This post is a short extract from the book Mobile Web 2.0, by Ajit Jaokar and Tony Fish.
This week we're focusing in on Mobile 2.0, which is basically the Mobile Web circa 2006. I'm much less familiar with the mobile world than the PC Web one, so I thought it'd be a good idea to tap the mind of an expert in this space - fellow Web 2.0 Workgroup member Ajit Jaokar. Ajit and his colleague Tony Fish published a book this year called Mobile Web 2.0, which I received a free copy of and have been flicking through in recent weeks. The following is a short extract from that book (adapted for this blog), which I hope explains a little about the context of mobile content - and how it is becoming more and more important on the Web. This particular extract is also very in tune with the read/write, two-way Web philosophy (which is why I chose it). Take it away Ajit and Tony...
For the most part, we are consumers of content. In our daily lives, we consume professionally created, produced and edited content from traditional and new media providers on our “six screens of life”. These “six screens of life” are divided into two broad categories, big screens and small screens, each with three sub groups.
The ‘BIG’ screens of life
The ‘small’ screens of life
Both for Big and Small screens, the user has traditionally been a passive receiver of content (i.e. content has been broadcast to the user) OR the user has been seen as a member of a carefully controlled and managed audience (for example voting) – but not as a primary creator of content.
For instance:
Reflecting the above trend, most of the content on the Mobile device to date, has also been the ‘re-presentation’ and ‘re-production’ of existing material delivered to the mobile screen. However the mobile device is changing from being a primary consumer to a major creator of content. The six screens of life and the creative/consumption balance can be seen below.
The above figure is divided into five broad areas. The three main areas are: Supply, Demand and Consumption. These are supplemented by the Platform and the Channel.
The supply side
The supply side of the diagram details content production. Some content is created by professional media companies (for example: movies, music), and other content by the individual (for example: blogs, wikis). Eventually, the content is consumed in a private or a shared fashion.
The platform
Content created from the supply sources is passed through a platform. The platform has two components of service: - the physical components and the enabling components.
Examples of the physical components are:
Examples of the enablers are:
The platform is built by companies who want to take content and deliver it to customers. Each company will offer different physical and enabling components depending on their business models.
Demand
Demand is classified into a number of services, each broken into shared and personal modes of consumption. These services include:
Channels
The channels of delivery are broadly broadcast, session IP and narrowcast. Broadcast represents TV and other broadcast channels. Session/ IP represents the Internet and narrowcast represents the mobile device. Unlike Broadcast, narrowcast has fundamental limitations due to the physics of the device itself, battery life and radio propagation. The model (supply – platform – demand – channel and consumption) ends with the content created being consumed on a variety of screens on a shared or a personal basis.
Consumption
Consumption is based on the six screens of life. To recap, these are:
The ‘Big’ screens of life
The ‘small’ screens of life
These screens could be classified into: Fixed, Carried and Carry screens.
Fixed: Fixed screens are physically confined to a space for example the TV, PC.
Carried: A carried device is a device which could be on the move BUT is not personal. In flight entertainment is an example of a carried device.
Carry devices: Carry devices are portable, lightweight and free of wires, the prime example being a mobile phone
Further, the devices could be classified into:
a) Shared : where more than one person could view the screen and
b) Personal : where one screen corresponds to one viewer
Consumption patterns
We make two observations with respect to consumption patterns:
1. Consumption is becoming increasingly personal especially with mobile (carried) devices; and
2. Private consumption needs an understanding of the context and the content. Merely transforming content from the shared, bigger screens to private, smaller screens is not enough. Specifically, in relation to mobile services, we note that existing mobile services are relatively simple and don’t take into account the content or the context. Like the Internet, mobility is all about communications. The end user is the ‘killer application’ providing both the content and the context to services such as voice, email, txt and IM. When we initiate a conversation (contact) we take into account the context of the message – for example, who we are communicating with (Partner, Work Colleague, Friend, Financial Advisor, Utility Service Provider, Customer, etc). This context also drives the content of the message (what we are actually saying). We also take into consideration other parameters, such as the time of day, time we have, the level of urgency, emotional state, location, the bill payer, etc.
So far, the network operators, fixed and mobile, have been successful in provisioning these en-mass communications services. These services lend themselves to provisioning on a large scale and require broad based (untargeted) marketing to their customer base. They are not complex and inherently price driven. As communications markets mature (both in penetration and in reach), new value will be derived from applications which lower costs for the end user, leverage the contextual and situational aspects and/or exploit disruptive technologies.
Comments
Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all Read/WriteWeb posts
Have put some thoughts of mine related to the evolution of the mobile as a device on my blog !
Posted by: Raghu | December 14, 2006 10:39 AMGreat post. This is where Readwriteweb scores over the Techcrunch: less noise, more signal.
Posted by: Pramit | December 14, 2006 11:32 PM... but does the signal actually carry any meaningful information? This just seems like a stream of consciousness to me.
Posted by: Jeff | December 15, 2006 4:16 AM