On the most recent episode of ReadWriteTalk, I sat down with Bret Taylor and Paul Buchheit of FriendFeed. Both have been successful 'intrapreneurs' inside of Google. Buchheit created GMail; while Taylor created Google Maps with another one of the 4 FriendFeed founders, and then led the Google developer tools program. After leaving Google separately, they eventually started working together on FriendFeed, originally as Entrepreneurs in Residence at Benchmark (we get into more details on the podcast).
FriendFeed is a great example of a startup leveraging the current trend of using feeds in social networks. In this post, we'll give an overview of the FriendFeed service and how it compares to similar services.
First of all, for those of you not familiar with FriendFeed. In our interview, Bret Taylor described it as:
"...a tool that lets you see what your friends and family and co-workers are up to on the web. You could see an aggregated news feed all of the blog post that they share from Google Reader, the photos that they’ve published on Flickr, the Twitter messages that they’ve posted and a variety of other sharing activity aggregated from the most popular social websites on the web and through the integrated feed. And then it promotes Water Cooler discussed around those items ... Right now our user base is primarily using it as a collaborative news stream where they find interesting news post and discuss it and post related news items. It has become a really fun dynamic."
Here's a screenshot showing the service in action:
After describing the range of techniques for aggregating 25+ sources of content, Bret commented:
"In many ways, FriendFeed is really riding the trend of people supporting open syndication format[s] and APIs and it’s something we’re really appreciative of. But there’s a time out of work to make that really genuinely useful where it doesn’t feel like you’re getting the output of a dumb machine. You actually do something useful so there is a fair amount of work to make that the right experience."
(emphasis ours)
Based on the fact that syndication is such a big trend, you might anticipate a number of companies (including social networks directly) being competitive with FriendFeed. Therefore, Paul's answer to who they compete with was quite interesting:
"Well there are a lot of products out there that are kind of superficially similar ... But at the same time there aren’t really any products that have quite the same user experience. And I think that’s something that we all learn at Google and that a lot of times it’s the subtle details can make a big difference. And so there’s a lot of products that are focused more on the just the aggregation aspect of it. But we’re really trying to go beyond simply aggregating to actually creating a pleasant social experience around the content."
(emphasis ours)
The challenge is obviously determining the right set of features to create this pleasant social experience. For example, through discussions and personally using the product, some of the useful things I've found FriendFeed doing on top of the aggregating the content include:
While FriendFeed has found one way to add value on top of syndicated content, I believe entrepreneurs have a ripe set of opportunities to create other value added experiences on top of these feeds too. Indeed, a few days after the interview I was approached by Dave McClure to moderate a panel at Graphing Social Patterns, on Social Networks and the Needs for Feeds. Bret will be joining me, along with Ian Kennedy from MyBlogLog, David Recordon from Six Apart and Kevin Marks from Open Social (see our interview with Kevin Marks here). If you have any questions or ideas that we could explore on the panel, please note them in the comments.
Disclosure: Sean Ammirati works for mSpoke, which has a feed management product called FeedHub.
Comments
Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all Read/WriteWeb posts
the same idea, but with a desktop client: http://www.mindity.com/WhatIs.aspx
Posted by: Antonina | February 8, 2008 12:46 AMI don't really categorize this as a social network in the traditional sense as really as it'a s digital lifestyle aggregator as it's gathering meta information from a variety of social networks
If that's the case, they belong in this category of other digital lifestyle aggregators
http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/09/07/list-of-companies-that-aggregate-social-networks/
Posted by: Jeremiah Owyang | February 8, 2008 5:19 AMHi Jeremiah,
On one hand I agree and think the lines are certainly becoming blury.
However, there is more of a closed commenting / conversation system inside of FriendFeed that I think distinguishes it in some ways.
- Sean
Posted by: Sean Ammirati | February 8, 2008 7:06 AMIsn't this something that Plaxo and Tumblr already do? e.g. My tumble log: http://khurtwilliams.com and my Plaxo Pulse: http://khurt.myplaxo.com/
Posted by: islandinthenet.comI think in order for FriendFeed to truly work the user would need to have either a) a very large group of friends or b) have a small, but tight-knit group of friends on the web who are actually active. I think the latter is pretty rare. Hell I think both are pretty rare unless you're in the upper echoleons of the web.
Posted by: Corvida | February 8, 2008 10:08 AMI get the feeling that these guys can do anything they set their minds to.. but still can't see what's new or different here. How many agregating do we need?
Of course, I'm heading there not to try it.. anything to compress more data and stream it into my head.
Must have more date.. must have more data
Posted by: Warren Whitlock | February 8, 2008 10:08 AMTo quote comic book guy - Worst idea ever.
Posted by: cmdrNacho | February 8, 2008 10:22 AMWhat is peoples fascination with knowing what everyone is doing at every second of the day. Maybe its jut me but I don't get it.
Lifestyle aggregator is pretty correct description... :-)
Posted by: YDRIVE | February 8, 2008 6:37 PMFriendFeed has an interesting approach and I think - with their experience from Google - a good chance of improving the general user experience in the lifestreaming category.
But I think one needs to provide more than a news feed of updates to really stand out among all the aggregators.
We pitch Second as a one-stop shop for everything an individual throws up online from del.icio.us bookmaks, Google Docs documents, blog posts, Flickr photos, You Tube videos using XML/RSS and the public APIs for these services. We offer more than social feed aggregation as we also provide the user with a way of organizing and searching content from these different services, giving each person multiple options for building a powerful content library online.
Posted by: Lars Teigen | February 13, 2008 5:03 AM