It's been just over a year since Google surprised the world with a release of their very own web browser, Google Chrome, now the basis for the company's upcoming operating system. Despite its flaws (lack of RSS support, no extensions), the browser soon became a hit among the niche crowd of early adopters...at least those running Windows. Why Windows? Because Google has yet to publicly release versions for either the Mac operating system or Linux. However, a recent update to their Privacy Policy hints that may be about to change.
In June of this year, Google finally released the first official beta versions of the Chrome browser for Mac and Linux. The builds were made available in the developer channel, but Google warned users that they were not ready for public consumption, only testing. Since it took nearly a year to get the point of beta releases, can it even be possible that Chrome for Mac and Linux is now ready for a public debut?
Not to get your hopes up, but a recent update to the Google Chrome Privacy Policy makes us wonder. A few days ago, the first two opening paragraphs of the Chrome Privacy Policy were revised. The old and new versions are provided below with bold indicating the changes:
The Privacy Policy below applies only to Google Chrome for Windows. For the Developer channel releases on other platforms see the privacy policies for Mac OS X and Linux . The Google Privacy Policy describes how we treat personal information when you use Google's products and services, including information provided when you use Google Chrome. In addition, the following describes our privacy practices that are specific to Google Chrome. Google will notify you of any material changes to this policy, and you will always have the option to use the browser in a way that does not send any personal information to Google or to discontinue using it.
You do not need to provide any personally identifying information in order to download and use Google Chrome. When you download Google Chrome or use it to contact Google's servers, Google receives only standard log information including your machine's IP address and one or more cookies. You can configure Google Chrome to not send cookies to Google or other sites as explained here.
The Google Privacy Policy describes how we treat personal information when you use Google's products and services, including information provided when you use Google Chrome. In addition, the following describes our privacy practices that are specific to Google Chrome. Google will notify you of any material changes to this policy, and you will always have the option to use the browser in a way that does not send any personal information to Google or to discontinue using it.
You do not need to provide any personally identifying information in order to download and use Google Chrome. When you download Google Chrome or use it to contact Google's servers, Google receives only standard log information including your machine's IP address and one or more cookies. On Google Chrome for Windows, You can configure Google Chrome to not send cookies to Google or other sites as explained here. Google Chrome for Mac and Google Chrome for Linux currently do not allow this level of configuration.
Maybe we're grasping at straws here, after all, the change could be referring to the developer builds of the browser and they're simply cleaning up the language for simplification. Still, that would be odd considering that they removed the reference to the developer builds' privacy policy, wouldn't it? Or then again, maybe Google is just consolidating the privacy policies for both the developer and public builds. A third option is that Google could be getting a little of the administrative work out of the way before they make the Mac and Linux builds public.
Testers have been reporting that the developer builds have been seeing steady improvement and the Chromium builds (the open source project that serves as the testing ground for Google Chrome) have been shaping up on a daily basis, too. Maybe a public version of Chrome for Linux and Mac is almost here? We can only hope.
Comments
Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts
Don't be afraid to use the development versions. I have been using Chrome on Linux for a while now and it's quite stable (although getting flash to work requires some manual configuration).
If you really want to know how close the Mac and Linux releases are, just check out the Chromium issues page:
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/list?can=2&q=label:ReleaseBlock-Beta&sort=-modified&colspec=ID+Stars+Pri+Area+Type+Status+Summary+Modified+Owner+Mstone&x=mstone&y=area&cells=tiles
That link takes you to the list of issues with the label: ReleaseBlock-Beta. These are all the Mac and Linux issues that need to be resolved before they make a public release. It looks like there are 189 issues left, so I'd give it a couple weeks.
Instead of poking around in privacy policies I suggest reading their blog. Remember that Chrome (Chromium) is an open source project.
http://chrome.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-chrome-turns-1.html
Quoting the article from five days ago:
"We're also hard at work on Google Chrome for Mac and Linux, which are making rapid progress on the developer channel. Our Mac and Linux versions are missing a few key features (such as printing), so we're keeping them in the developer channel a little while longer to make sure that they provide a satisfying native experience on these platforms and meet our standards for stability and performance. If you like living on the cutting edge and don't mind the work in progress, you can download Google Chrome for Mac and Linux today through the developer channel."
PS - I also suggest running the Mac builds, in my usage they are ready to go for testing by a much broader audience (currently minus printing support). If you subscribe to the dev channel builds they also auto-update in the background. Flash sites work fine too.
I've been using Chrome on Ubuntu 9.04, the last couple of weeks and, although it is missing several features available in Chrome for Windows, it is VERY stable and LIGHTNING fast!
Well, if people don't like the lack of privacy with Google Chrome then why not give SRWare Iron a go instead.
http://www.srware.net/en/software_srware_iron_download.php
Iron is basically Chrome + Privacy and is a very fast and simple yet compatible browser.
And there are now versions for the Mac and for Linux as well as the established version for Windows.
Problem solved :o)
Just another BORING product from Google - Why do people get so excited about the crap they make. It's a browser, no one cares!
Ditto Dave Sidner, plus, if "Google Chrome for Mac and Google Chrome for Linux currently do not allow this level of configuration" [i.e. the ability to "configure Google Chrome to not send cookies to Google or other sites"] then, who needs or even WANTS or would use it?
It's fast alright, but I don't know if I'm so keen that every single letter i type (every search, every non-search, every website I go to).. is sent to Google (watch it with a Sniffer). Google's 80% coverage of the internet becomes 100% with Chrome.
Nice topic
http://chromespot.com
I've been using Chromium 4 (current dev) on Linux a bit. It's really pretty nice. Faster than Firefox 3.5. No Flash, though.
Everyone should boycott Chrome until Google is forced to drop their Big Brother approach to it. The problem is that people are stupid and don't understand the implications that privacy invasion has in the grand scheme of things. They just regurgitate the same old "I have nothing to hide" mantra. The great irony is that most people who understand the need for privacy really don't have anything to hide, while the people pushing for the erosion of privacy are the ones who DO have something to hide.
Support of the Lou Zhu, Lou Zhu worked hard
Signature--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing is impossible for a willing heart.
ugg classic cardy