<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2011:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338-</id>
  <updated>2011-08-16T14:59:49Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Google&apos;s Semantic Web Push: Rich Snippets Usage Growing</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.35-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=20338" title="Google's Semantic Web Push: Rich Snippets Usage Growing" />
    <published>2010-06-24T21:50:54Z</published>
    <updated>2010-06-25T05:55:00Z</updated>
    <title>Google&apos;s Semantic Web Push: Rich Snippets Usage Growing</title>
    <summary>Google&apos;s Semantic Web Push: Rich Snippets</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Features" />
    
    <category term="Google" />
    
    <category term="SemTech 2010" />
    
    <category term="Semantic Web" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/google_options_logo.jpg" />At the <a href="http://semtech2010.semanticuniverse.com/">Semantic Technology conference</a> in San Francisco today, Google gave an update of its <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/search_options_google_search_evolves.php">rich snippets</a> initiative - which adds extra information to Google search results. For example, showing restaurant review ratings. It's an experimental Semantic Web feature, but today's update shows that usage is increasing and Google wants to ramp it up significantly.</p>
<p>Rich snippets was announced in May last year and began to be seen in results around October. At the SemTech panel today, Google's Pravir Gupta noted that rich snippets impressions have grown four-fold globally since October 2009, with a two-fold increase on the US/English Web. Rich snippets is available in more than 40 languages.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/richsnippets_june10a.jpg" /></p>
<p>Gupta told the SemTech audience that there are now more than 50 reviews sites using rich snippets, for example sites that offer restaurant reviews. Also there has been uptake on social networking sites,  like Facebook and LinkedIn.</p>
<p>The most common use cases are events (which was <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_search_just_got_a_little_bit_smarter_highli.php">added in January</a>) and recipe formats. Google is adding support for more formats, such as video, local businesses and shopping.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/rich_snippets_june10c.jpg" /></p>
<p>Google is using structured data open standards such as microformats and RDFa to power the rich snippets feature. As the below chart shows, microformats is more common than RDFa for this feature.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/richsnippets_june10b.jpg" /></p>
<p>Google spent a good deal of today's panel continuing its drive to get webmasters to adopt rich snippets. It has a tool called the <a href="http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets">Rich Snippets Testing Tool</a>, which helps publishers utilize rich snippets.</p>
<p>Finally, Kavi Goel from Google talked about how Google can accelerate growth of the ecosystem, noting that less than 5% of webpages currently have semantic markup. Google wants to see this rise to 50% or more. It is looking for critical mass, which includes adding more formats and encouraging more &quot;beneficial peer pressure&quot; for companies to support rich snippets. Goel cited restaurant review sites as an example - it's not just Yelp which supports it, but other restaurant review services too.</p>
<p>Rich snippets is an example of how the Semantic Web is being adopted by large and powerful Internet companies, so it's encouraging to see that Google is pushing for rapid adoption.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338-comment:299118</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php#c299118" />
    <title>Comment from Motorcycle Mirrors on 2011-01-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>Motorcycle Mirrors</name>
        <uri>http://www.d2moto.com/c-763-mirrors.aspx</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.d2moto.com/c-763-mirrors.aspx">
        <![CDATA[<p>Perhaps a good follow-up article would be something that explains the "semantic" Web and how rich extract only the beginning of a complete revolution in how we find our data. I spend my extracts RDFa format which is the primary markup language semantics.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2011-01-20T12:17:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338-comment:281353</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php#c281353" />
    <title>Comment from Martin Hepp on 2010-12-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Martin Hepp</name>
        <uri>http://purl.org/goodrelations/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://purl.org/goodrelations/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Dear all:</p>

<p>Most of the comments from above are now outdated, since as of November 2, 2010, Google is now recommending GoodRelations for product and price information in Web pages, and that in a way fully upwards compatible with the Semantic Web at large.</p>

<p>See <a href="http://www.heppresearch.com/gr4google" rel="nofollow">http://www.heppresearch.com/gr4google</a> for a recipe that caters for Google Rich Snippets AND the Web of Linked Data, and further links.</p>

<p>This is a major - if not the critical - step towards massive adoption of RDF, because there is now a clear incentive for any site owner in the world to add rich meta-data in RDFa to her or his page templates. </p>

<p>It is safe to assume that additional GoodRelations elements, not currently relevant for Rich Snippets, and RDF features currently not required by Google (e.g. datatype information), will not irritate Google's processing of RDFa markup, so you can cater for Google and the Web of Linked Data in one turn.</p>

