<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2011:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-</id>
  <updated>2011-08-16T16:11:41Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Top 10 Failures of 2009</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.35-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=17349" title="Top 10 Failures of 2009" />
    <published>2009-12-08T03:25:28Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-08T10:25:20Z</updated>
    <title>Top 10 Failures of 2009</title>
    <summary>In our yearly wrap-ups of the best products of 2009, we cannot but notice the shadow that falls over the editorial desk. We are chilled and saddened by the ghosts of the past year - the apps that should have been, the startups that failed to launch, the brilliant ideas that were throttled, the great...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Jolie O&apos;Dell</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="2009 in Review" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/top-10-fail-internet.jpg">In our yearly wrap-ups of the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/best_products_2009.php">best products of 2009</a>, we cannot but notice the shadow that falls over the editorial desk.</p>

<p>We are chilled and saddened by the ghosts of the past year - the apps that should have been, the startups that failed to launch, the brilliant ideas that were throttled, the great minds that were fired, the tech heroes that committed tragic gaffes. <font style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><script type="text/javascript"><br />
tweetmeme_url = 'http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php';<br />
tweetmeme_source = 'rww';<br />
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://tweetmeme.com/i/scripts/button.js"></script></font><font style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><script type="text/javascript">digg_url = 'http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php';digg_bgcolor = '#ffffff';digg_skin = 'normal';</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></font>But some failures were so monumental that they require specific enumeration and commentary. Here are the 10 worst tech failures of 2009.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<h2>Google Wave Sucked</h2>

<p>This is one case where the hype was as noisy as the app - and both were deafening. We have to hand it to Google's publicity team; we don't know one geek who wasn't positively salivating for a Wave invite. The ReadWriteWeb back channel was a complete melee when the first invites were rolled out to team members. But once we got there and saw the new tech tricks, like watching one another type, we started thinking about use cases. And the more we struggled to understand and use this product, the more frustrated and bored we became. Blame it on the steep learning curve. Blame it on our misunderstanding the product. Mount whatever feeble defense you like, but techies know Wave was a flop.</p>

<h2>The TabletPads Went to the Deadpool</h2>

<p>All we wanted was a $200-500 flat piece of glass and plastic with some fancy gizmodgery inside so we could look at the Internet from the comfort of our couches. And what did we get? Rumors, Photoshopped gadget porn, promises - lies, all lies. We'd have been better off if we'd spent those months drawing the Yahoo! home page on an Etch-A-Sketch. Although the Crunchpad has resurfaced as the <a href="http://thenextweb.com/2009/12/07/crunchpad-called-joojoo-arringtons-partner-speaks/">JooJoo</a>, the price has been marked up considerably, and the whole project just seems wrong to us now. Moreover, five will get you ten that Michael Arrington, father of the Crunchpad and a former attorney, is fixing to get litigious right about now, which might significantly delay the product's appearance on the market.</p>

<h2>Powerset Resurfaced as Bing</h2>

<p>In 2008, Powerset was one of the stealthiest, sexiest startups on the Silicon Valley block. About five minutes after launching, Powerset got snatched up by Microsoft to the tune of $100 million. When everyone had retrieved their dentures from the ground and changed their pants, they noticed that Powerset's ever-so-sexy tech had been folded quietly into the Borg for assimilation. And about a year later, Bing was born, reportedly from the tech that Microsoft scraped off the infant carcass of Powerset. And Bing sucked. We had such high hopes.</p>

<h2>Twitter Failed to Innovate</h2>

<p>While some of us had our money on a Twitter sale in 2009, others were simply waiting for the company to debut a radical, interesting, mutually beneficial revenue model. At the very least, most users were hoping that the scalability issues and downtime that made Twitter the tragic heroine of 2008 would be put to rest.</p>

<p>Twitter's failures this year were less about the headlines they made than the ones they didn't make. Rumors to the contrary notwithstanding, Twitter didn't capitalize on their massive adoption increase (a.k.a., their Oprahtization) and sell. Worse yet, they didn't buy. When one recalls the purchase of Summize and then contrasts it with this year's explosion of excellent Twitter apps, one wonders why none of these small startups or one-off side projects were acquired. Perhaps this was a case of "Hey, we can do that!" as Twitter certainly seemed intent on pilfering features (such as lists and retweets) from third-party developers. Too bad the "official" Twitter features suck a lot more than the original third-party designs.</p>

<p>But worst of all, we are still consistently experiencing downtime at a level that is unacceptable for any major web app. Google couldn't get away with this kind of failure; why should Twitter be allowed to do so?</p>

