<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bbc_to_kill_open_source_tv.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2011:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.16436-</id>
  <updated>2011-08-16T16:37:10Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for BBC To Kill Open Source TV?</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.35-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.16436</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bbc_to_kill_open_source_tv.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=16436" title="BBC To Kill Open Source TV?" />
    <published>2009-09-18T05:10:05Z</published>
    <updated>2009-09-18T17:41:50Z</updated>
    <title>BBC To Kill Open Source TV?</title>
    <summary>The BBC is looking to encode TV listing metadata and employ a compression algorithm to circumvent piracy, ad removal and illegal copying. According to a recent blog post by the EFF&apos;s Danny O&apos;Brien, the group wants to get mandatory DRM onto digital TV receivers via a broadcast flag. In other words, a &quot;public service broadcaster&quot;...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Dana Oshiro</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Video Services" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img alt="bbc_drm_sept09b.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/bbc_drm_sept09b.jpg" width="150" height="150">The BBC is looking to encode TV listing metadata and employ a compression algorithm to circumvent piracy, ad removal and illegal copying. According to a recent <a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/09/broadcast-flag-uk">blog post</a> by the EFF's Danny O'Brien, the group wants to get mandatory DRM onto digital TV receivers via a broadcast flag. In other words, a "public service broadcaster" wants to lessen the way we consume media by forcing manufacturers to limit product playing abilities. While open source TV services like <a href="http://www.boxee.tv/homepage/">Boxee</a> allow users to view programs over home networks regardless of the device, a broadcast flag would force all HDTV receivers to include content protection. For those of us who watch our programs online, this could pose a serious problem. </p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p><img alt="bbc_drm_sept09.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/bbc_drm_sept09.jpg" width="300" height="168" align="right">Says Boxee VP of Marketing Andrew Kippen, "Boxee believes there's a way to deliver entertainment in a way that is consumer-focused, while respecting the rights of content owners.  We've built our company around it. People are still buying content off iTunes, and labels / artists are still making money.  The way for content owners to make money is to cater to their audience, not to stifle innovation by creating a DRM racket like what's proposed here."</p>

<p>In 2004, the Federal Communications Commission and the Motion Picture Association of America attempted a similar enforcement regarding the US transition from analog to digital television broadcasting. However, by 2005 <a href="http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/docs/common/opinions/200505/04-1037b.pdf"> the broadcast flag was thrown out</a> and regulators argued that the FCC lacked the authority to ask for HD encryption. </p>

<p><sml><em>Photo Credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/jbonnain/">Josh Bonain</a> of <a href="http://www.grooveshark.com/">Grooveshark</a></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.16436-comment:171129</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.16436" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bbc_to_kill_open_source_tv.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bbc_to_kill_open_source_tv.php#c171129" />
    <title>Comment from Fran on 2009-11-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Fran</name>
        <uri>http://www.theopensource.tv</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.theopensource.tv">
        <![CDATA[<p>Well, let the BBC go down that path if they like, they don't make very good documentaries anymore anyway... long live www.theopensource.tv ! :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-29T00:25:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.16436-comment:158633</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.16436" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bbc_to_kill_open_source_tv.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bbc_to_kill_open_source_tv.php#c158633" />
    <title>Comment from Tyson on 2009-09-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tyson</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I find it ironic that the BBC have been offering a set of (Python-based) Open Source utilities and libraries for timeshifting and transcoding digital TV content for a while now, in the form of the Kamaelia project. </p>

<p>Still, I'd expect there to be a huge backlash if this is implemented, if only due to the fact that it'd end up rendering most deployed set-top boxes obsolete, thanks to certain manufacturers no longer supplying firmware updates...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-09-20T21:50:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.16436-comment:158358</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.16436" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bbc_to_kill_open_source_tv.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bbc_to_kill_open_source_tv.php#c158358" />
    <title>Comment from mika. on 2009-09-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>mika.</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Monopolist BBC to commit suicide. Good!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-09-18T14:02:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.16436-comment:158344</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.16436" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bbc_to_kill_open_source_tv.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bbc_to_kill_open_source_tv.php#c158344" />
    <title>Comment from Brad Bell on 2009-09-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Brad Bell</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>They've got a lot of gall even raising the issue. </p>

<p>It's difficult to predict how TV is going to survive, but one thing is sure: this is not going to happen. As a fan of the national broadcast model (BBC, Canada's CBC), and someone who has been using a Mac for a TV for the last 5 years - oh, the power! - this is a joke. The BBC is one of the few broadcasters that has a secure future in this country and they want to strip the remaining value from their publicly funded product? YGBFKM!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-09-18T12:51:45Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