<p>Best wishes</p>

<p>Martin Hepp</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-12-02T08:40:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338-comment:240983</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php#c240983" />
    <title>Comment from Onore on 2010-09-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Onore</name>
        <uri>http://onore.kiev.ua</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://onore.kiev.ua">
        <![CDATA[<p>2 Jakub<br />
I used Rich Snippets Testing Tool for <a href="http://www.peryskop.pl/produkt/808/CANON-PIXMA-MX850" rel="nofollow">http://www.peryskop.pl/produkt/808/CANON-PIXMA-MX850</a> and Dont see snipet.<br />
Which from big store used product snippets?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-09-02T07:07:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338-comment:228818</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php#c228818" />
    <title>Comment from jennifer duncan on 2010-07-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>jennifer duncan</name>
        <uri>http://www.worldsbestinformation.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.worldsbestinformation.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>well mike benefit to seo is secondary aspect google always considered visitors as primary one. Whereas still there are huge number of website who had not implemented this so it needs to create awareness to get atleast 50% positive response. Well google is expert the way google has implemented its comprehensive and universal search is really a cup of tea for google :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-07-28T13:16:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338-comment:222604</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php#c222604" />
    <title>Comment from Tifur Rahman on 2010-07-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tifur Rahman</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thank u</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-07-06T11:30:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338-comment:222337</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php#c222337" />
    <title>Comment from David on 2010-07-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>David</name>
        <uri>http://www.slicefactory.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.slicefactory.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>What's so interesting in this results? Why nobody asked the main question about Google Rich Snippet's implementation : <strong>what are the real benefits</strong>, i.e. SEO benefits, conversion benefits? In termes of CTR, search engin traffic increase?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-07-05T14:40:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338-comment:220305</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php#c220305" />
    <title>Comment from December on 2010-06-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>December</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Very interesting<br />
I spoke to several googlers and they are very sceptical aboout Semantic Web initiative. They believe semantic web search will be always inferior to google search.<br />
But Google found how to use Semantic Web in a very limited way - to generate snippets instead of improving search<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-06-26T18:25:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338-comment:220010</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php#c220010" />
    <title>Comment from Jakub on 2010-06-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jakub</name>
        <uri>http://www.peryskop.pl</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.peryskop.pl">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
We could add rich snippets to site, but there is no guarantee that Google use it. As a main provider of reviews through aggregation we could produce snippets for any language regarding product reviews. </p>

<p>See that on <a href="http://www.peryskop.pl/produkt/808/CANON-PIXMA-MX850" rel="nofollow">http://www.peryskop.pl/produkt/808/CANON-PIXMA-MX850</a> for one product.</p>

<p>Rgs, Jakub</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-06-25T09:22:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338-comment:220008</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php#c220008" />
    <title>Comment from mhausenblas.myopenid.com on 2010-06-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>mhausenblas.myopenid.com</name>
        <uri>http://sw-app.org/about.html</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://sw-app.org/about.html">
        <![CDATA[<p>@John: yes, you're right.</p>

<p>@Richard: I guess the Google chaps should catch up on Sindice; here are some other figures:</p>

<p>+ RDFa documents indexed: 25 millions [1]<br />
+ Microformats documents indexed: 20 millions [2]</p>

<p><br />
Cheers,<br />
Michael</p>

<p>[1] <a href="http://sindice.com/search?q=format%3ARDFA&qt=term" rel="nofollow">http://sindice.com/search?q=format%3ARDFA&qt=term</a><br />
[2] <a href="http://sindice.com/search?q=format%3AMICROFORMAT&qt=term" rel="nofollow">http://sindice.com/search?q=format%3AMICROFORMAT&qt=term</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-06-25T09:11:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338-comment:219884</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php#c219884" />
    <title>Comment from Sam on 2010-06-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sam</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Google Snippets are very limited and mainly microformats which is a dead end. Nothing I see here tells me they are advancing snippet support for RDFa. </p>

<p>On the otherhand surprisingly Facebook are extensively supporting RDFa in the OpenGraph Protocol </p>

<p>"We've added the Open Graph Protocol markup to every public Page on Facebook. Check out <a href="http://www.facebook.com/Starbucks," rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/Starbucks,</a> <a href="http://www.facebook.com/WhiteHouse," rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/WhiteHouse,</a> </p>

<p>And also listening to the community to make it more standardised </p>

<p><a href="http://groups.google.com/group/opengraphprotocol/browse_thread/thread/cc03368ef0d12c1a" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/opengraphprotocol/browse_thread/thread/cc03368ef0d12c1a</a></p>

<p>P.S I really hope Twitter annotations support RDFa.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-06-24T22:48:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338-comment:219873</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2010://1.20338" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_semantic_web_push_rich_snippets_usage_grow.php#c219873" />
    <title>Comment from John Breslin on 2010-06-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>John Breslin</name>
        <uri>http://www.johnbreslin.org/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.johnbreslin.org/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Are the RDFa stats lower because they are indexing the official Google Rich Snippets vocabularies only? I read that support has been added for FOAF - any others like Good Relations or *cough* SIOC?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-06-24T22:07:39Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
