<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-</id>
  <updated>2009-11-23T17:10:43Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Wolfram|Alpha: Our First Impressions</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14800" title="Wolfram|Alpha: Our First Impressions" />
    <published>2009-04-26T03:52:29Z</published>
    <updated>2009-05-01T05:25:16Z</updated>
    <title>Wolfram|Alpha: Our First Impressions</title>
    <summary>The hype around Wolfram|Alpha, the next &quot;Google killer&quot; from the makers of Mathematica, has been building over the last few weeks. Today, we were lucky enough to attend a one-hour web demo with Stephen Wolfram, and from what we&apos;ve seen, it definitely looks like it can live up to the hype - though, because it...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Frederic Lardinois</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="NYT" />
    
    <category term="Products" />
    
    <category term="Search Services" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img alt="alpha_logo_apr09.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/alpha_logo_apr09.png"  />The hype around <a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/">Wolfram|Alpha</a>, the next "Google killer" from the makers of Mathematica, has been building over the last few weeks. Today, we were lucky enough to attend a one-hour web demo with <a href="http://www.stephenwolfram.com/">Stephen Wolfram</a>, and from what we've seen, it definitely looks like it can live up to the hype - though, because it is so different from traditional search engines, it will definitely not be a "Google killer." According to Stephen Wolfram, the goal of Alpha is to give everyone access to expert knowledge and the data that a specialist would be able to compute from this information.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p><strike><em><strong>Note</strong>: Wolfram asked us to refrain from posting screenshots, so we will not use any in this post. </em></strike></p>

<p>Update 4/30: We just <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/see_wolfram_alpha_in_action_-_video_and_screenshots.php">posted our screenshots here</a>.</p>

<p>Alpha, which will go live within the next few weeks, is quite different from Google and really doesn't directly compete with it at all. Instead of searching the web for info, Alpha is built around a vast repository of curated data from public and licensed sources. Alpha then organizes and computes this knowledge with the help of sophisticated Natural Language Processing algorithms. Users can ask Alpha any kind of question, which can be constructed just like a Google search (think: "hurricane bob" or "carbon steel strength"). </p>

<p><img alt="wolfram_alpha.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/wolfram_alpha.png" /></p>

<p>In today's demo, for example, Stephen Wolfram searched for "internet users in europe," or "weather oakland" - two queries that most users would also use in Google or any other search engine. </p>

<p>Where Alpha exceeds, is in the presentation of its "search" results. When asked for how many internet users there are in Europe, for example, Alpha returned not just the total number, but also various plots and data for every country (apparently Vatican City only has 93 Internet users). </p>

<p>Another query with a very sophisticated result was "uncle's uncle's brother's son." Now if you <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=uncle&rsquo;s+uncle&rsquo;s+brother&rsquo;s+son">type that</a> into Google, the result will be a useless list of sites that don't even answer this specific question, but Alpha actually returns an interactive genealogic tree with additional information, including data about the 'blood relationship fraction,' for example (3.125% in this case).</p>

<p>Alpha, of course, doesn't hide its relationship with <a href="http://www.wolfram.com/products/mathematica/index.html">Mathematica</a>. Indeed, according to Stephen Wolfram, Alpha is built on top of 5 million lines of Mathematica code which currently run on top of about 10,000 CPUs (though Wolfram is actively expanding its server farm in preparation for the public launch). </p>

<p>Alpha can handle a lot of the mathematical questions that Mathematica can compute today (think: "integrate x^3 sin^2 x dx"), but every query will only run for a few seconds, so really complex queries will inevitable time out. Mathematica, however, will also be one of the first programs to make use of the Alpha API, so that Mathematica users will be able to access Alpha's repository of data.</p>

<p>Alpha also has a sophisticated knowledge of physics and chemistry data, and during today's demo, we also saw examples for nutritional information, weather, and census data. Most of the data in the system is curated, but real-time financial data or weather information will go through a system that checks the data for validity, so that outliers can be identified as potentially faulty information.</p>

<h2>Pro Version</h2>

<p>Alpha will come in a free version, but there will also be a paid version, which will allow users to download and upload data to Alpha. Stephen Wolfram did not go into too much detail, including pricing, but pro users will, for example, be able to not just see a graph, but also download the data behind this graph for use on their own machines or in Mathematica.</p>

<h2>Embedding and Alerts</h2>

<p>Wolfram is clearly taking a page from the modern Internet playbook and will allow users to embed not just a Wolfram|Alpha search box on their own pages, but they will also be able to embed results and a custom Alpha portal on their own sites. Users will also be able to receive email alerts when a result changes.</p>

<h2>A Few More Random Notes</h2>

<blockquote><ul>

<li>every search results page on Alpha will feature a link to the sources it used to compute the results</li>

  <li>when a fact is disputed, Alpha will note this in a footnote</li>

  <li>Alpha will only be in English for now - Wolfram notes that this was already a very hard task and that the company does not currently have the resources to replicate its natural language processing techniques for other languages</li>

  <li>money: alpha will feature ads in a sidebar, but Wolfram will also partner with other corporate entities. He didn't go into any details, but it sounded like these corporate partnerships might include other search engines.</li>

  <li>Wolfram will release toolbars for FF and IE, as well as an <a href="http://www.ieaddons.com/en/accelerators/">IE8 accelerator</a></li>

  <li>Alpha will also display results from traditional search engines (Google, Live, Yahoo) and will feature links to relevant Wikipedia articles</li>
</ul></blockquote>

<h2>Will it Kill Google?</h2>

<p><strong>No</strong>. Wolfram|Alpha will be an amazing product, but it's quite different from Google and other search engines. Indeed, maybe it is actually wrong to call it a search engine at all (and Wolfram prefers to call it a "computational knowledge engine"). If you wanted to know what sights to see on your next trip to New York City, for example, Alpha, from what we've seen so for, will not be able to help you.</p>

<p>Alpha, however, will probably be a worthy challenger for Wikipedia and many textbooks and reference works. Instead of looking up basic encyclopedic information there, users can just go to Alpha instead, where they will get a direct answer to their question, as well as a nicely presented set of graphs and other info. </p>

<p>Today's demo mostly focused on math and engineering data, so we'll still have to wait and see how Alpha copes with questions about historical events, for example. </p>

