<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Multimedia - ReadWriteWeb</title>
      <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/multimedia/</link>
      <description>Multimedia on ReadWriteWeb</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009 Richard MacManus</copyright>
      <managingEditor>readwriteweb@gmail.com</managingEditor>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:30:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.23-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>A New Venue for Indie Films: Your iPhone</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/rage-movie-dvd.png">Did you see the latest Jude Law movie? The film, a murder mystery from art house director Sally Potter takes place in Manhattan's fashion world and features other famous actors including Dame Judi Dench, Steve Buscemi, John Leguizamo, and Dianne Wiest. "Rage," as the film is called, isn't all that remarkable in and of itself, but the way it's being distributed is: via mobile phones. Choosing to forgo the typical theatrical release, Potter went an entirely different route for her new indie flick: Rage premiered exclusively on the iPhone.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=16543&amp;cb=16543' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=16543&amp;n=16543' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[

<p>Released last week through the iPhone/iPod Touch mobile application <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=296096904&amp;mt=8">Babelgum</a> (iTunes link), the film represents the first ever attempt to distribute a feature film for free by way of mobile phones. In fact, the mobile platform didn't just serve as the place for the film to make its debut - it was the primary distribution channel as well. The only theatrical showings of the movie were two red-carpet events - one at New York's The Box theater and another in London, both of which took place last week. </p>

<p>Not only does the film embrace the mobile as the core piece of its release pattern - a pattern which also includes simultaneous launches on DVD and the web - it embraces the mobile platform as a way to tell the story, too. Instead of offering up a large video download, Rage was released in seven parts throughout the week through the streaming media application, Babelgum, which has now climbed to #16 on the list of top free Entertainment-based iPhone apps. </p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/rage_movie.jpg" align="left">The film's style is also well suited to the mobile with a minimalist look and feel where the story is told through exclusively through close-up interviews of fourteen people who witnessed an event at a New York fashion show. There are no nuanced details or special effects here - it's a perfect fit for a mobile audience who often half-watches videos while killing time or driving to work. </p>

<p>According to filmmaker Potter, this experimental distribution for her new movie is actually an attempt to fight the digital piracy problem faced by the movie industry today. And yes, she's doing it by by offering up her film for free...albeit in a way that ensures the film can only be viewed, not recorded. However, after watching the iPhone release, those interested in owning the movie can immediately purchase a DVD which includes 21 unused scenes by way of <a href="http://ragethemovie.com/dvd/us">the film's online site</a> for $24.95. That, too, represents, a major change to the usual release pattern for films. Typically, the movie-DVD release window involves several months of waiting where the only way to watch the movie is through illegal means such as using the peer-to-peer technology known as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitTorrent_(protocol)">BitTorrent</a>.&#160; </p>

<p>Will this rethinking of movie distribution pay off? It's too soon to tell, but industry insiders are watching with deep curiosity. <a href="http://www.watoday.com.au/news/entertainment/film/downloadable-films-for-phone-all-the-rage/2009/09/19/1253209036649.html">Jim Shomos</a>, an Australian writer-producer known for mobile video series, for example, thinks using the mobile platform is a more direct way of getting the film to the target market - that is, people under 35. </p>

<p>Others are more skeptical. After all, does anyone really want to watch a full-length film on their mobile phone? Oh that's right, they do. Apple's iTunes store is proof of that. Now if we could only get studios to release really <em>good</em> films this way...</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/a_new_venue_for_indie_films_your_iphone.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/a_new_venue_for_indie_films_your_iphone.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/a_new_venue_for_indie_films_your_iphone.php</guid>
         <category>Mobile Services</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:30:49 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Sarah Perez</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Why Obama&apos;s Flickr Photos Aren&apos;t in the Public Domain</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="obamaflickr CC attribution by WhiteHouse.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/obamaflickr%20CC%20attribution%20by%20WhiteHouse.jpg" width="129" height="153">The White House is making unprecedented use of consumer web technologies but those technologies aren't always well suited to fit the government's needs.  They aren't always well suited to fit <em>anyone's</em> needs - but maybe if Obama leans on them a little bit things will change.</p>

<p>Today the White House launched <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse">an official collection of photos depicting Obama's first 100 days in office</a> on Flickr.  The <a href="http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/14237">Creative Commons Foundation asks</a> why these photos are licensed as Creative Commons Attribution (meaning you have to credit the source) instead of being in the Public Domain free for use in any context, as data created by the Federal Government usually is.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=14850&amp;cb=14850' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=14850&amp;n=14850' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<center><object width="400" height="300"> <param name="flashvars" value="offsite=true&lang=en-us&page_show_url=%2Fphotos%2Fwhitehouse%2Fshow%2F&page_show_back_url=%2Fphotos%2Fwhitehouse%2F&user_id=35591378@N03&jump_to="></param> <param name="movie" value="http://www.flickr.com/apps/slideshow/show.swf?v=71649"></param> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.flickr.com/apps/slideshow/show.swf?v=71649" allowFullScreen="true" flashvars="offsite=true&lang=en-us&page_show_url=%2Fphotos%2Fwhitehouse%2Fshow%2F&page_show_back_url=%2Fphotos%2Fwhitehouse%2F&user_id=35591378@N03&jump_to=" width="400" height="300"></embed></object></center>

<p>The answer to the question?  The photos aren't Public Domain because Flickr doesn't offer Public Domain licensing as an option.  That's a shame for every photo publisher, not just he White House.  Creative Commons licensing makes it really easy for people who want to re-use photos to do so quickly and easily by allowing content creators to communicate their conditions for re-use ahead of time.  If you just want to get your photos out into the world with absolutely no restrictions, though, Flickr doesn't offer that option.  Or, if you're a government agency that wants to publish photos on the best photo sharing site on the web and make them Public Domain like you  ought to - you're out of luck.</p>

<p>We're going to guess that the White House will be added to the list of selected partners participating in the <a href="http://www.flickr.com/commons">Flickr Commons</a>, where organizations like the Library of Congress have photos posted under a special "no known copyright" license.  That won't solve the problem for the rest of us, though, and it's probably not a scalable solution for every government agency that would like to publish to Flickr.</p>

<p>Hopefully Flickr will be prompted to change its licensing options; other users have asked for Public Domain as an option for some time.  We've asked the company for comment and will update this post if we get a helpful reply.  Flickr's support for Creative Commons has been fabulous.  The next logical step is to support publishing photos to the Public Domain.</p>

<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong>  <em>Since posting this we've been pointed to <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/flickrideas/discuss/72157606337352693/">an active conversation on Flickr about Public Domain</a>, where we found a link to site co-founder <a href="http://www.flickr.com/help/forum/en-us/7332/#reply36373">Stewart Butterfield's explanation four years ago</a> for not offering Public Domain as an option.</em></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_obamas_flickr_photos_arent_in_the_public_domai.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_obamas_flickr_photos_arent_in_the_public_domai.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_obamas_flickr_photos_arent_in_the_public_domai.php</guid>
         <category>Multimedia</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:17:12 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Marshall Kirkpatrick</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Enjoysthin.gs: A Dazzling New Way to Share and Discover Multimedia</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="thingslogo3.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/thingslogo3.jpg" width="150" height="150">The internet is a visual medium, so it's no surprise that visual bookmarking services are becoming increasingly popular.  The newest one we've discovered, called <a href="http://enjoysthin.gs/">Enjoysthin.gs</a>, takes the cake so far.  </p>

