<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-</id>
  <updated>2009-11-23T17:01:41Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Firefox Could Be the Real Facebook Challenger</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14924" title="Firefox Could Be the Real Facebook Challenger" />
    <published>2009-05-05T21:54:53Z</published>
    <updated>2009-05-07T08:46:13Z</updated>
    <title>Firefox Could Be the Real Facebook Challenger</title>
    <summary>Firefox Could Be the Real Facebook Challenger</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Marshall Kirkpatrick</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Browsers" />
    
    <category term="Features" />
    
    <category term="NYT" />
    
    <category term="Social Networks" />
    
    <category term="data portability" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img alt="fffb.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/fffb.jpg" width="106" height="125">Firefox doesn't keep track of the number of users it has but Asa Dotzler, Mozilla's director of community development, <a href="http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/archives/2009/05/firefox_at_270.html">said today</a> that the company estimates that there are 270 million people using the browser.  That's 35% more users than Facebook has signed up for accounts (200 million), and almost triple the number of people Facebook says log in to the social network every day (100 million).</p>

<p><font style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><script type="text/javascript">digg_url = 'http://digg.com/tech_news/Firefox_Could_Be_the_Real_Facebook_Challenger';digg_bgcolor = '#ffffff';digg_skin = 'normal';</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></font><strong>Why compare user numbers between a browser and a social network?  Because there's every reason to believe that the two technologies are converging in the near term future.</strong>  Here's why we believe that Firefox should be Facebook's biggest competition.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>These numbers from Firefox are pretty conservative.  DownloadSquad's Lee Mathews <a href="http://www.downloadsquad.com/2009/05/05/how-many-firefox-users-are-there-mozilla-estimates-270-million/">estimates that the real number could be closer to 340 million Firefox users</a>.  That's three and a half times the number of people Facebook says log in to its service daily.</p>

<p>This isn't an apples and oranges situation, either.</p>

<p>Though we may not be sure about his prediction that Google will act before Firefox, we think Forrester's Jeremiah Owyang offers a very compelling vision of the future of browsers and social networks in his excellent report <a href="http://www.forrester.com/Research/Document/Excerpt/0,7211,46970,00.html">The Future of the Social Web</a>.</p>

<blockquote>"... in a bid to extend the reach of its new browser, Chrome, we expect Google to build OpenID and its associated friend connections into the browser; look for Firefox and eventually Internet Explorer to copy this feature. Facebook and MySpace will also likely build a way for users to surf the Web within the Facebook experience, retaining the social functionality. These connections won't be perfect, but they'll allow social networks to colonize communities and other parts of the Web, extending their experience out to other sites through the shared ID. As a result, in two years, portable identities will become a ubiquitous part of the online experience as they reach maturity."</blockquote>

<p>It's only logical to extrapolate from that analysis that the line between browsers and social networks will become much less clear and the two types of software will very likely compete with each other.  </p>

<h2>The Browser as Social Network, Social Network as Browser</h2>

<p>Within months not years, the Firefox browser is likely to look very, very different.  The company must be scrambling to innovate even more than we can know, now that its primary source of revenue (Google) has launched its own browser.  Both Firefox and Facebook are probably working very hard to figure out new models of generating advertising revenues - something both are dependent on but neither can take for granted.</p>

<p>Three weeks ago we wrote about <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_future_of_firefox_no_tabs_built_in_ubiquity.php">Firefox's plans</a> to build the command-line-type Ubiquity system into the address bar.  That means your "apps" will be accessed and controlled through your browser.  </p>

<center><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/ubiquity_13_screenshot.png"></center>

<p>If Facebook is looking more and more like an Operating System with its app platform, Firefox is too - with the added advantage of having access to apps on the desktop, the web and integrated Rich Internet Applications.  Facebook <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/get_facebook_on_your_desktop_with_new_official_app.php">launched its own desktop interface last week</a> and we would be willing to bet that it is going to become much more browser-like in the near future, but Firefox has a huge running start in that department.</p>

<p>Facebook already has its own frames it uses for links shared through the site, holding the browsing experience inside the Facbook ethos.  It's not hard to imagine a search bar being placed inside that frame.</p>

