ReadWriteWeb

LiveBook Aims to Write Novel on Facebook, Bebo

Written by Josh Catone / March 28, 2008 9:10 PM / 5 Comments

LiveBook is a new collaborative writing project that aims to write two separate novels via applications on two different social networks: one on Facebook, the other on Bebo. The Facebook novel, "Helen and her Facebook" chronicles a girl named Helen who has just recently signed up on the social network, while the Bebo version, "Brian from Bebo," follows the similar tale, though this time it's a boy and Bebo. The stories are written sentence by sentence by the members each network with no outside editorial influence, though co-founder Dmitry Honcharenko thinks there exists the possibility for the two books to reference each other and for Helen and Brian to meet.

LiveBook works via a voting system. As each new sentence is added (anyone can add one), users vote it up or down and the first sentence to reach a certain point threshold is added to the story. Sentences that receive too many down votes are removed from the system and considered spam, or inappropriate.

In theory, the system might work, but LiveBook may rely too heavily on its points scheme. Points aren't just used to add lines to the story, but are also a sort of creative currency within the application. It takes 5 points to add a new sentence, for example, starting a new chapter costs 20, and every time you vote for a sentence it costs you a point. Earning points is, according to the FAQ, a matter of inviting new users.

Presumably, having a sentence selected for inclusion also earns you points, but what this adds up to is a book that heavily relies on the popularity of the app to succeed. Since new users only start with 10 points (enough to add a couple of sentences or dole out a few votes before going bust), the app has to be popular or run the risk of having very few users with enough points to contribute -- which would suddenly make the crowd a lot smaller. Right now, the Facebook version of LiveBook has 45 active daily users.

Other Innovative Ways to Write Online

We've looked at a number of innovative new collaborative writing applications on ReadWriteWeb over the past year. Here's a brief overview:

Recently, Sarah Perez reviewed the very slick Protagonize, on which users can work together to create choose-your-own-adventure style stories, as well as more traditional linear collaborative fiction. Last June, we looked at six "fiction 2.0" applications. Collaborative writing apps Novlet, Portrayl, and Ficlets, are still going strong, but Unblokt, has since shut down, which is too bad because it had produced some suprisingly readable fiction (note, you can actually still read the completed stories by navigating to this link).

We also looked at the National Novel Writing Month, in which people attempt to write a 50,000 word novel in a single month. For the 2007 edition this past November, there were a whopping 1,187,931,929 words written, and of the 101,000 participants, over 15,000 managed to crank out a full 50k word novel. For the even more insane writer, there's the 3 Day Novel contest during which people compete for cash prizes by writing a novel in 3 days. They actually publish the winners, some of which have won awards.

On more than one occasion we've mentioned the One Million Penguins Project. A collaboration between De Montfort University and Penguin Publishing in the UK, the idea was to see if a novel could be written by the crowd via a wiki. The result? According to one organizer it was "unlike anything I’ve read before." The novel has been broke up into sections, which you can read online. The banana version may be the oddest.

Clearly, there are a lot of new and interesting ways to write fiction online, and participating in any one of which can be a lot of fun. What's your favorite?

Comments

Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all Read/WriteWeb posts

  • Excellent review, Josh, thanks!

    We think a lot about the system of points and it certainly can be improved. On the one hand, we need to increase the number of users, on the other hand - to encourage users who offer high-quality proposals and fight spam.

    If RWW readers can express their views here - that would be great and very usefull!

    Posted by: Dmitry Honcharenko | March 29, 2008 12:24 AM


  • I have to admit this: When the movie studios were talking about filming several different endings to a movie and then letting the viewer choose the ending they wanted to watch...I was against it. I do not want to think or work or help the writer and/or the director out when I watch a movie...I just want to watch the movie.

    When I read a book...I just want to read a book. If I want to write a book...then guess what? I would write a book. I don't want hundreds of strangers writing a book with me. Just a wild guess....I don't think it would be a very good book. It takes a lot of talent and planning to write a book. And it takes talent, planning, and luck to write a very good book. It is not going to happen with 100 people throwing in a sentence here or there.

    What is the goal? Just to show that the technology exists and it is possible to do this? So what. Who really cares? What little is shown in the post above is not very good and my guess is that it won't get much better.

    Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should do it.

    Just My Opinion
    The Masked Millionaire
    www.TheMaskedMillionaire.com

    Posted by: The Masked Millionaire | March 29, 2008 3:27 AM


  • I would like to add a work-in-process project of mine, that is Paragraphr.

    As The Masked Millionaire at comment #2 mentioned, most of the creative works are done better by individuals and small groups. Wikipedia succeeded because it is mostly perspective-neutral. (Still, we know that there are often conflicts between contributors even at Wikipedia.)

    At Paragraphr, a writer writes, and involves readers for reviewing and proof-reading. We want to make a participatory platform, but based on division of labor not mechanical equality.

    Posted by: slow blogger | March 29, 2008 4:59 AM


  • Very nice, Josh, thanks! It is very entertaining and interesting information for me and for all.

    Posted by: Robert Bardou | March 30, 2008 12:01 AM


  • Penguin publishing house tried this already and it was an EPIC FAIL! It was called a Million Penguins ... it was a wiki novel...and...it was awful. Never published, and they abandoned the project - but best of luck!

    Posted by: Sorry... | March 31, 2008 9:45 AM




RECENT JOBS


RWW READERS


TEXT LINK ADS


RWW PARTNERS

adaptiveblue

Yahoo Buzz