Google Image Search Gets More Specific
Google Image Search remains one of the most comprehensive imagery resources available. But the sheer amount of imagery that the site indexes creates a problem. More of than not, Google Image Search gets you close to what you're seeking, but it doesn't really help you find exactly what you're looking for.
Now, Google is working to fix that with new filtering options.
For some time, the only filtering available was for "faces." Then, they added a filter for "photos." Now, Google has introduced new filters that enable you to cull the herd of photos even more. Using the new feature, you can constrain your search to "clip art" and "line drawings."
Still, I have to admit that I'm with Tam Vo over at VentureBeat. Even with these new options, the filter that would provide the most value is still conspicuously absent. I remain hopeful that Google Image Search takes a page from Flickr's book and adds the ability to search by Creative Commons licensing.
Until filtering by license information becomes available, Image Search remains a valuable tool for finding images - and with the new filters you have a much better chance of finding what you're seeking - but they're not images you're likely able to use, legally.
Comments
Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts
The best tool out there, and it hurts to sa so, is the Microsoft's one. The UI is really well designed.
They should add Creative Commons Filtering also, so we can just use them safely for blogs and sites. Flickr has a good one, http://www.flickr.com/creativecommons/by-2.0/
Hey Rick,
I think the only reason you wrote this article is you didn't see Microsoft image search http://www.live.com/?scope=images&mkt=en-US .
However the default that they don't do software right but this time they got it.
Thanks
"...I'm with Tam Vo over at VentureBeat. Even with these new options, the filter that would provide the most value is still conspicuously absent."
That doesn't make any sense - How can Google provide a filter for semantic data that isn't visible? Until the vast majority of people outside of Flickr add the markup to let machines know their photos are CC, there is nothing to filter. Machines only know what their told!
WTF?!?!?
This will be really useful for me -- I am almost always looking for a certain type of graphic; either photo or clip art. Licensing info is helpful, too, but the search will still really help.
Where's the porn only option?
Image search in Google made little easier now with choosing content wise.
Even without the CC filter, this is still a really helpful improvement. Thanks for the scoop, Rick.
Dear Thank you very much