<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271-</id>
  <updated>2009-11-23T00:21:25Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Bing Off to a Good Start: Takes #2 Spot Ahead of Yahoo</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=15271" title="Bing Off to a Good Start: Takes #2 Spot Ahead of Yahoo" />
    <published>2009-06-05T16:03:27Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-05T20:19:11Z</updated>
    <title>Bing Off to a Good Start: Takes #2 Spot Ahead of Yahoo</title>
    <summary>With Bing, Microsoft is definitely trying to make a difference in the search engine market, and while Microsoft&apos;s new search engine only launched less than a week ago, web analytics provider StatCounter released some interesting data this morning which shows Bing in the #2 spot ahead of Yahoo Search, and, of course, behind Google. What...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Frederic Lardinois</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Microsoft" />
    
    <category term="NYT" />
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <category term="Search Services" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img alt="bing_logo_may09.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/image/bing_logo_may09.png" />With <a href="http://bing.com">Bing</a>, Microsoft is definitely trying to make a difference in the search engine market, and while Microsoft's new search engine only <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_goes_live.php">launched</a> less than a week ago, web analytics provider StatCounter released <a href="http://gs.statcounter.com/press/bing-overtakes-yahoo/">some interesting data</a> this morning which shows Bing in the #2 spot ahead of Yahoo Search, and, of course, behind Google. What is interesting, though, is that Bing is mostly taking market share from Google, while the stats for Yahoo Search and AOL have remained stable. According to StatCount, Bing reached a 15.6% market share in the U.S. yesterday (Live Search never made it past 7%), while Google's share was down almost 6%.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Worldwide, StatCounter also sees Bing ahead of Yahoo, but only by less than half a percent (5.17% vs. 5.56%). </p>

<p>Some of this new interest in Microsoft's search engine was definitely driven by curiosity, but unlike other (failed) entries into the search engine market like Cuil, Bing actually delivers as a search engine, which should help Microsoft to retain a good chunk of these users. Of course, Microsoft's $80 million advertising blitz is definitely helping Bing as well, and based on our own experience, it is clear that Bing's marketing and PR campaign is reaching a lot of non-geeks and late adopters who would not typically go out of their way to try a new search engine.</p>

<p>We have to say, though, that our own stats don't corroborate StatCounter's findings. In our own analytics, Bing is barely visible, with Yahoo bringing us at least three times as many visitors. We are, however, not surprised to hear that a lot of users are checking Bing out right now.</p>

<div style="width: 600px; height: 400px" id="search_engine-US-daily-20090529-20090604" height="400" width="600"><object id="search_engine-US-daily-20090529-20090604-chart" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" width="600" height="400"><param name="_cx" value="15875"><param name="_cy" value="10583"><param name="FlashVars" value=""><param name="Movie" value="http://gs.statcounter.com/MSLine.swf"><param name="Src" value="http://gs.statcounter.com/MSLine.swf"><param name="WMode" value="Opaque"><param name="Play" value="0"><param name="Loop" value="-1"><param name="Quality" value="High"><param name="SAlign" value="LT"><param name="Menu" value="-1"><param name="Base" value=""><param name="AllowScriptAccess" value="always"><param name="Scale" value="NoScale"><param name="DeviceFont" value="0"><param name="EmbedMovie" value="0"><param name="BGColor" value=""><param name="SWRemote" value=""><param name="MovieData" value=""><param name="SeamlessTabbing" value="1"><param name="Profile" value="0"><param name="ProfileAddress" value=""><param name="ProfilePort" value="0"><param name="AllowNetworking" value="all"><param name="AllowFullScreen" value="false"></object></div>
<!-- You may change the values of width and height above to resize the chart -->

<p>Source: <a href="http://gs.statcounter.com/#search_engine-US-daily-20090529-20090604">StatCounter Global Stats - Search Engine Market Share</a></p>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.statcounter.com/js/FusionCharts.js"></script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://gs.statcounter.com/chart.php?search_engine-US-daily-20090529-20090604"></script>

