ReadWriteWeb

Napster Relaunches Tonight, Here Are The Details

Written by Marshall Kirkpatrick / May 18, 2009 7:18 AM / 16 Comments

Last fall, Best Buy bought Napster for a jaw dropping $121 million, a staggering sum in the free-music era that Napster helped create. The electronics retailer thinks it can do something special with the music service though and now those plans will see the light of day.

At 5pm PST the new Napster will launch with a $5 monthly subscription plan (down from the old $15 plan) and what you get for that price looks quite good. 5 MP3 downloads per month (screenshot shows free credits for an initial 35 MP3s too), free on-demand streaming of more than 7 million songs and additional download purchases for between 69 cents and $1.29. There's a screenshot of the new interface below and our thoughts on where this new version still falls short.

The New Front Page

newnapsterfrontpage.jpg

New Interface

newnapsterinterface.jpg

That interface looks like what iTunes would have looked like if it was a native Windows app.

The company says it is still working on making mobile a more compelling experience, something we expected to be a big part of the plan when the acquisition happened.

So how does this compare to other music solutions? Here at RWW we use Pandora, Lala and Amazon MP3. Obviously playing particular songs on demand is something Pandora doesn't do, but Pandora nails discovery and the iPhone. It's also free and very easy to use. Lala has a much nicer interface than Napster, it's less expensive but it's also a little confusing. Lala does, however, allow you to listen to new albums all the way through one time for free. Amazon MP3 is just a store, but works well when used in conjunction with Pandora or Lala.

This new Napster seems like a compelling offer but remains an incremental change from everything else the industry offers. Give me a $5 monthly subscription that combines Napster's streaming options with an entire album's worth of monthly MP3 files (5 songs is half an album), the full album previews of Lala, the recommendation and iPhone awesomeness of Pandora and the artist profile quality of Last.fm - and then we're really talking. Though for now, the new Napster seems like a pretty good deal.


Comments

Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts

  1. Marshall,

    Thanks for the write-up. Do you know what kind of DRM is included with Napster's downloads? I used to use them but then had trouble sending to friends, so I switched to Amazon...

    Posted by: David Mihm | May 18, 2009 7:51 AM



  2. David, these are unrestricted MP3 downloads. DRM died late last year.

     Posted by: Marshall Kirkpatrick Author Profile Page | May 18, 2009 7:54 AM



  3. Pandora is awesome...if you're in the US. Last.fm is awesome...if you're in the US. How about a comparison of these services with an eye toward the international crowd?

    Posted by: Rochelle | May 18, 2009 8:06 AM



  4. Just a minor note: the Napster bought by Best Buy is *not* the same Napster that created the "free-music era". The Napster bought by Best Buy is actually formerly Roxio, which bought out the brand name of Napster in 2004, after the original Napster went into bankruptcy in 2002. Roxio bought the brand name from Bertelsmann.

    Posted by: Ben Kuo | May 18, 2009 8:18 AM



  5. So everyone's heard of Spotify then? http://www.spotify.com/en/

    Free unlimited streaming, occasional ads, £9.99 for unlimited ads.

    No downloads, but it is integrated with Last.fm so you can scrobble tracks. Great for an international audience, especially in the UK.

     Posted by: Josh Author Profile Page | May 18, 2009 8:18 AM



  6. As I've written in my coverage over at last100:

    Mobile support in general is an essential component if we’re ever to be persuaded to move to a cloud-based model whereby our music collection resides on remote servers and is only accessible through the Internet. That’s something that competing services such as Pandora, Slacker, Last.fm and soon Spotify, already acknowledge.

    As Marshall rightly points out, until the new Napster offering supports mobile streaming, it will be a deal breaker for many.
    http://www.last100.com/2009/05/18/napster-tries-again/

    Posted by: steve | May 18, 2009 8:37 AM



  7. oh well, it seems pretty ugly. I think Spotify still remains the same. Why don't write a roundup about all of these services?

    Posted by: Federico Viticci | May 18, 2009 8:57 AM



  8. Best of luck to this venture, but i don't think we've seen the kind of revolution/revelation we need in monetizing music Dl's. Maybe revolution is too strong of a word... My friends mention that after experimenting in some private torrent communities, there is no better way to find new music... or so I've heard.

    I'm all for figuring out how to make the artists and labels money. So we need a really great solution, and I don't think this model is it. But i'm excited about what's happening on the fringes of this industry.

    Any guarantees they're mentioning about the how much/what kind of music they'll be serving?

     Posted by: Chase Author Profile Page | May 18, 2009 9:58 AM



  9. As Marshall rightly points out, until the new Napster offering supports mobile streaming, it will be a deal breaker for many.

    Posted by: rs gold | May 18, 2009 8:01 PM



  10. No downloads, but it is integrated with Last.fm so you can scrobble tracks. Great for an international audience, especially in the UK.

    Posted by: rs powerleveling | May 18, 2009 8:02 PM



  11. It looks like a big acquisition, of course,

    Posted by: Dans | May 19, 2009 3:45 AM



  12. Will people ever stop pushing version rap numbers on the web!
    http://www.hiphopalemi.net/Sohbet.asp

    Posted by: hiphop | June 27, 2009 3:48 PM



  13. Here in the UK Napster's new subscription rates have just hit. One of the advantages of the previous incarnation of Napster's subscription service was the ability to download tracks (albeit with DRM) of a higher quality than the streamed equivalent. For those of us who want quality rather quantity the new improved subscriptions would appear to be a backward step. Up the resolution of your streamed tracks or loose customers to the likes of Spotify!

    Posted by: Andy | October 6, 2009 7:09 AM



  14. Here in the UK Napster's new subscription rates have just hit. One of the advantages of the previous incarnation of Napster's subscription service was the ability to download tracks (albeit with DRM) of a higher quality than the streamed equivalent. For those of us who want quality rather quantity the new improved subscriptions would appear to be a backward step. Up the resolution of your streamed tracks or loose customers to the likes of Spotify

    Posted by: Hiphop | November 1, 2009 1:13 AM



  15. It looks like a big acquisition, of course,

    Posted by: GekkoG | November 1, 2009 1:14 AM



  16. No downloads, but it is integrated with Last.fm so you can scrobble tracks. Great for an international audience, especially in the UK.

    Posted by: mask | November 1, 2009 1:16 AM



Leave a comment

Optional: Sign in with Connect Facebook   Sign in with Twitter Twitter   Sign in with OpenID OpenID  |  

If you think Twitter is big, check out the Real-Time Web
RWW SPONSORS



FOLLOW @RWW ON TWITTER

ReadWriteWeb on Facebook
ReadWriteCloud - Sponsored by VMware and Intel



TEXT LINK ADS



RWW PARTNERS