<p>Every product, of course, looks good in a controlled demo (though Stephen Wolfram also happily entertained questions from the audience for almost an hour), and we will have to wait and see how well Alpha performs when faces with real questions from real users. Based on what we've seen today though, it seems rather unlikely that Alpha will be the next <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuil">Cuil</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135255</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135255" />
    <title>Comment from Ikram on 2009-04-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ikram</name>
        <uri>http://quranclub.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://quranclub.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of this. No, I love it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T04:49:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135257</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135257" />
    <title>Comment from Joe on 2009-04-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Joe</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Sounds pretty cool and it has a freemium business model - nice!</p>

<p>Strange name sounds academia/cultish at the moment, but in time it could sound as normal as Google sounds nowadays!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T05:03:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135260</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135260" />
    <title>Comment from Michael Fidler on 2009-04-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Michael Fidler</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Did you have to mention Cuil at the end?  It’s Bad Karma!  It seems like a partner such as Mahalo, could help to round out their offering. They both have unusual approaches to answering users questions.  It's is however, refreshing to see a startup that already has a monetization plan.  I can’t wait to try it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T05:30:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135261</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135261" />
    <title>Comment from Stefan on 2009-04-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Stefan</name>
        <uri>http://www.thelongrun.de</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thelongrun.de">
        <![CDATA[<p>Seems to be quite interesting. But as any of those search engines, they will have to prove the quality of data.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T05:42:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135262</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135262" />
    <title>Comment from MG Siegler on 2009-04-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>MG Siegler</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/parislemon</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/parislemon">
        <![CDATA[<p>good stuff frederic</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T06:02:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135264</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135264" />
    <title>Comment from EndlessSports on 2009-04-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>EndlessSports</name>
        <uri>http://endlesssports.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://endlesssports.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is going to be different then Google but it sounds very interesting!  Come check me out at <a href="http://endlesssports.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://endlesssports.blogspot.com/</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T06:34:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135265</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135265" />
    <title>Comment from Bill Zhang on 2009-04-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Bill Zhang</name>
        <uri>http://www.linkedin.com/in/cnties</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.linkedin.com/in/cnties">
        <![CDATA[<p>another cuil.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T06:39:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135266</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135266" />
    <title>Comment from Danny Sullivan on 2009-04-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Danny Sullivan</name>
        <uri>http://searchengineland.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://searchengineland.com">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=internet+users+in+europe" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=internet+users+in+europe</a></p>

<p>leads to first result on Google of:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats4.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats4.htm</a></p>

<p>which leads to:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats4.htm#europe" rel="nofollow">http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats4.htm#europe</a></p>

<p>which lists the same 93 users in the Vatican. So I'm guessing that's the source data?</p>

<p>Google doesn't present charts, of course -- and I imagine what Wolfram's doing sounds much cooler than the best I can imagine.</p>

<p>On "uncle's uncle's brother's son," well, I'm not even sure what that query was supposed to show. Who would search for such a thing? I mean, it's impressive that it generates results, but what was the question seeking. The blood relationship of the son of a brother to an uncle of an uncle? I'm confused just trying to figure it out.</p>

<p>Anyway, still interested to see it. All the early reports have people coming away impressed.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T06:46:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135269</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135269" />
    <title>Comment from Frederic on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Frederic</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/frederic</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/frederic">
        <![CDATA[<p>thanks MG - I think I was quite lucky to get an invite to this demo - wish I could show some screenshots - everybody who saw them wanted to start using Alpha immediately</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T07:01:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135268</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135268" />
    <title>Comment from Frederic Lardinois on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Frederic Lardinois</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@Danny - good chance that this is indeed the source. I think it's important to remember this this is data curated by 'experts' (they didn't quite explain who these experts are, though) - so Alpha is making at least some claim to providing authoritative information - something Google can't quite provide.</p>

<p>The genealogy example actually came up because somebody asked about how well Alpha could parse this kind of semantic data. The blood relationship was just one of a number of data points Alpha showed about this query - different ways to name this relationship were part of the answer as well, for example.</p>

<p>Btw. I know you're concerned up scripted demos, and this one didn't feel very scripted at all - it lasted for about 1:20 hrs and the last hour was basically just Wolfram asking random questions and trying different queries - he actually seemed surprised be some of the results.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T07:07:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135270</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135270" />
    <title>Comment from Danny Sullivan on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Danny Sullivan</name>
        <uri>http://searchengineland.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://searchengineland.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thanks again, Frederic. I am looking forward to seeing it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T07:43:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135272</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135272" />
    <title>Comment from Saddles and Tack on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Saddles and Tack</name>
        <uri>http://www.saddlesandtack.co.uk</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.saddlesandtack.co.uk">
        <![CDATA[<p>All sound very exciting, but for the normal Joe public user Google will always be king.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T08:46:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135273</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135273" />
    <title>Comment from L. Mohan Arun on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>L. Mohan Arun</name>
        <uri>http://interestsblog.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://interestsblog.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Will it have an API so users can program to it, will it have an RSS feed so we can view real time searches being made and what results the user clicked on, and collaborative refining of the search results may be, on the lines of Wikipedia + Stumpedia?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T08:53:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135276</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135276" />
    <title>Comment from Michael Fidler on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Michael Fidler</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/mikeroblogger</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/mikeroblogger">
        <![CDATA[<p>I didn't make the connection until now. Thanks.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T09:03:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135277</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135277" />
    <title>Comment from stetoscope on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>stetoscope</name>
        <uri>http://stetoscope-blog.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stetoscope-blog.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hi frederic, thanks for this interesting post.<br />
I am fascinated by the "google killer" hunt that web news bloggers are doing. I think it makes discussion bubbles about small things. This year we had "cuil", "powerset", "deepdyve"...</p>

<p>I think google is a giant that cannot be compete just with a better algorythm. The brand is to strong, the use very deeply set in every web user life. The presence very well organized, the google bar is just fantastic as to presence in web user life.</p>

<p>So, first to compete with google I see two technics : traditionnal algorithm/semantic search or a search social service. But whether you chose "algorithm/semantic" or "social search service" you won't face the same challenges : marketing for the first and credibility for the second.</p>

