After months of promises (and third party tools), Digg finally announced this week that their recommendation engine is to be released. Today, Digg has delivered the goods to private beta testers. Here are the first screenshots of the new digg recommendation engine features, along with a video guide.
Digg Recommendation Engine from Kevin Rose on Vimeo.
Anton Talks About The Digg Recommendation Engine from Kevin Rose on Vimeo.
Not all the users have these features enabled yet, but those of you who do can check by going to upcoming and checking for a red BETA label. The new upcoming system has three ways to sort it and the third option in the list, Most Diggs, is the one you're used to seeing, where all stories are presented in order of decreasing Diggs.

The first new option, Most Matches, looks at your history of Digging, compares it with other community members, and shows the stories in order of number of matches. In the case of the first story, you see the expanded view of the 'Recommendations via' list, and in the case of the second story, you see it in the compact version, not showing the user names and percentages, rather only the total number. For example:

The second new option, Most Recent, shows you the stories recommended by community members compatible with you, in reverse chronological order. You can also see why a story was recommended to you (via user name and percentage of compatibility with that user).

A new section in the sidebar, entitled 'Diggers Like You' shows you Diggers that are most like you in their Digging and submitting habits.

And finally, you can click on a user and compare exactly how much you overlap. In the screenshot you see below you can see the overlap between my profile and thediggboss's profile. In total we had 3864 overlapping Diggs in the past 30 days, which means our compatibility score over all our Digg activity is 38%.

Overall the design is great and there is a decent feature set. As far as what it is designed to do, it seems to function well. At the same time however, whether the engine will help content submitted by a fairly obscure user, remains to be seen. In the beginning, all your compatibilities are going to be with the people that you have been Digging and the people that have been Digging you back, i.e. your friends. It will require widespread use of the feature 'Diggers Like You' to help more obscure submissions travel to a lot of people.
It is also important to note that the recommendation engine will be a boon to advertisers as well (and of course Digg). By sending the most relevant links to the most relevant people, you can also send the most relevant advertisements to the right people (and ensure high-quality clickthroughs). Users get good content and related, hopefully non-intrusive ads, advertisers get the right potential customers, and Digg gets the money.
This is a guest post by Muhammad Saleem, a social media consultant and a top-ranked community member on multiple social news sites. You can follow Muhammad on Twitter.
Special thanks to thediggboss for providing the images.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4340
Comments
Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts
I like this new engine but I doubt this will help Digg to become profitable...
LOL, Is Digg trying to become the next Google or something?
JT
www.FireMe.To/udi
Had to laugh at my 42% 'match' with Mu . . . luckily this isn't a dating statistic as he's the wrong sex!
Interesting. I wonder how they weight it all. Will they adjust the cost for advertising according to how many people are in that network?
I wonder if they have a good algorithm to find good new original stories within each category. Though I wonder if the recommendations go further then just the basic categories, perhaps the system should establish taste-groups and list recommendations in those groups.
Also, perhaps it should display random items as a kind of "Upcomming" feature and provide an icon for the user to discard an item as "Not interesting" which would add to the algorithm.
Also to prevent spam and parrallel collaboration (such as the Obama digg effect), the algorithm should take into account each other users validity or verification of the account. Since each person should only have one account, perhaps even provide a credit card based ID verification mechanism for each account, and if people verify their identity with Digg, this would help collaboratively filter out spam since the army of ultra-verified users would be able to help sort through all the submittion and their Diggs would be more trustable. Unless you have a strong enough IP and usage statistic that is enough to verify that each user is in fact connected to a unique indirectly verifiable identity.
Now if they can just figure out how to bring old stories back if they get popular again without someone having to resubmit them then they'll finally have a system that is "complete."
If two Diggers' compatibility score ever hit 100% -- if you met your Digg doppelganger -- would the universe explode?