4 Realistic Things You Should Know on International Data Privacy Day
Today is being observed as the second annual International Data Privacy Day by the United States government, Canada, 27 European countries and a number of big corporations, including Yahoo! and Intel.
Though data privacy is a big issue these days - it's not a whole lot of fun to think about. We offer below a list of four things you should make sure to know about regarding privacy, including some pointers to discussions of how the privacy situation today is more complicated than a traditional approach to privacy protection may allow for. We're not going to focus on how to get your tin foil hat to use PGP encryption, we've got a short list of things that all of us realistically should know about for a baseline of online privacy awareness.
- The Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Basic Privacy Settings
- Browser Protection
- More Complex Perspectives
The EFF is the foremost watchdog organization on electronic privacy, copyright law and related matters. Right now they are running a campaign challenging the White House regarding cookies on the White House website.
You should know about the EFF, and you should consider making a donation to help them keep on looking out for us all. Big vendors like Google and Yahoo! simply cannot be trusted so organizations like the EFF are essential. If you're a Twitter user, you can follow the EFF there too.
It's a new world online and there are new ways that information gets passed around. If the rules of the road in the US changed to mirror those in Europe or Japan, you'd probably read the driver's manual again - right? Now that it's a social networking world, it would be a good idea to take a few minutes to familiarize yourself with privacy settings in these new places we're all communicating. One good place to start is Sophos's guide to Facebook profile settings. You may or may not agree with all their recommendations, but they are asking many of the right questions about privacy on social networks.
It's a good idea to know what technologies are available to let you browse or otherwise use the web anonymously, just in case you ever decide you want to. We're not going to focus on this much, but it's kind of like knowing where the fire extinguisher is at work and home. Maybe you'll never need to use it.
There's private browsing in IE or the stealth mode in Chrome. This author uses an awesome Firefox plugin called URLbarEXT which does a lot of things and anonymous surfing just happens to be one of them.
If you or someone you know lives under a repressive government, or are part of a culture that lived someplace for thousands of years before a government now considered "freedom loving" stole it from you and gave you all their nuclear waste, you might want to check out BlogSafer.org. It's a wiki in multiple languages about best practices for anonymous blogging.
In the Good Old Days you could just threaten to punch anyone who repeated your secrets into a tin can that had a string coming out of it, but as the privacy landscape has changed, philosophical considerations have as well. It's not as simple as "don't tell anybody my secret stuff!" anymore.
For some insight into other ways of looking at data privacy, you should check out the following articles:
Toward an Internet Publicy Policy
The makers of 43 Folders argue that..."millions of people are building online identities and reputations that are accumulating meaning and value. That value gets created as we build an online reputation, as we move our private knowledge into the public domain. The issues that this brings up get lost when the only policy folks have to reference is a 'privacy policy'. Perhaps we need a "publicity policy" for 2.0 websites."
Privacy, Publicity and Open Data
Open web thought leader Chris Messina starts with this premise:
My somewhat pessimistic view is that privacy is an illusion, and that more and more historic vestiges of so-called privacy are slipping through our fingers with the advent of increasingly ubiquitous and promiscuous technologies, the results of which are not all necessarily bad (take a look at just how captivating the Facebook Newsfeed is!)
How Should Dynamic Privacy Work?
Bringer of affliction to the comfortable Marc Canter tackles the debate around Facebook's trailblazing Dynamic Privacy strategy. He says:
Well let me just say that one way to figure out what's valuable - is to find out who DOESN'T want to give you access or control over it. And in this case - trust me - moving my data around IS the most valuable thing we need to preserve, control and fight for.
Harvard and Cluetrain co-author Doc Searls are working on a project called VRM, or Vendor Relationship Management. It's the flip side of CRM, Customer Relationship Management. Privacy is one of many matters for which a static policy may not be as desirable as we people/consumers/users having an empowered relationship with vendors.
Those are the things we think are most important, and realistic, to know about on International Data Privacy Day. What about you?
Share
Comments
Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts
Funny you posted this (and great picture!) because we we're wrapping up a DataPortability conference call when I saw your Tweet. The call was on some work we are doing for a template ToS and EULA compatible with all the above. Steve Greenberg who is chairing the effort introduced that maybe the real problem is context.
Perhaps that's what privacy is - it's simply about controlling the context of information and your communications. I don't think it's an illusion: we just don't recognise that's maybe what the issue is.
As Greenberg was saying, it's like in the real world, when someone spreads something you didn't want them to, they break social conventions and are gossipers. A search engine breaking the robots.txt convention in a similar light, is gossiping.
Being able to determine the context of your data and communications is ultimately you having your rights to privacy.
Marshall, definitely in top 10 pictures for RWW blog posts!
I might just add as another precaution to keep up to date on any and all digital security advances that are out there over time. I get mine from http://www.justaskgemalto.com and I understand they may be installing a blog to further keep the consumer up to speed.
Data privacy is indeed becoming an increased concern and issue. Larger portions of who we are are established online through multiple avenues. More and more of our interactions with both people and businesses are taking place there-paying our bills, banking, finding a good place for dinner, etc.
The security link Janet provided appears to be pretty useful. Lots of good articles on there.
This comment is about Sophos Facebook settings.
The contact information part is quite odd. Apparently people use Facebook for different things than I do. To me the most used feature of "friends" is that I don't have to store every phone number (or email) to my phonebook, but instead call from Facebook directly. With Opera mini I only have to choose person's phone number and click "call".
For anyone who doesn't already have a hidden phone number there is no reason to deny access to it. If it can be obtained anyways, why make it harder?
Though most of my friends don't want use Facebook at all.