<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Predictions - ReadWriteWeb</title>
      <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/predictions/</link>
      <description>Predictions on ReadWriteWeb</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009 Richard MacManus</copyright>
      <managingEditor>readwriteweb@gmail.com</managingEditor>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:36:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.23-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Google to Launch Microblogging Search Engine?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Google_logo.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/Google_logo.jpg" width="125" height="88"/>Microblogging has become a very popular way for people to share news and information or even live-blog events in real time, but if you have ever tried to search through services like <a href="http://twitter.com/">Twitter</a> using only <a href="http://www.google.com/">Google</a>, the Twitter native search or any number of other services, you know how difficult it can be to find exactly what you're after.  Today the  <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2009/06/google-to-launch-microblogging-search.html">Google Operating System blog reports</a> that Google will be launching a new microblogging search service that will sort results by relevance and integrate those results with its own web search engine to trigger a "microblog universal search group", closely related to the way Google Blog Search works.  If it turns out to be true, this is great news to those of us who constantly search Twitter for the latest news and trends.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=15368&amp;cb=15368' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=15368&amp;n=15368' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>Of course, <strong>you can always search Google in real-time with <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/make_google_real_time_with_twitter_ad-on.php">our favorite Greasemonkey script</a></strong> called, "Realtime Twitter Search Results on Google"</p>

<p>While Google has not confirmed this new search engine just yet, the company's search products chief <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2009/05/what-marissa-mayer-said-about-google-and-twitter.html">Marissa Mayer hints</a> that there may have been something like this in the works at Google for some time now: "...we are interested in being able to offer, for example, micro-blogging and micro-messaging in our search. Particularly in Blog Search and possibly in Web Search, but we don't have any particular plans to announce".  The <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/">Google Operating System blog</a> points to this description used in Google's localization service as further evidence that there is something going on.  It is allegedly a phrase that Google wants translated to be multilingual:</p>

<blockquote>"Recent updates about QUERY. This is the MicroBlogsearch Universal result group header text. A Microblog is a blog with very short entries. Twitter is the popular service associated with this format."</blockquote>

<p><img alt="GoogleTranslateScreenshot.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/GoogleTranslateScreenshot.png" width="580" height="175" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></p>

<p>This is not proof-positive that Google is developing a microblogging search engine, but it makes sense that they would.  Twitter and other microblogging platforms are rich with information could be used to rank messages.  Reportedly the search results will appear based on frequently used keywords or current events, but a whole bunch of other factors could play a role in providing relevant results.  The number of followers a person has, the author's authority in Twitter's social graph, replies, re-tweets, posting frequency and other stats could be used.  We hope Google is paying attention to current microblogging trends and will include those results in any microblogging search engine it may or may not be working on.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_to_launch_microblogging_search_engine.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_to_launch_microblogging_search_engine.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_to_launch_microblogging_search_engine.php</guid>
         <category>Google</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:36:45 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Doug Coleman</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Mapping the Current Web Transition</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/recession_hotdogs.jpg" width="150" height="119" />A year ago, I wrote a magnum opus <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/post_recession_phase_transition.php">three-part post</a> that attempted to chronicle some of the underlying changes happening in the economy and how this would impact web technology ventures. "Useful, but too long" was a recurring comment. So, here is a one-year update, much shorter. And hopefully a bit clearer, seeing as we are further into this transition.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=14705&amp;cb=14705' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=14705&amp;n=14705' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<h2>The Grossly Over-Simplified Web Transition Chart</h2>

<table border="1" width="100%" cellpadding="5">
<tr>
<th>&nbsp;</th>
<th>Pre-Historic</th>
<th>Recent History</th>
<th>Now</th>
<th>Future</th>
</tr>

<tr>
<th>Phase</th>
<td>1.0</td>
<td>2.0</td>
<td>2.5</td>
<td>3.0</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<th>A.k.a.</th>
<td>Dot-com</td>
<td>Social media</td>
<td>Get real</td>
<td>Main Street</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<th>Social Media</th>
<td>Experiments</td>
<td>Closed SNS</td>
<td>Fragmentation</td>
<td>Open and pervasive</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<th>Revenue</th>
<td>Investors</td>
<td>Advertisers</td>
<td>Mixed</td>
<td>Subs. & Trans.</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<th>Advertising</th>
<td>CPM</td>
<td>CPC</td>
<td>Mixed</td>
<td>CPA = Subs. & Trans.</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<th>Content</th>
<td>HTML paid creators</td>
<td>UGC + RDBMS</td>
<td>Curate & semantify</td>
<td>UGC + semantic</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<th>Start-Up Hero</th>
<td>Investment banker</td>
<td>VC</td>
<td>Nobody</td>
<td>Entrepreneur</td>
</tr>
</table>

<br />

<h2>Notes</h2>

<p>Why 2.5? Because we are in transition. The old is still with us, and the new is emerging but has not yet arrived. This was also true when "Web 2.0" was coined: only later did orthodoxy emerge.</p>

<p><strong>2.5</strong> is named "Get real" because we all have to do that. The punch bowl was taken away.</p>

<p><strong>3.0</strong> is named "Main Street" because the web is maturing... for everybody.</p>

<p><strong>Social Media:</strong> Closed social-network sites cannot survive in their current form, and yet they are so dominant today. So the transition to open and pervasive will be a big and messy fight... which will be great fun for journalists to cover!</p>

<p><strong>Advertising:</strong> Advertisers will adopt a barbell approach: CPM for branding, and CPA for direct-revenue generation (as soon as publishers figure out how to make money selling CPA). CPC will still be dominated by Google but will become less dominant as CPA gains traction. Google will play in CPA and CPM but won't dominate as it does in CPC. Publishers will sideline CPA because nobody will be able to compete with the CPC price set by Google. Ventures that bridge the gap between publishers wanting to sell CPM and advertisers wanting to buy CPA will do well.</p>

<p><strong>Revenue:</strong> Primary revenue will come from subscriptions and transactions, with advertising as one driver of those revenue lines. Today, we are in transition and in recession, so any revenue is good.</p>

<p><strong>Content:</strong> UGC reduced the cost of content but created too much junk. Curation (adding human editors to automated UGC content) will be aided by semantic technologies that aim to do what humans currently do well.</p>

