FriendFeed Opens the Floodgates with Real-Time Updates
Using FriendFeed to track all of your friends' activities has become a daily routine for many of us. But, apparently, pressing the refresh button to get the latest and greatest information has been a bit arduous for some.
Can't FriendFeed find a way to save their information-addled users by providing real-time updates without hitting refresh every five seconds? Yes, they can. And it turns out that, not only is this new feature good for you, it's good for FriendFeed, too.
FriendFeed has already been leading the charge to accelerate how RSS-consuming services get their data from sources more efficiently with its Simple Update Protocol. Now, they're turning their attention to how the users get information more quickly.
But what does FriendFeed's technological experimentation mean to you? Real-time FriendFeed updates. Without having to hit refresh.
Here's an example of the updates in action:
For Twitter politicos, the feature will seem very familiar, as it acts a great deal like Twitter's Election 2008 stream.
And I have to admit, it's a whole new way to consume FriendFeed. It's not only fast, it's addictive. But don't take my word for it. Head on over to the 2008 Debates room and see it in action for yourself. (It should get even more interesting once the debates are broadcast in the US, tonight.)
How does FriendFeed accomplish this addictive feature? They're experimenting with a technique called "long polling." In FriendFeed's words that means that their server "doesn't respond to your browser's request until there's something it wants to send."
There's an upside for the users and an upside for FriendFeed, as well, since they can now "show your FriendFeed faster using far fewer requests than before."
And fewer requests are good for everyone.
While the feature is only in testing, it's clear to see how this type of long polling could be applied to other services - and to our information consumption on the Web. For a medium that has long been about active engagement, technology is rapidly pushing it into something more passively consumed. Watching - and I literally mean "watching" - the impact of that change occur will be interesting indeed.
1 TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/8618
Comments
Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRC
I'm sure you can find a channel that allows you to "follow" the debate in real time.
Posted by: 1988 called and wanted its technology back | October 15, 2008 5:47 PM
Re: "1988 called and wanted its technology back"
Pseudo-real time Web feed aggregation adds more value than IRC because each users has his own set of channels. The channels are all different and all partially overlapping as a result of being various aggregate of the pool of sources.
Now if I could convince my IRC buddies who won't move to microbloging...
Posted by: Jean-Marc Liotier | October 15, 2008 10:43 PM
This is cool....but you can also do this with jabber....We will have this ability in our alpha in the coming weeks...and this way do not need to go anywhere for the updates....they come to you....I think that we are at a point where the idea of a "page" being the place to be is coming to a close.
For me the reality is "The conversation is the place to be"....
Posted by: william | October 16, 2008 12:32 AM
This is cool....but you can also do this with jabber....We will have this ability in our alpha in the coming weeks...and this way do not need to go anywhere for the updates....they come to you....I think that we are at a point where the idea of a "page" being the place to be is coming to a close.
For me the reality is "The conversation is the place to be"....
Posted by: william | October 16, 2008 12:33 AM
Long polling applied to twitter: www.twitscoop.com
See the tag cloud moving live...
Posted by: Jon | October 16, 2008 1:02 AM
Great ! not the first but great
Posted by: French presse release | October 16, 2008 2:08 AM