<h2>Does Microsoft Still Need Yahoo Search?</h2>

<p>If these stats hold up over the next few weeks, it will be interesting to see if we will still hear any chatter about Microsoft acquiring Yahoo's search assets in order to become a bigger player in the search engine market. Today, a combined Yahoo and Microsoft search engine could control almost 25% of the market. In an interview with PC Magazine this morning, Yahoo's CEO, Carol Bartz, <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2348275,00.asp">argued </a>that Yahoo was not under any pressure to make a deal with Microsoft, and that she thinks that any lift that Microsoft is seeing in the search market right now would only be temporary.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271-comment:141092</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php#c141092" />
    <title>Comment from Tina Bean on 2009-06-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tina Bean</name>
        <uri>http://visistat.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://visistat.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Great article about Bing’s relevance. VisiStat’s real-time web analytics now showcases Bing as a relevant search engine. Check it out at VisiStat.com.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-05T17:16:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271-comment:141094</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php#c141094" />
    <title>Comment from Giochi on 2009-06-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Giochi</name>
        <uri>http://www.giochiapalla.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.giochiapalla.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>interesting post, but we should wait a little bit more to see if bing.com is going to retain these visits or not</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-05T17:47:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271-comment:141097</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php#c141097" />
    <title>Comment from Sachin on 2009-06-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sachin</name>
        <uri>http://qtp.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://qtp.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I agree with this. Bings results are much like google results and moreover since its launch day many  readers are coming to my blog from bing. Rather we can say that Bing is ligh years ahead than cuil.com</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-05T18:04:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271-comment:141098</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php#c141098" />
    <title>Comment from Sachin on 2009-06-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sachin</name>
        <uri>http://qtp.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://qtp.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I agree with this. Bings results are much like google results and moreover since its launch day many readers are coming to my blog from bing. Rather we can say that Bing is ligh years ahead than cuil.com</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-05T18:06:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271-comment:141099</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php#c141099" />
    <title>Comment from blasis on 2009-06-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>blasis</name>
        <uri>http://officialtech.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://officialtech.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Great article about Bing’s relevance <br />
for my opinion Bing is a copy of google search engines</p>

<p><br />
<a href="http://officialtech.com/" rel="nofollow">http://officialtech.com/</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-05T18:09:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271-comment:141100</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php#c141100" />
    <title>Comment from Bob on 2009-06-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Bob</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Bing's launch got a ton of press.  Let's see how long it's success lasts after the novelty wears off.  I wish MS well.  But, seeing as how it's never been all that successful online, I'm skeptical. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-05T18:18:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271-comment:141105</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php#c141105" />
    <title>Comment from empirestatebuddy on 2009-06-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>empirestatebuddy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't really know much about Carol Bartz, but I've read a few interviews/comments by her over the past few weeks and... she seems rather arrogant (as opposed to confident). She says that she feels no added pressure because of Bing (Uh, well... she SHOULD!). Who knows whether Bing's numbers will hold-up or improve (it's still early), but for Bartz to be so arrogant would make me nervous if I was holding any Yahoo stock. I predicted a few days ago (before these numbers came out), that Yahoo will probably go the way of AOL. If Bing becomes a bonefied hit, it may happen even faster than I predicted...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-05T18:57:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271-comment:141106</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php#c141106" />
    <title>Comment from empirestatebuddy on 2009-06-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>empirestatebuddy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Just one other point... for those who say that Bing is a Google clone... that's simply not true. I mean, yes, if you just do a general search, they're pretty equal (in fact, I give Google an edge here). BUT... if you're looking for flights or shopping for a netbook... and you click on Bing's "shopping" or "travel" links, Bing is superior to Google. I really don't see how someone could argue otherwise. It's just easier with Bing</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-05T19:03:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271-comment:141109</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php#c141109" />
    <title>Comment from C_Urrea on 2009-06-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>C_Urrea</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p> Gee, there couldn't be any possible correlation between MS making "Dink" the default search for all IE users at THE SAME TIME. Don't get your hopes up, that was the ONLY way MS could get a share like that. Doubt it will ever happen again to!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-05T19:15:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271-comment:141110</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php#c141110" />
    <title>Comment from C_Urrea on 2009-06-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>C_Urrea</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Gee, did ANYONE notice the correlation between the time MS made "Dink" the default browser for IE and these numbers? What a cheat. Doubt it will ever happen again too.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-05T19:19:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271-comment:141115</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php#c141115" />
    <title>Comment from Rafa on 2009-06-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rafa</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Completely agree with #9 by C Urrea - this is just the effect of forcing this search engine into IE users. Why are you deliberately ignoring this in the article? It's evident...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-05T19:26:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271-comment:141122</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php#c141122" />
    <title>Comment from Marco on 2009-06-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Marco</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This might be a big shift. The question now is how this will affect lots of paid search budgets, as in: <a href="http://domusinc.blogspot.com/2009/06/does-microsoft-bing-change-paid-search.html" rel="nofollow">Does Microsoft Bing Change Paid Search?</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-05T20:37:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271-comment:141125</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php#c141125" />
    <title>Comment from Greene.Consulting on 2009-06-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Greene.Consulting</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I found that MS has some code in there that seem to ID your location and I don't like it..<br />
I played with Bing and its just hype and Bling with some dark side MS programing.<br />
If you done edting to you FF browser it ok but anyone using this with IE will get over loaded with Ads i bet from MS partners(you the 1000 of spam companies the paid MS so the can get left of the the Spma and AV detection) <br />
and WTH is that back drop for? ITs click able? WH!! WHY who NEEd IT? This will just download more date into memory/ hard drive to slow your system down.<br />
Hell my AV software when nutz and would not let run what ever it was trying to do in a video search in FF  in Flock it did but pre-loading video with re-direct to MS data center to store your search info inf i was in IE and on MS live ANY data would be recorded..DO you want your date recored?  </p>