<p><strong>Start-Up Hero:</strong> Today, it's "Nobody" because we are all in a hangover funk. In the near future, entrepreneurs really will hold the best cards; financiers will be secondary.</p>

<p><strong>Funding:</strong> The "Big VC" model is broken but will carry on for ages ("Zombie VC"). Angels and small VCs are in the cat-and-bird seat today. But they need a revived public market or something other, which we'll call "private + transparent."</p>

<p><strong>Prime Market:</strong> This is a century-long shift, like the one from Europe to America. Asia is not ready yet, America is in turmoil, and Europe is conservative, so this is another transitional phase.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mapping_the_current_web_transition.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mapping_the_current_web_transition.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mapping_the_current_web_transition.php</guid>
         <category>Predictions</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:40:20 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Bernard Lunn</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>2009: Predictions Across the Web</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="internet_dec_08.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/internet_dec_08.jpg" width="180" height="135" />The end of the year is typically a time for prediction posts. We have our own thoughts on what we expect the future to bring (which we will publish this week), but in this post we'll take a look at what some of our friends are discussing about the Web.  While not everyone offers a prediction for 2009, we hope their wishes for the future of the Web and their thoughts on what's important right now inspire thought and discussion.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=13165&amp;cb=13165' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=13165&amp;n=13165' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<h2>Chris Brogan Looks Forward to a 'One Ring' Profile</h2>

<p>After asking some of the Web's brightest minds to predict the future of social media, <a href="http://www.beingpeterkim.com/">Peter Kim</a> compiled <a href="http://beingpeterkim.typepad.com/files/Social%20Media%202009.pdf">Social Media Predictions 2009</a> [PDF]. One of the predictions is by <a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/">Chris Brogan</a> who believes that 2009 will bring an end to the fight over a single sign in system.</p>

<blockquote>Moving beyond OpenID, we'll have a sliced profile for social networks that will carry both our full profile plus the ability to break out specific segments for specific sites. I might not share my passion for beer on my church network, and I might not want to bring religion to my business social network.

<p>There will be some kind of "one ring" profile that will allow data pass through to the various places that use it. The reason this hasn't happened is that each company wants to own the database on the back end. Someone's going to win in 2009.</blockquote></p>

<h2>Ionut Alex. Chitu talks Google in 2009</h2>

<p>From the blog that watches Google's attempts to move your OS online, <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com">Alex Chitu</a> offers <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2008/12/predictions-for-googles-2009.html">16 predictions for Google</a> in 2009.  Here are our favorite three:</p>

<ul><li><a href="http://google.com">Google</a>'s search engine will lose a significant amount of market share as <a href="http://www.live.com/">Live Search</a>'s position will consolidate.</li><li>OneGoogle - a new interface that merges all Google applications so you can quickly switch between Gmail, Google Calendar, Google Docs without opening a new tab or losing your work.</li><li><a href="http://www.grandcentral.com/">GrandCentral</a> will be publicly available in the US and the interface will integrate with Gmail.</li></ul>

<h2>Dave Kellog Advises Corporate Bloggers to Get Real</h2>

<p><a href="http://marklogic.blogspot.com/2008/12/corporate-blogging-go-real-or-go-home.html">Dave Kellogg</a>, CEO of <a href="http://www.marklogic.com/">Mark Logic</a>, suggests that many corporations have latched onto the blogging phenomenon as a means to regurgitate their standard corporate messages.  Blogging this way doesn't work and if you're considering doing it - don't.  As a CEO who has been blogging for over three years, Dave's words are well worth noting. His blogging style is also well worth emulating.</p>

<p>Dave's recommendations:</p>

<ul><li>If you're going to make a corporate blog, go real or go home.</li><li>There is no point in ghost-written or PR-written blogs.</li>	<li>In my view, corporate blogs shouldn't exist. If you want a corporate blog, go find a few corporate bloggers instead.</li><li>Encourage those bloggers to write openly and honestly about your industry.</li><li>Let them ramble off-topic once in a while. You might discover something.</li></ul>

<h2>Om Malik: Tip'd Could Be a Daily Destination</h2>

<p>Cautiously optimistic, <a href="http://gigaom.com/">Om</a> sees great potential in the online community <a href="http://tipd.com/">Tip'd</a>, the site that brings together the best news on the Web relating to all things finance.  </p>

<p>From Om's <a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/12/26/tools-to-use-tipd-a-financial-social-news-service/">post</a>:</p>

<blockquote>I find 3-5 headlines that grab my attention each day, of which maybe two are worth reading. Rarely do I find an article I would archive, as truly quality content is sparse. But this is a new service (it had 100,000 visitors in November, according to Compete), so I'm willing to be patient.  

<p>If it can get itself embedded into the financial blog ecosystem the way Digg has plugged in the tech world, Tip'd could become a daily destination.</blockquote> </p>

<h2>Matt Mullenweg wants Blog Posts to Become More Interactive</h2>

<p>Talking with <a href="http://scobleizer.com">Robert Scoble</a> about <a href="http://twitter.com">Twitter</a> and <a href="http://friendfeed.com/">FriendFeed</a>, Matt talks about the addictiveness of instant gratification, and how he's looking forward to real time RSS and more interactive blog posts.</p>

<p>This is a partial transcript of the interview (at approx 03.33):</p>

<blockquote>What I love about those two platforms is the instant gratification.  You get that instant hit where people are replying to you right then, or you can drive a couple of hundred people to a link within 30 seconds.  I think what they've done beautifully is the coupling of the writing and the reading.  

<p>RSS is fantastic but it's a pull in technology.  It's not real time.  And so for years people have been talking about making RSS real time.  I think that I'd like to get to a point where Twitter and FriendFeed are mechanisms for this, where blog posts become a lot more interactive.  Like when you do a blog post, there is no reason that as many people that see your Twitter within the first five minutes shouldn't see your blog post in the first five minutes.  But how it works now, is I go to my Google Reader twice a day and I see your new post - you don't get that hit that we're all becoming addicted to.<br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>The complete video can be found <a href="http://www.fastcompany.tv/video/matt-mullenweg-reveals-future-wordpress">here</a>.</p>

<h2>Duncan Riley: The Year of the Uber Blog and New Media</h2>

<p><a href="http://inquisitr.com/">Duncan</a> predicts that Uber blogs, blogs that combines different content streams into one large blog with one primary top level URL, will <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/13390/2009-will-be-the-year-of-the-uber-blog/">explode in 2009</a>.</p>

<blockquote>In 2009 big will be better. Not big networks of many sites, but big blogs that break out of the narrow niche focus that has been typical of commercial blogging until now, and instead go wide in content but focused on one brand and one URL.