<p>Second, Google is now the search engine for everything, websites, piece of news, images, videos... Maybe a challenger could start by selecting a specific field before thinking about killing google. That is what happened to youtube.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T09:29:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135279</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135279" />
    <title>Comment from Jakob Stoeck on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jakob Stoeck</name>
        <uri>http://www.stoeck.it</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stoeck.it">
        <![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I like the name.</p>

<p>Small typo: "New York City, for example, Alpha, from what we've seen so *for*," (far)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T10:16:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135281</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135281" />
    <title>Comment from Sean McColgan on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sean McColgan</name>
        <uri>http://seanmccolgan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://seanmccolgan.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to trying this new search tool out...</p>

<p>Harvard are broadcasting a live webcast with Stephen Wolfram this Tuesday 28th April, 3.00pm ET</p>

<p><a href="https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/interactive/webcast" rel="nofollow">https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/interactive/webcast</a> </p>

<p>You can submit your questions here...</p>

<p><a href="http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/questions/wolframalpha" rel="nofollow">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/questions/wolframalpha</a></p>

<p>@L. Mohan Arun the top question to be asked at the talk - Will Wolfram have an API interface for the developers? </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T10:51:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135283</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135283" />
    <title>Comment from Ivan on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ivan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>"normal Joe public user" had no idea that google even existed some 5+ years ago. it all takes some getting used to for the "public joe" to switch the default - inertia is too big. 22% still using yahoo prove that.</p>

<p>I see the future search techniques shifting away to the context-analyzing engines and adding semantics to the web (either by manually curating data or by creating a superior algorithm, or both as is attempted in this case).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T11:09:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135285</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135285" />
    <title>Comment from Kent Beatty on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kent Beatty</name>
        <uri>http://kentbeatty.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://kentbeatty.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thanks Frederic for sharing your first look at Alpha. I'm looking forward to using it! Who, in 1998, would have predicted the success of Google?  AltaVista was king then and people may very well have said "AltaVista will always be king."  History has shown that most of those who attempt to predict the future, based on the past, are incorrect and that history is a poor guide to the future.  Google represents the past. Wolfram Alpha may very well represent the future. <br />
 <br />
Follow me on twitter:  <a href="http://twitter.com/kentbeatty" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/kentbeatty</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T11:20:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135286</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135286" />
    <title>Comment from Cameron on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cameron</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Does this mean Wolfram has stopped trying to calculate the cellular automata algorithm at the core of the physics? To build a new search engine? sheesh. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T12:10:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135294</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135294" />
    <title>Comment from Jim on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jim</name>
        <uri>http://www.thejimgaudet.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thejimgaudet.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Damn, I missed the demo yesterday... Sounds like this will be nice, I can't wait to test it out..</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T13:41:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135295</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135295" />
    <title>Comment from Sheamus on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sheamus</name>
        <uri>http://twittercism.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twittercism.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>It sounds amazing but it'll never take off with a name that sounds like a German professional wrestler. Even if it isn't after Google's share I'm sure it still wants to be a success, and a lot of folks are going to be put off from the start.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T13:44:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135301</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135301" />
    <title>Comment from fadithoughtpick on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>fadithoughtpick</name>
        <uri>http://www.thoughtpickers.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thoughtpickers.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Impressive indeed! Can't wait to try it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T15:10:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135303</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135303" />
    <title>Comment from Roman on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Roman</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>As somebody said above - "Looking forward to trying it", yes maybe trying but not using. Paid version)))))Are you serious???<br />
The technology is amazing of course, but is it for real life. For academics? For some curious rare visitors? Or is it another step to degradation, when you do not even have to know where to search, it brings you things out of nowhere))) <br />
Idea cannot clearly define itself. Is it a search engine or not?<br />
To me it is like super invention, backuped by good finance, otherwise they could get 10K PCs, but lacking something)))) I cannot say what exactly but it looks like an expensive prototype.<br />
Good luck WOLFRAM</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T15:34:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135307</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135307" />
    <title>Comment from Shawn Drewry on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Shawn Drewry</name>
        <uri>http://www.ShawnDrewry.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ShawnDrewry.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't think anyone stands a chance at bringing down Google </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T15:55:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135308</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135308" />
    <title>Comment from Dave Cunningham on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dave Cunningham</name>
        <uri>http://cunningadvice.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://cunningadvice.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>This does look promising.  Though it won't be a google-killer, I'm sure they will take notice as it is in their interests to make Google the only search vehicle in the public conscious.  They certainly don't want people thinking Google is only good for certain kinds of searches.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T16:37:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135313</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135313" />
    <title>Comment from virtual web symphony  on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>virtual web symphony </name>
        <uri>http://edunetsys.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://edunetsys.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have been following up on Twitter and other forums about this computational engine. I agree that it will be different from the Google search engine but somewhere down the line for it to be successful, it has to cross swords with Google. otherwise it can't be a successful business model. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T17:25:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135314</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135314" />
    <title>Comment from Overgauss on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Overgauss</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of Frink|Alpha</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T17:37:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135315</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135315" />
    <title>Comment from Ian on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ian</name>
        <uri>http://blog.locut.us/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.locut.us/">
        <![CDATA[<p>This sounds a lot like "True Knowledge" (http://trueknowledge.com/) which has been around for over a year.</p>

<p>It is always very dangerous to judge the effectiveness of this type of software based on queries provided by the software's creator.  I'd be much more interested in how it performs on queries created by ordinary people without any guidance from Wolfram.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T18:12:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135316</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135316" />
    <title>Comment from Gill on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Gill</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I like the curated/referenced data aspect.I doubt it will be a negative thing - if you consider the horror that is yahoo answers and the various US politicians manipulation of Wikipedia..uh..facts. Even if Wolfram/Alpha serves only to filter out all the unreliable rubbish floating around on the net - it will be a super useful tool for the average surfer.</p>