<p><enter><img alt="facebookbrowser.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/facebookbrowser.jpg"></center></p>

<p>In <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_future_of_firefox_no_tabs_built_in_ubiquity.php">that same post about Ubiquity in Firefox</a> we also looked at the Firefox user experience team's experimentation with removing the tabs from the browser and replacing them with an interface that looks a lot like iTunes.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/no_tabs_firefox.jpg"></p>

<p>Just like iTunes is all about the playlists, organizing content by type and category, Firefox may also start offering ways to organize the information you consume passively by browsing.  Two weeks ago we covered proposals by Firefox lead designer Alex Faaborg <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_offer_new_ways_to_view_data_mock-ups.php">to capture events, location and other microformatted information and serve it up other applications</a> like Google Earth and calender.  </p>

<p>Would Facebook like to build value on top of the data it collects from your browsing around the web?  You'd better believe it would, undoubtedly that's a big part of the vision behind the much celebrated <em>Facebook Connect</em>.  Facebook Connect requires that users give their permission to Facebook each time they want to connect it and the relative handful of pages that support the Connect login system.  Firefox has a huge advantage in that it has de facto permission by users to interact with all the data from all the pages we visit in the browser.  Facebook is going to want that too.</p>

<p>Firefox's Faaborg sees the browser as a first-class player in questions of Identity and Data Portability as well (much like Owyang predicts above).  All Firefox has to do is start offering messaging between users and a News Feed of user activity across all the social networks people use already.  Firefox could use Facebook Connect, for one thing.  How well could Facebook compete with social software that prioritizes multiple personas (work/friends seeing different sides of you) <em>and</em> breaks free from the walled gardens of standard social networking?  Those are approaches that Facebook will no doubt be moving towards soon as well.</p>

<p>Finally, Firefox is <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/what_went_wrong_with_fennec.php">fighting hard in the mobile space</a>.   This is one place where Facebook already has a huge leg up.  It will be a primary point of competition between the two companies in the future.</p>

<p>Facebook has a staff proven very skilled at building fundamentally social software.  That's less the case with Firefox, whose developers and developer ecosystem are grounded in a history of the browser as a private affair.</p>

<p><strong>Picture this, though.</strong>  Add messaging, public profiles and activity streams to Firefox and we can imagine Ashton Kutcher level hype - no problem.  (Firefox is already 300 times bigger than Kutcher, though!)  The browser team may or may not be able to execute on these types of ideas across all their users, but their odds aren't bad and the browser turning social network already has far more active users than the social network turning browser does.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136706</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136706" />
    <title>Comment from TechWraith on 2009-05-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>TechWraith</name>
        <uri>http://www.techwraith.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.techwraith.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Have you taken a look at flock? It builds in a ton of the social features that you talk about here. They do end up using the other social networks as a launching point, but it wouldn't be too hard to imagine them adding in their own social network in the future.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-05T22:26:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136707</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136707" />
    <title>Comment from Tobias on 2009-05-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tobias</name>
        <uri>http://blog.oneriot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.oneriot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Marshal, what's your take on Flock and why/how that fits/doesn't fit in here? Is Flock ahead of it's time, or are its (relatively) low install numbers demonstrating that users dont want their browser to be a social? Also... with Flock switching from FFx to Chrome, does that give Goog an advantage in the social browser race? </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-05T22:31:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136708</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136708" />
    <title>Comment from Ben Werdmuller on 2009-05-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ben Werdmuller</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/bwerdmuller</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/bwerdmuller">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's striking how far Firefox has come - remember that it was originally the lighter, simpler alternative to the more fully-featured Mozilla suite, and as a result became wildly more popular.</p>

<p>I feel strongly that the browser should be invisible; it's a facilitator for the web. As soon as you start adding other functionality, for example identity, you begin placing more and more limits on what the web experience can be. One of the strengths of the web is its flexibility, and there's also no guarantee that any of the extra functionality that's added will take hold (I was looking at my Windows Cardspace settings window just today in vague bemusement).</p>