<p>The rise of the uber blog will also mark the beginning of the time new media starts to surpass old media.</blockquote></p>

<h2>Pew Internet and American Life Project: The Future of the Internet 2020</h2>

<p>Rather than making predictions for 2009, the <a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/">Pew Internet and American Life Project</a> canvassed Internet specialists for their take on what we can expect <a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/270/report_display.asp">in the year 2020</a>.</p>

<p>Some of the predictions: The mobile phone will be the primary tool for connecting to the Internet; Voice recognition and touch technology will become more common, and Internet architecture will improve not by starting over, but by next-generation engineering of the network.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2009_predictions_across_the_we.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2009_predictions_across_the_we.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2009_predictions_across_the_we.php</guid>
         <category>Predictions</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 01:00:09 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Lidija Davis</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>2009 Tips for Big Web Companies</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/big_companies_nov08a.jpg" width="150" height="216">2009 is approaching quickly, and the consensus is that it's going to be a really tough year. The US financial crisis is triggering a global recession. Yet, a crisis is also a time full of hope. It is a time to re-think, re-tool, and get ready for the next upswing.</p>

<p>For big Internet companies, 2009 is going to be a very bad year for sure. Advertising profits are going to plunge, and consumers will spend less money overall, particularly on the web. There is little that can be done to change that. But what big companies <em>can</em> do is invest in innovation and killer moves that will bear fruit in the years to follow. Here is what we think would be cool for various big web companies to do in 2009.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=12712&amp;cb=12712' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=12712&amp;n=12712' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<h2>Tips for Google</h2>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/big_companies_nov08b.jpg" align="left" width="150" height="59">Despite the downturn, Google remains a lean, mean revenue-generating machine. The search king has a strong hold on this area of the web, and as soon as things get better, its revenues will go up as well. So it makes sense to invest in its next strongest assets: video and its new adventure, the web browser.</p>

<p><strong>1. Integrate Web-Wide Video Search in YouTube</strong></p>

<p>We recently <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_youtube_the_next_google.php">wrote here</a> about YouTube and its rising popularity among kids. In a couple of years, a lot of web content is going to evolve from text to video, making YouTube a much bigger asset for Google. Even today, YouTube is already the second-largest search engine on the web.</p>

<p>However, it is a portal featuring only user-generated content. Google should seamlessly plug its video search into YouTube and bring videos from around the web to the surface using this same user-friendly interface. This would make YouTube <em>the</em> destination for people searching for any video content on the web.</p>

<p><strong>2. Make Firefox Extensions Compatible with Chrome</strong></p>

<p>Google Chrome made a big spash when it was <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_to_offer_its_own_browser_chrome.php">launched</a> earlier this year. Surely Google's foray into the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/browser_war_2007.php">browser war</a> is very deliberate. Chrome looks like an excellent modern browser and already has a solid base of followers. But the road to mass adoption is quite steep, even if Google promotes Chrome via its home page and makes bundling deals with computer manufacturers.</p>

<p>One of the things that can definitely help Chrome gain adoption is extension support. Most early adopters use Firefox these days and love the Mozilla extensions that allow them to make the browser their own. A killer move would be for Google to support Firefox extensions. This would save a whole lot of time for all developers and users and would show that Google respects the existing web eco-system.</p>

<h2>Tips for Microsoft</h2>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/big_companies_nov08c.jpg" align="left" width="150" height="31">Everyone knows that Google is the new Microsoft and that Microsoft is the new IBM. Ever since it lost the search war to Google, the Redmond giant has been playing an agonizing catch-up game. And it has yet to make a dent in Google's market. Perhaps its most successful recent move has been investing $250 million in Facebook, which was valued at $15 billion. But while it was a clever strategic play, there is no impressive technology here. And this is really what Microsoft needs to invest in: execution and innovation.</p>

<p><strong>1. Execute Faster and Better</strong></p>

<p>This problem nags large companies. Bureaucracy takes over for common sense and introduces rot. Endless meetings, hierarchies of approval, and "what if" scenarios turn any large company into a beast. Microsoft needs to fundamentally restructure its approach to delivering products: reduce the coupling between products, shrink timelines, throw away old rotten code. In short, Microsoft needs to be more like Google in order to compete with Google.</p>

<p><strong>2. Innovate</strong></p>

<p>Sure, Microsoft has a lot of things going on in research. But every time we hear of a new product announcement, it sounds like "<em>Me too</em>" envy. First, there is the rivalry with Google in search. Many people think that advertising is the killer app for the web. Sure, it is, at least today. But it does not mean that search is the only way to deliver it. Microsoft is stuck in a battle to build a better search engine, while the answer may be to deliver advertsing in a fundamentally different way.</p>

<p>Similarly, Amazon has made a big push into cloud computing. Microsoft followed a year later with yet another "Me too." Zune was another fiasco, an attempt to chase the beloved Apple product. The problem is that the age of "Me too" is over. The only way to own the future is to define it. Microsoft needs to truly embrace innovation in order to have a chance of coming back.</p>

<h2>Tips for Amazon</h2>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/big_companies_nov08d.jpg" align="left" width="150" height="40"> Amazon has executed its web services play remarkably well. The company took its core infrastructure, which runs the biggest shopping store online, and turned it into a product. More importantly, Amazon's foray into web services marks the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/amazon_webos.php">true beginning</a> of the cloud computing era. But at the same time, strange things are happening with the store, such as <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/text_and_banner_ads_on_amazon.php">advertising appearing</a> on product pages. Amazon should continue to accelerate its web services strategy, but it also needs to go back to the store and clean up the way it looks.</p>

<p><strong>1. Continue the Rapid Push into Web Services</strong></p>

<p>The first-mover advantage sometimes works, and sometimes doesn't. Many first movers in the market are overtaken and ultimately defeated by the second comers who know how to improve on what has been done. But if the first move is brilliant (think Apple kind of brilliant), then it is becomes hard for others to keep up. Amazon has rapidly innovated in the web services market and has a very substantial lead.</p>