<p>Also, I like the possibility that Wolfram may be able to prove some of his new kind of science "too higher grade for me mumbo" with a real life working system, sort of like the first word processor did way back when.....Nice.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T18:17:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135317</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135317" />
    <title>Comment from Shishir Kakaraddi on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Shishir Kakaraddi</name>
        <uri>http://watilearnt.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://watilearnt.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.. knowledge searching wanna try this out. cuil and kosmix dint dazzle.. may be they will compete with google some day but that will take some time..</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T18:23:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135318</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135318" />
    <title>Comment from Shishir Kakaraddi on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Shishir Kakaraddi</name>
        <uri>http://watilearnt.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://watilearnt.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.. knowledge searching wanna try this out. cuil and kosmix dint dazzle.. may be they will compete with google some day but that will take some time..</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T18:24:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135330</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135330" />
    <title>Comment from bobbybrixton on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>bobbybrixton</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>A few marketing points:<br />
-It should simply be called a "knowledge engine" - drop the "computational", makes it sound too geeky (even though it is).<br />
-The "freemium" business model makes it seem like regular users are getting a lite version, which is a put-off. Best to just have a different name for the premium version like "Wolfram Alpha Editor"<br />
-Possibly find a new name overall since Wolfram sounds like a wolf with memory chips. Totally retarded, and also too linked to one person's identity. Imagine if Google was called Brin.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T21:09:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135338</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135338" />
    <title>Comment from CJ on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>CJ</name>
        <uri>http://www.scienceforseo.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.scienceforseo.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hi Bobby,</p>

<p>this is an excellent write up. I think a lot of people have misread what Wolfram is. I was also at the demo and I thought it was brilliant. Being a science person who could do with additional equation support and algorithm suggestions, it's perfect. As a user looking for stats and informational data - also brilliant.</p>

<p>Do you think that Wikipedia will suffer? I do see Google losing the information query traffic to some extent, at least from me anyway.</p>

<p>It was refreshing to read a complete and what I deem as accurate review. I'm glad you guys get it!</p>

<p>My own impressions were posted <a href="http://www.scienceforseo.com/search-engines/wolfram-alpha-rocks/" rel="nofollow">here</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T22:43:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135341</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135341" />
    <title>Comment from CJ on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>CJ</name>
        <uri>http://www.scienceforseo.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.scienceforseo.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Sorry frederic - clearly I meant "frederic" and wrote "Bobby" - not enough coffee this morning! - Aplologies.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-26T22:58:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135350</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135350" />
    <title>Comment from JohnDavius on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>JohnDavius</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Wow dude that is WAY cool!</p>

<p>RT<br />
privacy.mx.tc</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-27T01:21:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135351</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135351" />
    <title>Comment from Chris on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Chris</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Where is the demo? Oh wait, it's vapourware that only works with a small subset of user queries that have been hardcoded into it's database.</p>

<p>Sounds like Yahoo 2.0.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-27T01:26:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135369</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135369" />
    <title>Comment from Charlie Anzman on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Charlie Anzman</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/charlieanzman</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/charlieanzman">
        <![CDATA[<p>Frederic - Great initial insight. Thanks!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-27T02:21:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135370</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135370" />
    <title>Comment from Falafulu Fisi on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Falafulu Fisi</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Cameron said...<br />
<i>Does this mean Wolfram has stopped trying to calculate the cellular automata algorithm at the core of the physics? To build a new search engine? sheesh.</i></p>

<p>Dude, the Google PageRank algorithm was derived using the same methods/algorithms that particle physicists had been using for many decades in their physics simulations. This algorithm is called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markov_chain" rel="nofollow">Markov Chain</a> in which Page & Brin used to derive PageRank with. The majority of cutting-edge computing techniques/algorithms of today originated in Physics, way before the software professionals adopted them and this is fact. I am pretty much sure that Dr. Stephen Wolfram will bring the techniques from scientific computing into the development of his search engine product over time. </p>

<p>One of the state-of-the-art emerging techniques that does enhance the retrieval precision & recall of numeric-based search engine algorithm of today is the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensor" rel="nofollow">Tensor</a> calculus. Einstein first used Tensor in the development of his <i>General Theory of Relativity</i> (GTR) in 1916 when he published his paper. It is only recent that data-analysts realized its important in data analysis including search engine.  PageRank algorithm has a tensor of 2 only (ie, 2D data only, ie the PageRank uses a matrix of  inbound & outbound link frequencies) and I am not aware if Google has tensorized the PageRank yet, but there is no doubt that they must be researching/developing it (either for pure experimentation or for product enhancement). Recent tensor search engine uses 3D tensor  which is reported to have improved (ie, recall & precision) over the current 2D based algorithms. Tensor calculus is a very complex topic and this explains why GTR is a complex topic. The hyper-space or multi-dimensional space that one often sees isn scifi as Star-Trek movie originates in Relativity and Tensor, since Einstein's Relativity is all about multi-dimensional space.  </p>

<p>Anyway, since one of Dr. Wolfram's Physics research area was Cosmology, it means that he is well versed in Tensor Calculus since Relativity's application is mostly in  Cosmology and this is the reason that I believe that  Stephen will bring in the cutting edge techniques of science/physics to the development of his search engine product. </p>

<p>To those who compared Cuil to WolframAlpha is misleading. Cuil was a hype and I doubt that they invented anything original. Dr Wolfram is a scientist and he has been doing original research all his life. This means that he can always figured out a way (ie, always inventing) to improve his product.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-27T02:23:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135379</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135379" />
    <title>Comment from doug on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>doug</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Could you ask it what the most photographed landmarks in new york are? or for the most popular/best rated shows? What about economic data?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-27T03:03:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135396</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135396" />
    <title>Comment from vicaya on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>vicaya</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Even if it's just a free web interface to mathematica, It'd be awesome!</p>

<p>Look forward to checking it out!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-27T05:00:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135409</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135409" />
    <title>Comment from Jaap Aap on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jaap Aap</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Im not a geneologist, but the 'blood relationship fraction' seems wrong. Assuming that all relations are full siblings (not half-brothers) and that the 'blood relationship fraction' refers to average amount of genes shared (which is 1/2 for parent-child and 1/2 for siblings) you just use a factor 1/2 for every step from me to my uncle's uncle's brother's son. Uncle is 2 steps here (child - parent - sibling), so I end up with (1/2)^6, which is 0.016 rather than 0.032 ((1/2)^5). Also, this is when my uncle's uncle's brother's son is actually a different person from my uncle; they could be the one and the same. In this case I get 1/4.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-27T06:51:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135411</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135411" />
    <title>Comment from Casting parts on 2009-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Casting parts</name>
        <uri>http://www.china-machineparts.com/pro/Casting-parts.htm</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.china-machineparts.com/pro/Casting-parts.htm">
        <![CDATA[<p>Impressive indeed! </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-27T06:57:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135412</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135412" />
    <title>Comment from Jaap Aap on 2009-04-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jaap Aap</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>oops, its correct after all. Counted the last sibling step twice. The 1/4 option is still right though</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-27T07:03:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135417</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135417" />
    <title>Comment from janetalong on 2009-04-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>janetalong</name>
        <uri>http://famouspick.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://famouspick.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Who is your admired figure ? Discover book recommendations from famous people on:</p>