<p>That's not to say that these layers shouldn't exist, but I'd be inclined to either put them on the web or the plugin level.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-05T22:32:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136709</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136709" />
    <title>Comment from Marshall Kirkpatrick on 2009-05-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Marshall Kirkpatrick</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Last time I tried Flock it was terrible.  Total overkill, crashed, messed with my Twitter API limits, etc.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-05T22:36:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136710</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136710" />
    <title>Comment from Tony on 2009-05-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tony</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/tonyrobots</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/tonyrobots">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is very interesting, and I've no doubt that the distinction between "browser" and social platform will disintegrate eventually. But the problem is that the v1 of a paradigm shifting product like this is likely to be far from perfect, and quite unsettling to users, who always reject change at the outset. If Firefox pushed something like this through its normal upgrade channel as a simple (say) v5.0 release, which is would have to do to even begin to imagine converting that 270-340mm installed userbase, I think there would be a mass exodus, or at the very least a lot of people downgrading/refusing to update.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-05T22:37:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136713</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136713" />
    <title>Comment from Tobias on 2009-05-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tobias</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@tony i think that's correct. FFx does offer a way to, essentially, bling out your browser with all sorts of addons ... a billion of which were downloaded from AMO as of last november... many of them social. But what percentage of users currently install addons - and subsequently keep them as primary functions? I dont know that number, but i'd be shocked if it was significant in relation to the overall FFx user base. i.e. it's just not a mainstream thing yet. In the future? Could well be. Who's going to get there first? Wide open!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-05T22:48:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136714</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136714" />
    <title>Comment from mike on 2009-05-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>mike</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but in the end it's all about monetizing, you can't monetize a browser as much as you can a social networking platform.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.enbargain.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.enbargain.com</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-05T22:48:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136716</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136716" />
    <title>Comment from Einar on 2009-05-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Einar</name>
        <uri>http://www.mobspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mobspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Failing to see your parallels, Marshall. Sure, there are overlaps, but I hardly doubt that MozCorp will build their own social network. Sure, FB may wish to develop a browser but that is not new news..</p>

<p>I think the main point here is of the importance and centrality of the browser to the web now, more than ever. </p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-05T23:00:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136718</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136718" />
    <title>Comment from Tobias on 2009-05-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tobias</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@mike, you could argue that the effective way to monetize both is through search... which makes it more likely that Facebook will move towards the browser rather than FFX moving towards a socnet. (i.e. facebook can move from poorly targeted ads against UGC towards contextual ads against search). FFx already has "the good stuff" (via Google). Why would it bother to head towards the bad stuff (apart from to defend turf/user numbers if a popular socnet - a facebook, a myspace - launched a browser). </p>

<p>disclosure: I have not thought this point through. it could well be flawed  ;-)<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-05T23:02:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136720</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136720" />
    <title>Comment from Marshall Kirkpatrick on 2009-05-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Marshall Kirkpatrick</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Einar, I don't really believe FF will build their own social network.  I think they will stand in the middle of everything and facilitate social networking :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-05T23:06:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136722</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136722" />
    <title>Comment from Einar on 2009-05-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Einar</name>
        <uri>http://www.mobspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mobspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@MarshallK - well, agree w/ you there.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-05T23:24:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136728</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136728" />
    <title>Comment from Tom on 2009-05-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tom</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/tlimongello</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/tlimongello">
        <![CDATA[<p>Marshall, </p>

<p>How come we see the promise of browsers on the desktop as clear as capitalism over communism, but for the past year the future of mobile is apps, apps, apps and specifically not the browser? Articles like yours and the link below about how gaming consoles like xbox and playstation might start to appear in-browser show an almost sure win for browsers, and once the iPhone 3.0 drops with better HTML 5 support even location will work; it already does for the pre and android. </p>

<p>any thoughts?</p>

<p><a href="http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/developers-inspired-by-fantastic-future-of-browser-based-gaming" rel="nofollow">http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/developers-inspired-by-fantastic-future-of-browser-based-gaming</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-05T23:54:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136737</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136737" />
    <title>Comment from runescape gold on 2009-05-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>runescape gold</name>
        <uri>http://www.runescapesell.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.runescapesell.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think the main point here is of the importance and centrality of the browser to the web now, more than ever. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-06T03:36:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136741</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136741" />
    <title>Comment from Hugh on 2009-05-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Hugh</name>
        <uri>http://hughisaacs2.googlepages.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://hughisaacs2.googlepages.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've been thinking about this for a while.</p>