<p>Its delivery to date has been nearly perfect, and the company needs to continue to invest in its core stack. The more useful the blocks that are there, the less reason users will have to switch to something else. Cost and reliability are already there, so it boils down to adding a few more blocks and then re-focusing on customer support and enablement.</p>

<p><strong>2. Simplify and Clean Up the Product Pages</strong></p>

<p>Amazon pages, despite the recent cleanup, still feel so 1990s. There is just too much going on. First of all, the banner ads need to go. Sure, they make money, but it is insulting to see completely irrelevant truck ads when a user is looking at Freedman's latest book.</p>

<p>Secondly, the pages are difficult to read because of both the design and the amount of information on the pages. Most of the information is not needed and will not enhance transactions. Instead of geeky bar charts, give users a simple popularity indicator. People do not need to see 400 reviews; five should do. The lists promoted in the sidebar are distracting. And the list goes on; there is a lot of room for clean-up.</p>

<h2>Tips for eBay</h2>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/big_companies_nov08e.jpg" align="left" width="150" height="70">eBay has just not been an exciting company since the 1990s. It has not executed well, its site has not evolved, and it failed to make much of its acquisitions, such as Skype and StumbleUpon. What eBay needs to do is reinvent itself through relevant acquistions.</p>

<p><strong>1. Buy Etsy</strong></p>

<p>Etsy is a rapidly growing online marketplace for hand-made goods. With sustainability and green poised to be on people's minds for the next decade, hand-made is the new black. Etsy has got a stellar team behind it, a user-centric culture, and a knack for innovation. If Esty were to be unleashed on eBay's site, the user experience would likely be much more improved and fun.</p>

<p><strong>2. Buy Craigslist</strong></p>

<p>If one company other than Google has cracked the secret of simplicity on the web, it's Craigslist. It has discovered the most effective and simple way to do online classifieds, buy and sell things, find a job, and make a hire. Cloning the same simple service for many markets was genius, and Craigslist just nailed it. It is unclear whether they would be willing to sell, but if there is a transaction there, eBay's coolness level would shoot up high. And the revenue would likely follow, because Craigslist has been rather conservative when it comes to charging users.</p>

<h2>Tips for Yahoo!</h2>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/big_companies_nov08f.jpg" align="left" width="150" height="38">Yahoo! is in a really tough spot. It seems the only way out is through a focus on innovation (that is, if it really doesn't want to sell to Microsoft). First, Yahoo! needs to figure out what business it wants to be in, and then it needs to execute flawlessly in the direction it chooses.</p>

<p><strong>1. Invest in Best Directions, Cut Out the Rest</strong></p>

<p>Seems like a lot of internal projects were coming out of the brick house and then didn't go anywhere. The problem with incubating products, launching them, and then dropping the ball with user adoption and marketing is that it is not good for business. Take Yahoo! Shortcuts as an example: great idea, competitive space, well executed. Where is it now? Lanched in 2007, it works only on WordPress, hasn't really been promoted much, and is unlikely to go anywhere.</p>

<p>We see a similar pattern with acquistions. Too much time was lost getting the ball rolling with MyBlogLog and del.icio.us. The result? Momentum was lost, and so were users and opportunity. Yahoo! can't afford misses like these. Execution needs to be quick and flawless -- and relevant to the business. Yahoo! needs to assess its entire product line, pick the things to invest in, and then put both engineering and marketing dollars behind them.</p>

<p><strong>2. Compete in Search</strong></p>

<p>Not all is lost, especially when you are number two in the space. Sure the gap to get to number one is big, but you are only one spot away. Google attracts users with its simple user interface, speed, and relevancy. Yahoo! needs to fix the speed and relevancy of its search engine and then invest in a different user interface. I really think that the Search Monkey project is on to something. Out of all the recent innovations in the search space, this one stands out with its simple yet powerful approach.</p>

<p>And the recent idea to open up its search engine as a web service is great too. It just needs to be done better and faster in order to really undermine Google. Yahoo! should look to Seattle for the model of how to do this sort of thing quickly and elegantly. If Yahoo! can create a simple way for everyone to build vertical search applications, Google will surely take a hit and have to start playing catch-up.</p>

<h2>Conclusion</h2>

<p>2009 will surely be a tough year for everyone. Yet it is the year to revamp and invest in the future. How exactly the big web companies will execute really matters. What do you think they should be doing?</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2009_tips_for_big_web_companies.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2009_tips_for_big_web_companies.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2009_tips_for_big_web_companies.php</guid>
         <category>Predictions</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Alex Iskold</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>RWW Predictions: Walmart&apos;s MP3 Store VS Apple iTunes</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/headphones.jpg" width="150" height="150" /> Last month <a href="http://walmart.com">Walmart</a> gave consumers the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wal-mart_gives_consumers_number_1_reason_why_drm_not_answer.php">number 1 reason why DRM isn't the answer</a> when they announced that they would be shutting down their DRM server come October 9th. Since then, Walmart relaunched it's online music store on Tuesday. The new music store offers the latest hits at only $.79 per song, while standard songs are offered at $.94. With competitive pricing options Walmart could give iTunes stiff competition. </p>

<p>We'd like your help in <a href="http://readwriteweb.predictify.com/auctionview.aspx?ID=92010">predicting the following</a>: Will iTunes change its pricing from $.99 a song or go to a subscription music site by the end of 2008?</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=12379&amp;cb=12379' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=12379&amp;n=12379' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<h2>Fast Facts</h2>

<ul>
	<li>Microsoft's Zune Pass music-subscription service allows unlimited music downloads for $15/month</li>
	<li>Every song sold on Wal-Mart can be played an unlimited number of times on most portable devices</li>
	<li>Rumors have surfaced that Apple is considering a $129.99 a year subscription service for iTunes </li>
</ul>