<p><a href="http://famouspick.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://famouspick.blogspot.com</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-27T07:11:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135419</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135419" />
    <title>Comment from Mr Useless on 2009-04-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mr Useless</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>just so that you know</p>

<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Characteristica_universalis" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Characteristica_universalis</a><br />
<a href="http://www.autodidactproject.org/other/leibniz1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.autodidactproject.org/other/leibniz1.html</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-27T07:19:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135420</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135420" />
    <title>Comment from Engago team on 2009-04-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Engago team</name>
        <uri>http://www.LEADSExplorer.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.LEADSExplorer.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Try <a href="http://www.yauba.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.yauba.com/</a> for a change.<br />
Their search by segment is different.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-27T07:22:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135442</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135442" />
    <title>Comment from Kolammal on 2009-04-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kolammal</name>
        <uri>http://www.dotcominfoway.com/internet-marketing/search-engine-optimization</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.dotcominfoway.com/internet-marketing/search-engine-optimization">
        <![CDATA[<p>WolframAlpha looks good. But I'm bothered about the name. Why did the founder want a rather-difficult, typo-happening name? I'm sure no one will remember it the first time they hear about it. Maybe "alpha" is fine. Not "wolframalpha". </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-27T12:12:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135485</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135485" />
    <title>Comment from Govind Kabra on 2009-04-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Govind Kabra</name>
        <uri>http://www.cazoodle.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cazoodle.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Even amidst all the hype, it is relishing to see another search product coming out of Urbana Champaign. </p>

<p>We share the vision that understanding semantics of Web data will enable novel search capabilities. Our take on the problem is to design specialized vertical search engines. Try www.cazoodle.com</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-27T16:50:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135489</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135489" />
    <title>Comment from Miramon on 2009-04-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Miramon</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>FF@39:</p>

<p>Markov Chains are commonplace applied math, used in myriad disciplines for generations. Whether or not Google uses it for page rank calculation has nothing whatsoever to do with Wolfram Alpha, nor with the ludicrous "new physics" exercise that Wolfram spent so much time on in recent years. The reak computational capabilities of those automata are so weak and inefficient that it's almost silly to suggest they are relevant. Universal Turing machine or not, it's a pessimal way to do computation.</p>

<p>Similarly, reference to Einstein's use of tensors is just name dropping. Einstein also used arithmetic, but that doesn't mean my for loop is great stuff. All this is very old hat math, and has nothing whatsoever to do with whether WA will succeed or fail. Once you start going off into Star Trek physics, you have really wandered into hyperspace yourself.</p>

<p>The comparison with Cuil is apt from a hype perspective, but we will only see if WA has more to it than hype after it launches for real. It's certainly the case, though, that A New Kind of Science was hype-filled, leaden, and in the end, not very productive, hence the reference to it. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-27T17:20:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135542</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135542" />
    <title>Comment from Tom on 2009-04-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tom</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Advancements in language parsing and integration with Web search tools will undoubtedly change SEO practices—not overnight, but steadily.</p>

<p>Right now, the secret ingredient is "keywords keywords keywords" sprinkled throughout a Web site's copy and high-level markup.</p>

<p>Down the line, computers that make sense of text throughout the Web will have new ways of judging the "best" source of information for a given query.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-27T20:51:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135554</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135554" />
    <title>Comment from Falafulu Fisi on 2009-04-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Falafulu Fisi</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Miramon what is your definition of succeed or fail?  Define them? Fail according to what? Succeed according to what? Being widely adopted is not a measurement of success or fail  at all. If that's your criteria, then your cutting edge technology is the likes of Twitter or Facebook. Can you tell me what cutting-edge technology they use? None, except to you perhaps. </p>

<p>Did you read carefully of what the article stated about Dr. Wolfram's comment? He said that it is not a competitor to Google, do you get that? WA is an excellent tool for specific knowledge domain. It could be used for medical diagnostic tool for instance, since the knowledge in that domain are quite specific. It can perhaps outperform the diagnostic efforts of human doctors (this has already happened in real life application of limited capabilities of current medical expert system).</p>

<p>Miramon said...<br />
<i>Similarly, reference to Einstein's use of tensors is just name dropping. </i></p>

<p>Nope, I meant it for education purposes, since most readers here had no clue about the impact of Physics in IT. When I post on a subject, I do make sure that readers can follow why & what I am talking about.</p>

<p>Miramon said...<br />
<i>All this is very old hat math, and has nothing whatsoever to do with whether WA will succeed or fail.</i></p>

<p>Old math, new application. Do you see the point there? Now if I tell you that old math in Signal Processing had found new application in Search Engines, would you be surprised or not at all?  I bet you would be surprised, because old math from a completely different discipline has found a new application in an unrelated discipline (ie, Information Retrieval). I can tell you these techniques/algorithms if you're curious. So, my mentioning of tensor is relevant and informative to participants in his thread, unless you don't know what it is.</p>

<p>Miramon said...<br />
<i>Once you start going off into Star Trek physics, you have really wandered into hyperspace yourself.</i></p>

<p>Again, I was trying to make the connection here, because I am sure most readers have heard of it from scifi movie, but cannot make the connection with Google PageRank, which is a hyperspace of 2 dimension. If I say that higher dimension (3D, 4D, 5D or more) search engine algorithm  such as this <a href="http://www.math.jmu.edu/~carlam/talks/HH08_talk.pdf" rel="nofollow">3D tensor algorithm</a> outperformed the 2D one, then readers here have no clue or to what on earth is a 3D search engine algorithm. Citing Star Trek does  clarify or give them a mental picture of what tensor is  about even they don't fully comprehend of what it is.</p>

