DISCLOSURE: This post is part of my sponsorship arrangement with Marqui. I am being paid US$800 per month for 3 months, to post once a week about Marqui.
It's that time of the week again, when I give my thanks to Marqui for sponsoring my blog for 3 months. Thanks! Anyway I thought I'd have a little fun with it this week and continue with the cut-up/remix theme I experimented with yesterday. I did a cut-up of recent Marqui coverage on blogs, using this method:
1) I'm subscribed to a PubSub search for the word "marqui". Using my Bloglines aggregator, I requested the last 48 hours worth of results from that feed (about 7,300 words).
2) I then ran it through the Grazulis Cut-up Machine 10 times, using the "random" setting.
3) Lastly, I condensed it to 100 words using Microsoft Word's nifty AutoSummarize feature.
The result was this, which came out rather poetic...
***start***
consumers
other marketing unspoken) posts. entrepreneurs program
Marqui
be Canter's Marqui product blogs small advertisers finally, some post:
experiment.
customers. blog):
financial and bloggers
individual bloggers. about the time is company Marqui, their is paid?
bloggers was participate in
original highly Marqui. bloggers steps the marketing monster nicely.
I company. Blog Service
idea of Marqui
of authorís Marqui changes
activity pay. products. Marqui's with Weblog
already marketing own experiments.
A products.
launched products about? blogger
I marketing).
blogger).
Ladyís to bloggers link. talking points
***finish***
p.s. I think this 'blog for dollars' program is working out very well for Marqui, no matter what the bloggers actually write. Which is to say - the coverage Marqui is getting from this program is more important to its success than the words being written about them.
Comments
Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all Read/WriteWeb posts
If nothing else, it's going to raise their PageRank WAY up ...
Posted by: Phillip Pearson | December 10, 2004 2:15 PM
Pubsub's linkrank today:
marqui.com 2334 2157
Not all that bad.
Posted by: richard | December 10, 2004 4:38 PM