<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Polls - ReadWriteWeb</title>
      <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/polls/</link>
      <description>Polls on ReadWriteWeb</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009 Richard MacManus</copyright>
      <managingEditor>readwriteweb@gmail.com</managingEditor>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:15:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.23-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Poll: Which Light Blogging Service Do You Use?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/tumblr_post_sep09.jpg" />Earlier today <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/posterous_launches_support_for_themes.php">we reported</a> that <a href="http://posterous.com/">Posterous</a>, a popular minimalist blogging service, had added the ability for its users to import their <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/">Tumblr</a> content. Tumblr is a competing 'light blogging' service - the market leader in fact. Other similar services include <a href="http://soup.io">Soup.io</a>, <a href="http://www.noovo.com/">Noovo</a>, <a href="http://www.vox.com/">Vox</a>, <a href="http://www.profilactic.com/">Profilactic</a> and even <a href="http://wordpress.com/">Wordpress.com</a> and <a href="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger.com</a> are used for this purpose (although they're more used for long-form blogging).</p>
<p>We're curious to know which of these services our readers use. Let us know in the poll below, or make a comment if yours is not listed.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=16437&amp;cb=16437' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=16437&amp;n=16437' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/soupio_thermals_275.jpg" align="right" />What do we mean by 'light blogging'? It used to be called &quot;micro-blogging,&quot; although that term is as much applied to Twitter as to Tumblr. Twitter is limited to 140 characters and is more of a communications tool than a publishing one. In comparison Tumblr (and Posterous et al) are  publishing services. The key point is that you can publish 'found' things very quickly and at the click of a button. You can easily share content and media with these services.</p>
<p>In the example to the right, I posted a video of a band I like to <a href="http://velvetsfan.com/">my Soup.io blog</a> by simply inputting its MySpace video embed code and adding a couple of lines of comment. Much less effort than writing a post on ReadWriteWeb ;-)</p>
<p><a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/tumblr.com+posterous.com+soup.io+vox.com+noovo.com/#">Compete data</a> shows that Tumblr is the clear leader in this market, with Posterous about to overtake Vox as number 2. Note: we didn't include wordpress.com or blogger.com, because they are much larger than all of these and are used for different purposes too.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/compete_light_blogging_sep09.jpg" /></p>
<p>Here is our poll, please select the light blogging service you use most often. There are <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/35_lifestreamin_apps.php">many smaller services around</a>, so the list below is certainly not comprehensive. If yours is missing, add it to the RWW comments.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2006994.js"></script><noscript>
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/2006994/">Which service do you use the most for 'light blogging' (i.e. sharing content and media)?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com">answers</a>)</span>
</noscript></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_what_light_blogging_service_do_you_use.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_what_light_blogging_service_do_you_use.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_what_light_blogging_service_do_you_use.php</guid>
         <category>Polls</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:15:40 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Poll: What 3 Web Apps or Services Excite You Most?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/cat_excited.jpg" /><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/exciting_web_apps.php">One year ago today</a> we first asked that question, so now is a good time to ask it again. What 3 web apps or services do you find <strong>the most exciting</strong> right now? Note that <em><strong>'exciting'</strong></em> is the keyword, so they won't necessarily be your 3 <em>favorite</em> or  <em>most used</em> web apps or services. <font style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><script type="text/javascript">
tweetmeme_url = 'http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/reader_poll_what_3_web_apps_or_services_excite_you.php';
tweetmeme_source = 'rww';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://tweetmeme.com/i/scripts/button.js"></script></font>For example Facebook would make many people's list of 3 favorite sites, but does it get you all tingly with excitement these days? So, what we want to know is: what 3 apps <strong>get your juices flowing</strong> right now. </p>
<p>We did an informal poll at the ReadWriteWeb office (actually a Skype room) and our picks are below. We'd love to know yours as well, so please leave a comment telling us the 3 web apps or services that excite you the most.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=16100&amp;cb=16100' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=16100&amp;n=16100' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<h2>RWW Team:</h2>
<p><strong>Richard MacManus:</strong> <a href="http://www.pachube.com/">Pachube</a> (connecting environments), <a href="http://www.peoplebrowsr.com">Peoplebrowsr</a> desktop (Twitter app), <a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/">Wolfram Alpha</a> (computational knowledge engine)</p>
<p><strong>Marshall Kirkpatrick:</strong> <a href="http://know-thy-congressman.com/">Know Thy Congressman</a> (a bookmarklet  that displays political and biographical information), <a href="http://apture.com">Apture</a> (adds multimedia to websites), <a href="http://blip.fm">Blip.fm</a> (online music)</p>
<p><strong>Frederic Lardinois:</strong> <a href="http://www.lala.com/">Lala</a> (music), <a href="http://mail.google.com/">Gmail</a>, and <a href="http://seesmic.com/">Seesmic Web</a> (lifestreaming)</p>
<p><strong>Dana Oshiro:</strong>  Geo: <a href="http://playfoursquare.com/">foursquare</a> (explore your city), <a href="http://hypem.com/">Hype Machine</a> (online music), <a href="http://www.boxee.tv/">Boxee</a> (social media center)</p>
<p><strong>Jolie O'Dell:</strong> <a href="http://twitter.com">Twitter</a>, <a href="http://mail.google.com/">Gmail</a>, <a href="http://pixelpipe.com/">PixelPipe</a> (media gateway)</p>
<h2>You:</h2>
<p>Tell us in the comments!</p>
<p><i>Cat pic: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lambj/3508433307/">Tabbymom was B and V Cats</a></i></p>
<p><b>UPDATE:</b> Results of this poll have now been posted; <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_most_exciting_web_apps.php">Top 10 Most Exciting Web Apps or Services</a>.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/reader_poll_what_3_web_apps_or_services_excite_you.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/reader_poll_what_3_web_apps_or_services_excite_you.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/reader_poll_what_3_web_apps_or_services_excite_you.php</guid>
         <category>Products</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:15:51 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Reader Feedback: How Do You Backup Your iPhone Contacts?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/iphone.png">The weekend is the perfect time to get started on computer projects that you just didn't have time for during the week. This weekend, my project of choice is backups. Although I can safely say that the majority of my files are (relatively) safe in the cloud, it never hurts to make a run through and upload those that got overlooked. </p>