<h2>The Great Firewall of China Drama Continued and Worsened</h2>

<p>To date, China's "Golden Shield Project" restrictions on Internet use are throttling traffic from that country to websites such as Twitter, Facebook, Bing, and many, many more. Banned sites include news organizations that cover controversial events, pro-democracy sites and blogs, any site acknowledging the existence of Taiwan, YouTube, most blogging websites (Wordpress, Blogger, etc.) and anything the government deems to be obscene or profane. In countries where creative self expression and the ability to browse, learn and make decisions independently are freedoms too often taken for granted, these restrictions are indeed unthinkable. The project began in 1998 and still made plenty of headlines this year for its renewed affronts to freedom on the Internet. For example, in June, the Chinese government announced it would be rolling out <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/chinese_internet_strike_proposed_to_protest_censor.php">censorship software on every new computer</a> sold in the country.</p>

<p><!--nextpage--></p>

<h2>Microsoft Dumped Don Dodge</h2>

<p>Not too long ago, we at ReadWriteWeb were shocked to learn from startup guru and longtime Microsoft ambassador Don Dodge that the Big M had given him the kiss-off. Dodge was seen by many as an intelligent, approachable personality in front of a huge, out-of-touch, unpopular brand. It was the tech industry equivalent of FOX cancelling the Simpsons. It's been noted that Microsoft makes its paper from the enterprise, not startups, which would make Dodge a natural candidate for the chopping block. Still, the move was hugely criticized by bloggers, VCs and others. Microsoft's PR plot thickened a few days later when Google snatched up the briefly unemployed Dodge.</p>

<h2>Spotify Didn't Launch in the US... Yet</h2>

<p>It tops our list of Most Highly Anticipated Products Yankees Can't Get Their Mitts On. Streaming music service Spotify is changing the world - with the exception of the United States. We've already got a crowded market of players here, including Pandora, Last.fm and Imeem. Call us greedy, but we want the new hotness that is Spotify, too.</p>

<h2>The Web 1.0 Comeback Campaigns Were Embarrassing to Watch</h2>

<p>Now, we at ReadWriteWeb have no desire to kick a company when it's down, but a couple of the mastodons of the mid-nineties dotcom boom have been valiantly attempting to stage comebacks, some more successfully than others. Yahoo! did some good things for developers this year, but <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/love_it_or_loathe_it_aol_reveals_new_branding_poll.php">AOL/Aol's rebranding</a> was pitiful. And don't get Dana Oshiro started on the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendster_relaunching_a_lesson_in_how_not_to_brand.php">affront to end-user dignity</a> that is Friendster.</p>

<h2>Oracle Acquired MySQL</h2>

<p>Open-source geeks have been sporting metaphorical black armbands for the loss of MySQL, the world's largest open-source database, to Oracle, the largest pay-to-play database, following that company's acquisition of Sun Microsystems. We reported last week that <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/enterprise/2009/12/mysql-usage-expected-to-drop-x.php">MySQL usage is expected to drop</a> by around 10 percent over the next 5 years. Here's another handy stat: Oracle also this year <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/enterprise/2009/07/desparate-measures-oracle-prices-shoot-up.php">raised their own prices by 40 percent</a>. Will MySQL remain free-as-in-beer and open source? Or will it succumb to corporate lameness?</p>

<h2>And the Worst Fail of 2009... LeapFish Made a God-Awful Promotional Video</h2>

<p>Tonight, we dine in hell! LeapFish's bombastic promo clip (which you have to watch in 10-second segments to avoid waves of misplaced inspiration alternating with waves of nausea) is as horrifying as <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/leapfish_advertising_story.php">the company itself is sketchy</a>. The startup says it made $10 million before it even launched, and the CEO Ben Behrouzi is an infamous contrepreneur with a background in lead generation and <a href="http://brokerscience.com/legal/ben-behrouzi-voicemails-threatens-employee/">threatening employees</a>.</p>

<p><object width="610" height="367"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6qcMK1vPWFM&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6qcMK1vPWFM&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="610" height="367"></embed></object></p>

<p>So, there you have it: our list of the worst tech-related disasters of 2009. What did we omit? Let us know in the comments below, and don't hold back. Clearly, we didn't.</p>