<p>Here is the direction of future search. Search problems will be solved by a combination of both numeric algorithms & symbolic ones (ie, NLP). Its not going to be solved by numeric-based algorithms alone nor solved by NLP alone, because each of them have limitations which can't be improved further even with new algorithms. The point I was trying to make is that if WA can solve (and do it better) the inefficiencies of symbolic-based algorithms (NLP), then it is only a few steps away that Dr. Wolfram will combine his symbolic-based algorithms with numeric-based ones (ie, state-of-the-art ones, such as tensor techniques) to solve the universal problem of search.</p>

<p>Finally, lots of new algorithms today are based on old hat math, I can tell you that most of them are, but this doesn't change the fact that the new algorithms are new, that's why they're called new. Most algorithms boil down to using numerical linear algebra decomposition which are old hat and this is fact. So, I don't see your point of pointing out the obvious.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-27T21:46:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135574</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135574" />
    <title>Comment from Falafulu Fisi on 2009-04-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Falafulu Fisi</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>For those who are new to Tensor (even for seasoned software developers), check out the following link which lists various new cutting-edge tensor-based algorithms that are applicable to a varieties of data-analysis tasks including search engines (web or otherwise) & information retrieval.</p>

<p><a href="http://wiki.epfl.ch/ingmar.weber/tensors-literature" rel="nofollow">Papers on Tensors and their use in information retrieval.</a></p>

<p>If it is hard to imagine what the hell Tensor is, then just think of Star-Trek, that will give you an imagination of what it is.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-27T23:20:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135592</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135592" />
    <title>Comment from youfoundjake on 2009-04-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>youfoundjake</name>
        <uri>http://www.youfoundjake.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.youfoundjake.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I look forward to the release, and I must admit that I am quite curious as to how this will make an impact on the Search world, will it confuse users, or add to the experience?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-28T02:32:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135609</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135609" />
    <title>Comment from Grover69 on 2009-04-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Grover69</name>
        <uri>http://groversguide.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://groversguide.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Wow!  This looks like it may be perfect for doing better research on a topic.  Google is great, but sometimes just finding basic facts and numbers can be a chore.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-28T05:27:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135614</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135614" />
    <title>Comment from CJ on 2009-04-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>CJ</name>
        <uri>http://www.scienceforseo.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.scienceforseo.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have to say that a major distinction with Google is that WA is not a "search engine" but indeed a "knowledge engine". </p>

<p>There's a difference between "Database" (an organized body of related information) and "Knowledgebase" (a special kind of database for knowledge management).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-28T05:38:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135624</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135624" />
    <title>Comment from Falafulu Fisi on 2009-04-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Falafulu Fisi</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>CJ said...<br />
<i>a major distinction with Google is that WA is not a "search engine" but indeed a "knowledge engine".</i></p>

<p>CJ, that's correct, which I have stated in one of my previous message. I think that Dr. Wolfram's should have made that very clear early on so to avoid any pitfall or backlash in the high expectations of the general public.</p>

<p>I also find this post from Danny Sullivan of Search Engine Land as a bit of sour grapes.</p>

<p><a href="http://searchengineland.com/overhype-your-search-engine-18076" rel="nofollow">How To Overhype Your Search Engine</a></p>

<p>I will selectively highlight what Danny quoted in his article:</p>

<p>Danny Said...<br />
<i>Fail to brief those in the know:</i></p>

<p>Sorry Danny, but Dr. Wolfram is not in the know of who you are or what your website does. Remember, Dr.Wolfram's software is popular in the science/engineering domains (both industry & academics), so he is not a web-2 or web-xxx follower, so he doesn't know all of who he should talk to about his product, so you shouldn't be surprised if he didn't give you any heads-up about it, because I bet that if he did, he would have done that.</p>

<p>Danny Said...<br />
<i>Claim you’re the "next Google" or fail to set expectations:</i></p>

<p>Can you cite of where Dr. Wolfram made that claim? To the best of my knowledge, he never made such claimed. The claim originated from individuals who Stephen had shown his software to, unless I am wrong here.</p>

<p>Besides, you should concentrate on your definition of <i>Google  Killer</i> instead of spouting it out as a meaning phrase. Let me define it for you because I think that your definition has got nothing to do with technology at all. I am pretty certain that you mean this:</p>

<p><i>Claim you’re the "next Google <b>brand</b>" or fail to set expectations:</i></p>

<p>Being next Google brand (I suspect that's what you mean) is a completely different story from being a next Google? Next Google means that your search engine outperforms (in terms of precision & recall) the Google PageRank? Are you with me here? Google brand is the hardest to beat, but Google search is something beatable. If you doubt, then just check out the following paper from Microsoft Asia Research, where they came out with an algorithm that outperformed the Google PageRank in around 2005:</p>

<p><a href="http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/69111/22.pdf" rel="nofollow">Block-Level Link Analysis</a></p>

<p>My point here, that even with that superior algorithm from Microsoft, they never unseated Google's status as the #1 web search engine. See it for yourself in the benchmark from the paper I have cited above which is freely downloadable. It came back to brand name. The hurdle is the brand name, not the technology. Powerset was hype because it was obvious to anyone who knows how search algorithm works that it is not how you see or perceive the result. It is how the results retrieval precision & recall are benchmarked against other existing systems. That's where the comparison has to be made, not on how popular it is. Powerset's capability didn't outperform   Google. Google will always be popular with or without any superior algorithms that challenged it, because it is the brand that you have to battle and not the technology.</p>

<p>Now do you understand between the difference between toppling Google based on user popularity rather than technology superiority? I hope that you do.</p>

<p>Danny said...<br />
<i>Trot out big names with no connection to search:</i></p>

<p>Dr. Wolfram hasn't done that, but I agree with you. One only have to look no further than all these useless web 2.0 social networking sites that don't make a cent at the moment with their only hopes of recouping their investment is to look for someone to acquire them. These startups are littered with big names in the Venture funds endorsing their products which is somehow their involvement would make the market follow them. It can work sometimes to suck out funds from other naive investors.</p>