<p>My documents are spread out across <a href="http://docs.google.com">Google Docs</a>, <a href="http://www.officelive.com">Office Live</a>, <a href="http://skydrive.live.com">SkyDrive</a>, and <a href="http://box.net">Box.net</a>. My photos are on <a href="http://flickr.com">flickr</a> and <a href="http://facebook.com">Facebook</a>. My music and video collections are backed up locally to multiple external drives <em>(since I'm too cheap to pay for the hundreds of gigs of online storage needed), </em>but one thing that wasn't backed up anywhere but on my own PC was the thing that may be the most important of all: <strong>my iPhone</strong>. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=15361&amp;cb=15361' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=15361&amp;n=15361' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[

<p>Although iTunes does a good backup of your phone prior to each sync, that won't do you a lot of good unless that backup is also stored somewhere else besides your own PC. Computers crash, hard drives fail, and sometimes, sadly, laptops are even lost or stolen. Obviously, an iTunes-only backup is not a good system for the most important social network of them all - the people I actually speak to in real life. The people in my phone. </p>

<h2>How Do You Backup Your Contacts? The Results of the Twitter/FriendFeed Poll</h2>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/google_sync_logo_feb09.png" align="right">Is an iTunes backup stored off-site the most efficient way to go? Is that how most people handle this issue? Curious, I did what any social media addict would do: I asked <a href="http://twitter.com/sarahintampa/status/2106738007">Twitter</a> and <a href="http://friendfeed.com/sarahintampa/2fe84bb9/poll-how-do-you-back-up-your-iphone-contact-list">FriendFeed</a>. The answers I received have me pondering my options. After receiving nearly 30 responses, I was surprised to find how many people rely on Google as their address book (14 responses). In fact, keeping your addresses and phone numbers in Google and syncing that address book to your iPhone is actually what a lot of people consider a "backup" these days. </p>

<p>But as much as I trust in Google, the old I.T. girl in me can't help but think <em>"single point of failure, single point of failure!"</em> Truth be told, several folks must feel the same because they also used another method on top of the Google solution, often MobileMe. </p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/mobileme_logo.jpg" align="left"><a href="http://www.apple.com/mobileme">MobileMe</a> wasn't as popular as I would have expected, though. Only five people said they used it. That number would probably be higher if it wasn't a paid service.</p><p> Seven people counted on iTunes to do the backup for them, but a few were careful to also make sure their PC was backed up as well. </p>

<p>I'm hesitant to sync my Google contacts to my iPhone for <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_hasnt_anyone_developed_a_great_mobile_contact_manager.php">reasons I've stated before</a>, but it couldn't hurt to make sure that my iPhone contact information also exists in my online address book...something that I know isn't the case as I recently found out when the phone's battery died during a phone call and I frantically searched for my friend's number on the web. </p>

<h2>iPhone Contact Backup: Yep, There's An App for That</h2>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/idrive.png" align="right">I also recently happened across an additional solution which you could add to your backup routine with ease. Called <a href="https://www.idrive.com/iphone-backup.htm">iDrive Lite</a>, this free iPhone application will quickly backup all your contact info to your device in case you ever accidentally delete an important address or phone number. You'll also want to activate the app's "Web Enable" feature which backs up your contact data to the web where you can access it anytime at <a href="http://idrivelite.com">idrivelite.com</a>. Not bad for a free service. </p>

