ReadWriteWeb

Casting Stones Before the FCC: Google Voice and AT&T

Written by Dana Oshiro / October 9, 2009 2:42 PM / 3 Comments

google_fcc_oct09.jpgEver since AT&T filed a letter with the FCC about Google Voice's refusal to connect to certain areas, the two companies have been in a heated public battle. On the one side, AT&T takes the stance that as a carrier, Google is required to offer open access to all numbers. Nevertheless, in today's blog rebuttal, Google asserts, "Google Voice is a free web application, one intended to supplement and enhance existing phone lines, not replace them."

google_at&t_oct09.jpgIn addition to outlining that it is not a primary telecommunications carrier, Google points out that AT&T has hypocritically lobbied the FCC for permission to block local phone carriers. The reason both organizations want to restrict these groups is because they charge high termination rates and partner with adult hotlines and free conference calling centers to further drive traffic. Google argues that it cannot continue to operate as a free service while paying these rates.

Meanwhile, AT&T asserts that while it prefers existing internet principles and does not want radical expansions under the FCC, if the Commission does choose to further regulate, "It absolutely must ensure that any such rules apply evenly - not just to network operators but also to providers of Internet applications, content and services. Anything less would be ineffective, legally suspect and, in all events, a direct repudiation of President Obama's call for a 'level playing field'."

In your opinion should Google Voice be subject to the same rules that apply to AT&T or do you believe that web-based telephony groups like Skype, Google and Jajah should fall under a separate set of regulations?

Photo Credit: Aislinn Ritchie


Comments

Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts

  1. GV, Skype and other VoIp apps should be under separate regulations, because they are not wireless phone service prividers like AT&T or T-Mobile.

     Posted by: Tito Author Profile Page | October 9, 2009 3:37 PM



  2. Why not apply the rule evenly and let At&t off the hook too? If the FCC is forcing coverage of areas and local carriers are taking advantage of this, allow them to be ignored, the market will dictate that the termination charges be eliminated or people will choose mobile phones. Problem solved.

    Posted by: Jeff Rafter | October 11, 2009 1:29 PM



  3. 'In your opinion should Google Voice be subject to the same rules that apply to AT&T or do you believe that web-based telephony groups like Skype, Google and Jajah should fall under a separate set of regulations?'

    In all honesty, I would put them under the same rules and regulations ;)

    Posted by: Free iPod | October 11, 2009 3:34 PM



Leave a comment

Optional: Sign in with Connect Facebook   Sign in with Twitter Twitter   Sign in with OpenID OpenID  |  

If you think Twitter is big, check out the Real-Time Web
RWW SPONSORS



FOLLOW @RWW ON TWITTER

ReadWriteWeb on Facebook
ReadWriteCloud - Sponsored by VMware and Intel



TEXT LINK ADS



RWW PARTNERS