ReadWriteWeb

Current TV Takes User Generated Content On Air

Written by Josh Catone / July 6, 2007 1:03 PM / 6 Comments

With the massive Live Earth concerts, which will be broadcast live to an estimated 2 billion people over television and the Internet (you can watch them live on MSN), just about five hours away, I thought it might be interesting to take a brief look at Al Gore's other Internet and television endeavor.

Founded in 2005, Current TV is independent cable and satellite television network aimed at a youth demographic. Catering to the short attention spans of the 18-34 year old set, shows on Current are delivered in "pods," which are short segments that are generally under ten minutes in length (and usually not much longer than five). In March of this year, Current TV surpassed a global reach of 50 million homes when it launched in the UK on British Sky Broadcasting and Virgin Media.

Current is disruptive in a number of ways, not least of which is that 30% of its programming is created by viewers. On the Current TV website users are invited to upload, vote on, and comment on viewer created content (or VC2 as they call it). The most recent piece of viewer created content voted on air was the 5 minute and 14 second documentary Hip Hop Church, about "gospel rap." It had been viewed about 300 times before it was promoted to the the Current TV line up.

The rest of Current's programming, also delivered in pod-form, is created in house by its team of producers, some of whom started out as VC2 creators. Some of their current shows (no pun intended) include the news satire cartoon SuperNews and the Earth pod, which is about the environment (you knew they had to have one of those, right?). Check out the full list.

Current also invites its users to occasionally create advertisements for its sponsors, which they call VCAMs (Viewer Created Ad Messages). Ads that are selected to air on Current TV earn the creator a $1,000 pay day, and if the sponsor likes the ad enough to use it beyond Current TV, the creator is paid a $50,000 flat fee. At the moment, Current is soliciting VCAMs for XM Satellite Radio, the Toyota Prius, and and L'Oreal. I guess the chance at $50,000 is a great motivational tool, because some of the ads seem good enough for prime time TV to me. Check out the very well-produced animated ad for the Toyota Prius below.

Conclusion

Interestingly, Current TV is not planning to air the Live Earth concerts. I guess 24 hours of live, streaming music just doesn't fit with Current's programming approach. I wouldn't be surprised to see some post-concert recap pods appear in the next few weeks, though. Current TV is a unique approach to programming, and while the frenetic pace of 5 minute clips doesn't appeal to me (I enjoy watching 40 minutes of CSI!), YouTube has proven that ultra-short form content has a place in today's media. Current TV has figured out what appears to be a successful way to bridge the gap between user generated online video content and traditional television. It's no wonder the Washington Post proclaimed in a front-page headline in February that Al Gore (who is chairman of Current TV) may be America's "coolest ex-vice president ever."

Comments

Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all Read/WriteWeb posts

  • Current isn't broadcasting Live Earth because the rights for it belong to NBC Universal (in the States). They're highlighting it on NBC and are broadcasting it full in cable (in standard and HD, which is nice).
    http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6448366.html

    Wikipedia has a list of global broadcasters:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_Earth

    Posted by: David | July 6, 2007 1:49 PM



  • MSN's Live Earth coverage is going to be ambitious, with multiple streams, and archives will be searchable by country, artist and song. (Also take the last100 poll: how will you watch Live Earth: TV or Net?)

    Posted by: steve | July 6, 2007 2:02 PM



  • I meant that more as surprise that Gore didn't try to negotiate some broadcast rights for his own cable network (it would seem like a good idea to tie your progressive concert up with your progressive cable network...). I would guess the likely reason is, as I said, it just doesn't fit in with their approach. :)

    Posted by: Josh Catone | July 6, 2007 2:05 PM



  • The VCAM ads are a great idea. I guess the $50k could easily be taken up by production expenses, but still it is a chance for up and coming video producers to get their work noticed - maybe make a name for themselves as new media ad producers.

    Posted by: Richard MacManus | July 6, 2007 2:42 PM



  • It surprises me that Current isn't more prominent on the internet. You never hear about this company. It could probably be like YouTube but it's not.

    Waste.

    Posted by: Patricia | July 6, 2007 11:49 PM



  • @Patricia, For my taste Current.tv is too busy on the frontpage. Dark/Black site that's crowded - doesn't fit the image of Current.tv in my eyes.

    Posted by: macewan | July 8, 2007 6:07 PM




RECENT JOBS



TEXT LINK ADS


RWW PARTNERS


RWW READERS


RWW POLL