<p>Danny said...<br />
<i>Search Engine Mouthfeel</i></p>

<p>Mouthfeel is something subjective. Here is a Gedanken experiment (ie, thought experiment). If you switch Google & Live Search using a control group, ie, just switch the main page of both, so when one is clicking on Google's homepage the engine behind it is the Live Search and vise versa? Can you tell me what would the results will show? I bet you with high confidence, that the majority of the control group will always pick the best search engine as Google, even though they didn't know that search engines behind those respective front-pages were switched prior to the test. What does the result tell us? Yep, it all comes down to brand name as I stated previously. In people's mind, they're condition to select Google not because it is superior in its retrieval capability but because that's what they're used to or what others are using, and this is fact. It is easy to beat the technology, but very hard to beat subjectivity. Mind you that there is very little difference (precision & recall) between Live Search & Google and most users wouldn't tell the difference, but there is a huge huge difference in their brands.</p>

<p>Danny said...<br />
<i>Microsoft’s Hype Challenge</i></p>

<p>Now, you see what I mean. Microsoft is in there for the long haul and they're trying to build their brand.</p>

<p>Finally, I would like to stress of what CJ stated in her message that WolframAlpha is a knowledge engine rather than a search engine. Knowledge engine operates on a database full of knowledge nuggets, where a search engine this definition is not necessary true, such that Google PageRank has no prior knowledge of its data at all, ie, it doesn't have bits & pieces of knowledge that is organized as a prior and this is the difference.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-28T09:41:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135626</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135626" />
    <title>Comment from Falafulu Fisi on 2009-04-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Falafulu Fisi</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Now, I would like to state here that I am a Mathematica user and I am not a marketer for Wolfram products at all. I have a high regard for Dr. Wolfram's work in developing this product because one can only witness the huge number of mathematical algorithms already pre-packaged in the Mathematica software. I both use Mathmatica & Matlab which they're very popular tools for research & development in the area of science & engineering. I proto-type my numerical algorithms using these tools because they're fast and less hassle compared to any of the high-level languages and once I am satisfied with the tested proto-type algorithm, then I code it in Java for application development.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-28T09:48:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135631</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135631" />
    <title>Comment from Falafulu Fisi on 2009-04-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Falafulu Fisi</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Correction:</p>

<p>I meant to say:</p>

<p><i>... it doesn't have bits & pieces of knowledge that is organized as a prior<b>i</b> ...</i></p>

<p>rather than:</p>

<p><br />
<i>... it doesn't have bits & pieces of knowledge that is organized as a prior ...</i></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-28T10:16:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135728</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135728" />
    <title>Comment from Sean Canton on 2009-04-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sean Canton</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/eighteyes</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/eighteyes">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't see much hype in Alpha. They've always been straightforward, this is what it is. The hype might be from the rest of the swarm, but why pay attention to that anyway. It's not google, it's not supposed to be google, it's a way to find stuff that google can't touch with their indexing mechanism.</p>

<p>Which, by the way, will seem like a card catalog someday soon.</p>

<p>Cuil, on the other hand, was more often paired with 'ex-googlers' then anything else, relying on brand recognition to build buzz. Drawing a comparison between the two is unfair, fellow commenters.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-28T21:44:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135751</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135751" />
    <title>Comment from Madhan on 2009-04-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Madhan</name>
        <uri>http://www.repocarsforsale.info</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.repocarsforsale.info">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>

<p>Really a dream project.  I am just waiting to see, how it shall be when it goes live in May'09.</p>

<p>Regards<br />
Madhan.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-29T01:01:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135795</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135795" />
    <title>Comment from SEO Company Canada on 2009-04-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>SEO Company Canada</name>
        <uri>http://seocanadamarketing.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://seocanadamarketing.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I really want to see a close competitor of Google for a healthy competition.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-29T07:23:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135796</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135796" />
    <title>Comment from Tony on 2009-04-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tony</name>
        <uri>http://seocanadamarketing.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://seocanadamarketing.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I really want to see a close search engine competitor of Google for a healthy competition.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-29T07:27:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135813</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135813" />
    <title>Comment from Wolfgang Sohst on 2009-04-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Wolfgang Sohst</name>
        <uri>http://www.xenomoi.de</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.xenomoi.de">
        <![CDATA[<p>Maybe the real competition of WolframAlpha isn't Google and the world of search engines, but Wikipedia & Co. This will be definitely the case, if the public is encouraged to contribute to the knowledge pool. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-29T09:26:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:135849</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c135849" />
    <title>Comment from david on 2009-04-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>david</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>To me this actually sounds like a front-end for cloud computing more than a search engine.</p>

<p>Given the Mathematica hooks all manner of sophisticated processing could handled as "queries"</p>

<p>The really interesting thing would be if Wolfram's engine could extract an algorithm from a say a computer science paper, construct a model and allow the person searching to interact with that model</p>

<p>that would massively accelerate research compared to the usual approach of </p>

<p>1. search for paper<br />
2. sift queries<br />
3. read papers<br />
4. understand papers of interest<br />
5. construct models<br />
6. duplicate results<br />
7. compare to own algorithm</p>

<p>would collapse to</p>

<p>1. compare my algorithm to published algorithms and return results</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-29T14:38:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:136002</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c136002" />
    <title>Comment from Peter Jones on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Peter Jones</name>
        <uri>http://www.accelerated-ideas.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.accelerated-ideas.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a pretty good app. Its about time software started to understand language interpretation. Will it kill Google? No way, this is just going to be another side stream..</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T12:34:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:136107</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c136107" />
    <title>Comment from Andy Hickl on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Andy Hickl</name>
        <uri>http://www.languagecomputer.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.languagecomputer.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>WolframAlpha is indeed exciting, in no small part due to the fact that it makes available a new source of knowledge that wasn't (perceived as) available to us before.  Want to know what 88 mph is in m/s?  Or what Chrysler's stock is trading in Euros today?  Or how many people live in New Orleans in 2009?  It does a nice job of aggregating a lot of this structured data in one place.</p>

<p>However, the tech isn't exactly new.  MIT's START question-answering system (http://start.csail.mit.edu) has been serving up these kinds of results since 1993 -- with very similar coverage.</p>