<p>One issue though, is the fact that OpenID needs to update to to be more seamless like Facebook Connect and work like RSS, where you just log into a site and do something like click on a button in your address bar in order to give the site the ability to access your credentials, profile, data and contacts with the ability to check off what you want and don't want to allow (It would be great to see Firefox add-ons with the ability to access your profile data and friends list using something like this).</p>

<p>This could be implemented nicely using OpenID, OAuth, Portable Contacts, Open Social, and XMPP.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-06T04:19:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136743</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136743" />
    <title>Comment from Mike on 2009-05-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mike</name>
        <uri>http://www.intelligendo.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.intelligendo.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>It does seem like the natural next step. I've been using the google apps/firefox/ubiquity combo for awhile now. Aside from the gmail integration ubiquity scripts like twtplus give the browser some incredible social media functionality. But that would be a blog post in itself. It would be nice to see the "killer app" for that integration come from an open source project like Mozilla though so I hope you guys are right.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-06T04:44:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136744</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136744" />
    <title>Comment from Jerome Ryckborst on 2009-05-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jerome Ryckborst</name>
        <uri>http://FiveSketches.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://FiveSketches.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of the argument that Microsoft made some years ago in various antitrust cases: that the browser was an integral part of the operating system.</p>

<p>In that case, never mind FireFox or Facebook. Microsoft won't let Windows or Internet Explorer die without a fight.</p>

<p>And ... who was it that bought a piece of Facebook a year or two ago? Hmm.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-06T05:20:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136745</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136745" />
    <title>Comment from Evan Sharp on 2009-05-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Evan Sharp</name>
        <uri>http://evansharp.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://evansharp.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Re: the Firefox interface mockups . . .</p>

<p>It's funny, even Apple doesn't exploit the sidebar to its fullest potential.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.evansharp.com/2009/01/document-metadata-and-the-finder-part-i/" rel="nofollow">http://www.evansharp.com/2009/01/document-metadata-and-the-finder-part-i/</a></p>

<p>Where do you draw the line between integration/aggregation of software platforms, and overload from sheer quantity of information? Sure, you can filter everything - but filtering interfaces, for all of their power, have yet to be used on a broad level in an sort of fast and intuitive way. Even Smart folders on OS X don't have the quick editing flexibility I want during day-to-day searches on my local machine.</p>

<p>Just a provocation.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-06T05:26:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136747</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136747" />
    <title>Comment from Lloyd Budd on 2009-05-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Lloyd Budd</name>
        <uri>http://foolswisdom.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://foolswisdom.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Excellent article!</p>

<p>"Firefox doesn't keep track of the number of users it" could be misinterpreted. I'm sure they feverishly try to make as good of estimates as possible without encroaching on privacy, though it sounds hipper when Asa writes "that's something we're not interested in changing just for the sake of better accounting" ;-)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-06T06:07:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136763</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136763" />
    <title>Comment from Html To Pdf on 2009-05-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Html To Pdf</name>
        <uri>http://www.html-to-pdf.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.html-to-pdf.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>I believe a browser should be something very light, very easy to use.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-06T10:32:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136774</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136774" />
    <title>Comment from Chance on 2009-05-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Chance</name>
        <uri>http://billybuddy.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://billybuddy.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have downloaded every version of firefox and for a long time was an ambassador, spreading the Gospel of FF. I now use Chrome almost exclusively...but do not evangelize it. I just use it. I like that it is smaller, simpler, doesn't try to do too much but for some reason I don't toot its horn. I think the programmers are filling the void that FF used to fill...it is like the pages and blogs are better and with Chrome the navigating experience is better.</p>

<p>Some things I can't use chrome on (my vpn, sling box) but 98% of the surfing I do is Chromatic.</p>