<p>And to the companies mentioned in this report: 2009 isn't over yet. You've still got three weeks to make it right with end users.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:320200</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c320200" />
    <title>Comment from saythai on 2011-07-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>saythai</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Top 10 Failures of 2009<br /><a href="http://jdw-art.com" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://jdw-art.com" rel="nofollow">http://jdw-art.com</a></a> <br /></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2011-07-01T17:51:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:319363</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c319363" />
    <title>Comment from lacoste polos  on 2011-05-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>lacoste polos </name>
        <uri>http://www.lacostepoloshirtscheap.com.au</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lacostepoloshirtscheap.com.au">
        <![CDATA[<p>i have to admit that the article is very helpful to me.thanks so much.you are the one i really apprecieat.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2011-05-26T05:41:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:319364</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c319364" />
    <title>Comment from Business Loans on 2011-05-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Business Loans</name>
        <uri>http://www.merchantloans.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.merchantloans.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>So much in Google Wave.. I never thought people would not be not interested in the Gold Shield Project of China..</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2011-05-18T23:26:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:319365</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c319365" />
    <title>Comment from ralph lauren polo outlet onlin on 2011-05-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>ralph lauren polo outlet onlin</name>
        <uri>http://www.ralphlauren-poloshirts.co.uk</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ralphlauren-poloshirts.co.uk">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with others, I think GoogleWave is just in its infancy and in a few years it will all the rave.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2011-05-05T05:10:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:317747</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c317747" />
    <title>Comment from Prak pounleraksmey on 2011-04-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Prak pounleraksmey</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/pounleraksmey</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/pounleraksmey">
        <![CDATA[<p>Though I agree with most of the list the biggest disagreement is with Google Wave, I don&#39;t think it was a failure at all. It was advertised as the 2009 e.mail and I&#39;ve been using it as a replacement for email in several projects and that has led to many improvements in productivity and organization of work. Administration Admits That your website is very good and popular in the world can allow me post <a>websitehttp://worldbeach.info/...</a> Thank you for allow me post . . . . . . !</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2011-04-26T09:42:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:249230</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c249230" />
    <title>Comment from mikazi on 2010-10-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>mikazi</name>
        <uri>http://www.carpictures.co.cc</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.carpictures.co.cc">
        <![CDATA[<p>Though I agree with most of the list the biggest disagreement is with Google Wave, I don't think it was a failure at all. It was advertised as the 2009 e.mail and I've been using it as a replacement for email in several projects and that has led to many improvements in productivity and organization of work.</p>

<p>I think the problem with wave was that it generated a hype like if it was the new google social network, but it's a tool for work so people waited for it with the wrong expectations.</p>

<p>Wave is indeed a great tool and we'll have to wait for further developments because Google is making the wave team stronger.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-10-01T12:59:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:196172</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c196172" />
    <title>Comment from indir on 2010-03-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>indir</name>
        <uri>http://www.onlineyiz.biz</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.onlineyiz.biz">
        <![CDATA[<p>I can’t help but view source on every nice looking website I see. It’s like if you had x-ray glasses that allowed you to see any person you ever saw in their underwear at will. How could you not? It’s just so tempting to see if a beautiful website is built with beautiful code as well, or if its beauty if only skin-deep. Code? Beautiful? Sure. After all, Code is Poetry. This is just HTML, so it can’t be quite as intricate and elegant as a dynamic language, but it still bears the brush strokes of its creator.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-03-12T03:34:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:179080</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c179080" />
    <title>Comment from Mike Matthews on 2010-01-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mike Matthews</name>
        <uri>http://skiphireportsmouth.org.uk</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://skiphireportsmouth.org.uk">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm still a confirmed Google fan.<br />
Bing just doesn't serve up the results as yet.<br />
I might even go the whole hog & get the new Big G phone too!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-01-09T01:42:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:179077</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c179077" />
    <title>Comment from johnleo on 2010-01-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>johnleo</name>
        <uri>http://www.batterycentury.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.batterycentury.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think all new things need time to mature, the thing sucks in the begining may gets better later.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-01-09T01:23:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:178119</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c178119" />
    <title>Comment from wonkettte on 2010-01-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>wonkettte</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't think Google Wave sucks; it needs to mature.<br />
The same goes for Bing. I liked it enough to switch; in fact, the only Google product I use regularly is YouTube and Gmail.  Otherwise I use non-Google stuff. I am forced by my work to use Gmail; otherwise, I would continue to use other stuff.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-01-05T16:33:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:176672</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c176672" />
    <title>Comment from curtis on 2009-12-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>curtis</name>
        <uri>http://www.curtisandkyle.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.curtisandkyle.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>You forgot these two!</p>

<p>One huge sledding fail...<br />
<a href="http://curtisandkyle.com/2009/12/24/sledding-fail/" rel="nofollow">http://curtisandkyle.com/2009/12/24/sledding-fail/</a></p>

<p><br />
The worst football fans ever!<br />
<a href="http://curtisandkyle.com/2009/12/23/eagles-fans-at-it-again/" rel="nofollow">http://curtisandkyle.com/2009/12/23/eagles-fans-at-it-again/</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-26T22:28:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:176664</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c176664" />
    <title>Comment from Pushkar on 2009-12-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Pushkar</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p> I dont  agree with "RIP google wave". Ever since we are in the age of web 2.0 , main thing we focused is collaboration and communication. Chats, file sharing ,social networking were invented. And GW is incorporating everything into it! isnt that gr8! U can chat, share, socialize and collaborate easily with it...It just that it looks complex for beginner.  </p>

