Editor's note: We offer our long-term sponsors the opportunity to write posts and tell their story. These posts are clearly marked as written by sponsors, but we also want them to be useful and interesting to our readers. We hope you like the posts and we encourage you to support our sponsors by trying out their products.
Vertical search and comparison engines have been hyped for more than five years and have not taken off in most areas, despite generating better search results.
A new wave of such companies have launched (RedBeacon, Billshrink, FeeFighters, Sparefoot, Zillow, Trulia), and some exciting acquisitions have occurred - ITA, Like.com and Farecast. Is now the time for vertical search to break out?
Maybe, but vertical search suffers from a monetization disadvantage and can only succeed in instances where the site creates a much better user experience manifested in:
Vertical search suffers from a monetization disadvantage for two reasons:
Playing the other side of the equation, lead gen companies have been doing very well and some of the early comparison shopping success stories (like LendingTree) have morphed into lead gen companies.
A smart VC said to me, "We just passed/stalled on a [similar business]... We loved every aspect of the model but can't figure out to acquire customers when the leadgen guys have picked over every opportunity since there is a clear and immediate dollar value attached."
A friend at a big lead gen firm said, "We have experimented with similar comparison shopping models, but it doesn't monetize as well and it wouldn't make any sense for us to eat our own lunch."To survive long enough to win, however, they need to aggressively optimize conversion rate and figure out non-CPC ways of attracting customers. Founders and investors also need to be patient, since the investment required and ramp-time will more closely resemble that of a software company than a lead gen site.
Image by sachyn