<center><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://www.predictify.com/dist/widget/script.aspx?keyword=auctionid:92010&color1=0xFFFFFF&color2=0xB80103&color3=0xB80103"></script></center>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_walmarts_mp3_store_vs_apple_itunes.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_walmarts_mp3_store_vs_apple_itunes.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_walmarts_mp3_store_vs_apple_itunes.php</guid>
         <category>Predictions</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 19:05:00 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Corvida</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>RWW Predictions: Facebook Music Coming Soon?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/facebook-logo.jpg" /> <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_music_launches_tonight.php">Last month</a> we witnessed <a href="http://myspace.com">Myspace</a> launch its long awaited <a href="http://music.myspace.com/">Myspace Music</a> service. Users of Myspace can now assemble playlists from a vast collection of music from four major labels and one independent distributor. Users can also stream these songs for free or purchase them free of DRM restrictions thanks to the AmazonMP3 service integration. Myspace Music isn't <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/perfect_music_streaming_service.php">the perfect streaming music service</a>, and there are talks of <a href="http://facebook.com">Facebook</a> following suit. We'd like your help in <a href="http://readwriteweb.predictify.com/auctionview.aspx?ID=6859">predicting the following</a>: Will Facebook integrate streaming music into its site by the end of this year? If so, via which service/partner will it do so?</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=12291&amp;cb=12291' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=12291&amp;n=12291' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<h2>Fast Facts</h2>

<ul>
	<li>Facebook is the largest social network in the world with well over 100 million monthly active users</li>
	<li>Rival MySpace has recently launched MySpace Music, and is currently more profitable than Facebook</li>
	<li>Facebook is rumored to be partnering with either iLike, imeem, LaLa, or Rhapsody</li>
</ul> 

<center><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://www.predictify.com/dist/widget/script.aspx?keyword=auctionid:6859&color1=0xFFFFFF&color2=0xB80103&color3=0xB80103"></script>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_facebook_music_coming_soon.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_facebook_music_coming_soon.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_facebook_music_coming_soon.php</guid>
         <category>Predictions</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 19:14:22 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Corvida</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>RWW Predictions: YouTube&apos;s New Monetization VS Hulu</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/youtube_logo_july07.png" /> In an effort to monetize <a href="http://youtube.com">YouTube</a>, the video giant will start experimenting with full-length TV shows that include embedded ads. Upcoming video service <a href="http://hulu.com">Hulu</a> offers similar content on its site and is giving Youtube stiff competition. Help us in <a href="http://readwriteweb.predictify.com/auctionview.aspx?ID=6632">predicting the following</a>: with this new offering from YouTube, what will Hulu's traffic growth be for November 2008 according to <a href="http://compete.com">Compete</a>?</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=12215&amp;cb=12215' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=12215&amp;n=12215' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<h2>Fast Facts</h2>

<ul>
	<li>YouTube has brokered a deal with Viacom to run full-length episodes of television shows from CBS</li>
	<li>Hulu.com saw a 52.5% month over month increase in traffic in September 2008</li>
	<li>According to Reuters, YouTube boasts 330 million users and Hulu just 3.3 million users</li>
</ul>

<center><script language="javascript" src="http://www.predictify.com/Javascripts/pd_widget.js"></script><script language="javascript">PD_WIDGET.keyword="auctionid:6632";PD_WIDGET.height="250";PD_WIDGET.width="300";PD_WIDGET.color1="0xFFFFFF";PD_WIDGET.color2="0xB80103";PD_WIDGET.color3="0xB80103";PD_WIDGET.create();</script></center>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_youtubes_new_monetization_vs_hulu.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_youtubes_new_monetization_vs_hulu.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_youtubes_new_monetization_vs_hulu.php</guid>
         <category>Predictions</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:35:46 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Corvida</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>RWW Predictions Double: Facebook, Microsoft, &amp; Pandora</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/facebook-logo.png" width="96" height="32" /> Just last year, Microsoft snagged a $240 million stake in <a href="http://facebook.com">Facebook</a> in a bidding war against <a href="http://google.com">Google</a>. However nothing but speculation has resulted since that stake was won. This week we saw the first steps of <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_stake_in_facebook_be.php">integration of Microsoft Live Search on Facebook</a>. Microsoft is promising to improve the user experience on Facebook with the addition of Live Search functionality and advertisements. </p>

<p>We'd like your help in predicting what the percentage of Microsoft's share of searches will be by December of 2008 following the integration of Live Search on Facebook. Will it increase or decrease and by how much? <a href="http://readwriteweb.predictify.com/auctionview.aspx?ID=6285">Click here to cast your prediction</a>.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=12143&amp;cb=12143' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=12143&amp;n=12143' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<h2>Fast Facts</h2>

<ul>	<li>The arrangement was first announced in July and offers a revenue opportunity for both companies</li> <li>Microsoft owns a stake in Facebook and has an exclusive agreement with the site for banner ads</li> <li>Results vary on Facebook and Live.com because Facebook uses certain filters for their search results </li> </ul>

<center><script language="javascript" src="http://www.predictify.com/Javascripts/pd_widget.js"></script><script language="javascript">PD_WIDGET.keyword="auctionid:6285";PD_WIDGET.height="250";PD_WIDGET.width="300";PD_WIDGET.color1="0xFFFFFF";PD_WIDGET.color2="0xB80103";PD_WIDGET.color3="0xB80103";PD_WIDGET.create();</script></center>

<p><br />
<h2>Predicting Pandora's New Royalty Rate</h2></p>

<p>In the past few weeks, <a href="http://pandora.com">Pandora</a> was at the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/pandora_on_the_verge_of_closing_shop.php">forefront of many headlines</a>. The CEO of <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/pandoras_issues_a_call_to_arms.php">Pandora fought hard</a> to win a small victory that would grant Internet radio stations more time to reach a new royalty rate agreement with the powers that be. The cut-off time is February 15, 2009, which is right around the corner. <a href="http://readwriteweb.predictify.com/auctionview.aspx?ID=6152">We'd like you to predict</a> whether a new royalty rate agreement will be reached in time and what the new royalty rate will be.</p>

<h2>Fast Facts</h2>

<ul>
	<li>Senate approved a bill that says Congress must honor any royalty rate agreement reached</li>
	<li>Webcasters and copyright holders have until February 15th to come up with a deal on their own</li>
	<li>Current royalty rates would cost Pandora $18 million of its estimated $25 million in revenue in 2008</li>
</ul>

