ReadWriteWeb

Miro 2.0: What if Boxee and iTunes Had a Love Child?

Written by Frederic Lardinois / February 10, 2009 10:00 AM / 6 Comments

miro_logo_feb09.pngThe Participatory Culture Foundation just released version 2.0 of Miro, the open source online TV application formerly known as Democracy Player. Miro is a combination of a video and audio podcast player with a built-in bittorrent client. In this new version, Miro also adds rudimentary support for streaming video, though in that respect, it is clearly outclassed by Boxee. Besides the support for streaming video, the new version of Miro also features a more streamlined user interface, a better programming guide, and, maybe most importantly, significant performance upgrades.

The support for streaming video, however, feels half-baked. Unlike Boxee, Miro does not take the videos and displays them within its own interface - instead, it just loads up websites like Hulu.com in a browser inside the application.

miro_interface_big.jpg

Great Video Podcast Player

The area where Miro excels is as a video podcast client. Thanks to the Miro Guide, adding video podcasts like Democracy Now or the Onion News Network is just a two click process. The Miro Guide, which is very well designed, now features over 6000 video podcasts. It is important to remember, though, that this content is bound to your desktop, as Miro doesn't feature any support for portable players.

Too Much Competition

We really like the idea and people behind Miro, but while the promotional video calls it the "best internet video application available," others like Vuze or Boxee are currently offering a wider range of features. Maybe the comparison with Boxee is not necessarily a fair one, though, but the current trend is also clearly towards a convergence between TV and the Internet, and Miro doesn't offer a Boxee-like solution for bringing this content to your living room.


Comments

Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts

  1. I'm really surprised that Miro hasn't tried to take farther steps in bringing Internet content to TVs the way Boxee has. I simply haven't used Miro because there are so many other options out there that fit my needs better. The biggest step up they could make is, say, integrate with the Roku box or something. My two cents...

    Posted by: Mark Schoneveld | February 10, 2009 11:09 AM



  2. It's a superior player. We love it and really support an alternative so well made.

    Posted by: Nicholas Quixote | February 10, 2009 12:38 PM



  3. Looks like http://www.skejcast.com does all this already and then some. It can schedule playback of radio and video streams and supports about 10x more content then Miro.

    Posted by: Daniel Aharonoff | February 10, 2009 1:15 PM



  4. Boxee would win if it pared down the interface and concentrated on internet video.

    For the entrepreneurs: give away a Roku and stuff it with ad-supported TV like Hulu.

    Posted by: pwb | February 10, 2009 4:46 PM



  5. It's a superior player. We love it and really support an alternative so well made.

    Posted by: söve | March 4, 2009 1:49 AM



  6. Miro is not Boxee and it shouldn't be thought of as such. Boxee is too clunky for what I want. I want a computer not just an embedded TV app. Miro achieves this to a far greater extent than boxee.

    Posted by: d | October 8, 2009 7:14 AM



Leave a comment

Optional: Sign in with Connect Facebook   Sign in with Twitter Twitter   Sign in with OpenID OpenID  |  
RWW SPONSORS


FOLLOW @RWW ON TWITTER

ReadWriteWeb on Facebook



TEXT LINK ADS