This week we're opening a file on Google's efforts towards personalization, a trend that has become very apparent in Google over the past year. As we did with Yahoo last week, we'll publish a number of feature articles looking at how Google is implementing personalization into its products - and how it effects you, the user.
We mentioned in our Half-Year Web Technology Report that Google has impressed so far in 2007, on both the acquisition front and building up its own technology. Equally impressive is that Google is not sitting back and letting the hundreds of alternative search engines overtake them in technology. Often incumbent tech companies are content to sit on their market position and so they don't innovate much further. However Google has busily been experimenting with, and implementing into its main search properties, new types of personalization.
In January we ran a poll asking which "Search 2.0" approaches stood the best chance of beating Google. Personalized Search was the option that got the most votes. Also our interview with Google's Matt Cutts revealed that Google has been experimenting with personalization a lot over the past year or so.
And while there is no shortage of Google competitors doing personalization - indeed just last week Marcos Marado wrote a guest post on AltSearchEngines on this topic - Google is also developing its own personalization solutions...
Back in February we noted that Google was ramping up its personalization efforts via Google Accounts. When you're signed in to Google Accounts, said the Google blog, you'll "have access to a personalized Google - one that combines personalized search results and a personalized homepage." Matt Cutts mentioned it in a post too and linked to external analysis on the personalization theme.
I had noticed it earlier, via Google Accounts. I'd spotted the following message in the Google Accounts Help:
"What does it mean for Google to be more personalized with Google Accounts?
When you're signed in to Google Accounts, you'll now get more relevant, useful search results, recommendations and other personalized features. For example, if you use Google Bookmarks or Google Search History, you'll get more targeted web search results and recommendations for videos or gadgets."
So at that point Google was beginning to integrate its various personalization efforts more. Currently when you go to the Google Accounts frontpage, you are told that you can "customize pages, view recommendations, and get more relevant search results" when you login.
In May there was a Google Personalization Workshop, which gave more details of Google's push into personalization.
In the workshop the new name for Google Personalized
Homepage was revealed - iGoogle. Also shown off at the workshop was Gadget Maker, location-based personalized search results and a “My
Community” service for the iGoogle directory.
In regards to its personalized homepage, Google has always had far more gadgets available on its platform than live.com, Netvibes or Pageflakes. As of May there were over 25,000 different Google gadgets. Also according to Jessica Ewing at the May event, product manager of the Google Personalized Homepage program, iGoogle was the fastest growing product at Google in 2006.
Some useful background to Google's personalization efforts, from a Google Blogoscoped post in May:
"Why does Google invest in a “personal Google” now? Sep [Kamvar, from Google] says it’s because of recent trends in content on the web, and recent technological advances in search algorithms. He suggests that Google wants to compute PageRank for every single person, so to speak. Sep explains that Google thinks of personalization in 3 parts:
- Search Your own stuff (like Google Desktop Search, Web History)
- Traditional (Pull) Search
- Push Search (like recommendations, iGoogle/ personalized homepage)"
Google goes out of its way to ensure that the user is still "in charge" of the personalization experience, no doubt to keep the privacy hounds at bay. Apart from needing to be logged into your Google Account, Google also makes personalization optional - including giving the user the ability to pause the Web History feature or remove specific items from the history. Users can also export their Web History as an RSS feed, which is important given that the ability to export one's data has long been a key issue for 'open Web' advocates.
We'll take a closer look at privacy issues in one of our feature posts this week.
Google seems to be fighting a two-pronged battle with their personalization efforts - one is to keep themselves ahead of the alt search engine pack, and the other is to one-up Yahoo, Microsoft, Netvibes, Pageflakes and the other personalized start page contenders.
I still think Google has much to do in terms of innovation in search personalization - take a look at Collarity or Hakia as just two examples of alt search engines with innovative personalization approaches. But the Google Account (which is where much of this personalization in Google products is coming from) and the new iGoogle features show that Google is pushing forward in search innovation - certainly they are not resting on their considerable laurels!
Over the next 5 days we'll investigate Google's personalization efforts more. I hope you enjoy the Read/WriteWeb Files this week!
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1507
Comments
Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all Read/WriteWeb posts
One thing - slightly unrelated that I'd like to point out is from direct experience at one of my older sites.
Google has started removing any particular page from its indexes which contains paid links. I had some paid links through text-link-ads.com on a single page, it disappeared completely, for any searches at all on google. I removed the paid links. One day later, I was back my usual spot, no difference. A few days on, it's the same.
It looks like they're starting to really put their foot down on paid links. Which kind of destroys any businesses operating in that area.
Posted by: Amit | August 6, 2007 6:00 AM
I like the direction Collarity is going. The killer app of the future may be "Guided Search"... In essence, Google Maps is an example of this... they are personalizing the search results based on location. If Google could classify and tag content with additional attributes to give it more semantic meaning, it can then start to prompt users for attributes similar to a decision tree. Are you looking for a product, service, or business? Are you looking for financial, healthcare or personal advice? etc. etc. Interestingly, this guided search approach is closer to Yahoo's directory approach... which I use instead of Google for some searches within a specific topic, e.g. health.
I'm at a company that builds online shopping sites and guided navigation/search has become the killer feature. Our customers give their online shoppers search facets to help them fine tune their search results, e.g. they select filters for brand, price range, category, size, etc. This filters out irrelevant search results.
Posted by: Bill | August 6, 2007 3:23 PM
I'm really looking forward to these posts! Semantically, I think it's important to remember that we're using 'personal' and 'historical' pretty much interchangeably here. History-based personalization is the dominant paradigm, certainly, but it's not the only one! And non-history-based personalization efforts can go a long way towards minimizing privacy concerns.
Disclosure: I blog for a company that has a non-history-based personalization technology :-)
Posted by: Kaila Colbin | August 7, 2007 3:10 PM