<p>I am also a facebook crackhead. I use it almost like a social email.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-06T12:23:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136778</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136778" />
    <title>Comment from Shelley on 2009-05-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Shelley</name>
        <uri>http://realtech.burningbird.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://realtech.burningbird.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>Firefox challenging Facebook is about a viable topic as RSS is dead and Twitter killed it. </p>

<p>They really are apples and oranges. No, really.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-06T12:53:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136781</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136781" />
    <title>Comment from Allen on 2009-05-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Allen</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Right now I think Firefox should focus on being the best browser. Their competition is not facebook (facebook as an operating system?  what kind of web x.0 drugs are you smoking! Is it web 2.0 or 3.0 these days? who cares!): Firefox's competition is their sponsor Google.  </p>

<p>Chrome is focusing on the user experience. Mozilla-Firefox seem to be lost in feature-bloat-land.  The way Chrome out performs Firefox and the resources Google have to throw at it: Chrome is Firefox's greatest threat.</p>

<p>I didn't switch to Firefox because of any anti m$ sentiment. I did it because it was a superior product.  The only things holding me back from switching to Chrome are greasemonkey and firebug.</p>

<p>If firefox switch their attention to competing with facebook (a company that is yet to find a sustainable business model) they will go the way of their ancestors.  I'm sure some people still use Mozaic, and a few more still use Netscape, but unless they lift their game, M$ explorer 8 or Chrome are going to put Firefox into the same basket.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-06T12:58:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136788</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136788" />
    <title>Comment from Walter Roark on 2009-05-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Walter Roark</name>
        <uri>http://www.socialmediabuyingguide.org/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.socialmediabuyingguide.org/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I wouldn't doubt any of these scenarios coming to fruition, whole or in part. Firefox has come a really long way in a relatively short time. One thing about the internet——change is constant. Rapid change by historic standards. Remember when the tech community was in awe of Netscape...a stand-alone company, darling of Wall Street with stock valued around $100 per share? What about AOL and its take over of Time-Warner? These events seem implausible now, but they weren't that long ago (well, maybe a lifetime in web years).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-06T13:49:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136793</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136793" />
    <title>Comment from george.elliott2002 on 2009-05-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>george.elliott2002</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>You outlined the reasons that Firefox, Facebook and Twitter should merge.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-06T14:30:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136797</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136797" />
    <title>Comment from Michael Myers on 2009-05-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Michael Myers</name>
        <uri>http://michaelmyers.biz</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://michaelmyers.biz">
        <![CDATA[<p>Great post! Excited to see this happen and this convergence will allow for personalized marketing via our online (transferable via OpenID) personas. I posted about the impact of this trend in September. Take a look: <a href="http://www.michaelmyers.biz/CRUCES/your-browser-is-your-online-persona" rel="nofollow">http://www.michaelmyers.biz/CRUCES/your-browser-is-your-online-persona</a> </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-06T14:51:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136808</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136808" />
    <title>Comment from Charles Palma on 2009-05-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Charles Palma</name>
        <uri>http://www.brandingyp.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.brandingyp.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Firefox + Twitter + Facebook = Bigger than Google?</p>

<p>Hmm... That's a bad idea... It reduces the competition 'cause the merged company will be come too powerful to overthrow. </p>

<p>Technology gets discovered fast through competition. :(</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-06T15:28:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136809</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136809" />
    <title>Comment from Björn on 2009-05-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Björn</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/bjoernklose</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/bjoernklose">
        <![CDATA[<p>As a chrome convert, I can support the need for a viable plugin structure over here. But that would mostly revolve around greasemonkey and identity integration. As with the "market" for firefox addons, having Javascript as a dev basis opens up a huge opportunity to developers, if there is a proper way to have a user opt in. XUL is just not feasible for the average jQuery or widget developer. And restarting my browser to use a new addon isn't either. I'm thinking about a cross between AppJet and AppEngine from the developer perspective, and a simple RSS-button like experience ("12 userscripts/commands available for this domain") from a UX standpoint. If you add the possibility to have loose userscript and ubiquity command bundles, it's on. In the end, it's about the end to end experience for developers and users alike. And on that point, the App Store should be an example. Micropayment could be a part of this. But regarding the tech, it's clearly html 5 and javascript (e.g. WebOS, webkit in general). FBML or XUL loose, and...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-06T15:32:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136814</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136814" />
    <title>Comment from Alex on 2009-05-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Alex</name>
        <uri>http://www.mioamoredesign.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mioamoredesign.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I love Firefox and make every effort to let everyone I know about it.  I think the best part about it actually are the plugins which really make it stand out.  Sort of like the iPhone and the App Store!   I can see the convergence of the two!  Very interesting!  =)</p>

