<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/_new_licensing_agreement_could_open_floodgates_of.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2011:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17144-</id>
  <updated>2011-08-16T16:17:39Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for  New Tech Spec Licensing Agreement Could Open Floodgates of Web Innovation</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.35-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17144</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/_new_licensing_agreement_could_open_floodgates_of.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=17144" title=" New Tech Spec Licensing Agreement Could Open Floodgates of Web Innovation" />
    <published>2009-11-17T19:33:56Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-17T22:15:01Z</updated>
    <title> New Tech Spec Licensing Agreement Could Open Floodgates of Web Innovation</title>
    <summary>After 18 months of negotiation, the Open Web Foundation, a group made up of 106 employees of Yahoo, Google, Facebook, Microsoft, some small startups and their lawyers, today released a legal document template for licensing open web technology specifications. The result could be greatly accelerated time-to-market for new technologies developed on top of these specifications...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Marshall Kirkpatrick</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="NYT" />
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/owflogo.jpg">After 18 months of negotiation, the <a href="http://openwebfoundation.org/">Open Web Foundation</a>, a  group made up of 106 employees of Yahoo, Google, Facebook, Microsoft, some small startups and their lawyers, today released <a href="http://openwebfoundation.org/2009/11/introducing-the-open-web-foundation-agreement.html">a legal document template for licensing open web technology specifications</a>.  The result could be greatly accelerated time-to-market for new technologies developed on top of these specifications and more awesomeness, sooner, for web consumers.</p>

<p>Standardized legal documents for technical specifications may not seem like the sexiest thing in the the world - but this is actually pretty exciting news.  Developments like this could be a key part of the foundation that online service providers need to move forward on a long list of great ideas for ways to serve their users.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>What does this mean?  It means that other companies will be able to use technologies like Media RSS, OAuth, Salmon, Web Slices and more without fear that unclear licensing agreements will lead to legal problems later.  It also means that developers creating innovative new tech specifications to push and pull user data from one site to another can launch them using a turn-key license developed by some of the top legal teams in the business.</p>

<p>People come up with crazy ideas for making the web work better all the time.  This agreement aims to provide an easy way to make it safe to implement those ideas.  The companies participating have spent large amounts of time and money negotiating the agreement, now anyone can take advantage of the fruits of that labor at no cost.</p>

<p>Existing specifications that will be placed under the Open Web Foundation Agreement, per the announcement today, include:<br />
<ul><li>Syndicated media delivery spec <a href="http://video.search.yahoo.com/mrss">Media RSS</a> (currently controlled by Yahoo!)</li><br />
<li>Secure 3rd party authentication spec <a href="http://oauth.net/core/1.0a">OAuth Core</a> and <a href="http://bit.ly/oauth-wrap">Wrap</a> (from Facebook, Google, Yahoo! and Microsoft)</li><br />
<li>Real-time feed protocol <a href="http://code.google.com/p/pubsubhubbub/">PubSubHubbub</a> (Google)</li><br />
<li>Comment aggregation protocol <a href="http://www.salmon-protocol.org/">Salmon</a> (Google)</li><br />
<li><a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc304073(VS.85).aspx">Web Slice Format</a>  (Microsoft)</li><br />
<li>And several others.</li></ul></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17144-comment:240201</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17144" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/_new_licensing_agreement_could_open_floodgates_of.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/_new_licensing_agreement_could_open_floodgates_of.php#c240201" />
    <title>Comment from John Smith on 2010-08-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>John Smith</name>
        <uri>http://www.e-cig-reviews.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.e-cig-reviews.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Openweb is a good idea which should hopefully benefit the little guy who upon starting a new project gets hit with licensing issues from multiple big companies.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-08-31T12:30:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17144-comment:169227</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17144" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/_new_licensing_agreement_could_open_floodgates_of.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/_new_licensing_agreement_could_open_floodgates_of.php#c169227" />
    <title>Comment from davidru on 2009-11-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>davidru</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Marshall - Just wanted to clarify that the OWFa doesn't require signatories to give up their IP rights and the OWF doesn't take control of the patents or copyright.  Instead, the signatories of the agreement make their patents and copyrights available for free to implement the covered specification.</p>

<p>OWF doesn't get involved at all in the process.  It's much like how anyone can use the Creative Commons agreements on a document without the Creative Commons being involved.  OWF just provides the agreements for others to use.</p>

<p>- David</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-17T20:55:32Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