<p>Enjoysthin.gs lets you share all kinds of media, from images to videos to quotes to audio you call in and record from your phone.  The interface is beautiful and the site is a real joy to use.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=13679&amp;cb=13679' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=13679&amp;n=13679' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>The service was created by <a href="http://tedroden.com/">Ted Roden</a>, formerly of artists' video site Vimeo and now a "creative technologist" at the New York Times.</p>

<p><img alt="enjoysthingsscreen1.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/enjoysthingsscreen1.jpg" width="610" height="428" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></form></p>

<p>The user experience on the site is a real home run; from browsing through the beautifully displayed items from other users to interacting with the site's basic functionality.  Creating an account is remarkably smooth and the plush, over-sized displays make us want to jump up and down and clap our hands.</p>

<p>Anyone can tag items, even those saved by other people, and you can view recent shared items globally by tag.  Recent activities by your friends are displayed as another item in a big box when you are logged in.  There's even an API for integration with outside services; though we dare anyone to try to make a cooler interface, it would be nice to see Enjoysthin.gs on <a href="http://friendfeed.com">FriendFeed</a>.</p>

<p>There are clearly more features that are still needed, there are no RSS feeds or ways to view the most popular items, for example.  Roden is hard at work improving the site, he added <a href="http://enjoysthin.gs/31in31">31 new features in December alone</a>.  The new feature that lets you call in a voice recording is very cool - a message we recorded was posted to our profile page in just a few minutes.</p>

<p>You can <a href="http://marshallk.enjoysthin.gs/">befriend me at Enjoysthin.gs on this page</a>.  I'll probably be using the service for at least the next few days.  Not because it's particularly popular, secure, supportive of data portability or anything like that - just because it's so damn much fun to use.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enjoysthings_visual_bookmarking.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enjoysthings_visual_bookmarking.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enjoysthings_visual_bookmarking.php</guid>
         <category>Multimedia</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:01:38 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Marshall Kirkpatrick</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>iCandy: Make QR Codes That Play Music</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/icandy_logo.png">From the <a href="http://ricohinnovations.com">R&amp;D Labs at Ricoh</a>, there comes a new QR code creation tool called <a href="http://icandy.ricohinnovations.com">iCandy</a>. With this application, you can easily create QR codes that automatically launch and begin playing your music in iTunes. If you don't already own the song, scanning the QR code will prompt you to purchase it from either iTunes, Amazon, or Rhapsody. In addition to iCandy's music-related features, the app can also create codes that take you to any web site with a URL, perfect for bands wishing to promote their MySpace page, Facebook fan page, YouTube video, or anything else on the web.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=13398&amp;cb=13398' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=13398&amp;n=13398' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[

<p>The company behind <a href="http://icandy.ricohinnovations.com">iCandy,</a> Ricoh - or more specifically <a href="http://ricohinnovations.com">Ricoh Innovations</a>, the company's R&amp;D branch - is not really interested in selling or marketing the application. Instead, what they're hoping to learn is how QR code technology will be used by consumers and what types of interactions people find appealing. This app is being used as a part of their overall study into this area of technology, which is why iCandy is being offered for free and will most likely remain free through its lifecycle. </p>

<h2>Creating Codes</h2>

<p>Using iCandy is easy. You simply <a href="http://icandy.ricohinnovations.com/rocket2/index.php/about/print">drag and drop a web site link or iTunes track into the iCandy interface</a> to create the QR code. You can also add in photos from either your computer or an online service like <a href="http://www.flickr.com">Flickr</a> or <a href="http://www.snapfish.com">Snapfish</a>. The iCandy application then creates the barcode which you can then print out or use elsewhere on the web...like in a <a href="http://www.zazzle.com">Zazzle.com</a> store for example, where you could sell your barcode-emblazoned merchandise. The iCandy application supports any URL from the web, but will specifically support media from <strong>iTunes, YouTube, flickr, Facebook, MySpace, Scribd, Slideshare, last.fm, Pandora, and imeem.</strong></p>

<h2>Scanning Codes</h2>

<p>For end users interacting with the barcode, the process is simple, too. All you need is a webcam or a barcode reading application for your smartphone. The company suggests that iCandy could be used to create a digitally enhanced album collection which you could use to play tracks from your iTunes music library. This is demonstrated, quite adorably we might add, by one of the iCandy engineer's 4 1/2 year-old-daughter, who launches music (and dances around) in <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPryGwdm1Sg">this YouTube video</a>. </p>

<p>
  <div class="wlWriterEditableSmartContent" id="scid:5737277B-5D6D-4f48-ABFC-DD9C333F4C5D:b6ae7fa1-a034-4eff-8063-de8055e8efe3" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; float: none; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GPryGwdm1Sg" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></div>
</p>


<p>Although this idea of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxmlnOOYsu8">interacting with your music collection</a> appears to be the primary focus of <a href="http://icandy.ricohinnovations.com">the iCandy application</a>, we think its other uses are just as appealing, if not more so. With the QR codes created by the application, bands and other artists wishing to promote their music could create merchandise - flyers, t-shirts, cards, etc. - which link directly to their homepage on the web or the music itself. </p>

<p>Imagine how this could work: after a long night out at the local bars and clubs, you could simply scan a card or other giveaway item the band had handed out after their last set. That's much easier than entering in a URL or even having to locate the album listing manually. Thanks to iCandy's innovative technology, a code scanned for music you don't already own, would also give you a prompt to purchase it from iTunes, Amazon, or Rhapsody. </p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/iCandy-buyfromitunes.jpg"></p>

<h2>iPhone Application in the Works</h2>

<p>Even better than having to use your computer would be using your iPhone as the barcode scanner instead. Since the QR codes are just normal barcodes, you can scan them today using any third-party QR code scanning application on your iPhone, or any other smartphone for that matter. However, the company is working on an iPhone application that would auto-play the track if you already owned it and it was in your iPhone's music collection. If it wasn't, you could be shown the track in iTunes so that you preview it or purchase it, if desired. </p>

<p>The auto-play feature is where the company is having problems at the moment because of how Apple has the phone locked down. A company representative told us that they will probably have to meet with Apple in order to get this sorted out properly and play by all the rules. </p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="icandy_youtube.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/icandy_youtube.png" width="599" height="248" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span></p>

<p>In the meantime, QR codes that link to other web sites - <a href="http://icandy.ricohinnovations.com/rocket2/index.php/get-started/iphone">or even YouTube videos</a> - will work with the iPhone. Other camera-equipped smartphones can also be used to scan the barcodes and direct the users to the appropriate web sites. </p>

<h2>Try it Out!</h2>

<p>The iCandy application is still in beta, but you can register to try it out now. To get right in, use the code "RWW" when you <a href="http://icandy.ricohinnovations.com/rocket2/index.php/component/comprofiler/registers">sign up here</a>. Company feedback can be sent to the company via the feedback form on their homepage (<a href="http://icandy.ricohinnovations.com">http://icandy.ricohinnovations.com</a>) or via email (<a href="mailto:feedback@icandy.ricohinnovations.com">feedback@icandy.ricohinnovations.com</a>). </p>