<p>And LEAPfish video sucks bad! Any college kid can do better than this ! </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-26T19:15:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:176123</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c176123" />
    <title>Comment from Vlad Zablotskyy on 2009-12-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Vlad Zablotskyy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@Steven Vaughan Do you work for LeapFish? By the way thanks for stopping by and spewing your venom on my blog as well. Nice going! How long do you think you can stay anonymous?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-23T03:20:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:175501</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c175501" />
    <title>Comment from Raja Ejaz on 2009-12-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>Raja Ejaz</name>
        <uri>http://www.apexdigitals.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.apexdigitals.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yes as far as twitter is concerned it miserably failed in innovation. Today I heard that when anyone opens twitter it is redirected to an Iraninan site. I don.t if there is anybody fixing it. Thanks for very informative information.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-20T14:26:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:175490</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c175490" />
    <title>Comment from Maleextra on 2009-12-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>Maleextra</name>
        <uri>http://www.3inchesup.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.3inchesup.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I agree with most of you choices. And yes, Googlewave suck big time!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-20T10:57:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:175440</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c175440" />
    <title>Comment from Enigin on 2009-12-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>Enigin</name>
        <uri>http://www.enigindigital.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.enigindigital.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think Google Wave really failed this year.. but hopefully they'll innovate on it next year...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-19T20:28:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:175035</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c175035" />
    <title>Comment from PLANETwebfoot.com on 2009-12-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>PLANETwebfoot.com</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with others, I think GoogleWave is just in its infancy and in a few years it will all the rave. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-17T15:43:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:174930</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c174930" />
    <title>Comment from Mark Cramer on 2009-12-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Cramer</name>
        <uri>http://www.surfcanyon.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.surfcanyon.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>The Leapfish video is awesome. My only complaint is that it's too short. Is there a director's cut?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-17T00:29:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:174837</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c174837" />
    <title>Comment from cymbi on 2009-12-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>cymbi</name>
        <uri>http://www.dos60.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.dos60.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yeah,I come from China.Here,we cannot visit all the famous website around the world,like youtube,twitter,facebook and many many more.</p>

<p>I think the Internet must be World Wide Web,be free,without blocked.Everytime I want to visit the website,I have to use te Proxy,you now it's a sadness......</p>

<p>Fucking the Chine GFW.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-16T14:41:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:174663</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c174663" />
    <title>Comment from Kevin Hayes on 2009-12-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kevin Hayes</name>
        <uri>http://www.columbiamortgageguy.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.columbiamortgageguy.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I totally agree about Bing.....it sucks.  All the commercials and the hype to make it sound soooo much better and its just not.</p>

<p>The only thing i like about Bing is the windows mobile app they made that lets me check gas prices in my area.</p>

<p>Thanks,<br />
Kevin</p>

<p><a href="http://www.columbiamortgageguy.com" rel="nofollow">South Carolina Mortgage</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-15T20:38:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:174526</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c174526" />
    <title>Comment from m1garcia on 2009-12-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>m1garcia</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>What's your definition of failure? How come 'sucked' is used insted of failure?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-15T04:07:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:174445</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c174445" />
    <title>Comment from Kerri lotus on 2009-12-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kerri lotus</name>
        <uri>http://lotusweb.com.au</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://lotusweb.com.au">
        <![CDATA[<p>great article and i have to agree about google wave. went to a joomla day presentation by someone from google wave and all of us came away thinking that it was a whole heap of bells and whistles thrown together in a useless app that made no sense. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-14T21:43:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:174365</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c174365" />
    <title>Comment from Diana on 2009-12-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Diana</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Great article. About Google Wave. I disagree with Goggle Wave. I suppose it will develop and will be stronger than it is at this moment. We should to wait a little bit. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-14T12:03:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:174205</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c174205" />
    <title>Comment from FTS on 2009-12-12</title>
    <author>
        <name>FTS</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>GFW有份啊，我真“光荣”<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-13T05:47:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:174024</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c174024" />
    <title>Comment from Bobby on 2009-12-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Bobby</name>
        <uri>http://www.schmidtandclark.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.schmidtandclark.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>How about accessing spotify through a public proxy?  I did it and got as far as the pay to play page by using an English server.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-11T17:12:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173990</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173990" />
    <title>Comment from Sebastian Stephenson on 2009-12-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sebastian Stephenson</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Where did you get that lol cat? I must have it!!!!</p>

<p> thanks</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-11T12:50:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173919</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173919" />
    <title>Comment from Jorge on 2009-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jorge</name>
        <uri>http://jorge.threefivesup.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://jorge.threefivesup.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Though I agree with most of the list the biggest disagreement is with Google Wave, I don't think it was a failure at all. It was advertised as the 2009 e.mail and I've been using it as a replacement for email in several projects and that has led to many improvements in productivity and organization of work.</p>

<p>I think the problem with wave was that it generated a hype like if it was the new google social network, but it's a tool for work so people waited for it with the wrong expectations.</p>