<p>Alex - Professional Cutie<br />
www.mioamoredesign.com</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-06T15:49:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136824</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136824" />
    <title>Comment from JamesAven on 2009-05-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>JamesAven</name>
        <uri>http://www.epostmailer.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.epostmailer.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>The greatest benefit of Facebook is that it has many groups on the site that you can join. So if you are interested in Chicago Cubs you can research Chicago Cubs in the groups section and you will be able to find friends on there that like the Cubs. This is just one example, I know that you can join groups of your favorite football team, television show, or whatever you want for the most part! If you can't find a group for your interest, you can simply create one!</p>

<p><a href="http://www.emailcharger.com/" rel="nofollow"> <a href="http://EmailCharger.com" rel="nofollow">http://EmailCharger.com</a> </a><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-06T16:42:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136838</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136838" />
    <title>Comment from Amanda on 2009-05-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Amanda</name>
        <uri>http://www.blankcalendars.org/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.blankcalendars.org/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Firefox's default page with search surely makes them a large revenue.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-06T17:46:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136839</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136839" />
    <title>Comment from Martin Roberts on 2009-05-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Martin Roberts</name>
        <uri>http://refmoney.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://refmoney.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I like Facebookl.  It provides many groups you can join, depending on what you like.  It could rival similar systems in the future.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-06T17:47:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136840</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136840" />
    <title>Comment from Spammy on 2009-05-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Spammy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Firefox totally rocks dude, totally!</p>

<p>RT<br />
www.privacy-web.net.tc</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-06T17:51:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136841</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136841" />
    <title>Comment from Matt on 2009-05-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Matt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I usually don't comment on stories like this - but doesn't this just sound like everything is going back to an AOL / Netscape type of formula?  Granted, they were light on the social networking - but doesn't it seem like browers are building themselves up to be the contained Internet experience?  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-06T17:58:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136846</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136846" />
    <title>Comment from Krisj on 2009-05-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Krisj</name>
        <uri>http://meerkating.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://meerkating.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>My guess would be that Firefox will win. Function will always win over the form at the end. Facebook is more about the form right now. Or is it?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-06T18:21:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136898</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136898" />
    <title>Comment from Uncle Fishbits on 2009-05-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Uncle Fishbits</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/unclefishbits</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/unclefishbits">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.... it is odd that flock is so vilified. I have a unique perspective that I am relatively new to the trenches of social media, as I used to be a property level manager for hotels. I think I installed Flock in November? This reminds me of the situation with what I think was likely the best social media site EVER... tribe.net. It was great, basically broke and had so much downtime/maintance time that people eventually moved on. Sure it works again, but the massive disruption to the overall networking effect basically killed it. Same thing with Flock. The negative experience people had at the outset was so incredibly bad that no one even considers it at this point, although it seems to be an asset to me. Here's what I have experienced so far: If you have a small browser, it may be hard to use with the sidebars open. However, that is the last negative thing you will get from me. The crashing people talk about has been resolved. I am fairly confident saying it has never crashed on me, unlike both chrome and FF. The memory...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-07T02:40:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136904</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136904" />
    <title>Comment from Freddy on 2009-05-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Freddy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I hate Facebook. I find it eerie knowing stuff about people without them knowing i know. It's hard to look people in the eye sometimes. If FB and FF hook up it will be bye bye FF from me.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-07T04:12:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136942</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136942" />
    <title>Comment from Zackatoustra on 2009-05-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Zackatoustra</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/zackatoustra</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/zackatoustra">
        <![CDATA[<p>Fantastic.<br />
That means that we can't wait for the applications to change the web. That means that without the efforts of the browsers, they won't be real social web. <br />
And, if you ask me, I'm so glad the Mozilla Foundation is the one building all this!</p>