<em><p>For more information on barcode scanning, read our 3-part series, "The Scannable World": <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_scannable_world_mobile_phones_as_barcode_scanners.php">Part 1</a>, <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_scannable_world_part_2_scan_web_printouts.php">Part 2</a>, <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_scannable_world_barcodes_scanning_in_the_real_world.php">Part 3</a>.</p></em>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/icandy_make_qr_codes_that_play_music.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/icandy_make_qr_codes_that_play_music.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/icandy_make_qr_codes_that_play_music.php</guid>
         <category>Products</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:42:01 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Sarah Perez</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Ping.fm Gets Backing from Reid Hoffman, Joi Ito</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Pingfmlogo.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/Pingfmlogo.jpg" width="150" height="76" >Who uses cross-posting social media app <a href="http://ping.fm">Ping.fm</a>?  A lot of people do, but now you can add <a href="http://linkedin.com">LinkedIn</a> founder Reid Hoffman and <a href="http://creativecommons.org">Creative Commons Foundation</a> Chairman <a href="http://joi.ito.com/">Joi Ito</a> to the list.  The two are among the most high profile angel investors in the startup world and they've both just put money into Ping.fm, according to <a href="http://ping.fm/blog/good-news-for-everyone/?from=rss#1229963743">a post on the company's blog</a> this morning.</p>

<p>The service lets users send a message through one interface (SMS, IM, web publishing tools) and then automatically cross posts it to more than 30 other social networking sites.  It's a way to broadcast your messages into more networks than you could otherwise participate in.  Now with some very visible investment, the company should be able to scale and roll out even more features.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=13118&amp;cb=13118' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=13118&amp;n=13118' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<center><img alt="pingfmpic.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/pingfmpic.jpg" width="610" height="181" ></center>

<p>Ping.fm is just one of a number of companies trying to help users get their content out into multiple social networks automatically.  They are all a little bit different.  New entrant <a href="http://tarpipe.com">Tarpipe</a> may offer <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/tarpipe_social_media_workflow.php">the most sophisticated user controls</a> and <a href="http://pixelpipe.com/">Pixelpipe</a> stores high resolution copies of the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/pixelpipe_easily_share_media_files.php">photos and video it broadcasts in lower quality</a>.  There are a number of different services like this, but Ping.fm may be the most popular and now it's getting a big boost from Ito and Hoffman.</p>

<p>Reid Hoffman was one of a number of early PayPal execs who made out well when eBay bought their company in 2002.  Now referred to as "the PayPal mafia," the group sticks together informally to invest in or work for their many small investments in new Web 2.0 companies.  (See, for example, our news breaking coverage of another PayPal team member, Dave McClure, <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/jobwire/2008/12/dave-mcclure-joins-founders-fund.php">joining the high profile Founders Fund last week</a>.)  This group has been closely tied to the early days of YouTube, Facebook and Digg.  For an excellent and engaging history of the connections between all these companies, see <a href="http://sarahlacy.com">Sarah Lacy's</a> new book <em>Once You're Lucky, Twice You're Good</em>.</p>

<p>Getting an investment from Hoffman could bode well for future, larger, fund raising efforts by Ping.fm.  Hoffman is in touch with many of the hottest projects on the web - he's on the Board of Mozilla, Kiva.org, gaming company Zynga and a number of other companies.</p>

<p>Lacy calls Hoffman a "friend-tor," as opposed to an investor.  He's among the group of young technologists who have experienced the good and bad about institutional investors and can relate to young technologists who need to be more cautious than most people were in the first web bubble.  Plus LinkedIn is awesome, so we're sure Hoffman offers good advice.</p>

<p>Joi Ito has an equally impressive resume (see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joi_Ito">his Wikipedia profile</a>, for example).  He was an early stage investor in Flickr, Last.fm and many other very interesting companies.</p>

<p>Will these two investors make a big difference in helping Ping.fm in particular, and cross posting to multiple social networks, a standard part of life online?  Only time will tell, but with the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/niche_networking.php">proliferation of niche social networks</a> and the long tail of participation online across networks large and small - it makes sense.  Consider the growth of mobile media publishing as well and there's all the more reason to get your content out of a single silo of Flickr, or Twitter.  Hoffman and Ito have already bet on it.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/pingfm_gets_backing.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/pingfm_gets_backing.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/pingfm_gets_backing.php</guid>
         <category>NYT</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:51:06 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Marshall Kirkpatrick</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Idiomag Relaunches Personalized Music Magazine - Keeps Breaking Our Hearts</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="idiomaglogo.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/idiomaglogo.jpg" width="150" height="46"><strong>This fabulous idea still falls short in user experience.</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://idiomag.com">Idiomag</a> is a company we love to tell people about - it's one of the most awesome ideas we've seen in a long time.  The personalized music magazine site <a href="http://blog.idiomag.com/2008/10/idiomag-rollingstone/">relaunched today</a> with 4 times more content than ever before and a more traditional, link-intensive page design. Unfortunately, this great idea has serious problems in implementation and today's redesign doesn't appear to have solved those problems.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=12059&amp;cb=12059' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=12059&amp;n=12059' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>Here's the basic story of how Idiomag works.  The site asks for your user name on one of the most popular music social networks (Pandora, Last.fm, Moog, etc.) and then uses your publicly available taste data to build a personalized "music magazine" in Flash.  The magazine combines videos from YouTube, photos from Flickr, MP3s and syndicated music blog content.  </p>

<p>Idiomag looks at the color scheme of the video or photos accompanying an article and bases the whole page aesthetics on a complimentary set of colors.   The service learns from your feedback and offers a new set of recommendations ever day.</p>

<center><img alt="idiomagscreen.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/idiomagscreen.jpg" width="610" height="341"></center>

<p>We love the idea, but two years after Idiomag launched, we still return to the site begrudgingly today.  We visit it at every opportunity, appreciating the music recommendations and hoping the rest of the site will get better.</p>

<h2>Content is Hard</h2>

<p>Why is it so unpleasant to go to Idiomag?  Mostly because the syndicated text content from music blogs is awful.  Most of it is really poorly written and the presentation is even worse.  The Flash display of text from feeds misses punctuation, inserts spaces between letters in the middle of words - it's absolutely unreadable.  </p>

<p>We keep hoping that the next article served up will be free of overdrawn adjective soup or abrupt beginnings and topic changes.  No such luck.</p>

<p>There's obviously a world full of crappy music blogs out there, and we appreciate <a href="http://hypem.com">the MP3s they post</a>, but Idiomag's parsing for quality content isn't working.  The blog posts are placed very prominently on every page of the site and the whole user experience suffers as a result.</p>

<p>There are a lot of moving parts in the UI that make it unpleasant to use, as well.  The first paragraph of every article is repeated as a "pull quote" at the top of the page, meaning you've got to skip the 2nd paragraph on every page because it's the same as the first.  There's an independent collections of MP3s playing on all the pages, luckily they stop when a video loads, but they are no longer tied to the same artists as the articles and it appears that every article now has videos instead of photos.</p>

<center><a href='http://grapher.compete.com/idiomag.com+hypem.com+muxtape.com?metric=uv'><img src='http://grapher.compete.com/idiomag.com+hypem.com+muxtape.com_uv_460.png' /></a></center>

<p>We didn't see any of the celebrated new content from partners like Billboard and Rolling Stone.  As part of the relaunch today, <a href="http://idiomag.com">Idiomag</a> says it has quadrupled the number of articles it can offer - up to 11,000 per month.</p>

<p>Give it a try for yourself, it's a great idea and maybe it will serve you better than it has us.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/idiomag_relaunches.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/idiomag_relaunches.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/idiomag_relaunches.php</guid>
         <category>Mashups</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:18:44 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Marshall Kirkpatrick</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Mixtube: Make Mixtapes from YouTube Tunes</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="MixTubelogo.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/MixTubelogo.jpg" width="149" height="34" >YouTube is a great source of live music performances and other audio treasures.  Music companies get upset that their tunes are used without permission in lip sync and other types of videos on the site.  Where they see conflict, others see opportunity.</p>

