<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/practise_fusion_partners_with_salesforce.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2011:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15977-</id>
  <updated>2011-08-16T16:51:26Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Practice Fusion Partners With Salesforce - But Is Cloud Computing Suitable For Healthcare?</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.35-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15977</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/practise_fusion_partners_with_salesforce.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=15977" title="Practice Fusion Partners With Salesforce - But Is Cloud Computing Suitable For Healthcare?" />
    <published>2009-08-07T05:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-08-07T05:09:26Z</updated>
    <title>Practice Fusion Partners With Salesforce - But Is Cloud Computing Suitable For Healthcare?</title>
    <summary>One year ago we reviewed a new health app called Practice Fusion, a free, web-based EMR (electronic medical record) system for physicians. This week Practice Fusion announced an investment, amount not disclosed, by salesforce.com. They also announced the upcoming launch of their patient health record (PHR) application on Force.com, salesforce.com&apos;s cloud computing platform. With these...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Cloud Computing" />
    
    <category term="Health" />
    
    <category term="NYT" />
    
    <category term="Product Reviews" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/practice_fusion_logo_aug09b.jpg" />One year ago <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/practice_fusion.php">we reviewed a new health app</a> called <a href="http://www.practicefusion.com/">Practice Fusion</a>, a free, web-based EMR (electronic medical record) system for physicians. This week Practice Fusion announced an investment, amount not disclosed, by salesforce.com. They also announced the upcoming launch of their patient health record (PHR) application on Force.com, salesforce.com's <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/enterprise/2009/06/take-your-sites-to-the-cloud-with-forcecom.php">cloud computing platform</a>. With these announcements, now seems an appropriate time for a check-up of Practice Fusion. How is its own health and what are the implications of partnering with salesforce.com?</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>One year after our initial review,  the company is still going strong. The product was being promoted in August 2008 as a 'Google Apps for doctors', providing patient management, scheduling, secure email and more. However, as we pointed out in our article last year, Practice Fusion is <strong><em>not</em></strong> a competitor to Google Health. Practice Fusion is a physician-centered tool, whereas Google Health and the other bigco services are patient-centered.</p>
<p>Practice Fusion currently has &quot;over 18,000 users,&quot; which would appear to be a big increase on the 1,300 medical professionals they had one year ago. The product originally launched in November of 2007, so it's nearly two years old now.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/practice_fusion_aug09a.jpg" /></p>
<h2>Is Cloud Computing Suitable for Healthcare?</h2>
<p>A post on the Practice Fusion blog today asks the question: <a href="http://practicefusion.typepad.com/weblog/2009/08/is-cloud-computing-right-for-health-it.html">is "cloud computing" right for health IT?</a> We reported earlier this week that cloud computing is infiltrating <a href=" http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_cloud_computing_is_the_future_of_mobile.php">virtually every corner of technology</a> right now, but it <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_cloud_isnt_safe_or_did_blackhat_just_scare_us.php">still has  dangers</a>. We noted the recent hacking of Google Docs to steal internal Twitter documents, as one recent high profile example (high profile because the stolen documents were subsequently emailed to some news outlets, some of whom published the 'hot' docs). </p>
<p>However despite these risks Practice Fusion claims that the cost benefits of cloud computing in healthcare are significant, particularly in its EMR niche:</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>&quot;Cost and poor usability have been cited as the biggest obstacles to adoption of health IT - especially Electronic Health Records (EHR) systems - and has resulted in problematically-low EHR adoption rates. Eliminating this cost, and the IT maintenance burdens that are often beyond the reach of small medical practices, clearly removes these significant roadblocks to EHR adoption.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Security and safety is of course the big potentially negative issue with cloud computing. But Practice Fusion points to several use cases where it says that cloud computing has <em>advantages</em> over desktop apps: disaster-recovery, hacks (because &quot;SaaS providers are able to devote resources to solving security issues that many customers cannot afford&quot;), and privacy. All of those points come down to the premise that a cloud computing / SaaS specialist, such as Practice Fusion, has more expertise, more resources, and is generally better able to deliver those safety and security requirements.</p>
<p>That all sounds great in theory, however every case like the Twitter stolen documents one serves to undermine that argument. And there are just too many such cases right now. </p>
<p>Nevertheless, we're sure that over time cloud computing <em>will</em> become ever more secure. It's clear that Practice Fusion is a young company that is growing well. With Salesforce.com on its side too now, the future looks secure for them.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15977-comment:191483</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15977" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/practise_fusion_partners_with_salesforce.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/practise_fusion_partners_with_salesforce.php#c191483" />
    <title>Comment from Gary Colvin on 2010-02-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>Gary Colvin</name>
        <uri>http://www.stanfordtechnology.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stanfordtechnology.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is all wel and good to have an application through a cloud, client server or ASP environment.   What is often missing from these articles, however is what can this system do and what are some of the limitations?</p>

<p>I have found internet EMR's to have some significant limitations.    Storing images on-line for example would require large amounts of data getting loaded through limited t1 lines etc.   scanning, interfacing to EKG's and local labs or tying into a billing system make are huge questions in the work-flow of an office.   Free is good, but not at the expense of a physician seeing 35 patient a day down to 15.   One doctor reported to me they have the program but continue to handwrite notes.    (in other words they don't use it).</p>