<p>It'll be very interesting to see how WolframAlpha grows going forward.  Will they continue to add new data?  Will they continue to add more support for more queries -- and to provide data from other, "less trusted" sources?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T23:55:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:136111</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c136111" />
    <title>Comment from Mark - Melbourne Internet Marketing on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mark - Melbourne Internet Marketing</name>
        <uri>http://www.melbourneonline.com.au/internet-marketing.asp</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.melbourneonline.com.au/internet-marketing.asp">
        <![CDATA[<p>Certainly is interesting.  But like you say, it's not a search engine, is it?  It's more like an engineering wiki.  <br />
Great for uni students, science nuts and anyone who loves to sponge information!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T01:22:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:136400</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c136400" />
    <title>Comment from TechCombo on 2009-05-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>TechCombo</name>
        <uri>http://techcombo.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://techcombo.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>This news is very encouraging, potentially, if spread world-wide it could massive. I see the target audience perhaps to be school children to university students as they are always stuck on a piece of factual homework such as "why is the core of a protostar so hot?" Normally they will type this into google or yahoo answers and there would be no help. but with the more sophisticated Wolfram, a solution will be produced. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-03T19:12:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:136607</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c136607" />
    <title>Comment from Damodar Bashyal on 2009-05-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Damodar Bashyal</name>
        <uri>http://www.codefight.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.codefight.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>Anyone have any idea, when its gonna be released. Says MAY, but i am tired of checking that page.</p>

<p>Anyone got preview link?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-05T10:33:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:136659</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c136659" />
    <title>Comment from Pierre Lherisson on 2009-05-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Pierre Lherisson</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The Wolfram Alpha probably will be more sophisticated than the current Google. It appears that it will be a powerful tool for academic and scientific research.</p>

<p>Although it uses natural language,I doubt that it will be able to fathom any question in the vernacular format especially when the non verbal component of the language is missing.</p>

<p>Vernacular Language is too dynamic to follow the rigor of complex algorithm and mathematical formulas. That's why computer translation of spoken language is inaccurate at best.</p>

<p>This program might set the stage for the beginning of an undemocratic internet because it will have a pay per search version. That means the other search engines will start charging and increasing their fees periodically and arbitrarily.Before we know it the internet will be off limit to the poor.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-05T17:17:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:136660</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c136660" />
    <title>Comment from Pierre Lherisson on 2009-05-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Pierre Lherisson</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The Wolfram Alpha probably will be more sophisticated than the current Google. It appears that it will be a powerful tool for academic and scientific research.</p>

<p>Although it uses natural language,I doubt that it will be able to fathom any question in the vernacular format especially when the non verbal component of the language is missing.</p>

<p>Vernacular Language is too dynamic to follow the rigor of complex algorithm and mathematical formulas. That's why computer translation of spoken language is inaccurate at best.</p>

<p>This program might set the stage for the beginning of an undemocratic internet because it will have a pay per search version. That means the other search engines will start charging and increasing their fees periodically and arbitrarily.Before we know it the internet will be off limit to the poor.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-05T17:18:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:140043</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c140043" />
    <title>Comment from andre dajd on 2009-05-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>andre dajd</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Crap.  Could not find "quadratic spline".  I am not coming back...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-28T15:56:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:140054</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c140054" />
    <title>Comment from Freddie on 2009-05-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Freddie</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's an interseting project and I look forward to seeing how it fares.  Personally, I can't see it "killing" Google but maybe in the near future, Google will be forced to buy it out for a considerabel amount.  Who knows??  Another interesting article I read about Wolfram Alpha was on <a href="http://www.dimnetblog.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dimnetblog.blogspot.com/</a> </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-28T16:26:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:140139</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c140139" />
    <title>Comment from Elle23 on 2009-05-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Elle23</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I find WA too nerdy. I mean, I don't do calculations for most of my searches everyday. In that case, I'll still be needing typical search engines like <a href="http://find.com" rel="nofollow">find.com</a>, yahoo, etc. and yes, google. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-29T05:55:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:142254</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c142254" />
    <title>Comment from Biz on 2009-06-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Biz</name>
        <uri>http://www.biz-development.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.biz-development.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Wolfram Alpha is a good news in the area of search engines. It has some advantages compared to the other search engines. Still, it is not the competition to Google or other search engines, since it uses totally different approach. It is more like dictionary or encyclopedia than search engine.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-13T10:11:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:145475</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c145475" />
    <title>Comment from Introspective on 2009-07-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Introspective</name>
        <uri>http://www.my-introspective.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.my-introspective.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I like Wolfram Alpha. It offers a completely new way of searching for information.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-05T19:21:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:147833</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c147833" />
    <title>Comment from Ramesh on 2009-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ramesh</name>
        <uri>http://www.seo-websolutions.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.seo-websolutions.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>

<p>I like it . Keepit up I am waiting for New.</p>

<p>Thanks</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-18T12:01:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:155862</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c155862" />
    <title>Comment from tiffany on 2009-09-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>tiffany</name>
        <uri>http://www.tiffanyfree.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tiffanyfree.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>great post! thanks a lot.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-09-04T01:11:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:156239</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c156239" />
    <title>Comment from Tiffany Jewelry on 2009-09-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tiffany Jewelry</name>
        <uri>http://www.tiffanyfree.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tiffanyfree.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>The blood relationship of the son of a brother to an uncle of an uncle? I'm confused just trying to figure it out.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-09-07T02:50:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:156695</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c156695" />
    <title>Comment from ed hardy  on 2009-09-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>ed hardy </name>
        <uri>http://www.edhardyuk.co.uk</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.edhardyuk.co.uk">
        <![CDATA[<p>Alpha is built around a vast repository of curated data from public and licensed sources. Alpha then organizes and computes this knowledge with the help of sophisticated Natural Language Processing algorithms.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-09-09T08:42:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:163845</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c163845" />
    <title>Comment from DDos Protection on 2009-10-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>DDos Protection</name>
        <uri>http://dragonara.net/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://dragonara.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>No, Google will not patch this bug faster than Apple. Apple already patched it (although it took them 2 months to do it), and Google don't. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-21T08:15:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800-comment:164614</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14800" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wolframalpha_our_first_impressions.php#c164614" />
    <title>Comment from Jacob Matisky on 2009-10-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jacob Matisky</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I am on Kolammal's side. "WolframAlpha looks good. But I'm bothered about the name. Why did the founder want a rather-difficult, typo-happening name? I'm sure no one will remember it the first time they hear about it."</p>

<p>I had not thought of alpha.com, but I really like it. I have heard most people using wolfa.com which I also really like. Alpha is a bit better though but they could not copyright it since it a generic word. A made up word is easier to make their own. But I don't care what they call it, they just gotta change the darn name! please!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-24T06:56:48Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>