ReadWriteWeb

Compete Introduces Attention Statistics

Written by Richard MacManus / April 3, 2007 1:15 AM / 4 Comments

In an attempt to go beyond page views and visits, today web stats company Compete introduced "Attention metrics". The reason is that interactive Web page technologies such as Ajax and Flash - not to mention online video - are making simple page views and visits increasingly outdated. With Ajax for example, information on a webpage can be updated without needing to refresh the page. In order to get around these issues, Compete has introduced two specific attention metrics:

  • Attention: The total time spent on a site as a percentage of the total time spent online by all U.S. internet users
  • Velocity: The relative change in daily Attention; velocity is used to determine the relative growth of a website compared to other sites

The move is aimed at marketing people, to help them find "high-potential advertising sites".

To test this out, let's look at 3 popular websites - eBay, YouTube and MySpace. Here are their attention graphs on Compete:

Interesting that all 3 sites have an almost identical traffic pattern (in terms of peaks especially). Meanwhile MySpace has an attention metric of 13.073374%. YouTube has just over 1%, while eBay has just over 3% (of total time spent online by all U.S. internet users).

I also tested out a number of blogs, but most of them didn't have enough data to compute (including r/ww). Also there was an instance of incorrect data in Compete, relating to one of the few tech blogs that does have attention data. I've said it before, but Compete really needs to improve its data for blogs - because obviously popular blogs are key niche sites that marketers are interested in. Also as a publisher I would like to be able to measure 'attention' for R/WW, so I hope Compete can provide these metrics for blogs and small sites soon.

Disclosure: Compete is a current Read/WriteWeb sponsor.


4 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Compete Introduces Attention Statistics.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2098

Like most bloggers, I’m quasi-obsessed (okay, obsessed) with blog statistics. If my blog gets 1,000 more pageviews than yesterday, I want to know why, who and what. That said, there are literally dozens of ways to measure blog statistics so getti... Read More

» Today's headlines: GOOG aims at TV ads from Silicon Valley Watcher--reporting on the business and culture of disruption

Google announces TV ad trials (Google Blog) The state of Technorati (Dave Sifry) EU price probe into iTunes (BBC) Vonage does end-run around 2 of 3 Verizon patents (Ars Technica) Compete launches attention metrics (ReadWriteWeb) ViddYou launches Blogge... Read More

Today's entry is a bit of a monster. When you look through it you can see there are several items I almost made into the lead. I settled on pointing out the new collection of web logging services that return to the roots of blogging. ...Plus... Ways ... Read More

» Attention Metrics: Going Beyond Numbers from Pronet Advertising

A little over two months ago, I asked the question: should we measure traffic in minutes? The question was prompted by Scott Karp's observation that Read More

Comments

Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all Read/WriteWeb posts

  • Richard,
    I'm curious to know how you track Read/WriteWeb's stats. Do you use one service or multiple services?

    Mark

    Posted by: Mark Evans | April 3, 2007 12:02 PM


  • Hi Mark, I use multiple services - for site stats Google Analytics, Site Meter, Statcounter. I've also heard good things about CrazyEgg, so I want to try them out. For comparative stats, I use Compete, Alexa, Technorati, etc.

    Posted by: Richard MacManus | April 3, 2007 12:23 PM


  • This is very interesting...and definitly a move in the right direction.

    Posted by: Jitendra | April 4, 2007 9:55 AM


  • This is a great site! Thanks for the heads up and the great article. I just happened across complete last night and it tested out pretty well. Great flexibility, I always wonder about validity, but the numbers seem about right on the face of it.
    Thanks! Phil B.

    Posted by: Phil Butler | April 4, 2007 8:56 PM




RECENT JOBS


RWW READERS


TEXT LINK ADS


RWW PARTNERS

adaptiveblue

Yahoo Buzz