ReadWriteWeb

What Are You Looking At? Google Details Results of Eye Tracking Study

Written by Frederic Lardinois / February 6, 2009 12:51 PM / 3 Comments

google_doodle_logo_feb09.pngGoogle posted an update about its eye tracking usability studies today. Most of the results are not exactly groundbreaking. It is, for example, no surprise that most users only scan the first couple of search results. Indeed, most Google users don't seem to scan much further than the second result. There are, however, some interesting nuggets of information in this post about how Google uses this data to study every aspect of its search results page.

More interestingly, though, is that Google was apparently concerned that adding thumbnails into the 'universal search' interface would distract users. According to Anne Aula and Kerry Rodden, the two user experience researchers at Google who wrote the post, thumbnails did not make a big difference for how users scanned their search results. Instead, it apparently made it easer for users to skip over results with thumbnails when these weren't relevant to their searches.

google_eye_tracking.pngAs Google also points out, scanning the search results page and deciding where to look at and what to click on seems to be an almost completely subconscious process.

Overall, users on Google's search page follow the familar F-shaped pattern that was also apparent in earlier eye-tracking studies .

What About Google's Ads?

Google's researchers don't mention advertising in this post at all. Neither the video, nor most of the images in the post include any advertising. Given how important these ads are for Google, we can only asume that Google regularly uses these studies to test how its users perceive the advertising on the search results pages.

Judging from the only images that show ads, most users only look at them after they have scanned through at least the first three or four search results.

Chances are that Google didn't want to give away too much of its secret sauce, though it would have been nice to see a bit more information about how users perceive and react to these ads.


Comments

Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts

  1. my colleague and i were talking about this today at lunch. i didnt get to read everything but this would seem like a huge national defense tool, if it could be implemented secretly.

    Posted by: Ian Camarillo | February 6, 2009 1:48 PM



  2. Google never left the back pocket of the government. It was always there and is still there. We must be careful how we surf and that so called, "private" surfing isn't really showing them how we actually surf or collecting our data. Of course, they probably have been since Google started!

    Let's be careful out there . . .

    Posted by: Apres Ski | February 6, 2009 2:06 PM



  3. We must be careful how we surf and that so called, "private" surfing isn't really showing them how we actually surf or collecting our data mIRC

    Posted by: muhabbet | February 8, 2009 7:25 AM



Leave a comment

Optional: Sign in with Connect Facebook   Sign in with Twitter Twitter   Sign in with OpenID OpenID  |  
RWW SPONSORS


FOLLOW @RWW ON TWITTER

ReadWriteWeb on Facebook



TEXT LINK ADS