<h2>Your Turn! RWW Poll</h2>

<p>If you didn't have a chance to participate in the Twitter poll, please participate in this one below. Now, we know not everyone is an iPhone user here at RWW, but we know that a lot of you are, so let us know how you backup your contacts! If you find yourself marking "other," feel free to comment and explain.</p>

<p><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/1701275.js"></script><noscript>
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/1701275/">How Do You Backup Your iPhone Contacts?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://www.polldaddy.com">poll</a>)</span>
</noscript></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/reader_feedback_how_do_you_backup_your_iphone_contacts.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/reader_feedback_how_do_you_backup_your_iphone_contacts.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/reader_feedback_how_do_you_backup_your_iphone_contacts.php</guid>
         <category>Apple</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:59:03 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Sarah Perez</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Microsoft Hiring From the Open Web: Assimilation or a Changing Redmond?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Microsoft_logo.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/jobwire/Microsoft_logo.jpg" width="125" height="60" />As we reported <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/jobwire/2008/12/dick-hardt-joins-microsoft.php">on Jobwire</a>, OpenID thought leader Dick Hardt announced Friday that he has joined <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/en/us/default.aspx">Microsoft</a>.  Hardt's hire will be added to a recent history of the software giant making controversial hires from among its presumed opponents, advocates of open source and open culture.  Is this assimilation or are we seeing a company change, with the infusion of new and different DNA?</p>
]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=12916&amp;cb=12916' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=12916&amp;n=12916' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>Check out <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/jobwire/2008/12/dick-hardt-joins-microsoft.php">our full write-up over on Jobwire</a>, ReadWriteWeb's site that reports on new hires in tech and media. But we'd also love to get your opinion here via this poll:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/1183300.js"></script><noscript> <a href ="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/1183300/" >Is it good for the web that Microsoft is hiring such cool people?</a> </noscript></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_hiring_from_the_open_web.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_hiring_from_the_open_web.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_hiring_from_the_open_web.php</guid>
         <category>Polls</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:57:20 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Doug Coleman</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Word Processing: Most of You Still Use Desktop Software</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/weboffice/ms_vs_google.jpg" />This week we ran a poll asking which word processing tool you primarily use. We wanted to see if things had changed much since we ran the same poll <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_what_tool_do_you_use_for_word_processing.php">one year ago</a>.</p>
<p>So are ReadWriteWeb readers, many of whom are  early adopters of Internet technology, using <em>online</em> word processing services now instead of desktop software? Er, no.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=7173&amp;cb=7173' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=7173&amp;n=7173' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>As at time of writing, over 1,500 people had voted. 48% of those still use Microsoft Word as their main word processing tool. Its open source desktop equivalent OpenOffice got 15%. However, there is good news for Web Office fans - Google Docs was in second place with 17%. This is a 6% increase from last year according to our polls.</p>
<h2>Less Than 1/4 of You Use an Online Word Processer as Your Main Tool</h2>
<p>Let's delve further into the results, firstly for the desktop software. Last year MS Word got 46% and this year 48%. So not much has changed for the dominant office software supplier, even with RWW's Net savvy readers. OpenOffice slipped a bit, down from 17% last year to 15% this year. Overall, <strong>76% of readers still use a desktop software program</strong> as their main word processing tool (counting the 8% who use a text editor for this purpose). That's up slightly from 74% the same time last year.</p>
<p>That means that <strong>less than 25% of our readers use an online service</strong> as their primary means of doing word processing. The best of the online breed was Google Docs, with 17%, up from 11%. This is a good sign though, because Google Docs is now second behind only MS Word.</p>
<h2>Google Docs Gains Users, But Not From Microsoft</h2>
<p>What was a little surprising is that the Web startups competing with Google Docs all performed worse than last year. ThinkFree got 2%, Buzzword 1%, Zoho 1%, and Zimbra less than 1%. ThinkFree and Zoho both polled at 5% last year and Zimbra 2% (Buzzword wasn't in last year's poll). This indicates that Google Docs has gained users <em><strong>not from MS Word</strong></em>... but from the online startups. </p>
<p>Tell us your reaction to these results. What's happened to the startups? Are they doomed in this market dominated by the big guns?</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://s3.polldaddy.com/p/895296.js"></script><noscript> <a href ="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/895296/" >Which tool do you mostly use for word processing?</a>  <br/> <span style="font-size:9px;"> (<a href ="http://www.polldaddy.com">  polls</a>)</span></noscript></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/word_processing_poll_results_2008.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/word_processing_poll_results_2008.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/word_processing_poll_results_2008.php</guid>
         <category>Polls</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Poll: Which Word Processing Tool Do You Mostly Use?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/weboffice/ms_vs_google.jpg" />We ran a poll <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_what_tool_do_you_use_for_word_processing.php">a year ago</a> asking which word processing tool you used <strong><em>the most</em></strong>. What we were really driving at was: how many of you are using an <strong>online word processing service</strong> (Google Docs, Zoho, ThinkFree, etc) as your main tool, instead of a traditional desktop one (MS Word, OpenOffice, etc). The results surprised us a bit: MS Word got an overwhelming 46% of the vote, with OpenOffice next on 17%. The best of the online breed was Google Docs, with 11%. Perhaps we shouldn't have been surprised, given that Web Office is still relatively new and not entirely reliable yet. Still, we're keen to know if things have changed over the past year. Please participate in the poll below...</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=7133&amp;cb=7133' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=7133&amp;n=7133' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://s3.polldaddy.com/p/895296.js"></script><noscript> <a href ="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/895296/" >Which tool do you mostly use for word processing?</a>  <br/> <span style="font-size:9px;"> (<a href ="http://www.polldaddy.com">  polls</a>)</span></noscript></p>

