ReadWriteWeb

Grooveshark Launches Subscription VIP Service

Written by Dana Oshiro / August 12, 2009 5:26 PM / 10 Comments

grooveshark_vip_aug09a.jpg Not to be outdone by recent announcements from streaming music site Spotify, Gainesville-based Grooveshark announced a $3 per month or $30 per year ad-free Grooveshark VIP service. Grooveshark VIP offers users early access to development pipeline releases including early testing on the upcoming Grooveshark iPhone application and early August 24th access to Grooveshark 2 - the site's next generation. In addition to offering users WordPress and Facebook integration, Grooveshark spokesperson Josh Bonnain laid down some key differences between Spotify and Grooveshark.

Bonnain went on to explain that Grooveshark's subscription services cost less than a quarter of Spotify's monthly fees, and will offer many of the same features. For instance, both services stream ad-free music and both allow members to connect and discover premium content. Nevertheless Bonnain points out, "We're in 231 countries, we're web-based and our users can upload their entire catalogue to our site. Spotify requires users to install it on every machine they own and they're only available in a few countries."

Additionally, Bonnain went on to point out the Grooveshark artists community and quiet honestly, we were thrilled to discover it. Beyond the fantastic experience of the music discovery engine and the listener-focused features of the site, Grooveshark actually has a Bandcamp-style service for artists to promote themselves.

grooveshark_vip_aug09c.jpg

The Artist Dashboard allows bands to track their most popular songs, fan favorite play lists and measure play counts. Additionally, Grooveshark also allows bands to sell merchandise via Junkytees and TuniPop, license music via Creative Commons, land deals via YouLicense and crowdsource album funding via SellABand.

Within the artist's environment, Grooveshark monetizes its service by offering musicians a chance to have their music advertised and played alongside similar bands. With more than 7 million tracks in its catalogue, the company is effectively leveraging its size and existing audience to make a case as the premier destination for artist promotion. Artists can expect to see their tracks in community playlists and distributed via widgets, links and soon, through mobile playlists.

While Spotify's iPhone application has received a ton of buzz for its ability to play cached music streams, Grooveshark also has an iPhone application in the works. While the app's current iteration does not allow for offline play, Bonnain assures ReadWriteWeb that the feature is in the mobile developer pipeline and it won't cost $15 a month to try it when it arrives.

While both Grooveshark and Spotify's premium subscription programs are in their infancy, it will be interesting to see which service will find the right features and licensing partnerships to come out on top.


Comments

Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts

  1. "We're in 231 countries"

    There are not even 231 countries in existence - the number is between 192 and 195:
    http://geography.about.com/cs/countries/a/numbercountries.htm

    Posted by: Michael Li | August 12, 2009 7:17 PM



  2. Actually, there are 233 total countries. countries.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_outlying_territories_by_total_area

    Posted by: Stan Le | August 12, 2009 7:32 PM



  3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_outlying_territories_by_total_area

    Posted by: Stan Le | August 12, 2009 7:33 PM



  4. I would consider paying for Grooveshark long before paying for Pandora! Grooveshark is such a better user experience.

    http://www.russellheimlich.com/blog/move-over-pandora-hello-grooveshark/

     Posted by: Russell Heimlich Author Profile Page | August 12, 2009 8:14 PM



  5. I wonder how they are legal in 231 countries when sites like Pandora and Last.fm have trouble being in just a few countries?

    Posted by: Adam | August 12, 2009 11:27 PM



  6. @ Adam : they are not that much legal I guess. So fare I understand they try to gain momentum and get a deal with the studios later (the mixtape -rip- approach). Spotify and Last.fm however get the deals with the studios before rolling out in a country. But please correct me if I'm wrong on this one.

     Posted by: Jelle Verkleij Author Profile Page | August 13, 2009 12:18 AM



  7. Stan - "outlying territories" are not countries. See #13 as an example Greenland is "a country within in the Kingdom of Denmark."

    Posted by: Michael Li | August 13, 2009 5:38 AM



  8. this looks great. congrats to the team over at grooveshark for another stellar release.

     Posted by: nextbigsound Author Profile Page | August 21, 2009 12:37 PM



  9. Okay, so the artist dashboard is nice (for artists). And broader availability... also nice.

    But what else do we regular ol' users get for the $3 a month? Seems like:
    - No ads
    - Good karma
    - Chance to beta test the new UI, new features as they're introduced

    Moderately tempting. But not an OMG gotta have it kinda feeling for me, at least. Am I missing something?

     Posted by: Adam Author Profile Page | August 24, 2009 12:36 AM



  10. I saw an article today that hopes these types of devices or applications may be the saviour for the newspapers. I still have my doubts because you don't need a kindle to get your news, it's still free online.

    Posted by: GujHipHop007 Author Profile Page | December 4, 2009 9:00 PM



Leave a comment

Optional: Sign in with Connect Facebook   Sign in with Twitter Twitter   Sign in with OpenID OpenID  |  

If you think Twitter is big, check out the Real-Time Web
RWW SPONSORS



FOLLOW @RWW ON TWITTER

ReadWriteWeb on Facebook
ReadWriteCloud - Sponsored by VMware and Intel



TEXT LINK ADS



RWW PARTNERS