Early this summer we wrote a post titled Why Online Noise is Good For You. It was all about the personal and professional benefits of spending time consuming unfiltered information from the blizzard of sources proliferating daily on the internet. It was a fun post and was responded to with thought provoking replies by readers in the comments section.
We decided to follow up on and reprint that post here on a late Friday afternoon. We're sure many of readers either didn't see it at the time or hadn't yet discovered ReadWriteWeb. Not everyone who did read it agreed with our conclusions, so after the post below we've added some of our favorite pro and con comments from the original, plus a cool personal story from a member of the RWW community. What do you think? Does online noise play a meaningful role in your life?
Blogs, RSS, IM, Twitter and FriendFeed - the number of sources of sources of information online can feel like it's multiplying exponentially every day. It's easy, natural even, to feel overwhelmed. Especially when we are more familiar with the tightly controlled editorial policies of mainstream media.
The social media space is noisy, though. There are many times when filtering that noise effectively makes a lot of sense (some tools discussed below) - but there are also many times when noise is just what we need.
There are many ways you can roughly cut down on the noise in your information stream. More emerge all the time and this is a very valuable direction for services to be exploring. We don't want to argue that noise is always good, it's clearly important to spend some time without it every day.
The most recent entry into the noise filtering scene is probably FriendFeed's new "best of" feature. Late last night FriendFeed rolled out the ability to view just the items most popular with your friends on the service for the last day, week or month. It's something many people have been hoping for and there's no doubt it will prove useful. If you're not using FriendFeed yet, you can check it out and add me as a friend if you like here.
Other services that are good for filtering out noise are del.icio.us popular for a particular tag, AideRSS and Google Reader's overly friendly shared items from friends feature. We'd love to read about your favorite noise filtering tools in comments below.

Filtering isn't everything it's cracked up to be, though, and you wouldn't want to live in a fully filtered world all the time. Social media noise is an essential part of learning and living on the web. Hear are some reasons why.
Unexpected opportunities.
Some people call it "serendipity," others call it "passive and opportunistic information acquisition." (Erdelez, see below.) The less limited the boundaries of your scope of view are, the more likely you may be to find things you didn't even think to look for.
Scanning quickly over large quantities of roughly relevant information can turn up invaluable resources, opportunities, context and contacts that you can passively process or opportunistically leverage at will.
Future Needs
It's one thing to find something you didn't know you needed right now, it's a whole other skill to be able to recall information that seemed marginally useful at best in the past at a time in the future when the need for it arises. Who can't remember doing that before?
The ability to recall passively collected information that was gathered purposelessly in the past and put it to use in the future is a particularly powerful form of intelligence. A person with a substantial reservoir of generally relevant information is a great person to have on any team.
Maximizing Recall
Some people worry that being exposed to too much information will lead to not remembering very much of it. Scientists say that's not necessarily the case, though. Sanda Erdelez, for example, wrote the following in her study Information Encountering: It's More Than Just Bumping into Information
A majority of participants in my information encountering study, when asked about their past experiences of "bumping into information," were familiar with the notion of accidental discovery of information and could recall these experiences clearly
We may be afraid that we won't remember key information that rushed past us in a river of news, but Erdelez argues that when prompted about a particular incident of accidental discovery our memories are better than we might think.
We would argue here in fact that the more total information our minds are exposed to, the more particular items we'll be able to recall in the future. One useful strategy may be to spend some time going through a large amount of information just a touch more quickly than we're comfortable with.
General Knowledge
Beyond simple recall of particular information in the past, internalized noise can be just as useful in the formation of wisdom and perspective as introspection, thoughtfulness and other forms of attentiveness can be. Spend some time skimming, it'll make you a better person. You'll meet new people, learn new things - don't worry, it's fun.
Personal Growth
Serendipitous search in the offline world is believed to be one of the ways our understanding of the world expands. David Pescovitz at BoingBoing writes about Swedish ethnologist Erik Ottoson's PhD thesis titled Seeking One's Own: On Encounters Between Individuals and Objects:
"Ideals of what is beautiful, useful and reasonable," Ottoson argues "materialize in conjunction with the experience of what is available and what is absent or out of reach."
That's more than just a beautiful reason you should read BoingBoing, it's an interesting understanding of the way that swimming through noise helps us become who we are.
Quiet time, time off-line, deep thoughts and long books are all beautiful things - essential to a healthy intellectual, psychological and social life. We argue, though, that the opposite of all those things - online social media noise, is also a great opportunity that deserves to have its worth recognized at a time in history when many of us are struggling to deal with it.
So take some time for yourself when you can, find a nice place to sit with a cup of tea and blow through a few hundred items in your RSS reader. If you can relax into it, it'll help you remember some of the reasons why you love the internet.
Creative Commons photos, Christmas 2007 series, by Flickr user Kevin Dooley.
We write enough here everyday and read enough around the web that sometimes looking back at a post from earlier in the same year can feel like we're visiting another planet. This post, though, still feels pretty familiar.
A few things have changed, for sure. Hutch Carpenter, the blogger who made the chart in this posts about different ways to relate to noise, got a job at enterprise social bookmarking startup Connectbeam - in part, he says in announcing his new position, because of his use of FriendFeed! That's pretty heart warming.
In announcing his new job, Hutch wrote the following:
FriendFeed opened my eyes to the possibilities of knowledge as the basis of relationships. The ways in which content from a variety of sources is a powerful, addictive basis for learning, conversations and collaboration. How activity streams are compelling reads. I've been active on FriendFeed since March, and it shocks me how much I know about web 2.0 and technology in general versus last year. I've still got much to learn, and FriendFeed will continue to be a good source for that.
