52:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485-comment:132057</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php#c132057" />
    <title>Comment from Urzut on 2009-04-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Urzut</name>
        <uri>http://www.urzut.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.urzut.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Ya, Yahoo has always been known for its pretty interfaces, and Google for its simplicity.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-04T11:08:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485-comment:132066</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php#c132066" />
    <title>Comment from NTSLimo on 2009-04-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>NTSLimo</name>
        <uri>http://www.ntslimo.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ntslimo.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Live Image search is probably the best image search currently out there.  It provides relevancy and a great user experience.  Perhaps Image search, or some other niche topic, is the new way to make in roads into Google's search empire.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-04T13:20:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485-comment:132070</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php#c132070" />
    <title>Comment from homepage on 2009-04-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>homepage</name>
        <uri>http://sthrt.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://sthrt.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I wonder if they are using the ESP game that Luis Von implemented. Google had purchased this technology, but it is a fun game that has real people competing to tag images since computers can't recognize images the way humans can. Check it out - <a href="http://www.gwap.com/gwap/gamesPreview/espgame/." rel="nofollow">http://www.gwap.com/gwap/gamesPreview/espgame/.</a> Luis also invented the captcha and now the recaptcha which now helps to digitize books.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-04T14:07:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485-comment:132071</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php#c132071" />
    <title>Comment from Jorg Jansen on 2009-04-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jorg Jansen</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/jorgjansen</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/jorgjansen">
        <![CDATA[<p>Let's check it out</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-04T14:13:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485-comment:132092</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php#c132092" />
    <title>Comment from Edgardo R. Baez on 2009-04-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Edgardo R. Baez</name>
        <uri>http://www.thebaezlawfirm.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thebaezlawfirm.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I would have to see it, to believe it. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-05T00:30:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485-comment:132093</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php#c132093" />
    <title>Comment from Cheap Texas Divorce on 2009-04-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cheap Texas Divorce</name>
        <uri>http://www.cheaptxdivorce.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cheaptxdivorce.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>One of these days I will try it and then I will perhaps write my own article</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-05T00:31:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485-comment:133040</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14485" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_yahoo_image_search_better_than_googles.php#c133040" />
    <title>Comment from Collegiate Chris on 2009-04-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Collegiate Chris</name>
        <uri>http://www.collegiateliving.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.collegiateliving.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I am a very loyal google image user, and I can not believe Yahoo will seriouly make a dent in its userability.  It will take a long time to convert someone such as myself and I believe google's power is not is its userability but rather is overall library and speed.</p>

<p>I will try yahoos image service but until it can move to the spee of google...google image I will do!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-11T22:59:30Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>