<p><font style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><script type="text/javascript">digg_url = 'http://digg.com/music/Make_Mixtapes_from_YouTube_Tunes';digg_bgcolor = '#ffffff';digg_skin = 'normal';</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></font>We've seen a number of new services lately that focus on the audio in YouTube videos, but the most enjoyable one so far is <a href="http://mixtube.org">Mixtube</a> - a mixtape maker for YouTube audio.  It's based on the metaphor and interface of the now "sleeping" <a href="http://muxtape.com">Muxtape</a>.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=11974&amp;cb=11974' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=11974&amp;n=11974' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>The sound quality on YouTube is often not so hot but we appreciate the opportunity to do things like set up an auto-advancing playlist of Dar Williams live performances.  There's all kinds of nice little interface touches here, making it a really easy site to use.</p>

<p> We expect the site will be operable indefinitely, as YouTube rarely comes down on derivative services.  Thanks to <a href="http://waxy.org/links/">Andy Baio</a> for finding this one.</p>

<center><img alt="mixtubescreen.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/mixtubescreen.jpg" width="600" height="325" ></center>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mixtube_make_mixtapes_from_you.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mixtube_make_mixtapes_from_you.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mixtube_make_mixtapes_from_you.php</guid>
         <category>Multimedia</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:20:23 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Marshall Kirkpatrick</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>The Future of Blogging Revealed</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/blogging_paper.jpg">There has been a lot of talk lately about <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mixed_messages_blogging.php">the changing face of the blogging landscape</a>. <a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2008/07/21/has-blogging-lost-its-relational-focus/">Darren Rowse of ProBlogger</a> asked if blogging has lost its relational focus; Scoble explained <a href="http://scobleizer.com/2008/07/22/why-tech-blogging-has-failed-you/">why tech blogging has failed you</a>; and even though <a href="http://shegeeks.net/its-not-tech-blogging-thats-boring/">not everyone agreed</a> with his every statement, there was a renewed commitment in the blogosphere to return to blogging about what excites instead of just writing about "<a href="http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/2008/07/scobleizer-tech.html">Apple's newest gizmo or the peccadillos of tech personalities</a>." However, we're wondering if people even need to blog anymore...at least in the traditional sense. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=6942&amp;cb=6942' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=6942&amp;n=6942' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p><font style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><script type="text/javascript">digg_url = 'http://digg.com/tech_news/The_Future_of_Blogging_Revealed';digg_bgcolor = '#ffffff';digg_skin = 'normal';</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></font>Once the main way to publish your own personal thoughts and opinions for the rest of the web to read, blogging started a movement that democratized the web. Everyone could be a publisher. But now, blogging as everyone's preferred method of communication may be over. What's taking its place? Lifestreaming. And don't be fooled into thinking that we're talking just about FriendFeed here - lifestreaming as a format  for communication extends beyond just that one social site to encompass an entirely new way to establish your home on today's social web.</p>

<h2>Lifestreaming? </h2>

<p>Lifestreaming is a new way of documenting the activities surrounding your life using a chronologically-ordered collection of information. Bloggers like <a href="http://julia.nonsociety.com/">Julia Allison</a>, whose internet activities and real-world attention-grabbing stunts made her "internet famous," has used the format to rocket herself into stardom. That stardom even made her the subject of a recent <a href="http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/magazine/16-08/howto_allison">Wired magazine article on the subject of self-promotion</a>. Her method of communication? The lifestream, of course. <a href="http://julia.nonsociety.com/">Her blog</a> is no more than a short collection of photos, videos, copy-and-pasted emails, random thoughts, links, and general over-sharing.  The site even scrolls horizontally instead of vertically which makes it seem much more like a timeline than just another blog.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/julia_allison_blog.png"<i>Julia Allison's Site</i></p>

<p>The simplicity of a lifestream is ideal for our information overloaded age. Lifestreams are short and sweet, yet still provide the same insight into a person's life as yesterday's casual personal blog did. A video here, a photo there, and today's web citizens can voyeuristically peer into anyone's life and get a sense of who they are. Long-form bloggers, on the other hand (myself included) require time and attention to read, but with so many publishers out there, people just aren't reading content like they used to - <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_stats_are_in_youre_just_skimming_this_article.php">they're just scanning text and moving on</a>. For new bloggers, this means getting readers is harder than ever - your words are getting lost in a sea of noise. So to stand out, several are turning to the lifestream instead in order to get noticed. </p>

<h2>The New Blog</h2>

<p>But the Julia Allison method is only one option for lifestreaming. Over the weekend, I stumbled across <a href="http://cheslow.com/">this blog</a>, if you can even call it that. This was no ordinary blog - it was a lifestream based on the social aggregation service, <a href="http://www.friendfeed.com">FriendFeed</a>. Take a look:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/sarahintampa/2723546321/sizes/o/"><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/future_of_blogging.png"></a><i>The New Blog (Click To See It Larger)</i></p>

<p>What's amazing about this site is that the elements of traditional blogging are mirrored here. Instead of posts, there's a stream. Instead of "Recent Comments," there are the "Recent Discussions." And instead of an "About Me" page, there's a link to the blogger's Facebook profile. Could this be the future of blogging? For active social participants, the above site could certainly be the ideal blog as it highlights their participation instead of their thoughts and opinions.</p>

<p>But even though FriendFeed might be the easiest way to add a lifestream to your site (or turn your blog into a lifestream), it's certainly not the only way. The Lifestream Blog keeps track of the many different ways that web site owners are self-hosting their own lifestreams. You can check out the galleries of these sites both <a href="http://lifestreamblog.com/self-hosted-lifestream-gallery-1/">here</a> and <a href="http://lifestreamblog.com/self-hosted-lifestream-gallery-2/">here</a>. </p>

<h2>How You Can Stream Your Life</h2>

<p>So, how are people doing this? There are several ways, but many people today are using custom code on their sites in order to produce the lifestream. However, if you already have a Wordpress blog, you can set up a custom lifestream within Wordpress with relative ease. In fact, there are a couple of options to do so: </p>

<ul>
  <li><a href="http://kierandelaney.net/blog/projects/simplelife/">SimpleLife Wordpress Plugin</a> - this plugin lets you either add your lifestream as a widget or as a page. </li>

  <li><a href="http://rick.jinlabs.com/code/rss-stream">RSS Stream Wordpress Plugin</a> - this plugin lets you add a lifestream as a page on your site. </li>
</ul>

<p>We also told you about the much-anticipated <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/host_your_own_lifestream_with.php">Sweetcron</a>, brand-new automated lifestreaming software for self-hosting your own stream. </p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/sweetcron.png"<i>SweetCron</i></p>

<p>Unfortunately, <a href="http://www.yongfook.com/">the developer</a> has still yet to release the software, despite having originally promised a June release. These continued delays leave the door wide open for another developer to release their own software and capture the early adopter lifestreaming market. <em>(Do you know of any others in development? Let us know!) </em></p>

<h2>Lifestreaming Is The Always On Blog</h2>

<p>There was a time when casual, personal blogging was your way to communicate with your friends on the web. Via posts, commenting, and blogrolls, bloggers formed niche communities on the web to socialize with each other. Today, new tools provide that same level of socialization - perhaps even better than blogging ever could. Via micro-blogging sites like <a href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a>, every quick thought or link can be shared with your community of followers and you can see theirs, too. You can join and exit the never-ending conversation at your leisure. Plus, other social sites like <a href="http://www.friendfeed.com">FriendFeed</a> provide today's new discussion boards where conversation occurs surrounding the items posted and shared, leading to even more of a community feel, and one that's drawing more users every day. </p>