<p>Wave is indeed a great tool and we'll have to wait for further developments because Google is making the wave team stronger.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-11T04:51:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173888</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173888" />
    <title>Comment from Jay Cuthrell on 2009-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jay Cuthrell</name>
        <uri>http://fudge.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://fudge.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>Wave is going to be huge in 2011.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-11T01:02:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173879</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173879" />
    <title>Comment from Jolie O&apos;Dell on 2009-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jolie O&apos;Dell</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@Steven Vaughan - Your previous comment was deleted because it contained foul language and entirely personal attacks that had nothing to do with the discussion we are attempting to have in this thread.</p>

<p>We welcome a variety of opinions in our comments, but profanity and insults are not tolerated.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-10T23:47:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173815</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173815" />
    <title>Comment from Wayne Sutton on 2009-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Wayne Sutton</name>
        <uri>http://socialwayne.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://socialwayne.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm going to comment on #1, Google Wave. I don't think it sucked. Working on a post about use cases now. Hope to have ready soon.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-10T14:59:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173788</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173788" />
    <title>Comment from Σχολή Χορού on 2009-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Σχολή Χορού</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>That was a punch in the face for me. After struggling very hard for an invite to Google wave, i am reading that its the #1 failure of 2009 .... no i am not crying no ...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-10T11:39:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173779</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173779" />
    <title>Comment from Karl Roche on 2009-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Karl Roche</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The leapfish video just reminds me of The Day Today. Anyone for cake?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-10T10:17:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173775</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173775" />
    <title>Comment from Chazz on 2009-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Chazz</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Boybunny you say apple is a failure? Go look at apple stock then go look at microsofts stock apples stock is atleast 8 times higher and keep I mind apple is a 12 times smaller company than Microsoft. If that's not success then please explain what is? </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-10T08:50:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173721</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173721" />
    <title>Comment from Steven Vaughan on 2009-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Steven Vaughan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The sad thing about your post and blogging in general is that you post articles slamming various companies and they have absolutely no recourse.<br />
As an example, last night I posted some Google statistics about you, the author of this article, that were unflattering, but true in so far as they were numbers regarding Google search statistics. However, because you have the power in this particular rag, you can delete whatever you disagree with. That is not journalism. <br />
Just because you have a stage and a microphone does not mean you are correct or justified in what you have to say. Free speech does not mean that you can put someone down and then delete their rebuttal. That is not "free speech"; that is totalitarianism.<br />
Actually, it is really just your ego getting in the way of professional journalistic objectivity. Perhaps they don't teach that in Universities ranked in the high 3,000's.<br />
Sadly, you will delete this post as well which, between you and me, just proves my point.<br />
If you Google "Jolie Odell is a hack", you get 28,900 hits<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-10T04:17:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173685</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173685" />
    <title>Comment from Ville on 2009-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ville</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Nice list.</p>

<p>Only thing I don't agree also is with Wave. I do think Google overhyped the product at the launch, they did not manage expectations correctly. It is not a new Google search as such, and it should not be taken as a one simple product. it is something a bit more sophisticated and complex than that. </p>

<p>It should be seen as a raw platform, it will take some time for great google wave applications to popup, but when do do popup I believe they are (web)life changing. </p>

<p>Let's just hope that disappointment which came after the hype, doesn't kill the product before it even took off. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-10T02:33:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173657</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173657" />
    <title>Comment from Johnny Rocket on 2009-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Johnny Rocket</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Oh wow, you really did pick some good ones dude.</p>

<p>RT<br />
www.web-anonymity.se.tc</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-09T23:09:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173612</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173612" />
    <title>Comment from Web Axe on 2009-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Web Axe</name>
        <uri>http://WebAxe.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://WebAxe.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Google Wave is not web accessible, plain and simple. Horrible job here. They need to take the lead in this arena like Yahoo! is doing. And with the tons of money that Google has, this shouldn't be a problem. More on my podcast: <a href="http://webaxe.blogspot.com/2009/10/podcast-75-jeremy-keith-interview-wave.html" rel="nofollow">http://webaxe.blogspot.com/2009/10/podcast-75-jeremy-keith-interview-wave.html</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-09T19:32:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173610</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173610" />
    <title>Comment from Web Overhauls on 2009-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Web Overhauls</name>
        <uri>http://weboverhauls.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weboverhauls.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Great article! Especially agree on Twitter: they very badly need to make their service more reliable, notably the API.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-09T19:29:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173559</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173559" />
    <title>Comment from Katie Holland on 2009-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Katie Holland</name>
        <uri>http://tryingtogetpregnanttips.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://tryingtogetpregnanttips.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Ya i didn't care for Google Wave, either. Not a very big deal.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-09T16:03:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173540</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173540" />
    <title>Comment from Tikoim on 2009-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tikoim</name>
        <uri>http://www.tikoim.de</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tikoim.de">
        <![CDATA[<p>The Leapfish video is great - with Star Wars meets Sparrow sound track, M. Jackson  in it and endless buzzwords. Where the web meets the world? wt* <br />
Didn't know the AOL rebranding logos - they seem to be from the same author as the leapfish video. <br />
Keep it up!<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-09T13:40:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173537</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173537" />
    <title>Comment from Ryan on 2009-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I dont agree with you. Your foremost point - "Google wave Sucked" is not at all true. You need to understand it before you write such things.</p>