<center><script language="javascript" src="http://www.predictify.com/Javascripts/pd_widget.js"></script><script language="javascript">PD_WIDGET.keyword="auctionid:6152";PD_WIDGET.height="250";PD_WIDGET.width="300";PD_WIDGET.color1="0xFFFFFF";PD_WIDGET.color2="0xB80103";PD_WIDGET.color3="0xB80103";PD_WIDGET.create();</script></center>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_double_facebook_microsoft_pandora.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_double_facebook_microsoft_pandora.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_double_facebook_microsoft_pandora.php</guid>
         <category>Predictions</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:23:00 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Corvida</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>RWW Predictions: Will eBay Sell StumbleUpon?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/stumble_upon_logo3.jpg" />Last week rumors were swirling that <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rumor_ebay_stumbleupon_sale.php">eBay was looking to sell StumbleUpon</a>. <a href="http://ebay.com">eBay </a>purchased <a href="http://stumbleupon.com">StumbleUpon</a> in early 2007 for a bargain price of $75 million. </p>

<p><font style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><script type="text/javascript">digg_url = 'http://digg.com/tech_news/Will_eBay_Sell_StumbleUpon';digg_bgcolor = '#ffffff';digg_skin = 'normal';</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></font>We've still yet to have these rumors confirmed, but what if eBay were to actually sell StumbleUpon? <a href="http://readwriteweb.predictify.com/auctionview.aspx?ID=6065">Help us predict</a> whether eBay will sell the service by the end of this year and if so, the price tag that it might fetch. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=12021&amp;cb=12021' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=12021&amp;n=12021' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<h2>Fast Facts</h2>

<ul>	<li>Reports claim that eBay is in touch with Deutsche Bank to find a buyer.</li> 	<li>eBay purchased StumbleUpon for $75 million 16 months ago.</li> 	<li>In July 2008, StumbleUpon had 1.3 million worldwide visitors, down from 4.4 million a year prior.</li> </ul>

<center><script language="javascript" src="http://www.predictify.com/Javascripts/pd_widget.js"></script><script language="javascript">PD_WIDGET.keyword="auctionid:6065";PD_WIDGET.height="250";PD_WIDGET.width="300";PD_WIDGET.color1="0xFFFFFF";PD_WIDGET.color2="0xB80103";PD_WIDGET.color3="0xB80103";PD_WIDGET.create();</script></center>

<h2>Stumble Upon Our Discussion</h2>

<p>In addition to reading your predictions, we'd also like to know your thoughts on what this might mean for StumbleUpon community members. Here are some things to discuss in the comments section:</p>

<ul>
	<li>Will StumbleUpon's growth continue to decrease if the rumors are true?</li>
	<li>If you're a StumbleUpon user, what are your thoughts on how the StumbleUpon community may be affected by a sell?</li>
	<li>If StumbleUpon doesn't sale, what do you think eBay will do with the service?</li>
</ul>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_will_ebay_sell_stumbleupon.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_will_ebay_sell_stumbleupon.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_will_ebay_sell_stumbleupon.php</guid>
         <category>Predictions</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Corvida</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>RWW Predictions: Google&apos;s Android vs. Apple&apos;s iPhone</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/androidlogo2.jpg" width="133" height="111" />The tech and mobile industries are buzzing about the impending release of the first Google Android handset. We've been <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/android_prototypes.php">waiting since February</a> to find out whether an official Android handset will see the light of day. But after <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/setback_for_google_android.php">numerous setbacks</a>, a device that will carry Android is finally here. Better known as the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/first_android_phone_just_approved.php">HTC Dream or G1</a>, the device is set to be available on the T-Mobile network as early as next week, priced at $199.</p>

<p><font style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><script type="text/javascript">digg_url = 'http://digg.com/gadgets/Google_s_Android_vs_Apple_s_iPhone';digg_bgcolor = '#ffffff';digg_skin = 'normal';</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></font>We'd like your help in predicting the following: Will T-mobile or AT&T adjust their entry price point (either up or down) for the HTC Dream and the iPhone respectively in 2008? Let us know by casting your vote at <a href="http://readwriteweb.predictify.com/auctionview.aspx?ID=5978">RWW Predictions</a>. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=11967&amp;cb=11967' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=11967&amp;n=11967' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<h2>Fast Facts</h2>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/android_150.jpg" width="150" height="111" align="right" /><ul>	<li>The $199 price point for both phones is only available with a contract</li><li>Android is the first complete, open, and free mobile platform.</li>	<li>HTC targets 600000 Dream handset sales this year</li>	<li>Analysts predict Apple will sell 13 million iPhone units in 2008 </li>       <li><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/confirmed_chrome_is_coming_to_android.php">Google Chrome browser is confirmed to come to Android</a></li></ul></p>

<p>Check out a video of the Android OS just below and be sure to read up on our <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/10_android_apps_we_will_actual.php">top 10 picks of Android apps</a> we hope to use.</p>

<p><script language="javascript" src="http://www.predictify.com/Javascripts/pd_widget.js"></script><script language="javascript">PD_WIDGET.keyword="auctionid:5978";PD_WIDGET.height="250";PD_WIDGET.width="300";PD_WIDGET.color1="0xFFFFFF";PD_WIDGET.color2="0xB80103";PD_WIDGET.color3="0xB80103";PD_WIDGET.create();</script></p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rPIHeIRRDow&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rPIHeIRRDow&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_googles_android_vs_apples_iphone.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_googles_android_vs_apples_iphone.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_googles_android_vs_apples_iphone.php</guid>
         <category>Predictions</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:34:55 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Corvida</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>RWW Predictions: Funding for Yammer</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/yammer_logo.jpg" width="150" height="36" /><a href="http://readwriteweb.predictify.com/auctionview.aspx?ID=5900">This week's prediction question</a> focuses on the winner of TechCrunch50: <a href="http://www.yammer.com/">Yammer</a>. Yammer is a communications product that duplicates the functionality of Twitter, but with an enterprise twist. We certainly have <a href="Yammer is TC50 Winner - This is a Joke? Right?">our doubts about Yammer</a> as an enterprise tool. However, we'd like your help in predicting the financial future of Yammer.</p>

<p>Will Yammer raise a round of funding in 2008 or 2009. If so, how much will they take? Head to the <a href="http://readwriteweb.predictify.com/auctionview.aspx?ID=5900">ReadWriteWeb Predictions</a> site to cast your vote or try out our new Predictions widget at the end of this article.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=7257&amp;cb=7257' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=7257&amp;n=7257' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<h2>Fast Facts and Things to Consider</h2>

