Shelfari, a small book sharing startup, was acquired today by Amazon (an existing investor in the company). Shelfari is known for its innovative user interface, something which we've discussed a few times on ReadWriteWeb. Shelfari's competitors include GoodReads and LibraryThing. The relationship with the latter has been frosty, with LibraryThing writing on its site today that Shelfari is a "clone" and that it is "somewhat less intellectual, less featureful", among other barbs.
Despite LibraryThing's criticisms, Shelfari has impressed us with its innovative UI. As Alex Iskold wrote in May, Shelfari developed a contextual UI for interacting with individual books. "The remarkable thing about this UI", wrote Alex, "is that it violates a lot of classic principles yet it succeeds in delivering the necessary functions in a contextual and compact way." He goes on to describe this:
"When the user mouses over a book, a contextual popup comes up containing information about the book
and a set of associated actions. Part of the popup is a button/menu (sort of like a button and combo box)
widget that allows the user to provide information about what he or she did with the book. The first thing to note
is that combination of a button in a menu is not standard, yet it makes sense because it saves a click for the
most important action. Secondly, the menu is effectively a popup within a popup, which is a big no-no in the classic world,
but works well in this context. The elements of the menu are not buttons but check boxes, which allow multiple selection -
another violation of classic user interface elements, but which works very well in this context. What is remarkable is how
intuitive this gadget is - you are interacting with it in the context of a book and each choice is simple and clear.
Such clarity and simplicity was never present in the old interfaces. Clearly, this new approach to UIs is great, and early adopters are loving it. But will it cross over to the mainstream?"
To answer Alex's question, in a way it already has crossed over to the mainstream - as Borders implemented a very similar design near the end of May. But in general whether Shelfari goes mainstream will depend on how Amazon integrates it with its core business and with products such as the e-Reader Kindle.
Also it's worth noting that Amazon has been busy lately with book-related acquisitions. Earlier this month Amazon announced its acquisition of AbeBooks, an online marketplace for used and rare books. Interestingly AbeBooks owns 40% of LibraryThing!
LibraryThing is clearly worried about today's acquisition. In the above-linked piece, founder and lead developer of LibraryThing Tim Spalding notes that "Amazon can make Shelfari the choice of casual book-lovers who see a button on Amazon.com and click on it." LibraryThing hopes to compete with this by being a superior service. However it's very difficult to compete against Amazon's bulk.
Good luck to LibraryThing, we all love a feisty competitor. For now, tell us in the comments what you think Amazon will do with Shelfari now that it owns it outright.
Comments
Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts
Of course, AbeBooks has a 40% stake in LibraryThing as well.
C'mon, Richard- no mention of Shelfari's shady spamming and astroturfing?
Your post focuses on LibraryThing's distaste for Shelfari without mentioning that the folks at LibraryThing have always been very, very cordial with their competitors EXCEPT Shelfari precisely because of these behaviors.
I want to look more for shelfari, maybe you can tell me Richard?
I think the Shelfari UI is very nice, a fresh look that could improve the Amazon experince...
Shelfari is nice, but a bit over-fancy.
LT is nice, but a bit too dull.
aNobii may be another better way out, its popularity in Europe is probably an evidence.
Goodreads is also quite nice.
LibraryThing are right. Their features are significantly better than Shelfari and it's the reason I use them.
That said, their site suffers from speed issues and, while having all the social bit and pieces, really doesn't "flow" nicely. It really feels like it has been put together by people focused strongly on the books but with less web savvy.
If there was a solution that was a visually as good as Shelfari and had the tools of LibraryThing, that would be perfect.
Can anyone think of another service Amazon has purchased and implemented into its main site?
Posted by: Frankie Warren
|
August 27, 2008 12:49 AM
Frankie, good question!
David, I have to admit I'm not familiar with Shelfari's supposed "shady spamming and astroturfing".
I do know that Goodreads is my fave such app, but I have tried out Shelfari and liked it. Maybe I should give LibraryThing a spin too.
I don't know. I've never been spammed by Shelfari, and don't think that they use this tactic. Having been a user of both librarything and shelfari, I think the former is a P.O.S., and Shelfari is a gorgeous app with all of the _right_ features. It is like comparing early Windows CE with early Palm OS: too many crappy features in a product render the product LESS usable not MORE usable. The LibraryThing folks should come to realize that.
Just one of many hits for "Shelfari spamming"