<p><b>Related:</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/office_live_workspace_vs_google_docs_feature_by_feature.php">Office Live Workspace vs Google Docs: Feature-by-Feature Comparison</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/adobe_launches_online_office_suite.php">Adobe Launches Online Office Suite and New Flash-Enabled Acrobat 9</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/10_must_have_online_office_apps.php">10 Must Have Online Office Apps</a></li>
</ul>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_word_processing_tools.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_word_processing_tools.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_word_processing_tools.php</guid>
         <category>Polls</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 01:09:08 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Poll: Streaming Music Services</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/rww_live200.jpg" />This week's RWW Live podcast show (Monday 3.30pm PST) is on the topic of <strong>online music</strong>. We have 2-3 very special guests (so far we have representatives from Yahoo and Imeem, please <a href="mailto:editor@readwriteweb.com">email me</a> if you're interested in coming on the show, we have 1 final place to confirm). We've been writing a lot about online music lately. Last week Marshall asked: <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/perfect_music_streaming_service.php">What would the perfect streaming music look like?</a>. We got some great comments to that. But we're also interested in what your <strong><em>current</em></strong> favorite streaming music service is.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=7086&amp;cb=7086' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=7086&amp;n=7086' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>We asked <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_your_favorite_streaming_music_service.php">this very question in August last year</a>, at which point last.fm just pipped Pandora among our readers. In anticipation of RWW Live tomorrow, we're running the same poll now.</p>
<p>Note: there's no way we could mention every single online music streaming service in this poll, but if we happened to miss a <em><strong>major</strong></em> service then do shout it out asap in the comments!</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://s3.polldaddy.com/p/879678.js"></script><noscript> <a href ="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/879678/" >What are your favorite online music streaming services? (multi-choice)</a>  <br/> <span style="font-size:9px;"> (<a href ="http://www.polldaddy.com">  surveys</a>)</span></noscript></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_streaming_music_services.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_streaming_music_services.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_streaming_music_services.php</guid>
         <category>Polls</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:51:52 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>What Three Web Apps Excite You Most?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2142/1507196484_1523f4b06e_m.jpg" width="150" />One of our favorite Australians, Lachlan Hardy, twittered an interesting question today: What are the three things online that are exciting you most? Lachlan was asked this question as part of a newspaper article <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/dopple-your-fun/2008/08/16/1218307304122.html?page=fullpage">in the Sydney Morning Herald</a>. His own answers were interesting, but he also got a great response from commentors <a href="http://log.lachstock.com.au/past/2008/8/18/internet-gurus/">on his blog</a>. So we thought we'd ask the same question (well, slightly re-worded) here on ReadWriteWeb. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=7050&amp;cb=7050' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=7050&amp;n=7050' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>The three web apps most exciting me currently are: <a href="http://www.imeem.com"><strong>Imeem</strong></a> (I'm enjoying exploring this admittedly trendy music site, especially the playlists), <a href="http://soup.io"><strong>soup.io</strong></a> (an underrated lifestreaming app, better than Tumblr IMHO, with full-text feeds and loads of ajaxy goodness), and... <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/cuil_publicity.php">Cuil</a>. No I'm kidding about the last one. The third is <a href="http://www.basecamphq.com/"><strong>Basecamp</strong></a> (the online project management service that keeps our RWW business on track and organized; maybe stretching to call it 'exciting', but as a business app it does the business).</p>
<p>Lachlan said that his favorite 3 things online were Twitter (<a href="http://www.twitter.com">www.twitter.com</a>),
Tumblr (<a href="http://www.tumblr.com">www.tumblr.com</a>) and
Fire Eagle (<a href=
"http://www.fireeagle.yahoo.net">www.fireeagle.yahoo.net</a>).</p>
<p>There are literally thousands of great web apps to choose from, many of which have been profiled here on RWW. <strong>Tell us your current 3 favorites in the comments.</strong> We'd especially love to discover new things that may be flying under the radar...</p>
<p><em>Cat photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kevinsteele/1507196484/">Kevin Steele</a></em></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/exciting_web_apps.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/exciting_web_apps.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/exciting_web_apps.php</guid>
         <category>Polls</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 01:49:09 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Results: RWW Predictions &amp; Polls (FriendFeed, Bigcos, Google Docs)</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/34/109266586_65745333d2_m.jpg" width="150" />This week we <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/readwriteweb_predictions_friendfeed_twitter.php">announced</a> a new feature for our community: <strong><a href="http://readwriteweb.predictify.com">ReadWriteWeb Predictions</a></strong>, a Predictions Center that we hope will enable you to tap into the collective intelligence of RWW readers. The <a href="http://readwriteweb.predictify.com/auctionview.aspx?ID=5002">first prediction</a> is about the battle for users and mind-share that has emerged this year between <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/tag/twitter">Twitter</a> and <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/tag/friendfeed">FriendFeed</a>. Here are the results, along with results for our two polls this week...</p>
]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=6771&amp;cb=6771' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=6771&amp;n=6771' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[
<p>In RWW Predictions, we asked: How many monthly U.S. visitors will FriendFeed have for July 2008 according to Compete? As of writing, 400-599k is the most popular prediction. Here are the results so far:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/friendfeed_prediction_july08.jpg" /></p>

