When you think of widgets you typically think of web 2.0 companies. Flickr, Digg, del.icio.us were among the first services with widgets and many more followed. Indeed, if you're a startup then it could be seen as unusual nowadays if you don't have a widget strategy.
But the older and larger companies are still trying to wrap their hands around widgets. Just recently, we profiled NBC signing up to use Clearspring. This move clearly signals that NBC is serious about their widgets strategy.
In this post we look at an unlikely widget company, Random House Publishing. A quick look at their web service and the widget is enough to realize that the company "gets it". But a deeper look reveals that Random House not only has gotten the widget bug, it also has a broad and solid strategy around widgets. The publishing giant is using widgets to build its presence and brand awareness everywhere online.
There is nothing random (pun intended) about the Random House book widget. It is business engineering meets technology at its best. The widget is carefully crafted to:

The widget creators were focused on making the Random House widget useful to their customers. They built in search inside the widget and also 'browse this book' features. It is quite an impressive set of features to pack inside a widget. Take a look:
The Random House widget is powered by a web service called insight. This service exposes a set of programming interfaces for searching and browsing the contents of Random House Books. Insight is an impressive, ongoing effort to index, digitize, distribute and set the terms for using book content online. Developers can query Insight using a REST API and get back XML responses. Here are some examples of supported requests:
From the above use cases it is clear that Insight is a web service that offers a specific, vertical interface for book search. This is its strength and really the way that vertical web services should be done.
It is difficult not to generalize what Random House is doing. Exposing its information as a Web Service and building a Widget to deliver microcontent to millions of web pages is the new way that serious companies should play online. A Web Service serves a few purposes, but the most important one is opening up the data in a controlled way. This is what Amazon has been doing for years and Facebook just did recently. We covered this topic extensively in our When Web Sites Become Web Services post.

Building a Widget on top of the Web Service is also important, not only because it lets the company create a viral distribution channel, but because it offers a sanity check for correctness of the Web Service. If the widget developer runs into issues with the Web Service, so will everyone else. By creating a widget and exercising the Web Service, the company gets to test it out first.
Its great to see an older and bigger company that gets widgets and web services. Random House is leveraging its information in a controlled way to businesses and exposes it in a viral way to end users. This is savvy and economical. Their widget implementation nails the user experience, packing the key functions of searching and browsing into the widget. The only thing that would be great to add to the widget is user and expert reviews, but this does not seem to be the information that Random House has.
Let us know what you think about the Random House strategy. Also please share other great examples of web service and widget combinations that you have seen lately.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2282
Comments
Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts
Alex, this is very interesting. It shows that Elephants Can Dance (great book by Lou Gerstner about making IBM agile again). Publishers have been making a big effort for years to get their archives properly tagged in an XML format, which is the essential if unglamorous foundation for Web Services. Adding the Widget layer on top is exactly right.
I can see more publishers going this way. It is really just a smarter/modern form of syndication and that has always been something publishers try to do.
When lots of mainstream publishers figure out how to do this it will create a lot of competition for prime space. I suspect this will crowd out the small start-up widget offerings as brand does influence click through rates and in a crowded widget market the space will go to wherever the monetization works best.
Enjoyed reading this post. I am sure we will see more companies such as Random House embracing Widgets--not as a gimmick but as a core part of their presence on the web. It is a shame that most managers in mainstream companies pay scant attention to the Web, much less web 2.0. As more managers become familiar with such initiatives, I am sure we will see more creative development of interesting widgets that may create stickiness and traction with the community.
This is neat but my user experience left alot to be desired.
Heres what happened
1. Clicked feed link from iGoogle
2. See non functional widget with upgrade notice (first time an app has asked me to upgrade even though I go to tens of sites daily) Widgets should try to use older versions of flash if possible, IMHO
3. Linked over to Adobe and installed the new flash version
4. Was made to close browser
5. Went back to iGoogle and clicked link to article again
6. Viewed the widget
7. Sigh...
Alex, I always enjoy reading your articles and this was no exception. I think content owners large and small still struggle with the "why" and "what" of providing web services. Hopefully, some of them have come across your articles and found answers to those questions. Great work!
Regards,
Eugene
Hi:
I'm very new to this what are widget and what are they use for?
Thanks
Maggie
Nice write up, and introducing a wonderful widget to those who have not had a chance to see it in action. The Random House widget seems extremely well done, and actually useful. It can definitely drive traffic and conversions when segments of the audiences are moving away from search engines to blogs for the fulfillment news content.
The blogs then can act as the viral marketer.
Does the widget pay a certain CPM?
Good post.
Opens up how online marketing tools (widgets etc) can benefit essentially offline companies.
Smart companies will never operate in an either online or offline mode, but synergise both to produce greater results..
Good step ahead by Random House
- HKN
I've seen the widget that HarperCollins/LibreDigital offers, and it is great. Apparently it can be customized. They have it on MySpace and supposedly some other sites too.
Is this a technology that all book companies will be able to use, or just the big ones?
my first job in interactive was working at random house new media back in '96. we sat on the same floor as alberto vitale and the executive management team. they always got it. the problem back then was finding a way to use interactive to forward the publishing business without upsetting the primary sales channels.
Bloomsbury Publishing are using a widget/look inside on their website, supplied by Libre Digital, which allows a user to browse inside a book and copy the browse feature into a variety of websites, which I guess must be great for social marketing.
Very very interesting.