<p>Sites and social tools like these and many others encourage more participation on the social web than ever before. Although the social participants on these sites are often more active in socializing than they are in blogging, there's still that need to stake out your own piece of real estate on the web. But we wonder: does that really need to be a blog anymore? Perhaps not. </p>

<p><small><em>Blogging Newspaper image courtesy of <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/anniemole/">Annie Mole</a></em></small</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_future_of_blogging_reveale.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_future_of_blogging_reveale.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_future_of_blogging_reveale.php</guid>
         <category>Trends</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Sarah Perez</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>The Top 40 Online Video Producers in May - This List Might Surprise You</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="tubemogullogo.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/tubemogullogo.jpg" width="150" height="61">We're watching the media landscape change in real time and one of the most interesting ways that's happening right now is through new online video producers breaking the monopoly of the old TV giants.  Who's taking the lead in the new video landscape?  Though old media is making a strong play - it's not winning so far.  New, independent online video producers are the top publishers today.</p>

<p>A company called <a href="http://tubemogul.com">TubeMogul</a> is keeping track of the viewership on 15 different websites from YouTube to Crackle.  Today they've launched the <a href="http://www.tubemogul.com/about/top40.php">TubeMogul Top 40</a>, a monthly leaderboard for viewership across a wide variety of video services around the web.  Below is a look at who those leaders are.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=6637&amp;cb=6637' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=6637&amp;n=6637' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p><font style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;"><script type="text/javascript">digg_url = 'http://digg.com/tech_news/The_Top_40_Online_Video_Producers_in_May';digg_bgcolor = '#ffffff';digg_skin = 'normal';</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></font>TubeMogul provides easy video publishing to multiple sites at once, then tracks the views that its users achieve.   The company says it's got nearly 30,000 users today, including some of the biggest media brands in the world.  Some of those giant brands are even holding their own online.  </p>

<p>The list includes 40 different sources of video, but here's a look at the top 15.  How many of these have you heard of?</p>

<ol>
<li><a href="http://nextnewnetworks.com">Next New Networks</a></li><img alt="nnwlogo2.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/nnwlogo2.jpg" width="100" height="14" align="right" hspace="5px" vspace="5px">
A venture funded mini-empire of online video shows on a wide variety of topics, from sports to politics to a rip-off of the lolcat phenomenon as a video show.  Run by former edge-TV execs.  Some good stuff, and hey - they're winning!

<p><li><a href="http://chris.pirillo.com">Chris Pirillo</a></li><img alt="chrisplogo.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/chrisplogo.jpg" width="100" height="121" align="right" hspace="5px" vpsace="5px">A one man empire run by uber-(media)-geek Chris Pirillo.  Pirillo notes in a <a href="http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/06/24/who-are-the-internets-top-video-producers/">blog post about the TubeMogul 40</a> that these numbers don't include his successful live tech-help show, either.</p>

<center><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9GLjw0cVQIs&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9GLjw0cVQIs&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center>

<p><li><a href="http://www.howcast.com">Howcast</a></li><img alt="howcastlogo.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/howcastlogo.jpg" width="100" height="35" align="right" hspace="5px" vspace="5px">How-to videos, similar to the many other offerings in this space but with a little more allusion to sex.  And more viewers.</p>

<p><li><a href="http://www.foryourimagination.com/">For Your Imagination</a> </li></p>

<p>Professional video producers, making content for brands to ride along with.  </p>

<p><li><a href="http://torante.com">Tornante</a></li></p>

<p>Michael Eisner's company, the holders of <a href="http://Vuguru.com">Vuguru</a>.</p>

<p><li><a href="http://watchMojo.com">WatchMojo.com</a></li></p>

<p>More professional video producers, making content for brands to ride along with or otherwise make use of.  Apparently it's working, given the presence of these kinds of companies.</p>

<p><li><a href="http://tastyblogsnack.com/">iJustine</a></li></p>

<p>Justine Ezarik, the woman who stole Justin.tv's lunch in terms of publicity.  She's now interviewing top tech executives, covering movie launches for General Motors' I Got Shotgun social media campaign and generally having fun.</p>

<p><li><a href="http://willvideoforfood.com/">Nalts</a></li></p>

<p>According to his bio: "Kevin Nalts is one of the most-viewed YouTube comedians with more than 650 short online videos seen more than 25 million times. By day he's a Marketing Director at a Fortune 100 company, and he speaks, writes and consults in the area of online marketing and viral video."</p>

<p><li><a href="http://www.mydamnchannel.com/">MyDamnChannel</a></li></p>

<p>Hollywood veterans doing comedy, including the You Suck at Photoshop series.  It's working for them.</p>

<p><li><a href="http://www.fordmodels.tv/">Ford Models</a></li></p>

<p>Ad sponsored eye candy, content about beauty products, nothing new here - just supermodels blathering on the internet.</p>

<p><li><a href="http://www.cbs.com/sales/">CBS Interactive</a></li></p>

<p>The rolled up web properties of CBS.</p>

<p><li><a href="http://www.hbo.com/">HBO</a></li></p>

<p><li><a href="http://www.rocketboom.com/vlog/">Rocketboom</a></li></p>

<p>This daily short form, comedic documentary show just keeps on drawing crowds.   It's getting more social media play than PBS (#20).</p>

<p><li><a href="http://www.funimation.com/">FUNimation Productions</a></li></p>

<p>Anime!  Why am I not surprised?  I had no idea though.</p>

<p><li><a href="http://nationallampoon.com/">National Lampoon</a></li></p>

<p>Next generation, low-brow humor that's not as funny or smart as The Onion but is from a very established brand.</li></ol></p>

<h2>Notes</h2>

<p>That's just the top 15 of <a href="http://www.tubemogul.com/about/top40.php">TubeMogul's Top 40</a> and it's notable that these numbers don't count viewership through services like Blip.tv and Castfire, both big services.  TubeMogul is a very successful service so far though and their claim of 30,000 users is remarkable.</p>

<p><font style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><script type="text/javascript">digg_url = 'http://digg.com/tech_news/The_Top_40_Online_Video_Producers_in_May';digg_bgcolor = '#ffffff';digg_skin = 'normal';</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></font>Our take away from this list is that old media is still generally dominant but that video producers born and bred on the media fringe are holding their own very respectfully.  And that Chris Pirillo is a maniac.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_top_40_online_video_producers.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_top_40_online_video_producers.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_top_40_online_video_producers.php</guid>
         <category>Multimedia</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 06:51:51 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Marshall Kirkpatrick</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Pitchfork.tv Launches Music Video Site to Challenge MySpace Music</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="pitchforktvlogo.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/pitchforktvlogo.jpg" width="150" height="63" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;"/></span>Are the Pixies, Negativeland and early Radiohead what you consider classic music?  Wether or not that's the case, you may want to check out the new <a href="http://pitchfork.tv">Pitchfork.tv</a> - a new music video site that just launched today.  </p>

<p>The next stage in the evolution of popular niche music blog <a href="http://pitchforkmedia.com">PitchforkMedia.com</a>, <a href="http://pitchfork.tv">Pitchfork.tv</a> is among several forthcoming music video sites, the first out of the gate.  <br />
</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=6048&amp;cb=6048' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=6048&amp;n=6048' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>The forthcoming MySpace Music, set to roll out over the next 3 to 4 months, may have video from all the major labels (presuming EMI comes on board) but it will compete for the hearts and minds of young people with no-longer so-alternative music communities like Pitchfork.tv.</p>