<p>You can <a href="http://readwriteweb.predictify.com/auctionview.aspx?ID=5002">make your own prediction here</a>.</p>

<h2><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_best_internet_bigco_2008.php">Poll: Best Internet Bigcos of 2008</a></h2>

<p>We've reached the halfway point of 2008, so time for a half-year assessment of the Internet bigcos. This week we ran a poll asking for your picks for best bigcos so far in '08. We did <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php">a similar poll last July</a> - and Facebook just edged out Google for the RWW popular vote. At the end of '07 we named Facebook our <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_bigco_of_2007.php">Bigco of the year</a>. We also <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_best_internet_bigco_2006.php">ran the poll in 2006</a>. Here are the results this time round:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://s3.polldaddy.com/p/761328.js"></script><noscript> <a href ="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/761328/" >Which Internet bigco has impressed you the most over the first half of 2008?</a>  <br/> <span style="font-size:9px;"> (<a href ="http://www.polldaddy.com">  polls</a>)</span></noscript></p>

<p>At time of publishing, <strong>Google had 19%</strong>, followed by <strong>Apple on 18%</strong> and <strong>Mozilla 17%</strong>. Also in double figures were Amazon and Adobe, both of which got 12%. Interestingly, Facebook fell to 8% and the other two parts of GYM, Microsoft and Yahoo, didn't fare so well either. Microsoft scored 6% and Yahoo 5%.</p>
<p><em>See also: <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/public_internet_bigcos_market.php">Internet Bigcos - How The Market Sees Them</a>  and <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/there_is_no_bubble_public_stocks.php">It's Official: There Is No Bubble</a> </em></p>
<h2><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_docs_is_down.php">Google Docs Goes Down - How Long is Too Long for You? (POLL)</a></h2>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/googledocs-logo.jpg" align="left" />Earlier this week, Google's hosted office suite <a href="http://docs.google.com">Google Docs</a> was down for more than 30 minutes, rendering documents inaccessible and users frustrated.  Short outages are not uncommon, but it was a good time to ask - how long is too long for you?  At what point would you personally deem a web service too unstable to use, and presuming that varies from service to service, what's your requirement for Google Docs?</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://s3.polldaddy.com/p/765676.js"></script><noscript> <a href ="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/765676/" >How much down time would it take for you to quit using Google Docs?</a>  <br/> <span style="font-size:9px;"> (<a href ="http://www.polldaddy.com">  polls</a>)</span></noscript></p>
<p><em>Image credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/archeon/109266586/">hans s</a></em></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/results_rww_predictions_friendfeed_bigcos_googledocs.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/results_rww_predictions_friendfeed_bigcos_googledocs.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/results_rww_predictions_friendfeed_bigcos_googledocs.php</guid>
         <category>Predictions</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:43:04 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Internet Bigcos - How The Market Sees Them (POLL)</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/monopoly_ecommerce.jpg" />In this post we provide data that shows how public market investors see 7 of the Internet bigcos we listed in <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_best_internet_bigco_2008.php">our current poll</a> (repeated below). In particular this data provides some background insight into the the "sound and fury" <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/icahn_microsoft_yahoo_deal_possible.php">surrounding Yahoo</a>. </p>

