<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642-</id>
  <updated>2009-11-23T17:11:03Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for The PostRank Newsroom: Twitter For High-Value Information</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14642" title="The PostRank Newsroom: Twitter For High-Value Information" />
    <published>2009-04-14T16:30:01Z</published>
    <updated>2009-04-14T20:12:30Z</updated>
    <title>The PostRank Newsroom: Twitter For High-Value Information</title>
    <summary>The rise of link sharing on Twitter has cut down on many peoples&apos; use of RSS readers and social bookmarking services like Delicious. Now blog post ranking service PostRank is aiming to systematize that shift - and they&apos;ve done a really good job. digg_url = &apos;http://digg.com/tech_news/The_PostRank_Newsroom_Twitter_For_High_Value_Information&apos;;digg_bgcolor = &apos;#ffffff&apos;;digg_skin = &apos;normal&apos;;Imagine a system for delivering only...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Marshall Kirkpatrick</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="NYT" />
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img alt="postranklogo150.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/postranklogo150.jpg" width="150" height="44" >The rise of link sharing on Twitter has cut down on many peoples' use of RSS readers and social bookmarking services like Delicious.  Now blog post ranking service <a href="http://postrank.com">PostRank</a> is aiming to systematize that shift - and they've done a really good job.</p>

<p><font style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><script type="text/javascript">digg_url = 'http://digg.com/tech_news/The_PostRank_Newsroom_Twitter_For_High_Value_Information';digg_bgcolor = '#ffffff';digg_skin = 'normal';</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></font>Imagine a system for delivering only high-value information via Twitter.  That's what PostRank has built with its new <a href="http://postrank.com/twitter">PostRank Twitter Newsroom</a>.  The system finds the most engaging blogs on various topics, then automatically pulls the most talked-about posts from those blogs and now delivers those links to you via Twitter.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Trust us, we're as tired as you are of blog posts about Twitter - but these kinds of developments on top of the platform keep us coming back, day after day.  Twitter is incredibly sticky for users and has a great API - thus it's captured so many imaginations.</p>

<p>We're big fans of <a href="http://PostRank.com">PostRank</a> here at ReadWriteWeb.  The service takes inbound RSS feeds and scores each item in those feeds by number of comments, inbound links, mentions on Twitter, saves in Delicious, votes on Digg and other feedback metrics.  It then allows you to subscribe to the 10% of the items in any feed that are most popular with that blog's own community of readers.  It's an awesome way to keep track of the break-out hits on any topic, from any source.</p>

<p>Now PostRank has taken the next step and discovered the blogs about various topics that are most "engaging" with their own readers.  For 50 topics at launch and more in the future, the PostRank Newsroom now aggregates the most talked about posts on the most engaging topical blogs and delivers them to subscribers on Twitter.</p>

<p><img alt="twitterpostrankscreen.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/twitterpostrankscreen.jpg" width="610" height="488"></p>

<p>Want to get the hottest posts from the top blogs in <a href="http://www.PostRank.com/topic/Law">law</a>, <a href="http://www.PostRank.com/topic/Marketing">marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.PostRank.com/topic/Music">music</a>, <a href="http://www.PostRank.com/topic/Nonprofit">nonprofits</a> or <a href="http://www.PostRank.com/topic/Ruby">programming in Ruby</a> sent to you by Twitter?  Now you can.  That's a valuable service.</p>

<p>The editorial selection to determine which blogs are in which categories is open to question.   We're not sure why we're in Entrepreneurship, for example, and not startups or tech. And we're not sure that the full Digg front page feed is suitable for the Mac category - but hopefully these things will get worked out with reader feedback.</p>

<p>It's similar to something <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/demo08.php">we did last year for the DEMO event</a>, where instead of racing a bunch of other blogs to cover all the startups at DEMO we grabbed their RSS feeds, filtered for the word DEMO, ran them through PostRank and then put that feed into a Twitter account that people could subscribe to.  It worked pretty well, so we expect this new implementation from the company will work as well or better.</p>

<p>In this case the links are published from well explained Twitter accounts, with hashtags.  We expect people will retweet them and it will be a great way to spread the word about PostRank.  </p>

<p>Twitter for high-value information?  It might be hard for some people to believe - but this kind of machine processing to add value to people-published content is exactly the kind of development we expect to define the next phase of the web.</p>

