<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/webcasters_finally_reach_deal_with_music_labels.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15637-</id>
  <updated>2009-11-23T16:41:16Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Pandora Will Live On: Webcasters Finally Reach New Deal with Music Labels</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15637</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/webcasters_finally_reach_deal_with_music_labels.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=15637" title="Pandora Will Live On: Webcasters Finally Reach New Deal with Music Labels" />
    <published>2009-07-07T19:48:38Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-07T21:43:01Z</updated>
    <title>Pandora Will Live On: Webcasters Finally Reach New Deal with Music Labels</title>
    <summary>After years of wrangling and imminent doom constantly hanging over their heads, Pandora and other webcasters like AOL Radio have finally managed to work out a new deal with the music industry that should ensure the survival of their businesses for the next few years. Under this deal, large webcasters with revenue over $1.25 million...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Frederic Lardinois</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img alt="soundexchange_logo_jul09.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/soundexchange_logo_jul09.png"  />After <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/pandora_save_internet_radio.php">years</a> of <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/pandoras_issues_a_call_to_arms.php">wrangling</a> and <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/pandora_on_the_verge_of_closing_shop.php">imminent doom</a> constantly hanging over their heads, <a href="http://pandora.com">Pandora</a> and other webcasters like AOL Radio have finally managed to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/technology/internet/08radio.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss">work out a new deal</a> with the music industry that should ensure the survival of their businesses for the next few years. Under this deal, large webcasters with revenue over $1.25 million will pay the greater of 25% of their revenue, or a fixed price per song, which will increase from 0.08 cents to 0.14 cents in 2015. Services with less than $1.25 million in revenue will have to pay 12 to 14% of their revenue.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Earlier this year, <a href="http://www.soundexchange.com/">SoundExchange</a>, the non-profit performance rights organization charged with collecting royalties from satellite and Internet radio stations, was trying to get webcasters to pay 0.19 cents per song, a price that few businesses were able to pay and which could have meant the end of services like Pandora.</p>

<p>As the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/technology/internet/08radio.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss">New York Times</a> reports, John Simson, the executive director of SoundExchange, still argues that the original rates would have been "appropriate and fair," but he admits that these new rates will give "webcasters the opportunity to flesh out various business models and the creators of music the opportunity to share in the success their recordings generate."</p>

<p>Tim Westgren, Pandora's founder, <a href="http://blog.pandora.com/pandora/archives/2009/07/important_updat_1.html">points out</a> that this is not an ideal solution, but that this deal "still represents a thoughtful and reasoned outcome under the circumstances."</p>

<h2>Some Changes for Pandora</h2>

<p>At least <a href="http://blog.pandora.com/pandora/archives/2009/07/important_updat_1.html">for Pandora</a>, however, this will also mean that a small number of users who stream more than 40 hours of music per month will have to pay 0.99$ if they want to hear more music on Pandora during that month. Pandora says this will only affect about 10% of its user base and those users, of course, could also upgrade to Pandora's desktop player, Pandora One.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15637-comment:145891</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15637" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/webcasters_finally_reach_deal_with_music_labels.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/webcasters_finally_reach_deal_with_music_labels.php#c145891" />
    <title>Comment from Alan on 2009-07-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Alan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Given Mr Simpson's comments regarding the new deal, it sounds like he is still hoping to get more money out of webcasters down the line, but is prepared to settle for less for now and wait for the new rates to force the ranks of webcasters to reorganise, and possibly thin out a bit (as some will still struggle to stay afloat, I suspect), leaving a reduced opposition to further increases when the times comes around for new negotiations...</p>

<p>Sadly, I am currently denied the pleasures of Pandora, due to restrictions placed on them by copyright holders, but I do use (and subscribe to) Last.fm, and also pay a subscription towards SomaFM, having used both services extensively over the last few years.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-07T20:29:42Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>