<p>We looked at 7 Internet bigcos, chosen from the RWW poll list and with the addition of Cisco (per a suggestion from one commenter). This is a list of publicly traded companies. We have not included AOL - if we did we'd also have to include all of Time Warner, which makes them very far from an Internet company. We also can't include Facebook, Mozilla or LinkedIn - as none are (currently) public companies.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=6733&amp;cb=6733' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=6733&amp;n=6733' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>The data comes from Yahoo Finance, as at July 8th around 10.30am. So results may vary when you check the numbers! Yahoo Finance happens to be what I use, no statement being made there.</p>

<p>Out of many potential parameters, this analysis focuses on 5:</p>

<p><strong>1. Market Cap.</strong> This is a simple proxy of "bigness".</p>

<p><strong>2. PEG</strong>. This is <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/pegratio.asp">Price Earnings Growth.</a> This is a proxy for "value".</p>

<p><strong>3. Revenue Growth in last 12 months.</strong> Growth is the most prized parameter by investors. Revenue growth is less easy to "financially engineer" than profit growth, so it is a good proxy for basic growth.</p>

<p><strong>4. Cash.</strong> This just says "staying power" and is prized during recessions.</p>

<p><strong>5. 52 Week change in stock price.</strong> This ranks the companies by how happy their shareholders are. That matters, as Yahoo management can tell you (but as you can see, Yahoo is far from the worst on that ranking).</p>

<p>Here are the numbers, ranked alphabetically:</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/internet_bigcos2.png" /></p>

<p>Here is the ranking based on each of the parameters:</p>

<h2>A. Market Cap - bigness</h2>

<ol>
	<li>MSFT</li>
	<li>GOOG</li>
	<li>CSCO</li>
	<li>EBAY</li>
	<li>YHOO</li>
	<li>AMZN</li>
	<li>ADBE</li>
</ol>

<h2>B. PEG - value</h2>

<ol>
	<li>EBAY</li>
	<li>GOOG</li>
	<li>CSCO</li>
	<li>MSFT</li>
	<li>ADBE</li>
	<li>AMZN</li>
	<li>YHOO</li>
</ol>

<h2>C. Revenue Growth</h2>

<ol>
	<li>GOOG</li>
	<li>AMZN</li>
	<li>EBAY</li>
	<li>ADBE</li>
	<li>CSCO</li>
	<li>YHOO</li>
	<li>MSFT</li>
</ol>

<h2>D. Cash - staying power</h2>

<ol>
	<li>CSCO</li>
	<li>MSFT</li>
	<li>GOOG</li>
	<li>EBAY</li>
	<li>YHOO</li>
	<li>AMZN</li>
	<li>ADBE</li>
</ol>

<h2>E. Share price change - happy shareholders</h2>

<ol>
	<li>AMZN</li>
	<li>GOOG</li>
	<li>ADBE</li>
	<li>YHOO</li>
	<li>MSFT</li>
	<li>EBAY</li>
	<li>CSCO</li>
</ol>

<h2>Poll: Best Internet Bigco</h2>

<p>So, given all of the above data, which do you <em>now</em> see as the most impressive Internet bigcos so far this year? Vote in the poll below (note: Cisco has now been added as an option):</p>

<p><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://s3.polldaddy.com/p/761328.js"></script><noscript> <a href ="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/761328/" >Which Internet bigco has impressed you the most over the first half of 2008?</a>  <br/> <span style="font-size:9px;"> (<a href ="http://www.polldaddy.com">  polls</a>)</span></noscript></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/public_internet_bigcos_market.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/public_internet_bigcos_market.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/public_internet_bigcos_market.php</guid>
         <category>Analysis</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:45:54 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Bernard Lunn</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Poll: Best Internet Bigcos of 2008</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/monopoly_ecommerce.jpg" />We've reached the halfway point of 2008, so time for a half-year assessment of the Internet bigcos. Below is a poll, asking for your picks for best bigcos so far in '08. We did <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php">a similar poll last July</a> - and Facebook just edged out Google for the RWW popular vote. At the end of '07 we named Facebook our <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_bigco_of_2007.php">Bigco of the year</a>. We also <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_best_internet_bigco_2006.php">ran the poll in 2006</a>. Note that <strong>this poll is multi-choice</strong>, so select only the companies which have impressed you.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=6720&amp;cb=6720' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=6720&amp;n=6720' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>Please cast your vote(s) below. If you need a reminder of what each company has done this year, check out the RWW tag links below:</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/tag/adobe">Adobe</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/tag/amazon">Amazon</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/tag/apple">Apple</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/tag/aol">AOL</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/tag/ebay">eBay</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/tag/facebook">Facebook</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/tag/google">Google</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/tag/microsoft">Microsoft</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/tag/mozilla">Mozilla</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/tag/yahoo">Yahoo</a></li>
</ul>