Hutch's is a pretty happy ending to a story about noise, but not everyone who read our original post agreed with it.
One dissenter summarized a number of peoples' positions well when he wrote: "The web is about ME first and then comes the noise driven by the hype and the false version of truth that is popularity." That commenter, who went by the name "directeur," is building a startup based on this belief of his called FeedEgo.com. It's a personal relevance based feed reader and it's worth checking out, even if we do disagree with its creator about relevance vs. noise.
Some commenters said that balance was really what's most important. "Portland Broker" for example, wrote that "As with most everything, I think it's a matter of balance. Noise is everywhere; sometimes it's serendipitous, often it's not. A world that is overly filtered is lacking, just as one that is not filtered at all."
How can you as a person online create that kind of balance? Iconoclastic tech/culture blogger Stetoscope suggested the following: " I think what makes noise unbearable is the guilty feeling we have to not read everything. But if we takes some times to dive in the noise, without feeling guilty of what we have missed, it is just a positive habit." We like that advice and it sounds like it could work well with some of the tips we shared in a post last Spring titled Seven Tips for Making the Most of Your RSS Reader.
What do you think? Is social media noise good for you? How has it been treating you lately? If you believe in the need for balance, what are your favorite ways to create it?
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/8640
Comments
Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts
To bang the same old drum again: stuff that's chaotic can seem purely random, as though "just noise". But it ain't ... it's not entropic: it's information rich.
Is whot "new science of non-linearity / dynamical systems" is about, is whot.
Thanks for revisiting this Marshall. And I am enjoying myself at Connectbeam.
One memorable article that came out since this was originally posted was Clive Thompson's piece in the New York Times Magazine, Brave New World of Digital Intimacy (http://bit.ly/1GTlq0). In it, he describes another value from all the noise we consume on tools like Twitter. Here's a relevant quote:
"But as the days went by, something changed. Haley discovered that he was beginning to sense the rhythms of his friendsâ lives in a way he never had before."
Social scientists call this ambient awareness. I'd add another geeky term, apophenia, described in Wikipedia as: "Apophenia is the experience of seeing patterns or connections in random or meaningless data." One is more person-centric, one more event- or trend-oriented.
But both share the idea that consuming the noise lets patterns emerge that you wouldn't otherwise see.
Thanks for reprinting this post. I'm writing from the perspective of someone who long dreaded the dive into the world of social media--didn't I have enough to do already? Wasn't there enough noise in my e-mail?--but recently, tentatively, has taken the plunge (and to give credit where it's due, with a push from the author.)
I've found that yes, it is a lot of work, and not all the time feels like it's been well spent. On the other hand, in noise there is the possibility for an adventure, stimulation, a change of scene, another perspective, some unexpected delight, right at hand whenever I need a hit. And I do have the choice to tune it out.
My bottom line: bring on the noise, but don't let it get too loud!
wow, it was really worth reading...
Hi Marshall,
thanks for reprinting this post.
It is really interesting to re-read a post, we can discover some subtilities we missed at first reading.
It is a good thing to do, even if turms up the volume of the blogosphere ;-)
I think that there has to be some happy medium. In the world of social media, we are suffering from fatigue... information overload!! As more people adopt social media and as more people come online, as more consumers become prosumers, this issue will only get worse. We are exceeding the Dunbar number. We are holding onto our elementary school friends and all those old colleagues in one way or another.
The option becomes to embrace the firehouse and only sip the mass hysteria of the moment. Or the option becomes to self-filter self-filter until you don't allow the option for discovery. Except that I think there is a better way!!
http://threeminds.organic.com/2008/10/making_music_out_of_the_social.html
This is where the world of Semantic technology REALLY needs to come to Web 2.0's rescue. Semantic technology can give meaning to the data that we are looking at and make connections that would take us longer to figure out.
Headup uncovers the social meaning of keywords on the page as you browse... "David Bowie", did you know your friend loves this artist?
While I love love love Yelp, even I admit that searching through all those reviews is incredibly tedious. Boorah gives you the Zagat-esque consensus assembled from an assortment of review sites.
There will always be a place for social noise, but isn't it about time we had some music?
Marta Strickland
Editor, ThreeMinds
http://threeminds.organic.com
Noise, in the sense of "unwanted stuff," is in the metaphorical ear of the be-hearer. "Cellphone talker" next to me on the train or plane is by definition noise, and the likelihood that I'll learn anything valuable to me is nanoscopically small. The likelihood of annoyance, far higher.
I think you're onto something, though, regarding openness to new input. I get the print edition of two newspapers, and one thing I value about this (versus their online formats) is the random accessability of going through the main news, business, and local sections.
Could I do that online? I suppose -- but it's a lot harder -- the broadsheet pages offer a far larger "screen," there's no bandwidth involved, and I don't really have to bookmark.
In no way am I saying "get off the internet." On the contrary, as with Hutch Carpenter's chart, I see value in at least knowing where potentially rich streams of information are, and in visiting them.
I think of myself as a generalist, and I'm pretty good at bringing unrelated things together -- either for unusual comparisons or as springboards to new ideas. That's hard to do if you never get out of your neighborhood, no matter how diverse that neighborhood is -- as Saul Steinberg recognized with his famous view of the world from Manhattan.