PETA Embraces Social Networking Platforms
The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), have launched an application development contest on both Google's Open Social and the Facebook Platform. The contest calls for developers to create applications that promote PETA or its campaigns on either of the two platforms. The competition runs through January 25th and the winner receives a $500 Apple gift card.
I've never been a fan of PETA. I'm all for animal rights, but I think some of their campaigns go too far or use shock politics and bully tactics that dilute their message and make it harder for people to look at the issues seriously. But that said, I have to admire how they are using social networking to their advantage. PETA seems to be doing everything right when it comes to exploiting social networks as vehicles to get their message out.
PETA has well maintained presences on both major social networks (MySpace and Facebook), a photostream on Flickr, and they utilize RSS to keep their followers updated. (Their youth oriented peta2 organization also utilizes much of the same social software.)
Sure each of their profiles have under 10,000 friends -- hardly a blip compared to the total user bases of those sites. (Update: Allie Sullivan, PETA's online marketing coordinator, emailed me to point out their their peta2 MySpace page, which is aimed at young people, has over 168,000 friends.) But PETA has smartly distributed their message across multiple platforms making it easier for their fans and followers to interact with the organization. Their latest initiative, the application contest, has the potential to yield a killer app that can spread the message virally even further across social networks at a relatively small cost. And even if the contest doesn't pan out, for an organization that had $31 million in revenue in the fiscal year ending 07/2006, $500 is a drop in the bucket. It's a tiny risk for a potentially huge reward.
Using social networks and other web 2.0 technologies as promotional tool is often like that. Very small cost of entry, huge potential for success, high likelihood of failure. The way to make it work is to try the "see what sticks" method of getting your message out there in as many ways as possible and seeing which resonate with your particular target audience.
Other organizations could learn from PETA how to better utilize the social web to get their message out and reach the people who will be passionate about their cause.
FOLLOW RWW ON TWITTER
RECENT JOBS
Comments
Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts
I hear you, but in all those cases and promotions, PETA is right. Correct facts. A few wrong ways to promote them maybe.
Posted by: Ericson Smith | January 3, 2008 4:26 PM
Another critique of PETA, on gender grounds http://www.nostatusquo.com/ACLU/PETA/
Posted by: Marshall Kirkpatrick
|
January 3, 2008 5:00 PM
Speaking of PETA using social networks, someone posted this video of Animals being skinned alive for their fur in china to my facebook profile today .... definately not for those with weak stomachs. :-(
Posted by: Tony | January 3, 2008 5:00 PM
Kinda funny that they are giving away APPLE gifts cards, considering their recent antagonism and slanted promotions toward Apple. It certainly lends credence to the argument that they are just using Apple's popularity to boost their visibility...
Posted by: instig8r | January 3, 2008 6:08 PM
It is interesting that only now are they going the custom dev route. Many organizations jump both feet and hands into whitebox platforms that get all out of hand.
Essentially, I have had to de-funk one client that had:
1) a consultant for 'interaction marketing' (a famous one, too)
2) a social media designer. The young man listed his experience as 8 years of social media design experience. that out my flag up.
3) One pissed of long term Web developer had to be talked down from the ledge. He had been with these folks for years and started working for them, cut his teeth, and had become quite good. Losing him was not worth all the social media in the world.
They ended up with such a mess. a tangled web site, where they had a nice blog and a well defined presence before.
They would have been MUCH better of with a page on each service separately. Then later they could have amped up with a integrated platform, like Canter's people Aggregator.
I am such a genius? No. I am an analyst that works for folks in service businesses. All I did in this case was ask:
1) what are you trying to accomplish with all this profile data and such?
2) what business model is being extended?
3) what ROI or efficiency is being created for the customer?
The high and mighty "interaction designer", really took a fit. Looks like I wont get any referrals from her!
I hear she bills like high 6 fig a year.
Posted by: Alan Wilensky | January 3, 2008 6:26 PM
With 31 million in revenue they can't hire a serious company to put serious thought into a serious application?
I think a $500 gift card is pathetic. The only person this is going to motivate is a petahead, that is, someone who is already seriously motivated by peta's message. The overlap between a hardcore petahead and a truly smart social networking designer is how many people?
Posted by: ryan scott | January 3, 2008 6:46 PM