<p><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://s3.polldaddy.com/p/761328.js"></script><noscript> <a href ="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/761328/" >Which Internet bigco has impressed you the most over the first half of 2008?</a>  <br/> <span style="font-size:9px;"> (<a href ="http://www.polldaddy.com">  polls</a>)</span></noscript></p>

<p>Image credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/danielbroche/2258988806/">danielbroche</a>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_best_internet_bigco_2008.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_best_internet_bigco_2008.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_best_internet_bigco_2008.php</guid>
         <category>Polls</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 01:49:46 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>UPDATED! Poll: Which Instant Messaging Client(s) Do You Use?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/im_clients.jpg" /><em>Due to demand in the comments, 3 new IM clients have been added to the poll. You can now vote for Pidgin, Miranda, and Apple's iChat. Apologies for omissions!</em> Our poll this week focuses on IM clients. This weekend <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_im_interoperability_may_be_a_dream.php">Corvida wrote that</a> interoperability between popular IM clients is happening, albeit slowly. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=6558&amp;cb=6558' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=6558&amp;n=6558' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>One thing that Corvida mentioned got me wondering: "Digsby is poised to take a serious amount from the market share of the standard clients because of its interoperability not only with IM clients, but also because of the integrated social networks and even email." With that in mind, let us know which IM clients you currently use in the poll below.</p>

<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> Due to demand in the comments, Pidgin and Miranda have been added. At time of adding, 3651 votes had been cast. Apologies to fans of those two IM clients for the omission.</p>

<p><strong>UPDATE 2:</strong> Also added iChat (3983 votes cast).</p>

<p><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://s3.polldaddy.com/p/704505.js"></script><noscript> <a href ="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/704505/" >Which Instant Messaging client(s) do you use? (multiple choice)</a>  <br/> <span style="font-size:9px;"> (<a href ="http://www.polldaddy.com">  surveys</a>)</span></noscript></p>

<p>Photo credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jeffhester/2090031949/">BigBlue</a></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_instant_messaging_clients.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_instant_messaging_clients.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_instant_messaging_clients.php</guid>
         <category>Polls</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:07:18 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Poll Result: 52% Like or Love iPhone 2.0</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/iphone20b.jpg" />Earlier this week we <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/iphone_20_big_in_bubbleland.php">ran a poll</a> about the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/iphone_20_midway_through_the_p.php">latest version of the iPhone</a> announced at Apple's WWDC event in San Francisco. The results were a little surprising, in that only half (52%) of respondents thought iPhone 2.0 was a solid release -- just over 1 in 5 of those thought it was revolutionary. But overall, 20% thought it was 'meh' and about 25% were unimpressed.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=6549&amp;cb=6549' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=6549&amp;n=6549' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>At time of writing, after 900 votes, the results were:</p>

<p><b>Q: What do you think of iPhone 2.0?</b></p>

<p>It's revolutionary! 12% (105 votes)<br />
It's a very solid version 2 product, nicely done 40% (359 votes)<br />
Meh, it's ok 20% (182 votes)<br />
Bah, those features are already in [insert your fave phone here] 16% (140 votes)<br />
Yawn! 9% (77 votes)<br />
Wait, Apple has a phone? 4% (37 votes)</p>

<p>In case you didn't see the iPhone 2.0 announcement, our network blog last100 posted an <a href="http://www.last100.com/2008/06/09/its-official-iphone-20-is-3g-supports-gps-integrates-with-mobileme-and-is-cheaper/">excellent overview</a>. The new version iPhone supports 3G and faster data networks, has GPS, has a few cosmetic changes and is thinner, carries a (dramatically) lower price ($199 for the 8 GB iPhone, $299 for the 16 GB model) and will be available in 22 countries starting July 11. It also features Microsoft Exchange and full enterprise support out of the box.</p>

