ReadWriteWeb

OpenX vs Google Ad Manager

Written by Sean Ammirati / March 16, 2008 9:05 PM / 7 Comments

Recently on ReadWriteTalk, we interviewed Scott Switzer, the CTO and Founder of OpenX. Until recently they were known as OpenAds, but they've since rebranded as OpenX. Shortly after the interview was recorded, Google announced a competitive product called AdManager. Scott responded on the OpenX blog by saying that "Google’s announcement of a free ad server, Ad Manager, validates our marketplace". But he also cautioned: "as a publisher, I would find this a dangerous cocktail and I would worry that it may marginalize my revenue."

I agree that publishers who let Google serve all of their advertisements via AdManager, even the non-Google AdSense ads, are taking a big risk. This was already a risk with Google's Acquisition of Double Click, even before Google's announcement of Ad Manager. See our post last year, Google's Potential Vulnerability: An Open Ad Network, for more on this topic.

If you agree that a viable alternative is important to the marketplace, an interesting question is: what will OpenX's business model ultimately be? We'll focus on this question for the rest of this post.

OpenX Business Model

In our ReadWriteTalk interview, Scott mentioned two high-level revenue streams they think about regularly at OpenX:

  • Providing Paid Customer Support
  • Helping Publisher's Maximize their Ad Revenue

While it seems that customer support is a pretty obvious revenue stream for most open source projects, the 'maximising revenue' idea gives some interesting indications of the future business model for OpenX. Specifically, Scott highlighted three methods:

"I think that the next thing that we think about in terms of the business model is finding the best way for publishers to monetize their site ... we can help them by trying to build efficiency inside the advertising marketplace, which isn’t very efficient today. And that manifests itself in a couple of different ways.

One by getting our publishers better rates for ad networks than they could by themselves.

Another could be for our publishers to be able to take direct ads and build a workflow, so that advertising can be purchased directly from them without having to go through multiple emails and a IO process and payment process and that type of thing.

And another could be for ad networks to be able to take particular parts of inventory packaged up by publishers in a way that’s attractive for advertisers, ad networks. Those are three very specific things that we’re looking at."

Conclusion: Ultimately an Ad Exchange

This line of questioning started with me asking Scott if OpenX ultimately will become an ad exchange. While he wouldn't confirm this, when OpenX talks about "build[ing] efficiency inside the advertising marketplace" it leads me to believe that they will ultimately become an ad network. Scott did point out that they are also trying to be open and integrate with a lot of the traditional networks, such as Right Media - which is certainly a point of differentiation.

While I understand that perspective, according to Scott OpenX is "serv[ing] in the hundreds of billions of ads per month." This is in the same neighborhood as Double Click. And with the recent announcement that OpenX is launching a hosted solution (ultimately giving them even more visibility and becoming closer to publishers) an ad exchange seems inevitable at some point. In the meantime, we'll be testing the hosted ad server on ReadWriteTalk and may eventually use it on ReadWriteWeb as well.

What do you think OpenX will ultimately become? An ad exchange, or do you see another obvious business model? Also, what are your thoughts on Google launching AdManager - is it a threat to publishers?


Comments

Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts

  1. Sounds like some smart moves. Sounds like the kind of thing some heavyweight could try to swallow up. We definitely need and open source alternative and OpenAds has been it. And now a hosted OpenX option sounds great. Off to check it out now!

    Posted by: chrisco | March 17, 2008 1:15 AM



  2. I have used OpenX for my site http://crenk.com. I can see where they want to take the company. OpenX will ultimately become a mixture of DoubleClick and Right Media.

    Open X will have three ares:
    1. Ad Server : hosted by the users.
    2. Ad Server : In house hosted by Open X, which allows smaller publishers to control their inventory
    3. Advertising Exchange : Allowing the smaller users to sell their inventory direct through Open X, which allows them to keep more revenues. This will also allow other advertising agencies to join in and bid for site inventory.

    All of these features will now compete with Google and their Google Ad Manager / DoubleClick / AdSense options. Good Luck to Open X and I can wait to see the results, because the more competition their is, the better for the user.

    Posted by: Steven Finch | March 17, 2008 2:37 AM



  3. Its true that, OpenX will go long way as everybody want full control over there ads, nobody wants to give that to a third party. But, currently very few are ready to have that complete control and till then the players like Google are surely going to help them and cut OpenX's market share. And till then OpenX also should offer more to customers than they are currently offering, like also bringing in advertisers to the publishers, etc.

    Posted by: kuldeep | March 17, 2008 2:46 AM



  4. Exchange is the only way. You cannot build a new Ad Network today, lots of big smart ones already. Ad Exchange could work. Who is already doing this well? This will have to happen fast and with big funding. This is classic for a $10m VC round into OpenX. Come on VC, don't hesitate, time is of the essence. Publishers need an alternativ to either a) inhouse team or b) relying on one Ad Network.

    Posted by: bernard lunn | March 17, 2008 6:06 AM



  5. Providing a hosted ad serving capability means that in effect they forgo their 1st biz model (Providing Paid Customer Support) since that's unlikely to be heavily needed in such an environment. Hence that only leaves the 2nd stated biz model (Helping Publisher's Maximize their Ad Revenue) as a place to draw customer revenues from for this service. The ad exchange model may be the only one able to scale at the pace of their costs of hosting ad serving which will rapidly increase once they release this option.

    Posted by: P-Air | March 17, 2008 9:14 AM



  6. Il 4 aprile ad Ancona un seminario gratuito su OpenX. Interverranno dal Londra i responsabili di OpenX. Tutti i dettagli qui http://www.anso.it/openx/

    Posted by: Betto | March 27, 2008 6:36 AM



  7. "I would worry that it may marginalize my revenue"

    Translation into English, please? Ad Manager just lets you slot in ads. Where's the risk there? If Google goes Satanic, swap to another adserver.

    Posted by: Markx | April 5, 2008 3:05 PM



RWW SPONSORS


FOLLOW @RWW ON TWITTER

ReadWriteWeb on Facebook



TEXT LINK ADS