<p>Projects like Pitchfork.tv and the forthcoming <a href="http://videogum.com">Videogum</a> (newly acquired music blog <a href="http://stereogum.com">Stereogum</a> plus video) were undoubtedly conceived well before MySpace Music was announced - heck, that was just last week.  One has to wonder, though, if the established leaders in the music industry is in trouble not just because of the proliferation of free MP3s around the web, but also because of the mainstreaming of what used to be considered alternative music.  </p>

<p>Non-pop music has gotten big enough globally that <a href="http://danielhernandez.typepad.com/daniel_hernandez/2008/03/the-emos-in-mex.html">there are now running battles in the streets of Mexico</a> between Emo fans and angry bigoted crowds seeking to beat them up.</p>

<p>When the MySpace Music mega-portal was announced, <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_music_store_wheres_the_long_tail.php">we asked</a>: where's the long tail of independent music that was so key to MySpace's early growth?  It's on sites like Pitchfork.tv  MySpace says it will expand to include the long tail of music in time, but whether that site will be able to produce the authentic, informed content that sites like Pitchfork and Stereogum can would even then be a big question.</p>

<p>On the other hand, all of these people might be so "ironic," the music so homogenous that it will never scale or make more than an annoying blip on the mainstream music industry radar.  That's possible, too.  These folks are pretty ironic about being ironic, though, which may or may not be a good thing.</p>

<h2>The Features</h2>

<p>The site looks good.  Video quality is high, there's an embeddable player but no commenting or social features.  That's almost a relief.  Some of the content is embeddable and some of it isn't.  </p>

<p>In addition to a healthy list of music videos from bands ranging from The Chemical Brothers to Ted Leo and the Pharmacists, there's also a section for recordings of live concert performances and another that showcases premium content "for one week only."  The first One Week Only segment is a documentary about The Pixies 2004 reunion tour.  It's well produced and fun to watch.  Site navigation is good.  It's a good little site.</p>

<center><object width="540" height="425"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="movie" value="http://video.pitchfork.tv/mediaplayer.swf" /><param name="flashvars" value="file=http://pitchfork.tv/node/317/embed.xml" /><embed src="http://video.pitchfork.tv/mediaplayer.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" flashvars="file=http://pitchfork.tv/node/317/embed.xml" allowfullscreen="true" width="540" height="425"></embed></object></center>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/pitchforktv_launches_music_vid.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/pitchforktv_launches_music_vid.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/pitchforktv_launches_music_vid.php</guid>
         <category>music</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 08:29:26 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Marshall Kirkpatrick</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Will Microsoft Buy Limelight, or Build Their Own CDN?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/limelight-logo.jpg" width="130" height="55">Like Wowbagger the Infinitely Prolonged, rumors about Microsoft buying so-and-so just won't die.  The latest rumor to keep floating across our desk is that Microsoft is buying second place content delivery network (CDN) <a href="http://www.limelightnetworks.com/">Limelight Networks</a>.  In August, Microsoft entered into a <a href="http://www.streamingmedia.com/press/view.asp?id=7372">technology sharing partnership</a> with Limelight.  Under the terms of that deal, the two companies would, "cross-license certain technologies, consider joint development projects in the future, and cooperate on extending and improving their respective technology infrastructures."  Now it appears that Microsoft may be looking to buy the CDN outright.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=5430&amp;cb=5430' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=5430&amp;n=5430' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>Limelight's stock price fell precipitously over the summer, and shares have traded way down over the past year.  Shares of the company were up today about 11% on news that their fourth quarter earnings would be closer to the high end of estimates.  But as <a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/01/11/limelights-share-surge-dont-celebrate-yet/">Stacey Higginbotham writes</a>, Limelight spends about 60 cents on every $1 it earns, compared to 30 cents for chief rival Akamai. "I’m not sure how low Limelight can go. Or for how long," she said this morning, lending fire to the buyout rumors.</p>  

<p>With a $550 million market cap, Limelight is certainly in Microsoft's price range.  Why would Microsoft want Limelight?  <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/01/rumor-microsoft-to-buy-limelight-networks-llnwmsft.html">Henry Blodget suspects</a> it has to do with beefing up Microsoft's cloud computing technology an capacity.</p>

<blockquote><p><i>"Microsoft's entire business infrastructure is built around desktop servers and PCs. The entire business infrastructure of Microsoft's most fearsome competitor Google, meanwhile, is built around the wave of the future-- "cloud computing"--in which millions of devices interact with vast data centers and server farms out on the network.</p>
<p>Microsoft certainly doesn't need to be in the CDN business, but perhaps it believes Limelight's infrastructure and expertise will help accelerate its transition to cloud computing. Specifically, instead of buying CDN services from Akamai, et al, Microsoft could now float MSN, Office Live, Silverlight, and other Software-As-A-Service products on top of the Limelight infrastructure."</i> -- Henry Blodget</p></blockquote>

<p>But even as the rumor mill churns, Microsoft is reportedly building their own content delivery network, even though the August deal with Limelight also included a multi-year extension of the agreement the two companies already had in place for Limelight to provide content serving for Microsoft media properties.</p>

<p>"Right now we're actually building our own edge network," said Debra Chrapaty, Corporate Vice President of Global Foundation Services for Microsoft, at a recent conference, <a href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/Jan/11/microsoft_building_own_cdn_network.html">reports Rich Miller</a>. "We're going to put nodes all over the world that we can leverage a little more broadly than we could by using a partner."</p>

<p>"We're architecting one of the world's largest networks," said Chrapaty. "In environments like ours, we could look at network costs, if we continue to scale and support the world's data, in the billions of dollars. The numbers are really enormous."  Weighed against the potential cost of Microsoft's data delivery needs (according to Miller, Microsoft's media properties serve 460 million unique users per month), purchasing Limelight seems like small potatoes.</p>

<p>So which is it?  Is Microsoft building their own delivery network using licensed Limelight technology or are they purchasing Limelight as the basis for their new network?  I  think purchasing Limelight would make a lot of sense for Microsoft -- it would probably be cheaper then building their own content delivery network from scratch, and who knows Limelight's technology better than Limelight?</p>

<p>The why is simple.  As Dan Rayburn <a href="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/the_business_of_online_vi/2007/08/microsoft-and-l.html">wrote in August</a>, "Microsoft knows very well that what we are experiencing today with content delivery is only scratching the surface of where this business is going to go. They know that a few years from now this will truly be a powerful medium for delivering all kinds of video content and Microsoft wants to prepare now by making their platform ready for when it does hit."  That's why Microsoft would buy Limelight.  It's the "will they" that is the trickier question.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_limelight_buy.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_limelight_buy.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_limelight_buy.php</guid>
         <category>Microsoft</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:51:04 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Josh Catone</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Digital Lifestyle Mobile Jigsaw</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In my post about <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002188.php">internet-based mobility</a> earlier this week, I mentioned that the hype around mobile devices we endured during the 90's and early 21st century is finally being realized in 2004. Mobile phone market penetration is running at 70% where I live, up from 10% in the mid-90's. Other devices such as PDA's, the iPod and the Tablet are also being increasingly used. Whichever mobile device or combination of devices you have, it seems that information increasingly wants to be not only <a href="http://www.andrewsw.com/news/index.php?p=810">free</a> - but <b>mobile</b>.</p>

<h2>Connecting the pieces</h2>

<p>With all these devices and accompanying types of data I can now record - text, audio, video, photos, etc - it is apparent that I have a need to <b>connect</b> all the different pieces together. Not only that, I want to place myself at the <b>center</b> of my digital media.</p> 

<p>Joining all the pieces together, using myself as the locus, is how I strive to retain a sense of control over my technological environment. So naturally I want the process to be as <b>easy</b> as possible, so that my sense (illusion?) of control is greater.</p> 