<p><em>You can find <a href="http://twitter.com/rww">ReadWriteWeb</a> on Twitter, as well as the entire RWW Team: <a href="http://twitter.com/marshallk">Marshall Kirkpatrick</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/bernardlunn">Bernard Lunn</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/alexiskold">Alex Iskold</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/sarahintampa">Sarah Perez</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/fredericl">Frederic Lardinois</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/turoczy">Rick Turoczy</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/seanammirati">Sean Ammirati</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/madlid">Lidija Davis</a> and <a href="http://twitter.com/eng1ne">Phil Glockner</a>.</em></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642-comment:133468</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php#c133468" />
    <title>Comment from Steve on 2009-04-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Steve</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The more ideas and innovative applications on twitter the better IMO.  Constantly pushing the envelope is how new ideas are born and you never know what is possible until you are pushed to try.</p>

<p>For example, I saw in a video that the recent Moldovan protesters used multiple twitter search alternatives to co-ordinate and plan the protests. As a result "more than 10,000 people turned up at this protest.”  </p>

<p>Bring on the improved applications ... the more the better I say.</p>

<p>Here's the link: <a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/twittering_a_revolution/" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsy.com/videos/twittering_a_revolution/</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-14T18:24:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642-comment:133477</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php#c133477" />
    <title>Comment from jjray on 2009-04-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>jjray</name>
        <uri>http://www.ecelebritynews.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ecelebritynews.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>If postrank aims to be pagerank for twitter, I like the concept. But this part I don't get: "The system finds the most engaging blogs on various topics ... ."  Pagerank is created by coded process (at least this what we are told).  There is a formula.  The quote I reproduced in this comment sounds like subjective judgments from humans and that != pagerank.  If they have a reasonable formula to determine the "most engaging blogs on various topics", then I'm impressed.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-14T19:11:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642-comment:133480</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php#c133480" />
    <title>Comment from Marshall Kirkpatrick on 2009-04-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Marshall Kirkpatrick</name>
        <uri>http://readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>JJRay, engagement they do have an algorithm for.  Categorization I believe they do not.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-14T19:18:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642-comment:133483</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php#c133483" />
    <title>Comment from Ivan on 2009-04-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ivan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Awesome! Now lets actually fine tune that list so its only a few central authorities that properly vet the information and maybe have them operate as businesses... We can call these creations a "newswire".</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-14T19:44:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642-comment:133492</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php#c133492" />
    <title>Comment from grant on 2009-04-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>grant</name>
        <uri>http://www.2above.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.2above.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is a few more steps further ahead of service like twitterfeed. I will for sure use it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-14T20:57:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642-comment:133501</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php#c133501" />
    <title>Comment from john on 2009-04-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>john</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Actually, I am finding more and more keyword stuffing and outright spam on Twitter.  Personally, I'm looking at those tweets with more skepticism and less frequency. MSNBC effect?  ;-)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-14T21:47:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642-comment:133503</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php#c133503" />
    <title>Comment from Marshall Kirkpatrick on 2009-04-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Marshall Kirkpatrick</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>John, this isn't ranking tweets, this is ranking blog posts and sending the best through twitter.  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-14T21:50:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642-comment:133504</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php#c133504" />
    <title>Comment from Ilya on 2009-04-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ilya</name>
        <uri>http://blog.postrank.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.postrank.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>JJRay: All of the ranking we're doing is actually done by the community. For each of the topics we leverage all of the tags that our users assign to the feeds: feeds that make it into a 'photography' topic are the feeds that many of our users have tagged as 'photography'. Beyond that, we then use our engagement analytics engine to rank the actual blogs. For more info, take a look here:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.postrank.com/postrank" rel="nofollow">http://www.postrank.com/postrank</a></p>

<p><br />
Ivan, watch our blog.. We're very close to opening up the editorial process -- exactly what you're thinking about there.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-14T21:51:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642-comment:133537</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php#c133537" />
    <title>Comment from Replacement Windows on 2009-04-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Replacement Windows</name>
        <uri>http://www.westcoastvinyl.com/windows.html</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.westcoastvinyl.com/windows.html">
        <![CDATA[<p>Looks like your only limited by your creativity and knowledge of twitter api. Thanks for the insights and info.<br />
<a href="http://digg.com/educational/West_Coast_Vinyl_Hi_Tech_2" rel="nofollow">West Coast Vinyl</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-15T06:12:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642-comment:133556</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php#c133556" />
    <title>Comment from lilykudrow on 2009-04-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>lilykudrow</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hijacked Twitter Accounts Used in Webcam Scheme<br />
Twitter 2.0 Add-on for fring Available for WinMo and Symbian<br />
was checking some updates:<br />
<a href="http://techunits.com/content/list_all/87/twitter" rel="nofollow">http://techunits.com/content/list_all/87/twitter</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-15T09:44:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642-comment:133562</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14642" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_postrank_newsroom_twitter_for_important_inform.php#c133562" />
    <title>Comment from John Mason on 2009-04-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>John Mason</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Wow, right when you thought ole Tweet couldnt get any better!</p>

<p>RT<br />
www.anon-tools.at.tc</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-15T10:42:42Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>