<p>I agree, Google wave is tough to understand but there articles to explain <a href="http://www.gtricks.com/google-wave-tricks/google-wave-explain-simple-terms/" rel="nofollow">wave in laymans term </a>. You must understand that wave is not made for fun. It is not for causal users. Look at the usability for corporate point of view. Very useful for teams, professionals and small companies.</p>

<p>BTW, rest of your points are valid. 2010 should be hopefully good.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-09T13:00:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173507</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173507" />
    <title>Comment from muzik dinle on 2009-12-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>muzik dinle</name>
        <uri>http://www.netmuzik.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.netmuzik.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>its good article. and i agree to. Google wave did suck big time.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-09T07:37:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173420</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173420" />
    <title>Comment from Jeff on 2009-12-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I agree that this list isn't great, but there's one thing that I really want to clear up:</p>

<p>Steep learning curves means something is *easy* to learn. </p>

<p>I know that's not how people use it but that is what it means. A learning curve is the line on a graph or performance over time, where the performance axis ranges from beginner to pro. A steep learning curve means that the slope of the line is high, thus you are able to go from a no0b to a pro in a very short period of time. This means it is easy to learn. Think about it.</p>

<p>Hard to learn things are the opposite of steep. They take months and months to gain any skill, which means the learning curve is next to flat.</p>

<p>Think before you post [redacted] lists.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T23:52:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173417</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173417" />
    <title>Comment from Jason on 2009-12-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jason</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>You are wrong about Google Wave.  For those of us that have learned to use it and found its collaborative nature, it establishes new ground for sharing information.  Its much more effective if you know 100 people that have wave accounts that are in the same line of work.  Thats when its power starts to show.  Yes, its slow right now, but that can be fixed.  The product is great and does exactly what it says it will do.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T23:43:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173415</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173415" />
    <title>Comment from Markman on 2009-12-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Markman</name>
        <uri>http://www.scottmarkman.net/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.scottmarkman.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm glad to hear other people feel Leapfish is sketchy. At my last company, they tried to bully me to buy advertising on their site. I told them no a couple times, but they kept calling.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T23:25:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173413</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173413" />
    <title>Comment from BoyBunny on 2009-12-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>BoyBunny</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Apple in general. For a monopolistic company who had a free run while Android wasn't out of the starting blocks, and Vista was still dying of some nasty venereal disease, they completely failed to capatalise. I am sure there are plenty of Americans crying foul at the statement, but face it, USA has always been a small market on the world stage, and is now officially smaller than Europe, and will be smaller then China within 5 years, the fact that Apple can only please Americans while ignoring the desires, needs and basic consumer rights in every other country around the world only dooms Apple in the long run.</p>

<p>More specifically, Snow Leopard is a complete failure. The data eating 64 bit OS that only boots in 32 bit by default (and only 32 bit on more than 50% of Macs)... the OS that even Apple could not believe they could overcharge for. The OS with no new features (though to listen to Mac fanatics it was a W7 beater).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T23:02:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173409</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173409" />
    <title>Comment from dan on 2009-12-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>dan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This list is a failure.</p>

<p>I would write a long comment as to why, but that would be a further waste of my time after reading this blog post.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T22:52:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173407</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173407" />
    <title>Comment from Random Hero on 2009-12-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Random Hero</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Spreading content across multiple pages.... FAIL</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T22:47:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173386</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173386" />
    <title>Comment from John on 2009-12-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>John</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Uh, Google Wave does not suck....</p>

<p>So your problem was it took you too long to learn and you got frustrated at not being able to find a use for it, goodness forbid we try to learn new software.. Better to get frustrated and quit. Seriously any person who calls themselves a techie and acts like that is delusional. Just because YOU couldn't think of a use for it doesn't mean other people won't.</p>

<p>Only took me about a hour or two to get a grasp of how it worked then shortly after started to use it for planning some projects I'm working on with friends.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T19:17:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173383</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173383" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-12-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>1. Bing doesn't actually suck. It's not better than Google for most searches, but there's a difference between being somewhat inferior and actually sucking. For search engine sucking sounds, you'll have to go back last year to Cuil, or a few years more to Ask Jeeves.</p>

<p>2. 99.9-with-a-macron% of Bing has nothing to do with PowerSet. PowerSet technology is not useful on general web search material.</p>

