Don't trust what you read on the internet? That's no longer the dominant sentiment in the US, according to a new poll by Zogby International. A survey of more than 3000 people performed in the two days after the US Presidential Election found that 37.6% of respondents considered the Internet the most reliable source of news, 20.3% consider national TV news most reliable and 16% said that radio is the most reliable source.
The survey found that most people find all the news biased in some way and there were a number of other interesting findings. It's quite striking, though, that we're at a point in history where the internet is trusted more than TV and the Radio!
Other results of interest include:
The survey was commissioned by the Independent Film Channel for the IFC Media Project. The full details will be posted on the IFC site later tonight.
Zogby is a reputable polling firm but they have come up with some very interesting results before in other surveys. Last fall we wrote about a Zogby poll in which 24% of respondents said the Internet could serve as a replacement for a significant other and 11% of respondents said they were very or somewhat likely to "implant a device into your brain that enabled you to use your mind to access the internet if it could be done safely." That's a really bad idea.
This fall we wrote about how Google is changing political debate like nothing else ever has before. It may or may not be particular Internet news sources that are trusted by the respondents to this latest poll - it may just be the world of searchable information that makes for a richer and more informed understanding of the news. That's pretty hard to argue with.
Either way, this is an historic turning point. The Internet, the medium most famous for being untrustworthy, at this time when it's more characterized than ever by the ability for anyone to publish, is now more trusted that professional TV and Radio news!
Given both the obvious and documented affinity that young people today have for learning with the Internet - it doesn't seem like TV, radio and newspapers stand much of a chance in the future. Do they?
Comments
Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts
Makes sense to me. The more reporters there are, the harder it is to authoritatively spin an event.
Posted by: Daniel J. Pritchett
|
November 21, 2008 12:47 PM
I almost never watch TV news. I get it online from various sources, domestic and international, and try to find a balance from that.
Posted by: Ian May
|
November 21, 2008 12:55 PM
how exciting! a great time to be part of it and for great bloggers.
3000 people is not that much for a representative survey, is it? But I think this is where we are heading. Is this a good evolution? Yes, because it's more democratic then ever. And no, because bloggers will never have the same means, the same ethics and the same legal restrictions as classic media...
Looks like we are indeed heading in the right direction!
jess
http://www.anonymity.at.tc
Internet is more relaiable than TV and radio news every one getting news from internet only.We can watch tv and listen Radio from Internet it self isn't it relaiable
Interesting. I'm still processing this, but I'm curious to see the data behind this study. Zogby is not always accurate (just ask John Kerry.)
The NewsCred guys are leveraging this trend.
It should be pointed out that Zogby and Fox are pretty closely connected so it isn't that much of a surprise that FOX News comes out on top.
Looks like we are indeed heading in the right direction!
Interesting