<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/report_twitter_made_a_profit_in_2009.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2011:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17507-</id>
  <updated>2011-08-16T16:08:16Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Report: Twitter Made a Profit in 2009</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.35-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17507</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/report_twitter_made_a_profit_in_2009.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=17507" title="Report: Twitter Made a Profit in 2009" />
    <published>2009-12-21T15:32:04Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-21T21:24:13Z</updated>
    <title>Report: Twitter Made a Profit in 2009</title>
    <summary>According to a report by Business Week&apos;s Spencer E. Ante, Twitter&apos;s search deals with Google and Microsoft made the company about $25 million - enough to turn Twitter into a profitable business in 2009. According to these reports - which Twitter did not comment on - the deal with Google made Twitter about $15 million...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Frederic Lardinois</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="NYT" />
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <category term="Twitter" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img alt="twitter_logo_dec09.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/twitter_logo_dec09.jpg"  />According to a report by <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2009/tc20091220_549879.htm">Business Week's</a> Spencer E. Ante, Twitter's search deals with Google and Microsoft made the company about $25 million - enough to turn Twitter into a profitable business in 2009. According to these reports - which Twitter did not comment on - the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_indexes_twitter.php">deal with Google </a>made Twitter about $15 million this year and a similar deal with Microsoft generated about $10 million in revenue.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>The idea that Twitter made a profit from these deals is based on the assumption that the company's annual operating costs are roughly $25 million. Twitter, of course, doesn't release any information about its operating costs or the revenue it made from these deals, so we have to take this estimate with a grain of salt.</p>

<h2>Bringing Costs Down</h2>

<p>Business Week's Ante also argues that Twitter was able to reduce operating expenses by renegotiating its deals with the telecom carriers that support the service's text message system. Until this year, the cost of supporting the SMS system represented Twitter's largest expense, though according to one source quoted by Ante, "now people are the biggest line item."</p>

<h2>Generating More Income</h2>

<p>Earlier this year, Twitter also announced that it plans to create a revenue-sharing scheme that would allows Twitter to share in the profits generated by third-party applications and vice versa. The details of this plan are still under wraps, however, though at LeWeb, Ryan Sarver, Twitter's director of platform, <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/twitter_at_leweb.php">announced</a> that the company would announce details about this plan early next year.</p>

<p>Chances are that Twitter is still looking into creating revenue from advertising as well. If the company really managed to be profitable based on the search content deals with Microsoft and Google, however, then Twitter will at least have a longer runway before it has to open up this revenue channel, which is likely to alienate quite a few users.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17507-comment:176097</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17507" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/report_twitter_made_a_profit_in_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/report_twitter_made_a_profit_in_2009.php#c176097" />
    <title>Comment from Mike Bensonn on 2009-12-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mike Bensonn</name>
        <uri>http://smonow.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://smonow.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I guess I have to give it to those guys: they are the masters when it comes to making money out of nonsense.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-22T22:40:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17507-comment:175918</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17507" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/report_twitter_made_a_profit_in_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/report_twitter_made_a_profit_in_2009.php#c175918" />
    <title>Comment from cables on 2009-12-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>cables</name>
        <uri>http://www.zoombits.co.uk/cables</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.zoombits.co.uk/cables">
        <![CDATA[<p>Well, has Google made a bundle from its acquisition of YouTube? Are tweets from Ashton Kutcher worth billions of dollars? Um, no.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-22T04:09:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17507-comment:175793</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17507" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/report_twitter_made_a_profit_in_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/report_twitter_made_a_profit_in_2009.php#c175793" />
    <title>Comment from George on 2009-12-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>George</name>
        <uri>http://www.eleven3.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.eleven3.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@shreshtha - The articles says, "Until this year, the cost of supporting the SMS system represented Twitter's largest expense."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-21T17:48:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17507-comment:175785</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17507" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/report_twitter_made_a_profit_in_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/report_twitter_made_a_profit_in_2009.php#c175785" />
    <title>Comment from shreshtha on 2009-12-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>shreshtha</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Read this - </p>

<p>Twitter? Profitable? Really? <br />
<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-10419569-36.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20" rel="nofollow">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-10419569-36.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-21T17:06:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17507-comment:175781</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17507" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/report_twitter_made_a_profit_in_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/report_twitter_made_a_profit_in_2009.php#c175781" />
    <title>Comment from shreshtha on 2009-12-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>shreshtha</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>May be a very dumb question but being new in to these kind of analysis I want to ask a question regarding the expense of a software company like twitter.<br />
How twitter operating costs can be ~$25 million?</p>

<p>What I can think of is - <br />
1. Software developers, Administrators, Maintainer, Testers etc.<br />
2. Data space, servers<br />
3. Office space<br />
4. Advertisement.</p>

<p>What else? Does above things costs $25 M?</p>

<p>Thanks in advance,<br />
Shreshtha</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-21T16:38:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17507-comment:175767</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17507" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/report_twitter_made_a_profit_in_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/report_twitter_made_a_profit_in_2009.php#c175767" />
    <title>Comment from heady on 2009-12-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>heady</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/heady</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/heady">
        <![CDATA[<p>stop the presses!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-21T16:01:05Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
