<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democratization_of_news_media.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2011:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17150-</id>
  <updated>2011-08-16T16:17:29Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Top Internet Trends of 2000-2009: Democratization of News Media</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.35-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17150</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democratization_of_news_media.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=17150" title="Top Internet Trends of 2000-2009: Democratization of News Media" />
    <published>2009-11-18T10:34:01Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-18T18:29:06Z</updated>
    <title>Top Internet Trends of 2000-2009: Democratization of News Media</title>
    <summary>It&apos;s November 2009 and we&apos;re nearing the end of a decade. It&apos;s been a tumultuous time of change for many industries, much of it driven by the Internet. The newspaper industry has been particularly affected by the Web. Over the past 10 years, news media has undergone a seachange akin to the invention of the...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="New Media" />
    
    <category term="Trends" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/printing_press_150.jpg" />It's November 2009 and we're nearing the end of a decade. It's been a tumultuous time of change for many industries, much of it driven by the Internet. The newspaper industry has been particularly affected by the Web. Over the past 10 years, news media has undergone a seachange akin to the invention of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing_press">printing press</a> <font style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><script type="text/javascript">
tweetmeme_url = 'http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democratization_of_news_media.php';
tweetmeme_source = 'rww';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://tweetmeme.com/i/scripts/button.js"></script></font>in 1440. </p>
<p>Just as Johannes Gutenberg's printing press brought books to the mainstream public in the 15th century, Tim Berners-Lee's  World Wide Web brought commercial publishing to the people.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>The Web has always been a medium where people could just as easily write as read (yes, <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_readwrite_w.php">the read/write Web</a>), however it didn't reach its potential until  blogging came along earlier this decade.</p>

<h2>Blogging</h2>
<p><strong>Blogging</strong> not only allowed anybody to publish easily to the Web, it ended up shaking up the print media world.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/bloggercom_nov09.png" align="left" />Blogging <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_blogging_timeline">began in the 90s</a> as a form of online diary - Rebecca Blood wrote a good <a href="http://www.rebeccablood.net/essays/weblog_history.html">pre-history</a> in 2000. One of the early popular blogging services was <a href="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger.com</a>, launched by Evan Williams (who subsequently became a co-founder of Twitter) and Meg Hourihan <a href="http://www.blogger.com/about">in August 1999</a>. The service was acquired by Google in February 2003, a couple of months before ReadWriteWeb began. At that point, 2003, blogging was still seen as an informal diary-type of publishing. </p>
<p>Around 2004-05, blogging started to become accepted as a legitimate news source. This was around the time that ReadWriteWeb began to publish tech news, as well as analysis. </p>
<p>By the end of the decade, many blogs were directly challenging newspapers - proving that a solid news brand, such as Huffington Post, can be created from almost nothing in a few years.</p>
<h2>RSS</h2>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/rss_icon_big.gif" align="right" />Blogging software was one part of the democratization of media. RSS (&quot;Really Simple Syndication&quot;) was another. There were and still are different versions of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSS">RSS</a>, created by <a href="http://scripting.com">Dave Winer</a> and others. But whatever the flavor, syndication has had a major impact on media. </p>
<p>Basically RSS allowed people to subscribe to updates from blogs and other publications. Using RSS Aggregators, people could read news from a selection of niche and general news publications.</p>
<p>Blogs were the first to utilize RSS, but mainstream media followed during the 2005-06 period. Today it is very rare for a major news website - whether it be the New York Times or a leading blog - not to use RSS.</p>
<h2>Twitter &amp; The Real-Time Web</h2>
<p>The next major development in news media occurred towards the end of this decade. It was of course Twitter and the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_5_web_trends_of_2009_the_real-time_web.php">Real-Time Web</a>. </p>
<p>To be fair, this has challenged not only traditional media - but blogs as well. Now anyone, whether they're a writer or not, can publish 140 characters to the Web. And it might end up as breaking news, as the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/sorry_google_you_missed_the_real_time_web.php">Hudsen River plane crash</a> proved earlier this year.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/hudsen_twitter.jpg" /></p>
<h2>Media in the Next Decade</h2>
<p>There is much talk of the mainstream media &quot;dying&quot; and blogs usurping traditional media companies like the New York Times. While it's true that blogs sometimes report breaking news stories or analyze them better than newspaper websites, I'm a big believer in the power of brand. Washington Post, Wall St Journal, New York Times - these are all powerful brands and they reach a much wider audience than the vast majority of blogs.</p>
<p>The challenge of course for mainstream media is to (drastically) reduce their costs, because <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/80_of_us_consumers_wont_pay_for_online_content.php">few people want to pay for content</a> these days - news or otherwise.</p>
<p>However, in my view the traditional news media industry is in much less danger of extinction than <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_internet_trends_of_2000-2009_online_music.php">the music industry</a>. Musicians can bypass record labels completely nowadays, but there will always be a need for news to be questioned, put in context and analyzed. The best media publications of the next 10 years will do that and be successful, the ones that don't will fade away.</p>
<p><em>See also: <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_internet_trends_of_2000-2009_online_music.php">Top Internet Trends of 2000-2009: Online Music</a></em></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17150-comment:244446</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17150" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democratization_of_news_media.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democratization_of_news_media.php#c244446" />
    <title>Comment from شات مصر on 2010-09-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>شات مصر</name>
        <uri>http://www.m9ryh.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.m9ryh.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>vere vere goood nice gave us a $100K check - we realized that it would be used towards building stuff - <br />
nice The funy thing about the location problem is that it was solved quite a few | <a href="http://www.m9ryh.com" rel="nofollow">دردشة</a> | years ago by the API <a href="http://www.m9ryh.com" rel="nofollow">دردشة مصر</a>. But, since they're not so cutting edge, and managed by an old school mentality, people either forgot about them or never knew about them. It's sad | <a href="http://www.m9ryh.com" rel="nofollow">شات</a> | really, because their API for venues is quite comprehensive and has been around forvere vere goood nice friends and family money a large part eee gooood</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-09-14T07:10:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17150-comment:185468</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17150" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democratization_of_news_media.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democratization_of_news_media.php#c185468" />
    <title>Comment from منتديات on 2010-02-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>منتديات</name>
        <uri>http://www.z3lanh.com/vb</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.z3lanh.com/vb">
        <![CDATA[<p>thanks so much for a good topic</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-02-03T08:04:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17150-comment:185461</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17150" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democratization_of_news_media.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democratization_of_news_media.php#c185461" />
    <title>Comment from مركز تحميل on 2010-02-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>مركز تحميل</name>
        <uri>http://www.z3lanh.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.z3lanh.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>They really don't know what makes a "hit". They don't know how to discover *new* music, they just know how to repeat whatever was a hit last year. In general, they don't really pay *most* of their artists enough to make a living</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-02-03T07:55:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17150-comment:172350</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17150" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democratization_of_news_media.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democratization_of_news_media.php#c172350" />
    <title>Comment from r4i karte on 2009-12-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>r4i karte</name>
        <uri>http://www.r4-karte.ch</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.r4-karte.ch">
        <![CDATA[<p>With regard to news media there were many changes that took place from 2000 to 2009. There is major success in the role of news media and there are developments going on continuously.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-04T04:27:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17150-comment:170021</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17150" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democratization_of_news_media.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democratization_of_news_media.php#c170021" />
    <title>Comment from RedCreative on 2009-11-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>RedCreative</name>
        <uri>http://www.red-creative-moves.co.uk</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.red-creative-moves.co.uk">
        <![CDATA[<p>Reflect on this:<br />
The printing industry has been around nearly 600 years, and became at it's most 'efficient' (speed to market, spread of coverage, ability to utilise technology to gather and source news), as recently as the last decade.<br />
The Internet 'industry' literally 'happened', in a few short years!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-22T12:27:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17150-comment:169485</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17150" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democratization_of_news_media.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democratization_of_news_media.php#c169485" />
    <title>Comment from Garance A Drosehn on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Garance A Drosehn</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>For what it's worth, I also expect that the future will still have a place for some news organizations, while I don't see much point to record companies.  I buy a lot of music, and I've watched the music industry (as an outsider) since the late 1970's.</p>

