On Monday morning I attended a panel which included two case
studies from leading businesses built around open source software applications - Sugar CRM and MySQL AB. The case studies were presented by their
respective CEOs, John Roberts and Marten Mickos, and focused on the business model their
organizations have adopted.
The rest of the day, I found myself reflecting a lot on the presentation and then - as luck would have it - I ran into MySQL AB's Marten Mickos and Zack Urlocker (Executive VP of Products) at a happy hour that evening. I ended up talking to them about their business over a few beers and concluded that they are a great lesson for any website looking to scale audience.
Back to the panel now. First of all it is important to point out that both these organizations operate with the intention of making money. This obviously isn't true for every one of the over 140,000 open source projects listed on Source Forge. Both companies have more than a hundred people contributing to the product as paid employees and clearly are oriented towards generating value for their shareholders. In fact, John attributed being a 'commercial open source business' as one of the keys to SugarCRM's early success.
What is interesting is that they have been able to build these businesses with so much less capital than previous closed source applications in their space. John estimated that SugarCRM has achieved the same market traction at this point that Salesforce.com did in the first 3 years, but with about 20% of the costs.
They have done this by creating what
both panelists called an architecture of participation, which they built
into their business strategies. John covered six components to that 'architecture' that
made participation straight forward with SugarCRM:
SugarCRM has had 3 million downloads of their application and it has been translated into 50 different languages, so they are obviously doing something right.
MySQL has an even larger audience receiving approximately 50,000 downloads a day of their application. Marten framed the significance of this in an interesting way. He pointed out that their closest (closed source) competitor has fifty-six thousand paid employees. However, every day he has fifty thousand passionate new users. He quipped that while it is easy to disregard these as mere amateurs, "Noah's Ark was built by amateurs, Titanic by professionals."
While this model certainly has led to some interesting distribution and
keeps the cost of sales low, it is important to point out that both organizations have
executives responsible for sales. In fact, MySQL has over 70 sales professionals. The
difference is they are focused on selling consulting services and support, instead of
proprietary software. While MySQL doesn't disclose their revenue, it is about equally
divided between services, support and revenue from OEM partners.
The Web 2.0 conference has been organized under the theme 'web 2.0 is _____' - with everyone contributing something different in the blank space. In fact, the conference organizers provided conference t-shirts with 'web 2.0 is ____' and gave all of the attendees markers to fill in our answers. Many of the answers filled in centered around collaboration with users and efficient distribution.
What I found interesting after listening to the above presentation is that not only can web 2.0 entrepreneurs build sites on top of open source projects (like MySQL - L.A.M.P.), but they can actually learn a lot about promoting their services from these products. So the next time you're in a marketing meeting trying to figure out 'distribution', an interesting brainstorming question is -- what did mySQL or SugarCRM do?
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2141
Comments
Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts
Nice article and an interesting analogy - "Noah's Ark was built by amateurs, Titanic by professionals". There's just one flaw though, Noah's Ark is quite possibly a myth. Titanic was reality.
Services Overview: Create Instant Visual Credibility..
First impressions are important. Just as in person, how your website and online communications look can affect your credibility. When managed properly, your business image and identity extends far beyond a logo.http://www.betteremarketing.com/services.html‚Ä? > Services
This is a good article I understand. I ended up talking to them about their business over a few beers and concluded that they are a great lesson for any website looking to scale audience. If you are interesting visit the site business brainstorming