<p>Bing is just as I said Hype and MS Bling that turns out to be just all plated BS again  just as Win 7 is Vista lite and will be the same hype as Vista </p>

<p>GC</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-05T21:40:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271-comment:141127</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php#c141127" />
    <title>Comment from ObjectiveSearcher on 2009-06-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>ObjectiveSearcher</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>{what C_Urrea said}</p>

<p>MS is preying on the less tech-savvy while they still can. </p>

<p>Y'all better count your lucky stars that Google continues to have success. They're pretty much the only hope to finally challenging Microsoft's OS monopoly (the power of which is on display with their rapid promotion of Bing).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-05T22:23:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271-comment:141242</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php#c141242" />
    <title>Comment from George St John on 2009-06-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>George St John</name>
        <uri>http://www.ghq.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ghq.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Bing is a replacement name for live.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-06T17:16:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271-comment:141365</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php#c141365" />
    <title>Comment from Fleshlight Reviews on 2009-06-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Fleshlight Reviews</name>
        <uri>http://fleshjoe.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://fleshjoe.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>This bump is obviously a result of the "error" of Bing forcefully changing IE's default search engine. Some error, eh? Well, now that that's fixed, we'll see how long this artificial bump lasts.</p>

<p>If anything, this shows the dismal marketshare of IE -- only 18%?! I'd expect a hugely larger number than that. What's the real number of IE users left out there? Hey you neanderthals, wake up and switch to FF :)<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-07T22:18:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271-comment:141401</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php#c141401" />
    <title>Comment from free virtual world for kids on 2009-06-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>free virtual world for kids</name>
        <uri>http://www.wiglingtonandwenks.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wiglingtonandwenks.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Let's see how long Bing holds up.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-08T05:21:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271-comment:141403</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php#c141403" />
    <title>Comment from Marco on 2009-06-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Marco</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Why is there so much emotion (positive and negative) when a news story focuses on Microsoft? Let's stick with the facts and how they might or might not impact us. In what ways is Bing better or worse than Google or Yahoo? How will (or should) Bing's introduction affect marketers? Here are my newest <a href="http://domusinc.blogspot.com/2009/06/bing-yahoo-google-few-new-thoughts.html" rel="nofollow">thoughts on Bing, Yahoo!, and Google.</a><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-08T05:38:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271-comment:144500</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php#c144500" />
    <title>Comment from AKC on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>AKC</name>
        <uri>http://achugh.wordpress.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://achugh.wordpress.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>It is too early to just write off Bing. Microsoft may have made a mistake with Live but this time they seem to be better prepared. Bing, within a short time span, has managed to move ahead of Yahoo...however, no doubt, it would need to stick around to challenge Google supermacy. We will have to just wait and watch.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T13:38:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271-comment:148895</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php#c148895" />
    <title>Comment from techno on 2009-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>techno</name>
        <uri>http://yarismak.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://yarismak.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Great article about Bing’s relevance<br />
for my opinion Bing is a copy of google search engines<br />
<a href="http://yarismak.com" rel="nofollow">http://yarismak.com</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-24T16:46:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271-comment:169369</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php#c169369" />
    <title>Comment from Sanovnik on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sanovnik</name>
        <uri>http://www.sanovnik-snova.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sanovnik-snova.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>As the Sopranos would say.<br />
BadaBING.<br />
They coming in hard.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T14:16:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271-comment:169939</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_off_to_a_good_start_takes_2_spot_ahead_of_yahoo.php#c169939" />
    <title>Comment from Giochi Gratis on 2009-11-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Giochi Gratis</name>
        <uri>http://www.giocogiochi.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.giocogiochi.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I love bing, after google it's my biggest source of traffic</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-21T12:05:50Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>