ReadWriteWeb

Cyber War Games Confirm Flaws in US Security

Written by Lidija Davis / December 20, 2008 8:05 PM / 4 Comments

cyber_security_dec_08.jpgAfter participating in a two day cyber war simulation last week, government and industry officials said that the United States is ill-equipped to cope with a major attack against computer networks Reuters reports.

The cyber war game brought together 230 representatives of government agencies, private companies and other groups, and revealed failings in leadership, planning, and communications.

Mark Gerencser, vice president of Booz Allen Hamilton, the consulting service which ran the simulation said: "There isn't a response or a game plan; there isn't really anybody in charge."

The threats are serious. Earlier this year, federal prosecutors charged 11 people with stealing more than 41 million credit and debit card numbers, cracking what appeared to be the largest hacking and identity theft network ever exposed.

Chairman of the Homeland Security Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, US Representative James Langevin said that a successful attack could lead to failure of banking or national electrical systems.

"We're way behind where we need to be now," said Langevin. "This is equivalent in my mind to before September 11 ... we were awakened to the threat on the morning after September 11."

Mock War Game Findings Similar to CSIS Report

The mock cyber attack follows the December 8 release of the CSIS Cybersecurity Commission report, Securing Cyberspace for the 44th Presidency which found that America's failure to protect cyberspace is one of the most urgent national security problems facing the new administration.

The report claims that there has been immense damage to the national interest, citing major intrusions to various government departments during 2007 alone:

Slashdot Puts Questions to Rep. Langevin

With the 98 page CSIS report raising more questions than answers, Slashdot solicited questions for Langevin in an attempt to better understand some of the recommendations. Yesterday Slashdot posted his reply.

The key points include:

  • The advantages of moving towards a more operational-focused testing environment like red/blue teams and penetration testing
  • The need to develop and issue standards and guidance for securing three specific critical cyber infrastructures - telecom, finance, and energy
  • Whether or not cyber operations should be run by the White House

Having witnessed President Elect Obama's capabilities when it comes to all things Web, and having heard his intent to renew our information superhighway, we suspect he understands the importance of focusing on our cyber security issues and continues to build a stronger Internet for the citizens of the United States.

Photo credit: Marcos Papapopolus


Comments

Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts

  1. American security notwithstanding, who's ready for the Second Internet War?

    Posted by: Ari Herzog Posted on FriendFeed   | December 20, 2008 10:19 PM



  2. How about a nice game of chess?

    Posted by: Anrkist | December 21, 2008 7:15 AM



  3. As a first step to improve national security, why don't we first stop spreading the same old naive "official truth" about 9/11, and examine how it really happened? Maybe then, we can understand how and from whom we really need to be protected.

    Posted by: Kostas | December 22, 2008 3:18 AM



  4. So much for the "Dept of Homeland Security" and the last seven years. What a waste of time and money.

    Posted by: Lee | December 29, 2008 10:19 AM



RWW SPONSORS


FOLLOW @RWW ON TWITTER

ReadWriteWeb on Facebook



TEXT LINK ADS