ReadWriteWeb

Shouts on Digg are Now Gone - Replaced with Email, Facebook, and Twitter

Written by Frederic Lardinois / May 26, 2009 12:44 PM / 12 Comments

digg_logo.jpgAt a Digg townhall meeting earlier this month, Digg's founder, Kevin Rose, and CEO, Jay Adelson, announced that Digg's shout feature would be removed sometime this week and replaced with a share feature. This change just went live on the popular social media site. Users on Digg used to be able to share stories on Digg with other users right on the site, a feature that was often abused. Now, Digg's users can only email stories, or share them on Facebook and Twitter.

According to the announcement on the Digg blog, the Digg team "listened to your feedback, crunched some user data, and decided to remove shouts. As some of you know, shouts have been a controversial feature since their inception and considering the ever-changing landscape of the social web, we've elected to remove them in favor of more popular options."

digg_share_may09.png

To share stories, users can now hover over the 'share' link on the digg homepage and select the service they want to share the stories on (email, Facebook, or Twitter). Digg also removed the 'blog this' feature, which, according to Digg's Jen Burton only saw really low usage.

For a more detailed discussion of the pros and cons of shouts on Digg, please see our earlier report from last week.


Comments

Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts

  1. didn't visit digg for some months because it was chaotic there. now, it looks much better, cleaner, and easier.

     Posted by: Metin Author Profile Page | May 26, 2009 2:03 PM



  2. I hated the shout feature, so it's a good move in a certain way. BUT, I don't know how long Digg will be able to survive in this fast paced information sharing world. Honestly, with twitter, I don't see the need for Digg anymore.

    Posted by: Benoit Tremblay | May 26, 2009 2:31 PM



  3. What Digg does can be a good mirror of social media in general. I remember when "blog this" was a needed feature because reblogging was what Twitter is now.

    Then shouts came along, which was another Digg attempt at social sharing. Ultimately, though, what Digg learned with the rest of us is that social sharing is all about platform integration. Web 2.0-esque startups need not develop things that are already available and widely used elsewhere. But hindsight is always 20-20.

    Posted by: Bob Caswell | May 26, 2009 2:48 PM



  4. What Digg does can be a good mirror of social media in general. I remember when "blog this" was a needed feature because reblogging was what Twitter is now.

    Then shouts came along, which was another Digg attempt at social sharing. Ultimately, though, what Digg learned with the rest of us is that social sharing is all about platform integration. Web 2.0-esque startups need not develop things that are already available and widely used elsewhere. But hindsight is always 20-20.

     Posted by: Bob Caswell Author Profile Page | May 26, 2009 2:51 PM



  5. this is wise move in my opinion. they just had to incorporate social networks.

    Posted by: MacStories | May 26, 2009 4:39 PM



  6. FriendFeed's sharing is much better than digg. Posting to twitter is automatic, I wish they could do it that way.

    Posted by: Raymond | May 26, 2009 7:35 PM



  7. Digg is missing what I refer to as "the period of socialization". Like the "age of aquarious", these days are crucial to interfaces like Digg. Speaking of interfaces, why does it have to be so labor intensive. I agree with Raymond; we want automation!

    Posted by: Emmett Dixson | May 26, 2009 9:14 PM



  8. But what about the other changes - like the fact you cannot now 'share' to your blog? This was a big advantage of Digg - you could posted directly to your blog from Digg without doing anything else.

    This was the feature I used most and I find it ridiculous they have swapped this for the weak options of only Twitter, Facebook or email. Digg should be making it easier to share and disseminate, not harder. This is a big FAIL in my book.

     Posted by: Worldof Author Profile Page Posted on FriendFeed   | May 27, 2009 3:48 PM



  9. well there goes my only chances at getting dugg.

    Posted by: sir jorge | June 3, 2009 4:37 PM



  10. The question i have is what are the new digg features for 'friends' you have collected in Digg.com.

    No more shouts, so friends will be un-usefull?

    I don't know, what do you think about?

    Posted by: Seo Guru | June 8, 2009 8:52 PM



  11. Digg remains a useful tool, although it is now absorbed by hundreds of similar sites.

    Posted by: mariodalo | October 26, 2009 7:51 AM



  12. I saw an article today that hopes these types of devices or applications may be the saviour for the newspapers. I still have my doubts because you don't need a kindle to get your news, it's still free online.

    Posted by: tomeazsex Author Profile Page | December 4, 2009 11:02 PM



Leave a comment

Optional: Sign in with Connect Facebook   Sign in with Twitter Twitter   Sign in with OpenID OpenID  |  

If you think Twitter is big, check out the Real-Time Web
RWW SPONSORS



FOLLOW @RWW ON TWITTER

ReadWriteWeb on Facebook
ReadWriteCloud - Sponsored by VMware and Intel



TEXT LINK ADS



RWW PARTNERS