<p>These are all great features, but some people questioned: is the iPhone <i>really</i> that revolutionary compared to products available internationally? For example 3G has been available in many mobile devices for 2-3 years now in places like Japan. Check out <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/iphone_20_big_in_bubbleland.php">the robust discussion in the comments to our post this week</a>, as well as the results of the poll we ran and which you can still vote in:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://s3.polldaddy.com/p/686485.js"></script><noscript> <a href ="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/686485/" >What do you think of iPhone 2.0?</a>  <br/> <span style="font-size:9px;"> (<a href ="http://www.polldaddy.com">  polls</a>)</span></noscript></p>
<p><em>See also: <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/iphone_20_midway_through_the_p.php">iPhone 2.0, Video Highlights</a> and <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/iphone-less_try_tiled_browsing.php">iPhone-less? Try Tiled Browsing Instead</a> </em></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_result_52_like_or_love_ip.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_result_52_like_or_love_ip.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_result_52_like_or_love_ip.php</guid>
         <category>Polls</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 02:44:47 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Poll: Which Blog Search Engine Do You Use?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/technorati-logo-small.jpg" width="150" height="39" /><a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-technorati-gets-75-million-of-10-million-fourth-round/">paidContent is reporting</a> that <a href="http://www.technorati.com/">Technorati</a> has raised $7.5 million of planned $10 million fourth round of funding. That would bring the total amount raised by the blog search engine to about $30 million.  Google <a href="http://blogsearch.google.com/">Blog Search</a> has greatly eaten into Technorati's share of the blog search market, and the company <a href="http://www.sifry.com/alerts/archives/000508.html">changed CEOs</a> last August.  We documented <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_can_the_good_guys_still_finish_first.php">the company's struggles</a> last year, but now we'd like to ask you if Technorati is still relevant.  What blog search engine do you use?</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=6545&amp;cb=6545' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=6545&amp;n=6545' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>For my part, I use a mixture of Google Blog Search and Technorati.  In my opinion, Technorati tends to be better at finding recent blog posts, and the organization of results makes it easier to find things most recently written.  Plus, their blog weighting helps when you want to find posts specifically written by known voices in the online community.  Google, on the other hand, offers the convenience of being able to almost seamlessly switch between blog, web, and news search -- something that can be very helpful when researching a post.</p>

<p>Vote in our poll below and let us know your thoughts about Technorati's relevance in the comments below.</p>

<p><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://s3.polldaddy.com/p/696284.js"></script><noscript> <a href ="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/696284/" >Which blog search engine do you use?</a>  <br/> <span style="font-size:9px;"> (<a href ="http://www.polldaddy.com">  polls</a>)</span></noscript></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_blog_search_engines.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_blog_search_engines.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_blog_search_engines.php</guid>
         <category>Polls</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:05:00 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Josh Catone</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Watch Out TV: YouTube is Taking Over</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/television.jpg" width="100" height="96" />The theme for this week must be the erosion of market share for dominant technologies.  Earlier, we reported on the Firefox web browser's <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_continues_long_march_to_the_top.php">steady march</a> into Internet Explorer territory, and today <a href="http://newteevee.com/2008/06/05/tv-tops-but-pc-video-watching-grows/">NewTeeVee points to</a> a <a href="http://www.ipsos-na.com/news/pressrelease.cfm?id=3941">recent study</a> from Ipsos MediaCT that shows the PC continuing to encroach on the television's dominating position for eyeball time when it comes to video watching.  Where are you watching video? Vote in our poll below.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=6482&amp;cb=6482' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=6482&amp;n=6482' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>Ipsos MediaCT found that even though TV is still the dominant method of video consumption among those who have streamed a video online, that dominance is slipping.  TV was down to 70% of video watching time from 75% last year, while "personal computer" jumped from 11% in 2007 to 19% this year.  That was even more pronounced among teens.  In the 12-17 age group, PC watching was 24%, while TV was down to 55% of screen time.</p>

<p>Though the shift toward the PC for video watching is more pronounced among the younger set, Ipsos said the trend was "relatively consistent across all age groups and genders."  Even though the study only looked at the viewing habits of those who have streamed or downloaded video content, previous Ipsos MediaCT studies have found that is a rapidly growing segment of the population.</p>

<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/ipsosmedia-poll08.jpg" width="455" height="430" /></p>

<p>"Today, about half of all Internet users aged 12 and up have streamed a video file online in the past 30 days," said Adam Wright, Director at Ipsos MediaCT. "We really see these share gains in non-traditional video channels as not simply an isolated, generation-driven market effect, but rather a large macro-trend in the way consumers want their video content delivered that those in the entertainment industry should increasingly be paying attention to as we look forward to the rest of 2008 and beyond."</p>

<p>Last week, 28% of ReadWriteWeb readers indicated that they <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/are_you_still_watching_cable_tv.php">prefer online TV to cable</a>.  Now we'd like to ask you where you're watching most of your video these days?  Bear in mind that a DVD watched on your television, is still video consumed via TV.  (We realize this is not the same type of poll conducted by Ipsos MediaCT -- though it was clearly inspired by their study.)   Let us know in the comments the different places you're watching video these days.</p>

<p><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://s3.polldaddy.com/p/673778.js"></script><noscript> <a href ="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/673778/" >Where do you watch the most video content?</a>  <br/> <span style="font-size:9px;"> (<a href ="http://www.polldaddy.com">  polls</a>)</span></noscript></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/watch_out_tv_youtube_is_taking_over.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/watch_out_tv_youtube_is_taking_over.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/watch_out_tv_youtube_is_taking_over.php</guid>
         <category>Online Video</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 11:43:35 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Josh Catone</author>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>