ReadWriteWeb

4 Years Ago Today - Netscape Corporation Killed, Mozilla Foundation Born

Written by Richard MacManus / July 15, 2007 1:30 AM / 7 Comments

4 years ago today, 15 July 2003, AOL Time Warner disbanded Netscape Communications Corporation - the company that sparked the Dot Com Internet boom in the mid-90's with its 1995 IPO. Also 4 years ago today, The Mozilla Foundation was established. mozillaZine reported at the time:

"It has been learned through public and private sources that AOL has cut or will cut the remaining team working on Mozilla in a mass firing and are dismantling what was left of Netscape (they've even pulled the logos off the buildings). Some will remain working on Mozilla during the transition, and will move to other jobs within AOL.

The news isn't all doom and gloom, folks. I've been informed that the number of volunteer Mozilla hackers started eclipsing the number of Netscape hackers last month, and that a number of folks have already been snatched up by other organizations. "

firefox 24 years later? In 2006 Netscape was re-born as a digg clone and AOL struggles to make the news at all these days. But the Mozilla Foundation continues to grow, with the Firefox browser inching upwards every month in the browser market share. History has shown it was the right move to open source the Mozilla browser.

I was impressed with this post by Anil Dash 4 years ago, which in hindsight is remarkably prescient:

"Now that Netscape's more or less officially dead, it occurs to me that it might be worthwhile for Google to bankroll the Mozilla Foundation, either by donating a substantial sum or by hiring several of the browser engineers. Google's shown a penchant not just for being "not evil" but for supporting products and companies (ahem) that contribute to the web even if it's not directly in the area of search.

Since Google's all but announced that they're no longer "just search", I'd probably amend my qualms about lack of focus and say that if Google wants to own the entire area of information innovation, they need to be significant contributors to the evolution of Mozilla."

Remember, Anil wrote that 4 years ago - but it is almost precisely what has panned out. Google has hired a number of Mozilla engineers over the past few years and now dominates the area of Web innovation, at least among the big companies. We've commented a few times about the cozy relationship between Google and Mozilla, and it's interesting to look back 4 years and consider how that all started.

How poetic is this: the death of a Web 1.0 poster child (Netscape), ironically killed by a bloated bigco, led to the birth of a Web 2.0 standards bearer (Mozilla/Firefox) and the amorous attentions of the main Internet bigco today - Google. Shakespeare couldn't have scripted it better. Life is all about cycles though, so whether the Google/Mozilla romance turns out to be comedy or tragedy in 4 more years time -- that is the question.



2 TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2359

Comments

Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts

  1. Great insights, Richard. Cycles, indeed. It's really good to step back and look at history from time to time. People might say four years isn't going back that far -- but, hey, in this business, it's a lifetime.

    cheers,
    Graeme

    Posted by: Graeme Thickins | July 15, 2007 7:15 AM



  2. Wasn't Firefox previously named "Firebird" as in the mythological Phoenix.

    Posted by: Don Vaillancourt | July 15, 2007 7:22 AM



  3. A very nice commentary on the evolution from web 1.0 to 2.0. I consider myself quite historically relevant and you certainly hit on a key component to the evolution, a tipping
    point.

    But what's next? Any thoughts or comments? With the seemingly imminent beaking down of MySpace (two to three years) which will be followed by Facebook, has social media caused a bloating so substantial that it will be its own downfall?

    Posted by: Brett Williams | July 15, 2007 9:56 AM



  4. Haven't thought of Netscape in a while, so I didn't realize it...

    "Google's shown a penchant not just for being "not evil" but for supporting products and companies (ahem) that contribute to the web even if it's not directly in the area of search."

    Riiight... That's why they're monopolizing the universe.

    Posted by: Jason | July 15, 2007 10:59 AM



  5. Richard, thanks very much for the kind comments. You might enjoy the Circle of (Web) Life post I wrote a while back, too. :)

    Posted by: Anil | July 15, 2007 2:25 PM



  6. I love your post. World Wide Web evolves dramatically after its birth. "Study the past if you would define the future," written by Confucius. It's time for us to start looking for the history of WWW so that we may foresee its future.

    I just started a series of posts to present a view of web evolution at my own blog. Although this new view might not be perfect, I hope it would bring more attentions to this interesting topic of web evolution.

    Posted by: Yihong Ding | July 15, 2007 2:40 PM



  7. Heh. Yeah I was there...We just shipped Netscape 7.1 and then a bunch of us moved over to the Foundation, I joined a little later. And we chose Google not the other way around. Just to set this straight.

    Posted by: Rafael | July 15, 2007 7:37 PM



RWW SPONSORS


FOLLOW @RWW ON TWITTER

ReadWriteWeb on Facebook



TEXT LINK ADS