Facebook announced today that after facing legal pressure from the Canadian government, it will begin working on ways for users to choose which parts of their full profile they are willing to expose to applications they add on Facebook.
Though the company talks about privacy all the time, the fact that it will take an estimated 12 months before this situation is resolved demonstrates how invested Facebook really is behind the scenes in a "let it all hang out" philosophy.
This morning we wrote about how Facebook quizzes are vacuuming up the profile data of unaware users. Anyone who has added an application from the Facebook platform, though, has seen the pop-up request for info: if you want to put a vibrating hamster picture on your Facebook page, for example, you have to expose all your info (marital status, school info, etc) to the people who made the hamster app. That never sounded like a tenable situation for the long term, and today it begins to change.
Presumably more user trust will facilitate more use of the applications, but Facebook privacy settings will become complicated with this new policy. You'll be prompted to choose which parts of your info you are willing to expose and which you aren't - but isn't that how real life works? Real life has very granular privacy controls; it's not an all-or-nothing experience.
This spring, we wrote about Facebook's moves to encourage more users to expose more of their information to more people. We asked the company on a press call if they were trying to push people towards being less private on the site, and they confirmed that yes, they are. That's clearly in Facebook's interest, but we believe that most users are interested in using the site primarily to communicate with known friends and family.
In real life offline, we usually get to choose what information we expose to particular people in particular situations. Facebook's new policy with regard to using apps will reflect that, but it will take time to put in place and it's a departure from the general direction the rest of the site is moving in.
We would love to see developers and analysts have free access to anonymous aggregate data on Facebook (it's in the public interest), but instead the company appears fundamentally aimed at limiting access to aggregate activity while pushing individual users to expose more of their information to platform apps and advertisers.
Comments
Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts
A few days ago I went through my facebook and removed everything that was out of date or of no use to me.
Is it any wonder that the only thing I kept were my friends, fan pages, photos and basic info?
Once you really evaluate what Facebook offers, everything other than what I kept is a joke / waste of time...
I guess all those stupid apps seemed to do more for people harvesting info than for myself... What's worse the way Facebook is set up all you have to do is accept something from a friend and boom you installed an app? Usually a completely worthless app that has an install process that too often chokes my Firefox browser!
I even asked all my friends if I was overlooking any essential apps? No one mentioned a single useful app. Do any of you out there know of a valuable app worth keeping? Be well, Deane
Canadians are wusses! Why bother, I say...
Deane, most facebook apps are dumb, I agree.
Remontti, Canadians have some of the best television in the world. Hardly wuss-like at all. And the hockey players?
Facebook Backs Off Total Exposure Requirement to Use Apps http://bit.ly/hy6Lr [from http://twitter.com/marshallk/statuses/3583420403]
Posted by: Marshall Kirkpatrick
|
August 27, 2009 1:01 PM
It's a good news.
I'd question the assertion that free access to anonymous, aggregated, data is in the ''public interest''. It's certainly in the commercial interest of developers and Facebook as a business.
Anyway, good to see some level of privacy control coming back to the individual, empowering the user and facilitating choice is a good thing.