<p>And, as for Flock, i've been using it some times ago, and didn't convince me at all.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-07T11:52:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136962</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136962" />
    <title>Comment from Richard Mesquita on 2009-05-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard Mesquita</name>
        <uri>http://www.publicworkscomics.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.publicworkscomics.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>So...you are saying that Firefox, facebook, twiter should merge? </p>

<p><a href="http://www.publicworkscomics.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.publicworkscomics.com</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-07T14:41:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136976</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136976" />
    <title>Comment from beni gumbelt on 2009-05-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>beni gumbelt</name>
        <uri>http://ngenet.web.id</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://ngenet.web.id">
        <![CDATA[<p>it's nice add-on.. i like this..thanks for your article, i have appiled it at my firefox</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-07T15:48:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:136982</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c136982" />
    <title>Comment from Voice Talent on 2009-05-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Voice Talent</name>
        <uri>http://amazingvoicetalent.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://amazingvoicetalent.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Great article!  I love everything abut Firefox! </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-07T16:26:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:137196</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c137196" />
    <title>Comment from jake on 2009-05-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>jake</name>
        <uri>http://j.h.@.hotmail.co.uk</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://j.h.@.hotmail.co.uk">
        <![CDATA[<p>friefox is trustable</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-08T19:43:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:137255</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c137255" />
    <title>Comment from thegeniusfiles on 2009-05-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>thegeniusfiles</name>
        <uri>http://www.thegeniusfiles.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thegeniusfiles.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Using Facebook is like drawing with crayons: fun, colorful, but always has a crude childlike quality to it. Firefox has a lot more possibilities and is a more polished product. My money on Firefox for the win.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-09T18:47:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:137274</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c137274" />
    <title>Comment from medlaw on 2009-05-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>medlaw</name>
        <uri>http://www.medlawplus.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.medlawplus.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I really think gmail is huge threat to facebook.  Firefox, if it were me picking the target, should aim for twitter / delicious.  Here is the distinction.  Facebook is not really a publishing platform per se in that it is a closed communications platform limited to the user's circle of friends.  Gmail is similar in that there is closed chat plus it has document sharing.  Facebook acts to aggregrate all your other social networking activities in one place.  It would be easy enough for gmail to create profiles only viewable by friends with features at least as good as facebook.  How many gmail users are there out there? 100 or 150 million?  Big threat to facebook if google wanted to be.</p>

<p>The reason I say firefox could aim for twitter / delicious is that firefox, as a browser, could easily aggregate browsing data that is then published.  Instead of bookmarking a page, let's say I hit a button with posts the page to my public firefox account--(user name) reading "title of article" on readwriteweb.com--URL.  I am then given the option to write some comment about the page I am reading.  This is published.  Others can comment on my comments.  All posts to this firefox service can be searched.  The firefox browser would both send and receive messages through this service.  Unfortunately, there is already a twitter plugin for firefox.  It does everything listed above.  Firefox would have to come up with some sort of a competitive advantage.  Personally, I think twitter is already a monster showing no signs of slowing down.  It's quite a dragon for somebody even on the scale of firefox to take down.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-10T02:03:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:137346</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c137346" />
    <title>Comment from Nicholas Finnegan&apos;s Need Self Esteem on 2009-05-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nicholas Finnegan&apos;s Need Self Esteem</name>
        <uri>http://www.nicholasfinnegan.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.nicholasfinnegan.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I love fierfox it's the only broweser I like to use. It crashes sometimes though. As for face book I'm can't seem to keep away from it. 200 million users is ALOT! of traffic everyday! lol! Whichever directions these company go in they will always be at the top of internet mainstream!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-11T01:57:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:137361</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c137361" />
    <title>Comment from Clint on 2009-05-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Clint</name>
        <uri>http://spikedwall.wordpress.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://spikedwall.wordpress.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Removing tabs from the browser would be a bad idea. The thumbnail cover flow thing is a novelty; nothing more.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-11T04:34:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:137363</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c137363" />
    <title>Comment from technogran on 2009-05-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>technogran</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Haven't you heard of Flock? Why oh why do users and people such as yourselves completely miss this browser? If what you say is true then they are all really playing catch up in my opinion! <br />
Flock has been allowing users to both view and update ALL of their social networks for at least the last two years, and the guys behind it were brilliant enough to anticapate ALL of this social networking and that users would want to keep tabs on it all on one screen! (my world) <br />
As its built on Firefox I find it extraordinary that everyone but everyone seems to have missed this great browser and just how powerful its integration with just about every social network out there is! Take a look,set it up and see what I mean <a href="http://www.flock.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.flock.com</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-11T04:54:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:137374</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c137374" />
    <title>Comment from Rashidi on 2009-05-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rashidi</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This year, we are making plans to move away from IE in the corporate workplace. Firefox allows us to do more, its convergence with social media apps means that we can extend our workplace to allow greater collaboration and individual creativity.</p>

