In the clearest sign yet that
the big guns are preparing to step up the battle for Web Office, Microsoft
has said it is considering releasing a version of Microsoft Works (the poor cousin of
Microsoft Office) as a web suite. The desktop version of Works retails for $50 and
includes a calendar, word processor, spreadsheets, Web Browser and e-mail. While its
currently positioned as a home productivity toolset (to do your accounts, write letters,
etc), it could pretty easily be re-positioned as a (small) business web office suite.
In any case - because Works includes basic word processing and spreadsheet software, to web-enable that and bundle it as a suite would be a step above what both Microsoft and Google currently offer. Right now Microsoft has Office Live (web hosting, email, project collaboration) and Google offers Apps For Your Domain (email, IM, calendar and website creator).
Microsoft's planned web-based Works would be a free package, supported by advertising. As Reuters put it:
"[Microsoft] faces a growing pack of Web-based competitors -- led by Google -- that is offering similar [office] technology for free with a business model that makes money off advertising.
The world's largest software maker is now mulling how it can move Microsoft Works, a basic suite of business software that often comes preloaded on inexpensive consumer PCs, onto the Web as part of its growing stable of free online services."
I think
this is a wise move by Microsoft to pre-empt Google's upcoming Web Office suite. It
clearly won't affect sales of their flagship MS Office, as the functionality is much
richer in the desktop version - even more so when Vista and Office 2007 are released.
Works is very basic by comparision - but it does have word processing and
spreadsheets.
On the other hand Google will probably easily trump a web-based Works, once they package up Writely and Google Spreadsheets into a proper suite. So far there have only been hints that Google will take that next step - perhaps they're still busy working on the business models for such a move.
All in all, things are starting to get interesting in the Web Office space. I wouldn't mind betting that Google pushes forward whatever secret plan they have for a full office suite, now that Microsoft has made noises about webifying word processing and spreadsheets.
See also: Google Office: a close-up look and image gallery of Google office apps.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2775
Comments
Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts
Its interesting that they are still thinking MS Works vs. MS Office for online.
I think it might be much harder sell, because people are used to that when they upgrade online, they just get more features not a totally different product.
Alex
Works as a hybrid office app (work offline but collab and can do online via Windows Live) would be a nice and slick seller for them. It would steal the low end from MS office, and make ODMs think about bunding MS products diffently, but this would be a good move for MS
IMO, works was always too light for use, although it could work as a pseudo office in some applications.
I just recently switched to Google calendar from Yahoo. Boy is there a real deifference. I can't wait for more web based office functionality from Google, and I'm curious to experience Microsoft's version as well.
I wonder how Google will integrate Writely and their other office services. Writely is a whole different architecture; first of all it's Microsoft based; so this is not only a look'n feel issue. From this point of view, MS is already one step ahead, because they'll be offering a unique experience across all office suite applications and this experience will be the one that you are already used to.