<p>3. PowerSet, however, was never very impressive even prior to its buyout by Microsoft, mainly because prior to Bing all it could really do was a little bit of processing on Wikipedia and Freebase, for which direct use of either site was more efficient.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T18:27:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173379</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173379" />
    <title>Comment from Todd Steel on 2009-12-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Todd Steel</name>
        <uri>http://www.paramount-roll.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.paramount-roll.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>People are still offering Google Wave invites on Twitter, but it's more hush-hush now - almost apologetic.  I'm still not interested.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T17:53:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173374</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173374" />
    <title>Comment from Dan Ruby on 2009-12-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dan Ruby</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Cuil anybody?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T17:29:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173367</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173367" />
    <title>Comment from Richard Ashby on 2009-12-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard Ashby</name>
        <uri>http://www.leeds.ac.uk/comms</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.leeds.ac.uk/comms">
        <![CDATA[<p>Regarding Google Wave, I'm not sure how you can really say unfinished beta software is a failure but there you go.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T16:43:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173350</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173350" />
    <title>Comment from kramer on 2009-12-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>kramer</name>
        <uri>http://neonhomer.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://neonhomer.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>"It was the tech industry equivalent of FOX cancelling the Simpsons."</p>

<p>Bad analogy - the simpsons should have been cancelled a long time ago, it's only a shadow of the great relevant show it once was. Maybe you should have used arrested development or futurama.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T15:31:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173345</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173345" />
    <title>Comment from Fred on 2009-12-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Fred</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Uhm, so PowerSet -- a $100m acquisition, returning over 10x multiple for their investors, now integrated into the second-most-popular search engine on the planet, is a failure?</p>

<p>What kind of weird standard are you guys using as a measure of success, in that case?  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T15:14:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173340</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173340" />
    <title>Comment from Iain Wallace on 2009-12-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Iain Wallace</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>That Leapfish video looks like it could have come right out of a Brasseye special. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T14:36:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173336</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173336" />
    <title>Comment from Scott on 2009-12-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Scott</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Am I missing something here...Bing is on your best and worst lists? Please make up your mind!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T14:12:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173319</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173319" />
    <title>Comment from SidGabriel on 2009-12-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>SidGabriel</name>
        <uri>http://TheTechnologist.TV</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://TheTechnologist.TV">
        <![CDATA[<p>Twitter did not fail to innovate. It was innovation to let the realtime web flourish without eating it's big monetized players. That was an innovative strategy. I argue that Twitter's massive and diverse ecosystem of 3rd party applications is an innovation in distributed application development. They have so many diverse and interesting apps running on their infrastructure. Ideas they didn't come up with and are not liable for and can make money from the success of. That is an amazing invention. </p>

<p>Signing deals to feed Google and Microsoft (to keep them relevant to the present). Against the competitive trend of "dominating" a media format is innovative business development. Microsoft and Google wouldn't have made that deal. That deal made Bing and Google literally yesterday's internet. </p>

<p>It was an amazing piece of stewardship to watch. For anyone with the eyes to see it. Evan Williams held steady and focused on maintaining the service as it scaled massively once again (they scale on a vertcal slope year over year).</p>

<p>Every outlet in the media had at least one writer who suddenly became a nosy grandparent, nagging him: "how are you going to make money?, shouldn't you shack up with someone nice like Google?, how are you going to keep this up?" </p>

<p>His infrastructure encroached upon Iran's Election and proliferated interconnection in realtime between disparate cultures all over the planet.</p>

<p>They could have cashed in at record scale many times this year. Instead, they held the line, dug in their position and continued to do what they are good at: The Work. </p>

<p>That that service stays up is a magnificent achievement and I believe the reason the Wave sucked so bad (and you're right, it sucked) is that Google doesn't know how to scale to the size of Twitter. Not the Tweeting part and the website. The API and partnerships. </p>

<p>The ecosystem was an innovative success. Take them off the fail list please. They deserve better treatment. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T10:18:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173310</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173310" />
    <title>Comment from Richard on 2009-12-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Like many of the other people here, I don't agree Google Wave is a failure yet. Yes, it's far too slow to be genuinely useful, but it shows promise.</p>

<p>But I do agree about the Oracle/MySQL thing. Most disturbing. It's deals like that which anti-trust, anti-competitive authorities should be looking at rather than wasting their time on nonsense such as which web browser Windows ships with. Buying up your competitors who offer free alternatives... that's REALLY anti-competitive.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T09:24:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173301</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173301" />
    <title>Comment from Alex Young on 2009-12-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Alex Young</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I agree with all of these.  Spotify also had a major security breach back in March.</p>

<p>I don't think MySQL will become closed source, Oracle will just want to capitalise on it as a way to sell other services to small businesses.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T07:31:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173299</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173299" />
    <title>Comment from Anders Ytterstr on 2009-12-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anders Ytterstr</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>What about trading? You americans get Spotify, and Europe - or at least Scandinavia - get Hulu.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T07:27:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173286</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173286" />
    <title>Comment from Peter Kretzman on 2009-12-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Peter Kretzman</name>
        <uri>http://www.peterkretzman.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.peterkretzman.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Spot on, Jolie -- and nicely avoiding the usual crowd wisdom that yawns loftily about major trends like cloud computing while (mysteriously, to my mind) embracing Google Wave as groundbreaking.  Also a scream to read: I'm still getting over the "infant carcass" line.  Well done!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T06:57:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173281</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173281" />
    <title>Comment from Warren Benedetto on 2009-12-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Warren Benedetto</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I wouldn't call Google Wave a failure. A "letdown" maybe. Maybe a "disappointment." But it's soooo early to call it a failure. </p>

