ReadWriteWeb

Sexy Librarians of the Future Will Help You Upload Your Videos to YouTube

Written by Marshall Kirkpatrick / December 20, 2007 7:01 PM / 16 Comments

A new poll from Harris Interactive was released this morning, finding that US respondents are more excited about watching mainstream, commercial content like full length TV shows and movies online than are about watching User Generated Content, news or sports video.

While hardly surprising, I don't think it has to be this way forever. Who could help improve this landscape by maximizing the impact of the read/write web? Super sexy librarians, that's who!

The Harris poll provoked two trains of thought in my mind. First, would these numbers change if high-quality and relevant videos were easier to find on sites like YouTube?

Harris Poll on Feelings About YouTube
The second thought this study brought to mind is that even these numbers don't look too bad for amateur or user generated video. While respondents were least likely to watch more amateur video if it were available online, 38% of respondents also said that UGC was the best thing about YouTube. It may not be the biggest commercial market to pursue, but a lot of us are excited about noncommercial video online.
Harris Poll on What Viewers Want More of
Those of us who are excited about non mainstream content in general would be better served if high-quality content that was relevant to us was easier to find, and if that were the case our numbers would likely grow substantially. The best things about mainstream media content are that it is well produced and generally entertaining enough to watch. We can ask for more than that from our media, though, now that access to media production is exploding.

Finding good stuff online is going to be a huge market opportunity in the near-term future. That's why CBS bought Last.fm, why eBay bought StumbleUpon, why MyStrands has raised more than $50 million for its recommendation engine, why Google Reader is introducing easy sharing between friends and why you're going to see many more startups working in this direction.

And Now for the Sexy Librarian Part...

From the other direction, though, as any experienced online media producer will tell you - there are steps that you can take to make your media easier for the right person to find. This is going to be an important role for information workers of the future.

Check out this wonderful 3 minute section of an interview that Microsoft's Jon Udell did last week on the Talking With Talis podcast. Udell posits that the librarian of the future will help a growing number of citizen media producers to classify their online media and get it connected to other related content in ways that will increase its discoverability. That is hot.

Imagine a future when you go to the library with a 5 minute video you've just made about last night's Presidential debates and that librarian says to you:

You should upload it to YouTube and tag it with these four tags - two broad and two more specific to existing communities of interest on YouTube and the topic of your video. Then you should embed that video in a blog post along with some text introducing it and linking to some of your favorite posts by other people who have also written today about the Presidential debates. Make sure to send trackbacks to those posts!

Now, I think this is a particularly good video on the topic, so if you're interested I will vote for it on StumbleUpon (as a sexy librarian I have a very powerful account there) and give it a good summary explanation. Any of those are steps you can take that will make your work all the easier for people to discover.

Would that be great, or what? That's only the beginning of what is possible! My point is, while mainstream commercial media may still be what the majority of people online are looking for - there are a substantial number of us for whom that's not the case and as we learn to serve eachother and ourselves better in terms of recommendations, discoverability and relevance - our numbers will likely grow.


Comments

Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts

  1. Interesting and useful.

    Posted by: suresh | December 20, 2007 8:47 PM



  2. Spot on about the way librarians' jobs are changing. I'm a librarian employed by my university library, with an office right in the middle of the main traffic area, to do just this type of thing for our staff and students.

    I also suggest the best ways to create an article for Wikipedia so it stays there, provide training in using Flickr, del.icio.us etc, coordinate the University's Second Life Island and am currently writing a report assessing a business case for the university to self-host blogs and wikis. Why? Because that's what librarians DO.

    Posted by: Kathryn Greenhill | December 20, 2007 9:48 PM



  3. Marshall

    Finally - somebody figures out the future of tagging & search! Sort of the French Maid TV version of Maholo.

    Very human search.

    Smart is the new sexy, though, so I'm guessing sexier algorithms are the way to go.

    A smarter upload application could prompt you for tags intelligently, based on speech-to-text indexing, your user history and contextual prompting.

    Once you've got the video uploaded, YouTube could create a WordPress entry for you and update Twitter about it. Then it could prompt you to send alerts to bloggers likely to be interested in your video, based on their own history of video embedding.

    Better than even an army of ready-to-let-their-hair-down über-librarians. Not as much fun, though.

    Meeoowww!

    Posted by: James Lewin | December 20, 2007 10:11 PM



  4. I knew marrying a librarian--and then incessantly babbling to her about these types of topics--would pay off someday.

    Still, she's only giving me the Dewey decimal classifications for my content.

    Posted by: Rick Turoczy | December 20, 2007 10:35 PM



  5. Thank you, librarians and librarian lovers - your comments are much appreciated!

     Posted by: Marshall Kirkpatrick Author Profile Page | December 20, 2007 10:56 PM



  6. Nice article. However, any article on sexy librarians is incomplete when not including a picture of myself. Just saying.

    Posted by: royce | December 21, 2007 12:00 AM



  7. I (a librarian) do this sort of thing all the time, but I guess the next question is why do you have to go to a LIBRARY to do it? Or, why don't you know that we're doing this already? Hi Royce, hi Kathryn!

    Posted by: jessamyn | December 21, 2007 4:36 AM



  8. That's great to hear, jessamyn. i remember talking to gary price years ago and he said too, if only people knew what was already available!

    Posted by: Marshall Kirkpatrick | December 21, 2007 4:48 AM



  9. Interesting post. I've been avoiding the entire creating videos thing. Mainly because I can't come up with any good ideas :-)

    I personally would have been one of the ones that prefer user generated content. I like to watch short videos 2-5 minutes, but anything longer and I start wanting to click somewhere else

    Posted by: Bruce | December 21, 2007 11:40 AM



  10. There already are quite a few librarians doing this. I guess they already have the sexy part down!

    Posted by: Cheryl Stevens | December 21, 2007 12:52 PM



  11. No Marshall thank-you! :)

    It's funny that those who are ingrained in web content culture often see the value of Librarians more than the average surfer. Hopefully that bodes well for our future.

    Posted by: Steve Matthews | December 21, 2007 5:36 PM



  12. sounds like FrenchMaid TV to me http://frenchmaidtv.com

    Posted by: Jenny | December 21, 2007 6:10 PM



  13. Cool, finding high quality and relevant videos can be easier this time.

    Nhick
    http://www.itrush.com

    Posted by: ITrush | December 21, 2007 10:47 PM



  14. Nice thinking

    Posted by: Vimlesh Kumar | December 22, 2007 3:27 AM



  15. Sadly, however, librarians are not yet at this level of technical sophistication. Whether your "sexy librarian" idea materializes or not is uncertain, but librarians will feature prominently in the future of the Web. And your idea is exactly why librarians will be required---not because Google is broken, it's less about search and retrieval, but rather because of the added value that only a librarian can provide.

    Posted by: Quinn DuPont | December 22, 2007 10:27 AM



  16. Meridia Buy 4ucom Online

    Posted by: 4ucom Buy Meridia Online | December 25, 2007 4:05 PM



RWW SPONSORS


FOLLOW @RWW ON TWITTER

ReadWriteWeb on Facebook



TEXT LINK ADS