<p>I want to be able to connect my mobile phone to my PC, for example. And connect to the Internet on my PDA, via a bluetooth connection on my mobile phone. And I want to synch PDA data with my PC. There are lots of other scenarios, particularly as there are an increasing number of software applications and services I can add to the mix. For example, I recently signed up to <a href="http://www.flickr.com">Flickr</a>. So now I can take a photo on my phone, email it from there to the Flickr server, then copy it across to my Movable Type <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/photos/">photoblog</a>. To view it I can hook up my PDA or phone to the Internet, via my bluetooth phone connection, and view the result in a WAP browser. Or simply log on to my Tablet (if I had one).</p>

<h2>Total Connectivity</h2>

<p>We're approaching the long-held dream of total connectivity. Whether wired or wireless, we're at the stage now where we can connect a variety of devices together via a variety of software apps or services. The issue we're having in 2004 is that total connectivity is far from a polished reality. It still takes a fair bit of configuration effort to hook up your mobile phone to wirelessly connect to the Internet, for example. It takes some technical nous to automatically send your phone pics to your blog via Flickr, to use the example I quoted earlier. Things aren't as <b>user friendly</b> as we'd like them to be in this new Mobile Internet world. Which is to be expected - it takes time for new technologies to piece themselves together.</p>

<p>Even self-confessed geeks have trouble connecting all the bits together. I know I do - for example getting my Palm PDA to speak to my new mobile phone via bluetooth took a bit of to'ing and fro'ing (and googling). Another person who has been writing about connecting technology together is <a href="http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2004/09/04.html#a1330">Lilia from Mathemegenic</a> - in her case it is WiFi, Tablet PC SP2, SkypeOut and Bluetooth headsets. I think that even outgeeks me ;-)</p>

<h2>So how do we make things user-friendly?</h2>

<p>That's the six million dollar question. I think this is where the <a href="http://blogs.it/0100198/stories/2004/03/26/digitalLifestyleAggregation.html">Digital Lifestyle Aggregation</a> concept and similar ideas come in. The DLA is <a href="http://blogs.it/0100198/">Marc Canter's</a> baby and at heart it's all about making it simple for people to easily connect all their digital appliances and services together. In Marc and his company <a href="http://broadbandmechanics.com/">Broadband Mechanics</a>'s case, the DLA will be like a wrapper for all the open source digital services in the world - Flickr, blogs, Open Media and others. Well, there's more to it than that - but I'm trying to simplify it here :-)</p>

<p>Other companies, notably the "big co's" are taking a more proprietary approach. For example Apple's <a href="http://www.apple.com/ilife/">iLife</a> suite of multimedia tools - made up of GarageBand, iPhoto, iMovie, iDVD and iTunes. According to Apple, they are "tightly-integrated applications that work together seamlessly". In other words, Apple is pushing the 'user-friendly connectivity' angle too. Further proof is that the word "easy" (or a derivative of it) is mentioned 10 times on the iLife homepage!</p> 

<p>A key part of Apple's general strategy is to position themselves as a hip and trendy "digital lifestyle" company. The <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=uber-cool">uber-cool</a> and mega-successful iPod is the cornerstone (currently) of that strategy.</p>

<h2>Microsoft shoehorns into DLA's</h2>

<p>As for <a href="http://www.microsoft.com">Microsoft</a>, well their strategy has always been to bundle as many products and services as possible on top of their dominant OS. Exhibit 1: Windows and the attempt to integrate the Internet Explorer browser. Exhibit 2: Longhorn, which is being designed to be a kind of 'Desktop Web'. Which is to say: browsing, search and a lot of other Web things are going to be integrated into the Longhorn OS.</p>

<p>Until recently, Microsoft hasn't really challenged Apple on the Digital Media front. But their new <a href="http://beta.music.msn.com/">MSN Music Service</a> is a sign of a change in strategy and is a direct challenge to Apple. In a recent interview <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/sep2004/tc2004092_2455.htm">Bill Gates elucidates</a> on where Microsoft is heading with digital media.</p>

<p>For example, <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/sep2004/tc2004092_2455_PG2.htm">Gates said</a> (specifically about digital media in the living room): "We see these things as connected. But this isn't the point yet where consumers see those things totally connected. Over time, a lot of the advances will come through <b>the simplicity of how those work together</b>."</p>

<p>Emphasis in that last sentence mine. I think Bill Gates hit the nail on the head there - but then hitting things on the head is what Microsoft is good at. In 2004, there are <i>too many</i> media products and services to connect together and so mainstream users don't know where to begin. Not only that, connecting those things together can get complicated pretty quickly (Bluetooth is a prime example).</p> 

<p>The key - for Broadband Mechanics, Apple, Microsoft and whoever else wants to jump in the ring - is to make connecting digital things together as simple as possible for the end-user.</p>

<h2>Final Thought</h2>

<p>Currently users are forced to fit technology products and services together like a jigsaw - except the pieces have jagged edges and often don't match. For this reason it's usually only geeks who attempt to fit together the jigsaw. That's the situation in 2004, but it's slowly getting better. DLA's hold the promise of making the jigsaw user-friendly for everybody and smoothing out those edges.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=4266&amp;cb=4266' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=4266&amp;n=4266' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digital_lifesty.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digital_lifesty.php</guid>
         <category>Multimedia</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2004 22:56:42 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Mobile Media</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gonze.com/weblog/index.cgi/8-17-4.trackback">Lucas Gonze comments</a> on my post from yesterday:</p>

<p class="quote">"Richard MacManus is throwing himself into eBooks. A synchronicity is that I ran across an excellent bit of non-fiction by Phillip K. Dick which is available freely on the net and couldn't figure out what to do with it. It's not desk reading -- it's too long, and it needs to be read with patience rather than the half-attention I usually give writing on the web. It needs to be read after work, with a beer, on the couch instead of at the desk. Like a videoblog, it's couch media, not desk media."</p>

<p>Couch media is a good term. I also think of it as <b>mobile media</b>, because I make most use of my PDA on the bus and train. I spend about 2 hours each weekday travelling to and from work, but I optimize that time by reading blog posts and other content on my PDA. I don't get anywhere near 2 hours of couch time per day (except in the weekend, when I'm likely to spend it watching rugby). So for me 'mobile media' is how I usually participate in the 'read' part of the read/write web.</p>

<p>I have to admit I'm not totally <i>wirelessed</i> up (if there is such a phrase!). I don't yet have a decent bluetooth or wireless internet-enabled mobile phone... although I have a birthday coming up, so maybe that is my opportunity! So what I do is save webpages from my desktop onto my PDA, so I can read them offline and when I'm on the move (bus, train).</p>

<p>This is why I've never objected to long-form blog posts, and in fact I favour reading them over the short and sharp 'shoot em up' linky style blogs. As Lucas alluded to, long-form style writing isn't designed to be read sitting at a desk. That's where PDA's and other mobile media devices (such as the iPod and the latest in mobile phones) come in. They're ideal tools to feed us our daily doses of media, in whatever format bakes your cake.</p>
<p>For me right now, eBooks on a PDA do it for me. But I also think of long-form blog posts as a kind of eBook. That's why I'm busy exploring the 'eBooks as social media' theory currently over on <a href="http://www.ebookculture.com">eBook Culture</a>. It's a new take on eBooks and also a new take on blogs.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=4254&amp;cb=4254' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=4254&amp;n=4254' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mobile_media.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mobile_media.php</guid>
         <category>Multimedia</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 11:20:16 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Context on the Web</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><i><b>Summary:</b> Microcontent in the form of sound bites, links and text extracts
are the lingua franca of the Web. But the flipside is that context morphs very easily, so
what are the moral and ethical implications of that?</i></p>