<ul>
	<li>Mint.com won TC40 last year and went on to raise $17 million in VC funding.</li>
	<li>Yammer applies a Twitter messaging system to internal corporate communications.</li>
<li>Yammer is currently being praised by employees of the following companies and start-ups: <a href="http://testimonials.yammer.com/2008/09/josh-baltzell-xerox.html">Xerox</a>, <a href="http://testimonials.yammer.com/2008/09/steve-barsh.html">GetSatisfaction</a>, <a href="http://testimonials.yammer.com/2008/09/rashmi-sinha-slideshare.html">Slideshare</a>, and <a href="http://testimonials.yammer.com/2008/09/don-macaskill.html">SmugMug</a>.</li>
</ul>

<p><br />
<center><script language="javascript" src="http://www.predictify.com/Javascripts/pd_widget.js"></script><script language="javascript">PD_WIDGET.keyword="auctionid:5900";PD_WIDGET.height="250";PD_WIDGET.width="300";PD_WIDGET.color1="0xFFFFFF";PD_WIDGET.color2="0xB80103";PD_WIDGET.color3="0xB80103";PD_WIDGET.create();</script></center></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_funding_for_yammer.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_funding_for_yammer.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_funding_for_yammer.php</guid>
         <category>Predictions</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:46:02 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Corvida</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>RWW Predictions: Browser Wars 2.0</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/browser_wars_sep08.jpg" />This week we're running a prediction challenge, on the topic of browsers. Google's new browser, <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome">Chrome</a> (<a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/weekly_wrapup_chrome_edition.php">our coverage</a>), is sure to take market share from the existing players. So we want you to help us predict: which of the following browsers will lose the most share (in percentage terms) between August 2008 and December 2008? Internet Explorer, Firefox, Safari, or a tie or other? You can cast your prediction by visiting <a href="http://readwriteweb.predictify.com/auctionview.aspx?ID=5819">RWW Predictions</a>. It'll be interesting to see what the ReadWriteWeb community thinks will happen!</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=7199&amp;cb=7199' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=7199&amp;n=7199' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<h2>Fast Facts</h2>

<ul>
	<li>Chrome has taken 1-2% share of the global browser market since its launch (NetApp)</li>
	<li>IE has lost 4-5% share so far in 2008 (NetApp)</li>
	<li>Analysts are skeptical of Chrome's adoption by enterprises, given its unproven "beta" status </li>
<li>IE had 72% share and Firefox had 20% share in August 2008</li>
<li>Microsoft and Mozilla recently launched browsers (IE 8 & Firefox 3) with similar features as Chrome</li> 
</ul>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.predictify.com/auctionview.aspx?ID=5819">Click through to RWW Predictions</a></strong> to login and cast your prediction.</p>

<p><strong>Note:</strong> On Monday afternoon the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_live_online_music_special.php">RWW Live</a> crew will be discussing Chrome's impact on the browser market with 2-3 special guests. Be sure to tune in at 3:30 pm PDT Monday.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_browser_wars.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_browser_wars.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_browser_wars.php</guid>
         <category>Predictions</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:41:27 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>RWW Predictions: iPhone Sales in 2008</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/iphone_prediction.jpg" /><a href="http://readwriteweb.predictify.com/auctionview.aspx?ID=5063">This week's prediction</a> is about (what else) the iPhone. We're asking: <strong>How many total units of the iPhone will Apple sell in 2008?</strong>.<br />
 <br />
For background, Apple sold 2.3 million units in Q1 2008 and 1.7 million units in Q2 2008. Today <a href="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2008/07/14iphone.html">Apple announced</a> it's already sold 1 million 3G units. In 2007 Steve Jobs said he expected <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/what_to_expect_at_macworld.php">10 million unit sales in 2008</a>.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=6780&amp;cb=6780' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=6780&amp;n=6780' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>The new 3G is twice as fast, available all over the world, and (for <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/telco_greed_iphone3g.php">some people</a> anyway) half the price at $199. So Jobs' 2007 estimate may even be conservative. What do you think - how many iPhones will Apple sell in '08? <a href="http://readwriteweb.predictify.com/auctionview.aspx?ID=5063">Click here to make your prediction</a>.</p>

<p><b>UPDATE:</b> Apple <a href="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2008/07/14iphone.html">today announced</a> it sold its one millionth iPhone 3G on Sunday, only three days after its launch on Friday, July 11. Here is the rest of its announcement:</p>

<blockquote><p>iPhone 3G is now available in 21 countries--Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Hong Kong, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, UK and the US--and will go on sale in France on July 17.</p>

<p>"iPhone 3G had a stunning opening weekend," said Steve Jobs, Apple's CEO. "It took 74 days to sell the first one million original iPhones, so the new iPhone 3G is clearly off to a great start around the world." </p></blockquote>

<p>See also: <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/app_store_10_million_downloads.php">Apple's App Store: 10 Million Downloads Later</a>; and <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/iphone_personal_computer.php">iPhone: The New Personal Computer</a></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_iphone_sales.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_iphone_sales.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rww_predictions_iphone_sales.php</guid>
         <category>Predictions</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:10:18 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Results: RWW Predictions &amp; Polls (FriendFeed, Bigcos, Google Docs)</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/34/109266586_65745333d2_m.jpg" width="150" />This week we <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/readwriteweb_predictions_friendfeed_twitter.php">announced</a> a new feature for our community: <strong><a href="http://readwriteweb.predictify.com">ReadWriteWeb Predictions</a></strong>, a Predictions Center that we hope will enable you to tap into the collective intelligence of RWW readers. The <a href="http://readwriteweb.predictify.com/auctionview.aspx?ID=5002">first prediction</a> is about the battle for users and mind-share that has emerged this year between <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/tag/twitter">Twitter</a> and <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/tag/friendfeed">FriendFeed</a>. Here are the results, along with results for our two polls this week...</p>
]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=6771&amp;cb=6771' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=6771&amp;n=6771' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[
<p>In RWW Predictions, we asked: How many monthly U.S. visitors will FriendFeed have for July 2008 according to Compete? As of writing, 400-599k is the most popular prediction. Here are the results so far:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/friendfeed_prediction_july08.jpg" /></p>