<p>The thing about record companies is that they don't really know what the hell they're doing, and haven't known for at least 20 years.  All they did was put up a "toll-gate" between the people who wanted to perform music, and people who wanted to listen to music.  And then they appointed themselves the gate-keepers, and charged everyone a toll for letting music go from one side to the other side.  They really don't know what makes a "hit".  They don't know how to discover *new* music, they just know how to repeat whatever was a hit last year.  In general, they don't really pay *most* of their artists enough to make a living (because the record company is skimming off too much of the money for themselves, not the artist).  And now record-companies want "360-deals" from whatever artists they sign.  What a rip off.</p>

<p>In the late 1990's, the record companies fired a bunch of old-timer artists who weren't making enough money for the companies.  Some of those artists then went on to make *more* money without a record company, then they had made when the record company was "helping" their career.  The artists would have smaller audiences (usually), but collected more money from each fan in that audience.  And the artist was left to do whatever music they wanted to do, and not what some record executive thought was "hot with the kids these days".</p>

<p>The problem for news organizations is that the public wants everything for free.  The problem for the record industry is that the public doesn't want a gate-keeper in the first place.  I want to hear the music I want to hear, and not the playlist that some top-40 station is locked into.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-19T04:23:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17150-comment:169467</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17150" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democratization_of_news_media.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democratization_of_news_media.php#c169467" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Bryce, I agree that's an issue. Nevertheless, in terms of their popularity, traffic and brand name - I think they're right up there with some newspapers as a news source.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-19T02:05:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17150-comment:169355</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17150" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democratization_of_news_media.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democratization_of_news_media.php#c169355" />
    <title>Comment from Bryce  on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Bryce </name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Interesting post. But I beg to differ on your assertion that "By the end of the decade, many blogs were directly challenging newspapers - proving that a solid news brand, such as Huffington Post, can be created from almost nothing in a few years."</p>

<p>Is the Huffington Post really a solid news brand? As far as I am aware, they produce very little original content, relying instead on the aggregation of news from established players. </p>

<p>One man's aggregation is another man's theft ..</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T12:38:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17150-comment:169352</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17150" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democratization_of_news_media.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democratization_of_news_media.php#c169352" />
    <title>Comment from Fernando Arocena on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Fernando Arocena</name>
        <uri>http://www.papblog.com.ar</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.papblog.com.ar">
        <![CDATA[<p>Brillant. Simple, complete, smart and short. I agree with your concepts and selection of highlights.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T11:52:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17150-comment:169350</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17150" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democratization_of_news_media.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democratization_of_news_media.php#c169350" />
    <title>Comment from jeffjaner on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>jeffjaner</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Innovation for both traditional and the new democratized media in the next decade is less about driving traffic to a destination site and more about how the original source benefits (i.e., makes money) from their content as it's distributed and re-aggregated across the web. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T11:48:17Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