<p>Following on from my post the other day about <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002119.php">Systems Builders</a>, in which I
touched on these themes: synthesis, analysis, visonaries, implementers. Some interesting
trackbacks occured out of this. Let me first mention <a
href="http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/2004/08/12.html#a1058">Jon Udell's post this
morning</a>, because his discussion of "sound bites" is particularly relevant to the
points I want to make here. Paul Graham made a speech at Oscon 2004 that caused ripples
of controversy around the Web. Ironically I haven't heard that particular speech yet, but
I read <a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/gh.html">Graham's 'Great Hackers' essay</a> and
listened to <a href="http://www.itconversations.com/shows/detail164.html">an earlier
interview</a> he did with Doug Kaye. Here's what Jon said about Graham's Oscon
speech:</p>

<p class="quote">"Consider Paul Graham's remark. I suspect that most who commented on it
did not actually hear it, but instead read it, or read about it. How much of its impact
is conveyed by the text, and how much by the delivery? Whatever that ratio, access to the
primary source -- the words as actually spoken -- is bound to affect the perception of
the remark."</p>

<p>It's all about context. According to Jon's quote above, how you take Graham's remarks
will depend largely on whether you heard them in the original audio or in text form
(transcription, synthesis, extracts, etc). I'd go further and say that how you received Graham's remarks also depends on whether you listened to just an extract of the speech, or the whole thing. The most reliable context is listening to all of the
original audio.</p>

<p>Jon Udell goes on to say:</p>

<p class="quote">"In the realm of public discourse, it's easy to imagine what this could
mean. The presentation and analysis of sound bites has been almost entirely at the
discretion of the broadcast media. Think how different it will be when we the media can
choose the sound bites that we want to discuss."</p>

<p>Jon is putting a positive spin on the situation - every Joe and Jane Bloggs can now
put things into their own contexts. We don't rely on broadcast media to do that so much
now.</p>

<p>But... there's a flip side to that coin. Before I get to that, here's a bit more from
Jon:</p>

<p class="quote">"Think about how we "write up" meetings today. Some people try to
transcribe, and fail to synthesize. Others synthesize, at the risk of revising history. A
collective synthesis rooted in the audio transcript seems like the best of both
worlds."</p>

<p>It's true that a "collective synthesis" is very democratic and has wider breadth, because it's not just a
product of a broadcasting elite (i.e. journalists). But let's not overlook the corollary
of that: the more people you have transcribing, analyzing and synthesizing audio and text
on the Web, <b>the more things get taken out of their original context</b>. For example,
something that makes a great deal of sense within the context of the original source file,
can take on a totally different meaning if you take a snippet of the original file and
put it into your own post which is on a different subject.</p>

<p>Paul Graham wrote a number of controversial things in his 'Great Hackers' essay. For
example, this paragraph:</p>

<p class="quote">"Hackers like to work for people with high standards. But it's not
enough just to be exacting. You have to insist on the right things. Which usually means
that you have to be a hacker yourself. I've seen occasional articles about how to manage
programmers. Really there should be two articles: one about what to do if you are
yourself a programmer, and one about what to do if you're not. And the second could
probably be condensed into two words: give up."</p>

<p>When I read that in the original essay, I understood the point he was trying to make:
that to manage hackers you need to understand their spirit, to be in the same headspace.
That theme was recurrent throughout his essay and therefore it strongly resonated with
me. But when you take that paragraph out of the context of the rest of his essay (as I've
done just now), it becomes much more blunt and the meaning changes. In fact when that
paragraph is isolated from the rest of the 'Great Hackers' essay, as in <a
href="http://www.andrewsw.com/news/index.php?p=784">Andrew's post yesterday</a>, I now
find I <i>disagree</i> with what Graham says. I don't agree that only programmers can
manage other programmers - that's just plain wrong. In my view a visionary may not be a
programmer, yet he or she can certainly lead a team of programmers in the implementation
of his or her vision. Examples are Mitch Kapor and Marc Canter.</p>

<p>So you see my point? I had two different reactions to Paul Graham's paragraph on
managing programmers - I agreed with him in the context of his original essay, but I
disagreed with him when I read it again in Andrew's post.</p>

<p>Incidentally, at the end of his post Jon Udell mentioned Glenn Gould's The Idea of
North (did he get that link <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002098.php">from me</a>, via my link to him?).
The form of audio splicing that Gould did in The Idea of North is one method of putting
things people say into new contexts and creating new meaning out of that. That was
re-contextualizing as art, but what's happening now on the Web is context-morphing on a
mass scale.</p>

<p>Microcontent in the form of sound bites, links and text extracts are the lingua franca
of the Web. They enable us to bootstrap the Web of Ideas. But context on the Web is much
more fluid and it <i>morphs</i> very easily. So when we link to something (a piece of
audio or text) but give it a different meaning - what are the moral and ethical
implications of that?</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=4252&amp;cb=4252' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=4252&amp;n=4252' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/context_on_the.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/context_on_the.php</guid>
         <category>Multimedia</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2004 11:04:08 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Media</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Open-Media.org is an Open Source Media Project launched today by <a href="http://marc.blogs.it/archives/2004/08/openmediaorg.html">Marc Canter</a> and <a href="http://www.newmediamusings.com/blog/2004/08/open_media_the_.html">J.D. Lasica</a>. It's going to be like the Internet Archive, only for multimedia files. In fact Brewster Kahle of the <a href="http://www.archive.org/">Internet Archive</a> (home of the <a href="http://www.archive.org/web/web.php">The Wayback Machine</a>) is providing free storage and free bandwidth for Open Media. Here is J.D.'s description:</p>

<p class="quote">"Open-Media.org is an open source media project that seeks to expose, preserve, and advance works of grassroots creativity (chiefly, but not limited to, amateur video). Individuals, communities and organizations have begun telling digital stories that enthrall, entertain and often move audiences to take positive action. Plain text or the cool detachment of "objective" media do not come close to matching the emotional power of multimedia stories laced with personal narrative."</p>

<p>I'm not sure why "amateur video" gets top billing? Audio, art, eBooks, photos, and mixing the whole lot together - these all seem to me to be just as important. Maybe it'll become clearer to me over time.</p>

<p>Here is <a href="http://marc.blogs.it/archives/2004/08/openmediaorg.html">Marc's description of Open Media</a>:</p>

<p class="quote">"Then all this content at the Internet Archives can be accessed - built-right into your image gallery or jukebox (audio or video!) We're also going to establish a way for ANYBODY to contribute their media (via OpenMedia's and other orgs web sites) to this common Creative Commons pool of media."</p>

<p>Sounds great! I've joined the Open Media project, which is currently based on <a href="http://www.socialtext.net/openmedia/index.cgi">a SocialText wiki</a>. You can ask Marc or J.D. to send you an invitation.</p>

<p>I'm not sure yet what I can contribute, but with my analytical mind and vision for multimedia and the read/write web - I'm sure I can help! I'm particularly interested in the "digital storytelling" aspect and the potential to promote <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002110.php">electracy</a> (21st century media literacy). I'd like to think <a href="http://www.ebookculture.com">eBooks</a> have a place in this project too, so maybe I can contribute my ideas on that.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=4250&amp;cb=4250' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=4250&amp;n=4250' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/open_media.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/open_media.php</guid>
         <category>Multimedia</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:36:11 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>