<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_scholar_legal_opinions_launch.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2011:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17140-</id>
  <updated>2011-08-16T16:17:45Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Google Scholar Gets Smarter: Now Features Legal Opinions</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.35-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17140</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_scholar_legal_opinions_launch.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=17140" title="Google Scholar Gets Smarter: Now Features Legal Opinions" />
    <published>2009-11-17T17:36:48Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-17T17:48:50Z</updated>
    <title>Google Scholar Gets Smarter: Now Features Legal Opinions</title>
    <summary>Google just announced that it now features legal opinions in Google Scholar. Starting today, Google Scholar will feature the full text of legal opinions from US federal and state district, appellate and supreme courts. Through this, users can now easily find the text of Roe v. Wade or Brown v. Board of Education, for example....</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Frederic Lardinois</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Google" />
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img alt="google_scholar_logo_nov09.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/google_scholar_logo_nov09.png"  />Google just <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/finding-laws-that-govern-us.html">announced</a> that it now features legal opinions in <a href="http://scholar.google.com/">Google Scholar</a>. Starting today, Google Scholar will feature the full text of legal opinions from US federal and state district, appellate and supreme courts. Through this, users can now easily find the text of <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?about=12334123945835207673">Roe v. Wade</a> or <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12120372216939101759">Brown v. Board of Education</a>, for example. Google Scholar also lists other legal opinions and journals that cited these opinions. In addition, users can also do standard <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&amp;q=file+sharing&amp;as_sdt=2002&amp;as_ylo=&amp;as_vis=0">keyword searches</a> to find legal documents. </p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Users can easily restrict searches to opinions from federal courts or courts in certain states. In addition to finding the case and legal opinion, Google Scholar also displays related documents in a sidebar, as well as a list of cases where a certain opinion was cited. Google's Anurag Acharya also notes that a lot of these opinions are <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17464395627871183767">surprisingly readable</a>. </p>

<p><img alt="google_scholar_legal.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/google_scholar_legal.png"  /></p>

<p>As Google points out in the <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/finding-laws-that-govern-us.html">announcement</a>, finding these legal opinions has typically been difficult. Now, the company makes it very easy to find any legal opinion about <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&amp;q=file+sharing&amp;as_sdt=2002&amp;as_ylo=&amp;as_vis=0">Napster</a>, for example. Google notes that it hopes that access to this information will allow regular citizens to "learn more about the laws that govern us all." </p>

<p>It's interesting to see that Google continues to add more and more public data to its repositories. Just last week, Google added <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_makes_world_bank_data_more_discoverable.php">data from the World Bank</a> to its search results. Earlier this year, Google also <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/04/adding-search-power-to-public-data.html">started</a> to include data from the <a href="http://www.bls.gov/">U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics </a>and the <a href="http://www.census.gov/popest/estimates.html">U.S. Census Bureau's Population Division</a>. Google didn't go as far as integrating these legal opinions on its search results page yet - though for searches for <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&amp;q=roe+v+wade&amp;btnG=Search&amp;as_sdt=2002&amp;as_ylo=&amp;as_vis=0">Roe v. Wade</a> or <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&amp;q=miranda&amp;btnG=Search&amp;as_sdt=2002&amp;as_ylo=&amp;as_vis=0">Miranda v. Arizona</a>, these results could really enhance the current search results. </p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17140-comment:169193</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17140" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_scholar_legal_opinions_launch.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_scholar_legal_opinions_launch.php#c169193" />
    <title>Comment from william on 2009-11-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>william</name>
        <uri>http://www.adelph.us</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.adelph.us">
        <![CDATA[<p>.....It is not really a fact that google scholar became smarter....computer cannot become smarter...they are just machines and cannot learn or become smart in a humane sense..<br />
Google scholar seems to be smarter because google has access to this information....I m sure that bing, would also appear smarter if they also had access to the information....I m also certain that any number of enterprise search companies could do the same kind of "magic" if they has access to the same information.....</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-17T17:55:23Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