<p>The challenge is always going to "resistance to change" its something we are planning to tackle head on with a serious of workshops and seminars with all our companies to explain the benefits. I want to commend the author of the article for articulating my feelings on the subject so eloquently.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-11T05:55:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:137387</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c137387" />
    <title>Comment from Alex on 2009-05-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Alex</name>
        <uri>http://www.sponks.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sponks.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>First Google Friends Connect with 3D view mode:<br />
<a href="http://www.sponks.com/fans.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.sponks.com/fans.php</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-11T08:48:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:137749</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c137749" />
    <title>Comment from mechape on 2009-05-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>mechape</name>
        <uri>http://mechape.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mechape.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
Firefox is OPEN SOURCE and that makes him very different from I don't-know-what-you-talking-about FB. All I know about FB is that they notoriously steal user information.<br />
I won't tuch FB ever. I'm using Gentoo Linux and compiling the code. <br />
Number two, the whole model of corporate internet is going to die. There will be another Net, not associated with american goverment and greedy .com . Once people start building distributed WiFi networks, most of social activity will be there, because ? After all, people will become paranoic about their privacy.</p>

<p>To the topic: Facebook is nothing special, will die within 3-4 years. Livejournal was much better 8 years ago for that time. I'm not speaking about Myspace crap, sorry.  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-13T11:01:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:138491</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c138491" />
    <title>Comment from powerlevelingz on 2009-05-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>powerlevelingz</name>
        <uri>http://www.powerlevelingz.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.powerlevelingz.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's funny, even Apple doesn't exploit the sidebar to its fullest potential.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-18T08:52:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:138492</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c138492" />
    <title>Comment from 4urpower on 2009-05-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>4urpower</name>
        <uri>http://www.4urpower.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.4urpower.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>All I know about FB is that they notoriously steal user information.<br />
I won't tuch FB ever. I'm using Gentoo Linux and compiling the code. I like it!!<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-18T08:53:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:141234</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c141234" />
    <title>Comment from eniyimuzik on 2009-06-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>eniyimuzik</name>
        <uri>http://www.eniyimuzik.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.eniyimuzik.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>My guess would be that Firefox will win. Function will always win over the form at the end. Facebook is more about the form right now. Or is it?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-06T15:11:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:156717</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c156717" />
    <title>Comment from ed hardy  on 2009-09-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>ed hardy </name>
        <uri>http://www.edhardyuk.co.uk</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.edhardyuk.co.uk">
        <![CDATA[<p>Within months not years, the Firefox browser is likely to look very, very different. The company must be scrambling to innovate even more than we can know,</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-09-09T09:19:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924-comment:158905</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14924" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_could_be_the_real_facebook_challenger.php#c158905" />
    <title>Comment from Mony on 2009-09-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mony</name>
        <uri>http://reviewsmyfavourite.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://reviewsmyfavourite.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have seen many comparison like Firefox vs IE, Firefox vs Google chrome, but.. comparing Firefox with Facebook really different.  This is a very different perspective and I got more knowledge about the future.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-09-22T10:07:42Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>