<p>You can <a href="http://readwriteweb.predictify.com/auctionview.aspx?ID=5002">make your own prediction here</a>.</p>

<h2><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_best_internet_bigco_2008.php">Poll: Best Internet Bigcos of 2008</a></h2>

<p>We've reached the halfway point of 2008, so time for a half-year assessment of the Internet bigcos. This week we ran a poll asking for your picks for best bigcos so far in '08. We did <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php">a similar poll last July</a> - and Facebook just edged out Google for the RWW popular vote. At the end of '07 we named Facebook our <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_bigco_of_2007.php">Bigco of the year</a>. We also <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_best_internet_bigco_2006.php">ran the poll in 2006</a>. Here are the results this time round:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://s3.polldaddy.com/p/761328.js"></script><noscript> <a href ="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/761328/" >Which Internet bigco has impressed you the most over the first half of 2008?</a>  <br/> <span style="font-size:9px;"> (<a href ="http://www.polldaddy.com">  polls</a>)</span></noscript></p>

<p>At time of publishing, <strong>Google had 19%</strong>, followed by <strong>Apple on 18%</strong> and <strong>Mozilla 17%</strong>. Also in double figures were Amazon and Adobe, both of which got 12%. Interestingly, Facebook fell to 8% and the other two parts of GYM, Microsoft and Yahoo, didn't fare so well either. Microsoft scored 6% and Yahoo 5%.</p>
<p><em>See also: <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/public_internet_bigcos_market.php">Internet Bigcos - How The Market Sees Them</a>  and <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/there_is_no_bubble_public_stocks.php">It's Official: There Is No Bubble</a> </em></p>
<h2><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_docs_is_down.php">Google Docs Goes Down - How Long is Too Long for You? (POLL)</a></h2>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/googledocs-logo.jpg" align="left" />Earlier this week, Google's hosted office suite <a href="http://docs.google.com">Google Docs</a> was down for more than 30 minutes, rendering documents inaccessible and users frustrated.  Short outages are not uncommon, but it was a good time to ask - how long is too long for you?  At what point would you personally deem a web service too unstable to use, and presuming that varies from service to service, what's your requirement for Google Docs?</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://s3.polldaddy.com/p/765676.js"></script><noscript> <a href ="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/765676/" >How much down time would it take for you to quit using Google Docs?</a>  <br/> <span style="font-size:9px;"> (<a href ="http://www.polldaddy.com">  polls</a>)</span></noscript></p>
<p><em>Image credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/archeon/109266586/">hans s</a></em></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/results_rww_predictions_friendfeed_bigcos_googledocs.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/results_rww_predictions_friendfeed_bigcos_googledocs.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/results_rww_predictions_friendfeed_bigcos_googledocs.php</guid>
         <category>Predictions</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:43:04 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>After Lively, What&apos;s Next for Google?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="google150.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/google150.jpg" />Yesterday, <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/lively_google_launches_virtual.php">Google released Lively</a>, a browser based virtual world somewhat reminiscent of <a href="http://thepalace.com/">The Palace</a> from the mid-90s. A lot of people have been wondering why <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> would be interested in entering this market, but <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/us-heather-hopkins/2008/07/google_lively_predictions_goog.html">according to Hitwise</a>, it seems Google is looking at all the major categories its search engine is sending traffic to and then tries to develop a product for that category.</p>
]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=6749&amp;cb=6749' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=6749&amp;n=6749' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>Hitwise has a very good track record in using its Clickstream data for predicting Google's next moves. In January, they <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/us-heather-hopkins/2008/01/google_health_predicting_googl_1.html">predicted</a> Google would enter the health, travel, or virtual world market. Since then, Google <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_health_pilot_program.php">launched Google Health</a> and <a href="http://lively.com">Lively</a>, though it doesn't have a major travel product besides <a href="http://maps.google.com">Google Maps</a> in its portfolio just yet.</p>

<p>Looking at the latest data, Hitwise predicts that Google would either enter the automotive or music market next. Both of these are very broad categories with a large range of competitors already operating in them, but then, that has never stopped Google from entering a new market.</p>

<p><img alt="Google Lively.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/Google%20Lively.png" /></p>

<h2>Google Autos</h2>

<p>Google could easily build a competitor to <a href="http://cars.com">cars.com</a>, <a href="http://vehix.com">Vehix</a>, or <a href="http://www.autotrader.com/">Autotrader</a> by tying together data from its Google Base product (which already has a '<a href="http://www.google.com/base/s2?a_n0=vehicles&amp;a_y0=9&amp;hl=en&amp;gl=us">Vehicles</a>' category) and mashing it up into a more comprehensive used car market by also allowing users (or dealers) to easily put up their own cars for sale. As of now, Google is only aggregating data from all the major online car buying sites. </p>

<h2>Google Music</h2>

<p> <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Google/?p=189">Rumors</a> about Google Music have flared up regularly over the last few years, but so far, no actual product has materialized. Entering the music business is obviously fraught with problems for any new player. Given the issues around licensing music, as well as its failure in selling videos on Google Videos, Google might not want to develop a mainstream music platform.</p>

<p>What Google could do, though, would be to offer a platform for independent musicians, somewhat akin to what MySpace was in its early days or what <a href="http://amiestreet.com/">AmieStreet</a> does today.</p>

<h2>Google Travel</h2>

<p>Given Google's background in search, we think Google might also be likely to develop a competitor to the large travel aggregator sites like <a href="http://kayak.com">Kayak</a> or <a href="http://farecompare.com">FareCompare</a>. Not only is this a market where Google could develop a decent revenue stream outside of its core advertising market, but it would fit in right with Google's core expertise. As of now, Google only links to Kayak, Expedia, Hotwire and others when you enter <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=pdx+to+sfo+7%2F15">the right query</a> into its search engine, but it doesn't display any actual results itself yet.</p>

<h2>Our Prediction: Travel is Next</h2>

<p>If Google is indeed trying to fill out all of these major niches with a product of its own, we think a travel product is still Google's most likely next move. It is not only the closest to Google's core competency of search, but Google could also easily put ads on there as well.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_next_for_google.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_next_for_google.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_next_for_google.php</guid>
         <category>Products</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 10:32:45 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Frederic Lardinois</author>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>