<p>In its current incarnation, it is plagued by information overload. But I think that will be hammered out over time, as Google iterates the product based on user feedback.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T06:51:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173279</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173279" />
    <title>Comment from Sam Schuurman on 2009-12-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sam Schuurman</name>
        <uri>http://ithnk.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://ithnk.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I would add the blockage of the Google voice app for the iPhone.</p>

<p>+ the continuing hold up of VOIP (e.g. skype) apps for mobile</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T06:27:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173273</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173273" />
    <title>Comment from JP on 2009-12-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>JP</name>
        <uri>http://reflect7.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://reflect7.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>What's wrong with the LeapFish video? I kinda like it. Do you feel the music is cheesy? I mean... I agree, it really doesn't demonstrate what the service does. However, it did enough to keep me watching until the end.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T06:12:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173252</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173252" />
    <title>Comment from Anthony Young on 2009-12-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anthony Young</name>
        <uri>http://www.driversoftwareupdate.com/compare</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.driversoftwareupdate.com/compare">
        <![CDATA[<p>"Oracle Acquired MySQL... Will MySQL remain free-as-in-beer and open source? Or will it succumb to corporate lameness?"</p>

<p>It will be sad to see MySQL go down the road of "pay-to-play database". But thats were it would eventually end up because Oracle is in the business of making money.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.driversoftwareupdate.com/compare/" rel="nofollow">driver update software</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T05:18:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173251</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173251" />
    <title>Comment from Pallav on 2009-12-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Pallav</name>
        <uri>http://reviewera.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://reviewera.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't agree on Google Wave either. I don't know what Google was thinking launching a half-baked version but I think views will change on Wave in time.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T05:17:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173250</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173250" />
    <title>Comment from reechard.myopenid.com on 2009-12-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>reechard.myopenid.com</name>
        <uri>http://softmachinecubed.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://softmachinecubed.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'll have to agree 100% on LeapFish. The ridiculous, bombastic, drama-queen-on-steroids music is so over the top, I fear this is a larger trend. Especially prevalent in reality programming like Hell's Kitchen.</p>

<p>OMG, they're going to make a SALAD in THREE MINUTES. Break out the Carmina Burana! Will civilization survive? </p>

<p>When someone beats me over the head like this, I say "ow" -- not "wow."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T05:15:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173248</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173248" />
    <title>Comment from Rich on 2009-12-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rich</name>
        <uri>http://blogs.verisign.com/web-user-experience/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.verisign.com/web-user-experience/">
        <![CDATA[<p>R.I.P Google Wave!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T05:05:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173245</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173245" />
    <title>Comment from GR on 2009-12-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>GR</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think I'll wait for Google Wave to actually come out of its Alpha 'Preview' release status before I drop the hammer on it.  You haven't even seen a feature complete version of the product yet!  Its pretty ambitious don't you think?  I swear that soon you bloggers will want real unicorns delivered with every new app (no matter how many alpha/beta graphics are stamped on it) before you're satisfied.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T04:36:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173243</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173243" />
    <title>Comment from Jorge on 2009-12-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jorge</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don´t agree about googlewave...we´ll see in some time if you are right.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T04:30:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173236</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173236" />
    <title>Comment from Jonathan Streeter on 2009-12-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jonathan Streeter</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Now wait just a sec here...you're saying that the Emperor has no clothes? But eleventy million Tweeters (all of whom seem to be offering a free social media webinar this week) told me that Wave is the next big thing and that people are no longer going to need to learn how to speak since the future is all about apps on your iPhone. Who to believe???</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T04:09:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173230</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173230" />
    <title>Comment from Jerry Limonta on 2009-12-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jerry Limonta</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Excellent article !!!!!!</p>

<p>ereaderuniverse.com</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T04:03:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173227</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173227" />
    <title>Comment from Marna on 2009-12-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Marna</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>LeapFish may of been a fail, but huge applause to whoever the music supervisor was on the video.  Bold, strong, and convincing music... the kind of music that makes investors feel like conquerors.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T03:42:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349-comment:173226</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.17349" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_failures_of_2009.php#c173226" />
    <title>Comment from Eston on 2009-12-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Eston</name>
        <uri>http://socialuxe.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://socialuxe.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bit.ly/4B5exm" rel="nofollow">Like I said</a> about the Leapfish video the other day: this is what happens when you give a Leapfish intern After Effects, some Web buzzwords, and the soundtrack to Pirates of the Caribbean. Brilliant.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-08T03:38:26Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