<p>Other questions:   How is the content setup for OBGYN, OPTHALMOLOGY, RADIOLOGY/IMAGING etc.     Usually the content for systems two years on the market is rather limited and these turn out to be nothing more than a glorified MS/Word repository.</p>

<p>How about tying into coding assitance, claims scrubbing, E&M calculating, Drug to drug interaction warnings and allergy checking, dosage calcualtors.   Most of all how is it tracking HealthMaintenance/preventative diseases and flow charting.</p>

<p>If it isn't going to be interoperable with other health systems the doctors will not get the stimulus money!   So, does it have continuity of care Record/Document to export or import.  </p>

<p>Those are just some of my questions.   Usually, when a deal is too good to be true, it usually is.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-02-19T20:20:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15977-comment:165006</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15977" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/practise_fusion_partners_with_salesforce.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/practise_fusion_partners_with_salesforce.php#c165006" />
    <title>Comment from Raymond Zakhari, NP on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Raymond Zakhari, NP</name>
        <uri>http://MetroMedicalDirect.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://MetroMedicalDirect.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have recently launched a web-based primary care medical house calls practice using Practice Fusion as my EHR/ PM, but at the time I had to purchase portal services which provided me the ability to have online forms, bill pay, secure messaging and email consults.  As my overhead costs come down I can render more affordable services. Right now I'm the most cost effective practice in NYC.<br />
I have to spend more on advertising than my entire operating budget.<br />
The practice is called Metro Medical Direct.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T20:25:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15977-comment:161610</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15977" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/practise_fusion_partners_with_salesforce.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/practise_fusion_partners_with_salesforce.php#c161610" />
    <title>Comment from Skip on 2009-10-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Skip</name>
        <uri>http://www.thevirtualspecialist.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thevirtualspecialist.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Way to go Glenn. I get so tired of all the hand wringing everytime a revolutionary solution comes to a much needed application. This whole security conversation is so full of holes anyway. Why don't we all just live in lead houses?<br />
Skip Rodenbush<br />
Founder and CEO <br />
Interactive Multimedia Artists  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-08T02:17:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15977-comment:151102</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15977" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/practise_fusion_partners_with_salesforce.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/practise_fusion_partners_with_salesforce.php#c151102" />
    <title>Comment from Glenn Laffel, MD, PhD on 2009-08-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Glenn Laffel, MD, PhD</name>
        <uri>http://www.practicefusion.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.practicefusion.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Issues of data security and patient confidentiality are central to the entire family of EHRs, whether they be client-server based legacy systems or newer, cloud-based EHRs like the one offered by Practice Fusion.</p>

<p>As providers in New Orleans discovered to their dismay following Katrina, client-server based EHRs are subject to data loss associated with disasters from hurricanes to floods and fires. In addition, on-site servers can be stolen, damaged or hacked into, as can laptops and thumb drives associated with such systems--which often store data locally, including patient confidential information.</p>

<p>With cloud-based EHRs, all patient data is stored in multiple, distributed, extremely secure off-site locations, which eliminates the above risk. The above situations by the way, are by far the most common form of security breach in health care and other industries.</p>

<p>With Practice Fusion and salesforce.com, physicians are getting access to $100 million worth of infrastructure (and associated security features) for free. </p>

<p>That degree of security and comfort had heretofore been available to only the largest of health care providers ...and at considerable cost, to say the least.  </p>

<p>Glenn Laffel MD, PhD; Sr. VP Clinical Affairs; Practice Fusion; Free Web-based EHR.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-07T14:14:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15977-comment:151096</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15977" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/practise_fusion_partners_with_salesforce.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/practise_fusion_partners_with_salesforce.php#c151096" />
    <title>Comment from perde on 2009-08-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>perde</name>
        <uri>http://www.jaluziperde.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.jaluziperde.net">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jaluziperde.net" rel="nofollow">jaluzi</a>:thanks for information</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-07T13:41:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15977-comment:151094</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15977" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/practise_fusion_partners_with_salesforce.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/practise_fusion_partners_with_salesforce.php#c151094" />
    <title>Comment from Joanne Cirillo on 2009-08-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Joanne Cirillo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I basically agree with your assessment.  The Cloud is too risky right now to overwhelm the cost associated with 24/7 server/system redundancy.  However, the Cloud will be the future.  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-07T13:36:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15977-comment:151086</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15977" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/practise_fusion_partners_with_salesforce.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/practise_fusion_partners_with_salesforce.php#c151086" />
    <title>Comment from NMN on 2009-08-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>NMN</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a promising new app. <a href="http://AppUseful.com" rel="nofollow">http://AppUseful.com</a><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-07T12:52:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15977-comment:151083</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.15977" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/practise_fusion_partners_with_salesforce.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/practise_fusion_partners_with_salesforce.php#c151083" />
    <title>Comment from Jason on 2009-08-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jason</name>
        <uri>http://www.justsay.on.ca</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.justsay.on.ca">
        <![CDATA[<p>Salesforce seems to be everywhere nowadays. A thumb in every pie. Now their brand name is in ReadWriteWeb's headlines too.</p>

<p>To me, it suggests a lack of focus. Kind of like a cloud.</p>

<p>I hesitate to add I was underwhelmed with my (albeit brief) personal experience with Salesforce. They talk a good game, but they seem a bit like the cloud itself, nebulous, everywhere, but not particularly solid.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-07T11:22:26Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
